RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Meropenem is a widely prescribed beta-lactam for hospitalized patients. There are few data on meropenem allergy assessments in inpatients with a reported history of penicillin allergy who require a treatment with meropenem. This can lead to the use of less effective second-line antibiotics that may increase antibiotic resistances. We aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of a meropenem allergy assessment in admitted patients with a reported history of penicillin allergy that required meropenem for the treatment of an acute infection. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 182 inpatients labelled with a penicillin-allergy who received meropenem after an allergy assessment. The allergy study was performed bedside if meropenem was required urgently. The study included skin prick tests (SPTs) followed by an intradermal skin test (IDT) to meropenem, and a meropenem drug challenge test (DCT). If a non-immediate reaction to a beta-lactam was suspected, it was initiated with patch tests. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 59.7 years (range 28-95) and 80 (44%) were women. A total of 196 sets of diagnostic workups were performed, with 189 (96.4%) of them being tolerated. Only two patients had a positive meropenem IV DCT, both presenting a non-severe cutaneous reaction that completely resolved after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This study evidenced that a bedside meropenem allergy assessment of hospitalized patients labelled with a 'penicillin allergy' who require a broad-spectrum antibiotic for empiric coverage is a safe and effective procedure, avoiding the use of second-line antimicrobial agents.
Asunto(s)
Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Masculino , Meropenem/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Penicilinas/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , beta-Lactamas/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas Cutáneas/métodos , Hipersensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológicoAsunto(s)
Asma , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos , Hipersensibilidad , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Biológicos , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/etiologíaAsunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/diagnóstico , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Anciano , Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/inmunología , Aspergilosis Broncopulmonar Alérgica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangreRESUMEN
Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe T-cell-mediated off-target adverse reaction. DRESS cases caused by vancomycin have often been reported. The HLA-A*32:01 allele has been associated with genetic susceptibility to vancomycin-induced DRESS in US citizens of European descent. We have analyzed the association of the HLA-A*32:01 allele in 14 Spanish DRESS cases in which vancomycin was suspected as the culprit drug, and the lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) as an in vitro assay to evaluate vancomycin sensitization. The results were compared to vancomycin-tolerant control donors. LTT was performed in 12 DRESS cases with PBMCs from resolution samples available and in a group of 12 tolerant donors. ROC curves determined that LTT is a suitable tool to identify patients sensitized to vancomycin (AUC = 0.9646; p < 0.0001). When a stimulation index >3 was regarded as a positive result, contingency tables determined 91% sensitivity, 91.67% specificity, 91% positive predictive value, and 91.67% negative predictive value (p = 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). The HLA A*32:01 allele was determined by an allele-specific PCR assay in 14 cases and 25 tolerant controls. Among the DRESS cases, five carriers were identified (35.7%), while it was detected in only one (4%) of the tolerant donors, [odds ratio (OR) = 13.33; 95% CI: 1.364-130.3; p = 0.016]. The strength of the association increased when only cases with positive LTT to vancomycin were considered (OR = 24.0; 95% CI: 2.28-252.6; p = 4.0 × 10-3). Our results confirm the association of the risk allele HLA-A*32:01 with vancomycin-induced DRESS in Spanish cases, and support LTT as a reliable tool to determine vancomycin sensitization.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested a relationship between asthma and obesity. Moreover, atopy is an important risk factor for asthma, but the relationship between obesity and atopy is uncertain. METHODS: A cross-sectional multicenter study was conducted in a population of Spanish adults between November 2007 and July 2008. The subjects included had experienced asthma symptoms in the last year but had a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1))/forced vital capacity (FVC) > 70%. Mild asthma diagnosis was confirmed by measuring airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine. Body mass index in kg/m(2) was used as measure of obesity. Subjects were considered atopic when they had at least one positive skin prick test to common aeroallergens. Adjusted odd ratios (OR) were obtained by logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 662 subjects were included and 234 subjects (35.3%) were diagnosed with asthma (consistent symptoms and positive methacholine test). After adjusting the model for age, gender, atopy, baseline FEV(1), and FEV(1)/FVC ratio, there was no association between overweight or obesity with asthma diagnosis, with OR of 0.889 (95% CI, 0.60-1.38) and 0.925 (95% CI, 0.577-1.48), respectively. A multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed that atopy increases the risk of asthma (p = 0.008). The non-atopic obese group had an increased risk of asthma compared to the non-atopic group with normal weight or overweight (p = 0.0032). CONCLUSIONS: In this study obesity was not associated with a diagnosis of asthma. The presence of atopy was a risk factor for asthma, independent of obesity. Obesity, however, may be a risk factor for the development of asthma among non-atopic subjects.
Asunto(s)
Asma/complicaciones , Asma/epidemiología , Obesidad/epidemiología , Adulto , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/complicaciones , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales , Pruebas Cutáneas , Fumar/epidemiología , España/epidemiología , Adulto JovenAsunto(s)
Erupciones por Medicamentos , Infecciones por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Bismuto/uso terapéutico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Erupciones por Medicamentos/etiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sympathomimetic (alpha-adrenergic) drugs are mainly used because of their vasoconstrictor properties, for nasal congestion, or as mydriatics. Although sympathomimetic drugs are used often, allergic reactions are rare, especially when the drugs are administered systemically. Cross-reactivity may exist among catecholamine derivatives, although reported data on this are contradictory. In this study, we investigate if there is cross-reactivity in patch tests among these drugs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patch tests with 10% phenylephrine and 10% pseudoephedrine in petrolatum, and 10% and 20% ephedrine, 10% phenylpropanolamine, 5% fepradinol, 1% methoxamine, and 10% oxymetazoline, all administered in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), were carried out in 14 patients with a history of allergy to any of these drugs. DMSO was used as the negative control. RESULTS: All patients except one (patient number five) showed positive patch-test reactions to at least two different drugs. Nine patients (64.3%) were cross-sensitized to three or more different drugs, and 57.1% of patients were sensitized to four or more sympathomimetic drugs. Patients who experienced generalized rashes caused by orally administered pseudoephedrine had a stronger response and more cross-reactivity with other sympathomimetic drugs in patch tests than those who experienced local contact dermatitis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that there is cross-reactivity among the different sympathomimetic drugs tested, especially if the drug is administered systemically.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos/inmunología , Conjuntivitis Alérgica/inmunología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Midriáticos/inmunología , Pruebas del Parche , Simpatomiméticos/inmunología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Reacciones Cruzadas , Dimetilsulfóxido , Efedrina/inmunología , Etanolaminas/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metoxamina/inmunología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Midriáticos/efectos adversos , Oximetazolina/inmunología , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Fenilefrina/inmunología , Fenilpropanolamina/inmunología , Método Simple Ciego , Simpatomiméticos/efectos adversos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Opium alkaloids can cause immunological reactions. Cross-sensitization among them must be considered in these situations.