RESUMEN
Gender identity represents a topic of growing interest in mental health research. People with non-conforming gender identity are prone to suffer from stigmatization and bullying and often present psychiatric issues, which may in turn lead to a high prevalence of suicidal ideation and behaviors. The present meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicidal behaviors in gender non-conforming children, adolescents and young adults. A systematic search was performed in Web of Science and PsycINFO from inception to December 2018. We selected cross-sectional and cohort studies including youths (up to 25 years) with a diagnosis confirmed by a clinician according to international classifications, or after a direct interview with a peer. A random-effects meta-analysis was computed for the following outcomes: non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. Overall, we found a mean prevalence of NSSI of 28.2% (9 studies, 3057 participants, 95% CI 14.8-47.1). A similar prevalence (28%) was found for suicidal ideation (6 studies, 2249 participants, 95% CI 15-46.3), while the prevalence of suicide attempts was 14.8% (5 studies, 1039 participants, 95% CI 7.8-26.3). Subgroup analyses revealed no significant differences according to biological sex. Given the prevalence of suicidal behaviors in gender non-conforming youths, it appears desirable to implement therapeutic and support strategies for this population. Moreover, educational interventions directed to parents, teachers, mental health professionals and general community should be promoted to struggle against stigma and social isolation, factors that may contribute to increasing the risk of suicidal behaviors.
Asunto(s)
Identidad de Género , Ideación Suicida , Adolescente , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Intento de Suicidio , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Pharmacological neuroenhancement refers to the non-medical use of prescription drugs, alcohol, illegal drugs, or the so-called soft enhancers for the purpose of improving cognition, mood, pro-social behavior, or work and academic performance. This phenomenon is undoubtedly more frequent than previously supposed especially amongst university students. The aim of the present paper was to carefully review and comment on the available literature on neuroenhancement, according to Prisma guidelines. The results showed a great use of all prescribed drugs (benzodiazepines, antidepressants, antipsychotics, nootropic compounds, and especially stimulants) as neuroenhancers amongst healthy subjects, although probably the real prevalence is underestimated. The use of illicit drugs and soft enhancers is similarly quite common. Data on the improvement of cognition by other compounds, such as oxytocin and pheromones, or non-pharmacological techniques, specifically deep brain stimulation and transcranial magnetic stimulation, are still limited. In any case, if it is true that human beings are embedded by the desire to overcome the limits of their intrinsic nature, neuroenhancement practices put into question the concept of authenticity. Therefore, the problem appears quite complex and requires to be deepened and analyzed with no prejudice, although within an ethical conceptual frame.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The prolonged lockdown related to COVID-19 pandemic determined disruption of lifestyle and social isolation. METHODS: To assess the mental health status of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS) patients regularly followed at the MS center of Catania (Italy) and returning to work after the easing of lockdown during COVID-19 pandemic. Then, to identify any variables associated to psychological distress. RRMS patients returning to work during the COVID-19 pandemic were invited to answer a telephonic interview consisting of the administration of the Short-Screening-Scale for DSM IV (SSS-DSM-IV), the Depression, Anxiety, Stress Scale- 21 (DASS-21) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Other information was extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Valid and complete interviews were obtained from 432 patients (response rate 64.3%). Out of them, 277 (64.1%) were female, mean age 40.4 (SD 12.4) years. One-hundred thirty-seven (31.7%) RRMS patients received a score ≥4 at the SSS-DSM-IV, indicating clinically significant PTSD-like symptoms. About DASS-21, moderate-to-severe anxiety was reported by 210 RRMS patients (48.6%), moderate-to-severe depression, and moderate-to-severe stress were respectively reported by 95 (22%) and 220 (50.9%) RRMS patients. Insomnia was reported by 128 patients (29.6%). Factors associated with major severity of symptoms were: marital status, previous diagnosis of mood disorders, switching/starting Disease-Modifying Therapies in the last 12 months, and a higher level of disability measured with Expanded Disability Status Scale (for all, p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the need to provide psychological support to MS patients facing the delicate phase of returning to work and to normal activities.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/psicología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Estrés Psicológico , Trastornos de Ansiedad/complicaciones , COVID-19/virología , Depresión/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/complicaciones , Esclerosis Múltiple Recurrente-Remitente/virologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), a common, chronic, and disabling psychiatric condition, has significantly improved in the last decades, with the demonstration of the specific effectiveness of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs), a large proportion of patients still show high relapse rates. In addition, pharmacological treatments should be maintained for years, so that the clinicians should take into account the pharmacokinetic changes in the long-term, which may be responsible for dangerous side effects or interactions. Areas covered: The aim of this paper was to review the literature on the pharmacokinetics of SSRIs and clomipramine, and on their pharmacokinetic parameters in OCD patients. Expert opinion: Although the literature on the pharmacokinetics of both clomipramine and SSRIs is consistent, data on pharmacokinetic parameters in OCD patients are very few. Given the impact of OCD, its chronicity requiring long-term treatments, together with the need to increase the clinical response rate, more studies in this field are urgently required.