Systemic antibiotics for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in outpatients with non-hospitalised exacerbations of pre-existing lung diseases: a randomised clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The effect of dual systemic antibiotic therapy against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with pre-existing lung disease is unknown. To assess whether dual systemic antibiotics against P. aeruginosa in outpatients with COPD, non-cystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis, or asthma can improve outcomes. METHODS: Multicenter, randomised, open-label trial conducted at seven respiratory outpatient clinics in Denmark. Outpatients with COPD, non-CF bronchiectasis, or asthma with a current P. aeruginosa-positive lower respiratory tract culture (clinical routine samples obtained based on symptoms of exacerbation not requiring hospitalisation), regardless of prior P. aeruginosa-status, no current need for hospitalisation, and at least two moderate or one hospitalisation-requiring exacerbation within the last year were eligible. Patients were assigned 1:1 to 14 days of dual systemic anti-pseudomonal antibiotics or no antibiotic treatment. Primary outcome was time to prednisolone or antibiotic-requiring exacerbation or death from day 20 to day 365. RESULTS: The trial was stopped prematurely based in lack of recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic, this decision was endorsed by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board. Forty-nine outpatients were included in the study. There was a reduction in risk of the primary outcome in the antibiotic group compared to the control group (HR 0.51 (95%CI 0.27-0.96), p = 0.037). The incidence of admissions with exacerbation within one year was 1.1 (95%CI 0.6-1.7) in the dual antibiotic group vs. 2.9 (95%CI 1.3-4.5) in the control group, p = 0.037. CONCLUSIONS: Use of dual systemic antibiotics for 14 days against P. aeruginosa in outpatients with chronic lung diseases and no judged need for hospitalisation, improved clinical outcomes markedly. The main limitation was the premature closure of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03262142, registration date 2017-08-25.

Repeated doxycycline treatment among patients with neuroborreliosis: a nationwide, population-based, registry-based, matched cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate receipt of antibiotics among patients with neuroborreliosis after initial antibiotic treatment, likely attributable to posttreatment symptoms. METHODS: We performed a nationwide, matched, population-based cohort study in Denmark (2009-2021). We included all Danish patients with neuroborreliosis, i.e. a positive Borrelia burgdorferi intrathecal antibody index test and a cerebrospinal fluid leukocyte count ≥10 × 106/l, and initially treated with doxycycline. To form a comparison cohort, we randomly extracted individuals from the general population matched 1:10 to patients with neuroborreliosis on date of birth and sex. The main outcome was receipt of doxycycline, and the secondary outcome was receipt of phenoxymethylpenicillin. We calculated short-term (<1 year) and long-term (≥1 year) hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: We included 463 patients with neuroborreliosis and 2,315 comparison cohort members. Compared with the comparison cohort members, patients with neuroborreliosis initially treated with doxycycline had increased receipt of additional doxycycline within 1 year (HR: 38.6, 95%CI: 17.5-85.0) and ≥1 years (HR: 3.5, 95%CI: 1.9-6.3). Compared with comparison cohort members, patients with neuroborreliosis had no increased receipt of phenoxymethylpenicillin (<1 year HR 1.0, 95%CI: 0.7-1.3; ≥1 years HR 1.2, 95%CI: 0.9-1.5). CONCLUSIONS: After initial antibiotic treatment, patients with neuroborreliosis have increased receipt of doxycycline particularly within one year after initial antibiotic therapy but also subsequently. The lack of increased receipt of phenoxymethylpenicillin suggests that the receipt of doxycycline was not merely due to differences in healthcare-seeking behaviour, increased risk of early Lyme borreliosis due to exposure, or differences in antibacterial usage in general.

Obtainment of prescribed analgesics among patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis; a nationwide, population-based matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Radicular pain is the most predominant symptom among adults with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) but the duration preceding and following diagnosis remains unknown. We aimed to investigate whether patients with LNB have increased obtainment of analgesics before and after diagnosis and for how long. METHODS: We performed a nationwide, population-based, matched cohort study (2009-2021). all Danish residents with LNB (positive Borrelia burgdorferi intrathecal antibody index test and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis) were included. To form a comparison cohort, individuals from the general population were randomly extracted and matched 10:1 to patients with LNB on age and sex. Outcomes were obtainment of simple analgesics, antiepileptics, tricyclic antidepressants, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, tramadol, and other opioids. We calculated monthly and six-monthly proportions of individuals with obtainment of analgesics and absolute risk differences. RESULTS: 1,056 patients with LNB and 10,560 comparison cohort members were included. An increased proportion of patients with LNB obtained analgesics from 3 months before study inclusion, especially simple analgesics, tramadol, and other opioids. Within the 0-1-month period after study inclusion, patients with LNB most frequently obtained simple analgesics (15 %), antiepileptics (11 %), and tramadol (10 %). Thereafter, obtainment of analgesics declined within a few months. A slightly larger proportion of patients with LNB obtained antiepileptics up to 2.5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Up to 3 months preceding diagnosis, LNB was preceded by increased obtainment of analgesics, which suggests diagnostic delay. Importantly, most patients with LNB did not obtain analgesics after the immediate disease course, although obtainment remained more frequent up to 2.5 years after.

Healthcare-seeking behaviour preceding diagnosis of Lyme neuroborreliosis: population-based nationwide matched nested case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: To identify diagnostic opportunities, we investigated healthcare-seeking behaviour among patients with Lyme neuroborreliosis (LNB) within 28 weeks before diagnosis. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, nationwide matched nested case-control study (Denmark, 2009-2021). As cases, we included all Danish residents with LNB (positive Borrelia burgdorferi intrathecal antibody index test and cerebrospinal fluid pleocytosis). We randomly selected controls from the general population and matched 10:1 on date of birth and sex. Exposures were assignment of diagnostic codes for symptoms, contact to medical specialties, medical wandering, and undergoing diagnostic procedures. We calculated the weekly and 3-month proportions of individuals with exposures and calculated absolute risk differences with corresponding 95% CI. RESULTS: We included 1056 cases with LNB and 10 560 controls. Within 3 months before diagnosis, the most frequent assigned symptoms were pain (difference: 13.0%, 95% CI: 10.9-15.1). Cases with LNB exhibited increased contact with most specialties, particularly general practitioners (difference: 48.7%, 95% CI: 46.0-51.4), neurology (difference: 14.3%, 95% CI: 11.7-16.8), and internal medicine (difference: 11.1%, 95% CI: 8.7-13.5), and medical wandering (difference: 17.1%, 95% CI: 14.3-20.0). Common diagnostic procedures included imaging of the brain (difference: 10.2, 95% CI: 8.3-12.1), the spine (difference: 8.8%, 85% CI: 7.0-10.6), and the abdomen (difference: 7.2%, 95% CI: 5.4-9.1). The increase in healthcare-seeking behaviour was observed ≤12 weeks preceding diagnosis. DISCUSSION: Pain appears to be an ambiguous symptom of LNB, potentially contributing to delays in establishing the correct diagnosis. It would be difficult to identify patients with LNB more effectively as the increased healthcare-seeking behaviour preceding diagnosis is distributed across many medical specialties.

Risk of heart failure among individuals tested for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato antibodies, and serum Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato seropositive individuals; a nationwide population-based, registry-based matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Lyme borreliosis is a tick-borne disease caused by the bacterium Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) sensu lato complex. Previous studies have suggested an association between Lyme borreliosis and heart failure, which have been suggested to be a possible manifestation of Lyme carditis. We aimed to investigate the risk of heart failure among individuals tested for serum Bb antibodies, and serum Bb seropositive individuals. METHODS: We performed a matched nationwide cohort study (Denmark, 1993-2020) and included 52,200 Bb seropositive individuals, and two age- and sex-matched comparison cohorts: 1) 104,400 Bb seronegative comparison cohort members, and 2) 261,000 population controls. We investigated the risk associated with 1) being tested for serum Bb antibodies, and 2) being Bb seropositive. Outcomes were: 1) a composite of heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and/or myocarditis diagnosis, and 2) redemption of cardiovascular medicine used for treatment of heart failure. We calculated short-term odds ratios (aOR) (within 1 month) and long-term hazard rates (aHR) (after 1 month) adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, pre-existing heart failure, and kidney disease. RESULTS: Compared with the population controls, individuals tested for Bb antibodies, regardless of the test result, had increased short-term risk of heart failure, cardiomyopathy, and myocarditis (aOR 8.3, 95 %CI: 6.7-10.2), and both increased short- and long-term risk of redemption of cardiovascular medicine (aOR 4.3, 95 %CI: 3.8-4.8, aHR 1.13, 95 % CI: 1.11-1.15). The Bb seropositive individuals had no increased short- or long-term risk of any outcome compared with Bb seronegative comparison cohort members. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, Bb antibody tests seemed to be performed in the diagnostic work-up of heart failure, but Bb seropositivity was not associated with heart failure.

Risk of cardiac conduction disorders, and pacemaker implantations among individuals tested for serum Borrelia burgdorferi antibodies, a nationwide, matched, population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the short- and long-term risks of atrioventricular block and other cardiac conduction disorders associated with being tested for Borrelia burgdorferi (Bb) antibodies or Bb seropositivity as measures of confounding by indication and Bb infection, respectively. METHODS: We performed a nationwide population-based matched cohort study (Denmark, 1993-2021). We included 52 200 Bb-seropositive individuals (stratified as only Bb-IgM-seropositive [n = 26 103], only Bb-IgG-seropositive [n = 18 698], and Bb-IgM-and-IgG-seropositive [n = 7399]) and two age- and sex-matched comparison cohorts: 104 400 Bb-seronegative individuals and 261 000 population controls. We investigated the risk associated with being tested for serum Bb antibodies and being Bb seropositive. Outcomes were atrioventricular block and other conduction disorders. We calculated short-term odds ratios (aOR) (within 1 month), and long-term hazard ratios (aHR) (after 1 month) adjusted for age, sex, diabetes, chronic heart failure, and kidney disease with 95% CI. RESULTS: Compared with population controls, individuals tested for Bb antibodies had increased short- and long-term risks of atrioventricular block (aOR 47.9, 95% CI: 30.0-76.7, aHR 1.3, 95% CI:1.2-1.3), and other conduction disorders (aOR 18.2, 95% CI: 10.1-32.8, aHR 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.4). Compared with Bb-seronegative individuals, only Bb-IgM-and-IgG-seropositive individuals had increased short-term risk of atrioventricular block (aOR: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.5-3.1). DISCUSSION: The results suggest that Bb antibody testing is included in the diagnostic work-up of conduction disorders. Finally, that Bb seropositivity is not associated with other conduction disorders than atrioventricular block or with increased long-term risk of conduction disorders.