RESUMEN
AIM: To determine the reliability of hospital discharge codes for heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke compared with adjudicated diagnosis, and to pilot a scalable approach to adjudicate records on a population-based sample. METHODS: A population-based sample of 685 people with diabetes admitted (1274 admissions) to one of three Australian hospitals during 2018-2020 were randomly selected for this study. All medical records were reviewed and adjudicated. RESULTS: Cardiovascular diseases were the most common primary reason for hospitalisation in people with diabetes, accounting for ~17% (215/1274) of all hospitalisations, with HF as the leading cause. ICD-10 codes substantially underestimated HF prevalence and had the lowest agreement with the adjudicated diagnosis of HF (Kappa = 0.81), compared with AMI and stroke (Kappa ≥ 0.91). While ICD-10 codes provided suboptimal sensitivity (72%) for HF, the performance was better for AMI (sensitivity 84%; specificity 100%) and stroke (sensitivity 85%; specificity 100%). A novel approach to screen possible HF cases only required adjudicating 8% (105/1274) of records, correctly identified 78/81 of HF admissions and yielded 96% sensitivity and 98% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: While ICD-10 codes appear reliable for AMI or stroke, a more complex diagnosis such as HF benefits from a two-stage process to screen for suspected HF cases that need adjudicating. The next step is to validate this novel approach on large multi-centre studies in diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Hospitalización , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Masculino , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Australia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Costo de Enfermedad , Prevalencia , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing heart transplant are at high risk for postoperative vasoplegia. Despite its frequency and association with poor clinical outcomes, there remains no consensus definition for vasoplegia, and the predisposing risk factors for vasoplegia remain unclear. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, predictors, and clinical outcomes associated with vasoplegia in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing heart transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing heart transplantation from January 2015 to December 2019. A binary definition of vasoplegia of a cardiac index of 2.5 L/min/m2 or greater and requirement for norepinephrine (≥5 µg/min), epinephrine (≥4 µg/min), or vasopressin (≥1 unit/h) to maintain a mean arterial blood pressure of 65 mm Hg, for 6 consecutive hours during the first 48 hours postoperatively, was used in determining prevalence. Given the relatively low threshold for the binary definition of vasoplegia, patients were divided into tertiles based on their cumulative vasopressor requirement in the 48 hours following transplant. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, intubation time, intensive care unit length of stay, and length of total hospitalization. RESULTS: After exclusion of patients with primary cardiogenic shock, major bleeding, or overt sepsis, data were collected on 95 eligible patients. By binary definition, vasoplegia incidence was 66.3%. We separately stratified by actual vasopressor requirement tertile (high, intermediate, low). Stratified by tertile, patients with vasoplegia were older (52.7 ± 10.2 vs 46.8 ± 12.7 vs 44.4 ± 11.3 years, Pâ¯=â¯.02), with higher rates of chronic kidney disease (18.8% vs 32.3% vs 3.1%, Pâ¯=â¯.01) and were more likely to have been transplanted from left ventricular assist device support (nâ¯=â¯42) (62.5% vs 32.3% vs 37.5%, Pâ¯=â¯.03). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was prolonged in those that developed vasoplegia (155 min [interquartile range 135-193] vs 131 min [interquartile range 117-152] vs 116 min [interquartile range 102-155], Pâ¯=â¯.003). Intubation time and length of intensive care unit and hospital stay were significantly increased in those that developed vasoplegia; however, this difference did not translate to a significant increase in all-cause mortality at 30 days or 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Vasoplegia occurs at a high rate after heart transplantation. Older age, chronic kidney disease, mechanical circulatory support, and prolonged bypass time are all associated with vasoplegia; however, this study did not demonstrate an associated increase in all-cause mortality LAY SUMMARY: Patients undergoing heart transplantation are at high risk of vasoplegia, a condition defined by low blood pressure despite normal heart function. We found that vasoplegia was common after heart transplant, occurring in 60%-70% of patients after heart transplant after excluding those with other causes for low blood pressure. Factors implicated included age, poor kidney function, prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time and preoperative left ventricular assist device support. We found no increased risk of death in patients with vasoplegia despite longer lengths of stay in intensive care and in hospital.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Hipotensión , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Vasoplejía , Femenino , Trasplante de Corazón/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalencia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vasoplejía/epidemiología , Vasoplejía/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical factors favouring coronary angiography (CA) selection and variables associated with in-hospital mortality among patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) without ST-segment elevation (STE) remain unclear. METHODS: We evaluated clinical characteristics associated with CA selection and in-hospital mortality in patients with OHCA, shockable rhythm and no STE. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2018, 118 patients with OHCA and shockable rhythm without STE (mean age 59; males 75%) were stratified by whether CA was performed. Of 86 (73%) patients undergoing CA, 30 (35%) received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). CA patients had shorter return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) time (17 vs. 25 min) and were more frequently between 50 and 60 years (29% vs. 6.5%), with initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score >8 (24% vs. 6%) (all p < 0.05). In-hospital mortality was 33% (n = 39) for overall cohort (CA 27% vs. no-CA 50%, p = 0.02). Compared to late CA, early CA ( ≤ 2 h) was not associated with lower in-hospital mortality (32% vs. 34%, p = 0.82). Predictors of in-hospital mortality included longer defibrillation time (odds ratio 3.07, 95% confidence interval 1.44-6.53 per 5-min increase), lower pH (2.02, 1.33-3.09 per 0.1 decrease), hypoalbuminemia (2.02, 1.03-3.95 per 5 g/L decrease), and baseline renal dysfunction (1.33, 1.02-1.72 per 10 ml/min/1.73 m2 decrease), while PCI to lesion (0.11, 0.01-0.79) and bystander defibrillation (0.06, 0.004-0.80) were protective factors (all p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with OHCA and shockable rhythm without STE, younger age, shorter time to ROSC and GCS >8 were associated with CA selection, while less effective resuscitation, greater burden of comorbidities and absence of treatable coronary lesion were key adverse prognostic predictors.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico por imagen , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Angiografía Coronaria , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Approximately 5-10% of patients presenting for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have concurrent atrial fibrillation (AF). To what extent AF portends adverse long-term outcomes in these patients remains to be defined. METHODS: We analysed data from the multicentre Melbourne Interventional Group Registry from 2014-2018. Patients were identified as being in AF or sinus rhythm (SR) at the commencement of PCI. The primary endpoint was long-term mortality, obtained via linkage with the National Death Index. RESULTS: 13,286 procedures were included, with 800 (6.0%) patients in AF and 12,486 (94.0%) in SR. Compared to SR, patients with AF were older (72.9±10.9 vs 64.1±12.0 p<0.001) and more likely to have comorbidities including diabetes mellitus (31.3% vs 25.0% p<0.001), hypertension (74.4% vs 65.1% p<0.001) and moderate to severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (36.6% vs 19.5% p<0.001). Atrial fibrillation was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality (11.0% vs 2.5% p<0.001) and MACE (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularisation) (11.9% vs 4.2% p<0.001). In-hospital major bleeding was more common in the AF group (3.1% vs 1.0% p<0.001). On Cox proportional hazards modelling, AF was an independent predictor of long-term mortality (adjusted HR 1.38 95% CI 1.11-1.72 p<0.004) at a mean follow-up of 2.3±1.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Preprocedural AF is common among patients presenting for PCI. Preprocedural AF is associated with high-rates of comorbid illnesses and portends higher risk of short- and long-term outcomes including mortality underscoring the need for careful evaluation of its risks prior to PCI.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Hemorragia/etiología , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: We aimed to assess the impact of the severity of chronic kidney disease (CKD) with long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). METHODS: We analyzed data on consecutive patients undergoing PCI enrolled in the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR) from January 2014 to December 2018. Patients were stratified into tertiles of renal function; estimated glomerular filtration (eGFR) ≥60, 30-59 and < 30 ml/min/1.73 m2 (including dialysis). The primary outcome was long-term all-cause mortality obtained from linkage with the Australian National Death Index (NDI). The secondary endpoint was a composite of 30 day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. RESULTS: We identified a total of 51,480 patients (eGFR ≥60, n = 40,534; eGFR 30-59, n = 9,521; eGFR <30, n = 1,425). Compared with patients whose eGFR was ≥60, those with eGFR 30-59 and eGFR<30 were on average older (77 and 78 vs. 63 years) and had a greater burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Worsening CKD severity was independently associated with greater adjusted risk of long-term NDI mortality: eGFR<30 hazard ratio 4.21 (CI 3.7-4.8) and eGFR 30-59; 1.8 (CI 1.7-2.0), when compared to eGFR ≥60, all p < .001. CONCLUSION: In this large, multicentre PCI registry, severity of CKD was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality underscoring the high-risk nature of this patient cohort.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Australia , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Humanos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies examining the impact of periprocedural intravenous morphine on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Morphine analgesia may reduce the absorption of co-prescribed P2Y12 antagonists attenuating platelet inhibition. The impact of periprocedural intravenous morphine on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI for STEMI is not well defined. METHODS: Analysis of the electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov for association of peri-PCI intravenous morphine use with in-hospital or 30-day myocardial infarction (MI) (primary outcome) and in-hospital or 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included for systematic review. One study was a randomized controlled trial, 10 were observational studies. Five studies including 3,748 patients were included in meta-analysis of in-hospital or 30-day MI. Within this group, patients were treated concurrently with ticagrelor (n = 2,239), clopidogrel (n = 1,256) and prasugrel (n = 253). There was no significant association of in-hospital or 30-day MI with intravenous morphine (odds ratio 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-4.09; I2 0%). Across seven studies and 5,800 patients, no increased risk of mortality at the same composite time endpoint was evident (odds ratio 0.70; 95% CI 0.40-1.23; I2 19%). CONCLUSIONS: Periprocedural intravenous morphine administration was not associated with adverse short-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI. Further randomized trial data are needed to evaluate the pharmacologic interaction between morphine and P2Y12 antagonists with clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Morfina/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Manejo del Dolor , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Esquema de Medicación , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morfina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/efectos adversos , Dolor/diagnóstico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/mortalidad , Manejo del Dolor/efectos adversos , Manejo del Dolor/mortalidad , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/mortalidad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Antagonistas del Receptor Purinérgico P2Y , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Stent thrombosis (ST) is an uncommon but serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The reported rate of definite ST with new generation drug-eluting stents ranges from 0.5 to 1% at 30 days. We aimed to examine the incidence and outcomes of ST in a real-world setting. METHODS: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry was established in 2012 as a state-wide clinical quality registry, with all PCI capable centres contributing in 2017. Data were collected on 41,137 consecutive PCI procedures from 2013 to 2017. We describe the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in definite and probable ST at 30 days. RESULTS: Stent thrombosis occurred in 225 patients (0.55%). Compared to patients without ST, these patients were more likely to be female (32.0% vs 23.4%, p≤0.01) and have a history of diabetes (28.6% vs 21.9%, p=0.02). ST was more common in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9% vs 4.6%, p<0.001) and in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest for their index PCI (all p<0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy at 30 days was less frequent in patients with ST (84.8% vs 92.0%, p<0.001), while 30-day mortality was more common: 23.6% versus 2.0% (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Even with contemporary stents and adjunctive medications, ST still occurs following 1 in 200 PCIs, and is associated with increased mortality at 30 days.
Asunto(s)
Trombosis Coronaria/epidemiología , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Anciano , Australia/epidemiología , Angiografía Coronaria , Trombosis Coronaria/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most widely used medications worldwide. Dementia is an increasingly common cause of disability in older populations. Recent studies have suggested an increased risk of cognitive impairment and dementia diagnosis among people who consume PPIs. This systematic review explores dementia, cognitive impairment, and the use of PPIs. METHODS: Systematic searches were conducted in the databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), PSYCinfo, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for articles published from inception to June 30, 2016. Primary outcomes of interest were the use of PPIs and diagnosis of dementia or acute cognitive impairment. Studies conducted on people aged less than 18 years old were excluded. All study designs were eligible for inclusion. Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data from included studies. RESULTS: The systematic search strategy and screening process yielded 11 studies for inclusion in the systematic review. Four studies explored PPI use and dementia, and seven studies explored PPI use and acute cognitive impairment. Three of the four studies exploring dementia identified a positive association with PPI use. A positive association was also observed in the majority of studies exploring acute cognitive impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the current published literature, this systematic review has identified that the reported association between PPI use and dementia is limited by methodological issues and conflicting results. Further longitudinal studies with robust bias limitation are required to explore the use of PPIs and dementia or acute cognitive impairment, and to ascertain the existence of any causal relationships.
Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva/inducido químicamente , Demencia/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Bases de Datos Bibliográficas , Demencia/epidemiología , Humanos , RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hyperlactatemia (HL) is a common phenomenon after cardiac surgery which is related to tissue hypoperfusion and hypoxia and associated with poor outcomes. It is also often seen in the postoperative period after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHTx), but the association between HL and outcomes after OHTx is not well known. We evaluated the incidence and outcome of HL after OHTx. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 209 patients who underwent OHTx between January 2011 and December 2020. Patients were classified into 3 groups according to their peak lactate levels within the first 72â¯h postoperatively: group 1, normal to mild hyperlactatemia (<5â¯mmol/L, nâ¯=â¯42); group 2, moderate hyperlactatemia (5-10â¯mmol/L, nâ¯=â¯110); and group 3, severe hyperlactatemia (>10â¯mmol/L, nâ¯=â¯57). The primary composite endpoint was all-cause mortality or postoperative initiation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) within 30â¯days. Secondary endpoints included duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. RESULTS: Patients with higher postoperative peak lactate levels were more commonly transplanted from left ventricular assist device support (33.3â¯% vs 50.9â¯% vs 64.9, pâ¯<â¯0.01) and had longer cardiopulmonary bypass time [127â¯min (109-148) vs 141â¯min (116-186) vs 153â¯min (127-182), pâ¯=â¯0.02]. Composite primary endpoint was met in 18 patients (8.6â¯%) and was significantly more common in patients with higher postoperative peak lactate levels (0.0â¯% vs 6.4â¯% vs 19.3â¯%, pâ¯<â¯0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Severe hyperlactatemia following orthotopic heart transplant was associated with an increased risk of post-transplant VA ECMO initiation and mortality at 30â¯days.
RESUMEN
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, particularly in patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV symptoms. Decades of discovery have heralded significant advancements in the pharmacologic management of HFrEF. However, patients with NYHA IV symptoms remain an under-represented population in almost every clinical trial to date, leaving clinicians with limited evidence with which to guide drug treatment decisions in this patient group with severe heart failure. Randomized controlled trials of adult patients with NYHA IV symptoms of HFrEF randomized to current guideline-recommended medical therapy were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The outcomes of interest included the rate of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure hospitalization. A total of 39 randomized controlled trials were included. A total of 6 studies examined angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, with meta-analyses of 2 demonstrating a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (relative risk (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.97, p = 0.03). A total of 11 studies examined ß blockers, with meta-analysis of 6 demonstrating a reduced risk of all-cause mortality (risk ratio 0.74, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.92, p = 0.008). A study examined the mineralocorticoid antagonist spironolactone, reporting a reduced risk of all-cause mortality in the NYHA IV subgroup. A total of 6 studies examined device therapy, demonstrating the benefit of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without an implantable cardiac defibrillator in reducing hospitalization in the NYHA IV subgroup. Although trial evidence exists for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, ß-blockers, and mineralocorticoid antagonist therapy in the NYHA IV population, the role of angiotensin receptor blockers is unclear. Ivabradine, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitors remain underinvestigated and have not been proved to provide any benefit above standard heart failure therapy in patients with HFrEF and NYHA IV symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Adulto , Humanos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/tratamiento farmacológico , Volumen Sistólico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , New York , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clinical features among patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and initial shockable rhythms of ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia are not well-characterized. METHODS: We compared clinical characteristics and coronary angiographic findings between patients with refractory OHCA (incessant ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia after ≥3 direct-current shocks) and those without refractory OHCA. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2018, a total of 204 patients with ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia OHCA (median age 62; males 78%) were divided into groups with (36%, 74/204) and without refractory arrest (64%, 130/204). Refractory OHCA patients had longer cardiopulmonary resuscitation (23 versus 15 minutes), more frequently required ≥450 mg amiodarone (34% versus 3.8%), and had cardiogenic shock (80% versus 55%) necessitating higher adrenaline dose (4.0 versus 1.0 mg) and higher rates of mechanical ventilation (92% versus 74%; all P<0.01). Of 167 patients (82%) selected for coronary angiography, 33% (n=55) had refractory OHCA (P=0.035). Significant coronary artery disease (≥1 major vessel with >70% stenosis) was present in >70% of patients. Refractory OHCA patients frequently had acute coronary occlusion (64% versus 47%), especially left circumflex (20% versus 6.4%) and graft vessel (7.3% versus 0.9%; all P<0.05) compared with those without refractory OHCA. Refractory OHCA group had higher in-hospital mortality (45% versus 30%, P=0.036) and greater new requirement for dialysis (18% versus 6.3%, P=0.011). After adjustment, refractory OHCA was associated with over 2-fold higher odds of in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 2.28 [95% CI, 1.06-4.89]; P=0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Refractory ventricular fibrillation/pulseless ventricular tachycardia OHCA was associated with more intensive resuscitation, higher rates of acute coronary occlusion, and poorer in-hospital outcomes, underscoring the need for future studies in this extreme-risk subgroup.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Oclusión Coronaria , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Taquicardia Ventricular , Masculino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fibrilación Ventricular/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Ventricular/terapia , Fibrilación Ventricular/complicaciones , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Oclusión Coronaria/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapiaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Sex differences in patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and shockable rhythm might be associated with disparities in clinical outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study and compared characteristics and short-term outcomes between male and female adult patients who presented with OHCA and shockable rhythm at two large metropolitan health services in Melbourne, Australia between the period of 2014-2018. Logistic regression was used to assess the effect of sex on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Of 212 patients, 166 (78%) were males and 46 (22%) were females. Both males and females presented with similar rates of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (44% vs 36%, P = 0.29), although males were more likely to have a history of coronary artery disease (32% vs 13%) and a final diagnosis of a cardiac cause for their OHCA (89% vs 72%), both P = 0.01. Rates of coronary angiography (81% vs 71%, P = 0.23) and percutaneous coronary intervention (51% vs 42%, P = 0.37) were comparable among males and females. No differences in rates of in-hospital mortality (38% vs 37%, P = 0.90) and 30-day major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization and nonfatal stroke) (39% vs 41%, P = 0.79) were observed between males and females, respectively. Female sex was not associated with worse in-hospital mortality when adjusted for other variables (odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.28-1.60, P = 0.36). CONCLUSION: Among patients presenting with OHCA and a shockable rhythm, baseline sex and sex differences were not associated with disparities in short-term outcomes in contemporary systems of care.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Caracteres Sexuales , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , HospitalesRESUMEN
Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS)-related cardiogenic shock (CS) with or without concomitant CA may have disparate prognoses. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with CS secondary to ACS with and without cardiac arrest (CA). Between 2014 and 2020, 1,573 patients with ACS-related CS with or without CA who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention enrolled in a multicenter Australian registry were analyzed. Primary outcome was 30-day major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization and stroke). Long-term mortality was obtained through linkage to the National Death Index. Compared with the no-CA group (n = 769, 49%), the CA group (n = 804, 51%) was younger (62 vs 69 years, p <0.001) and had fewer comorbidities. Patients with CA more frequently had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (92% vs 86%), occluded left anterior descending artery (43% vs 33%), and severe preprocedural renal impairment (49% vs 42%) (all p <0.001). CA increased risk of 30-day MACCE by 45% (odds ratio 1.45, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 2.00, p = 0.024) after adjustment. CA group had higher 30-day MACCE (55% vs 42%, p <0.001) and mortality (52% vs 37%, p <0.001). Three-year survival was lower for CA compared with no-CA patients (43% vs 52%, p <0.001). In Cox regression, CS with CA was associated with a trend toward greater long-term mortality hazard (hazard ratio 1.19, 95% confidence interval 1.00 to 1.41, p = 0.055). In conclusion, concomitant CA among patients with ACS-related CS conferred a particularly heightened short-term risk with a diminishing legacy effect over time for mortality. CS survivors continue to exhibit high sustained long-term mortality hazard regardless of CA status.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome Coronario Agudo , Paro Cardíaco , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Humanos , Choque Cardiogénico/etiología , Choque Cardiogénico/complicaciones , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Factores de Riesgo , Australia , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/complicaciones , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Despite an increase in the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices for acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS), there is currently no randomised data directly comparing the use of Impella and veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). METHODS: Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were systematically searched in November 2021. Studies directly comparing the use of Impella (CP, 2.5 or 5.0) with VA-ECMO for AMI-CS were included. Studies examining other modalities of MCS, or other causes of cardiogenic shock, were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: No randomised trials comparing VA-ECMO to Impella in patients with AMI-CS were identified. Six cohort studies (five retrospective and one prospective) were included for systematic review. All studies, including 7093 patients, were included in meta-analysis. Five studies reported in-hospital mortality, which, when pooled, was 42.4% in the Impella group versus 50.1% in the VA-ECMO group. Impella support for AMI-CS was associated with an 11% relative risk reduction in in-hospital mortality compared to VA-ECMO (risk ratio 0.89; 95% CI 0.83-0.96, I2 0%). Of the six studies, three studies also adjusted outcome measures via propensity-score matching with reported reductions in in-hospital mortality with Impella compared to VA-ECMO (risk ratio 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.86, I2 35%). Pooled analysis of five studies with 6- or 12-month mortality data reported a 14% risk reduction with Impella over the medium-to-long-term (risk ratio 0.86; 95% CI 0.76-0.97, I2 0%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no high-level evidence comparing VA-ECMO and Impella in AMI-CS. In available observation studies, MCS with Impella was associated with a reduced risk of in-hospital and medium-term mortality as compared to VA-ECMO.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Renal impairment post-percutaneous coronary intervention (post-PCI) is a well-described adverse effect following the administration of contrast media. Within a large cohort of registry patients, we aimed to explore the incidence, predictors and clinical outcomes of renal impairment post-PCI. METHODS: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry is an Australian state-based clinical quality registry focusing on collecting data from all PCI capable centres. Data from 36 970 consecutive PCI cases performed between 2014 and 2018 were analysed. Patients were separated into three groups based on post-procedure creatinine levels (new renal impairment (NRI), defined as an absolute rise in serum creatinine>44.2 µmol/L or>25% of baseline creatinine; new renal impairment requiring dialysis (NDR), defined as worsening renal failure that necessitated a new requirement for renal dialysis; no NRI). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the impact of NRI and NDR on clinical outcomes. RESULTS: 3.1% (n=1134) of patients developed NRI, with an additional 0.6% (n=225) requiring dialysis. 96.3% (n=35 611) of patients did not develop NRI. Those who developed renal impairment were more comorbid, with higher rates of diabetes (22% vs 38% vs 38%, p<0.001), peripheral vascular disease (3.4% vs 8.2% vs 11%, p<0.001), chronic kidney disease (19% vs 49.7% vs 54.2%) and severe left ventricular dysfunction (5% vs 22% vs 40%, p<0.001). Multivariable analysis found that when compared with the no NRI group, those in the combined NRI/NDR group were at a greater risk of 30-day mortality (OR 4.77; 95% CI 3.89 to 5.86, p<0.001) and 30-day major adverse cardiac events (OR 3.72; 95% CI 3.15 to 4.39, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: NRI post-PCI remains a common occurrence, especially among comorbid patients, and is associated with a significantly increased morbidity and mortality risk.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Insuficiencia Renal , Australia , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Creatinina , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Renal/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Characteristics of patients presenting with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) selected for coronary angiography (CA) and factors predicting in-hospital mortality remain unclear. We assessed clinical characteristics associated with undertaking CA in patients presenting with OHCA and shockable rhythm (CA group). Predictors of in-hospital mortality were evaluated with multivariable analysis. Of 1,552 patients presenting with cardiac arrest between 2014 and 2018 to 2 health services in Victoria, Australia, 213 patients with OHCA and shockable rhythm were stratified according to CA status. The CA group had shorter cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration (17 vs 25 minutes) and time to return of spontaneous circulation (17 vs 26 minutes) but higher proportion of ST-elevation on electrocardiogram (48% vs 24%) (all p <0.01). In-hospital mortality was 38% (n = 81) for the overall cohort, 32% (n = 54) in the CA group, and 61% (n = 27) in the no-CA group. Predictors of in-hospital mortality included non-selection for CA (odds ratio 4.5, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 14), adrenaline support (3.9, 1.3 to 12), arrest at home (2.7, 1.1 to 6.6), longer time to defibrillation (2.5, 1.5 to 4.2 per 5-minute increase), lower blood pH (2.1, 1.4 to 3.2 per 0.1 decrease), lower albumin (2.0, 1.2 to 3.3 per 5 g/L decrease), higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (1.7, 1.0 to 3.0 per 5-point increase), and advanced age (1.4, 1.0 to 2.0 per 10-year increase) (all p ≤0.05). In conclusion, non-selection for CA, concomitant cardiogenic shock requiring inotropic support, poor initial resuscitation (arrest at home, longer time to defibrillation and lower pH), greater burden of co-morbidities (higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score and lower albumin), and advanced age were key adverse prognostic indicators among patients with OHCA and shockable rhythm.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Albúminas , Angiografía Coronaria , Cardioversión Eléctrica , Humanos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Pronóstico , Victoria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
International guidelines suggest revascularization within 24 hours in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Within a large population cohort study, we aimed to explore clinical practice regarding timing targets for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in NSTEMI. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry was established in 2013 as a state-wide clinical quality registry, pooling data from public and private PCI capable centers. Data were collected on 11,852 PCIs performed for NSTEMI from 2014 to 2018. Patients were divided into 3 groups by time of symptom onset to PCI (<24 hours; 24 to 72 hours; >72 hours). We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis conditional on several baseline covariates in investigating the impact of timing of PCI in NSTEMI on clinical outcomes. Patients who underwent PCI within 24 hours represented 18.4% (nâ¯=â¯2,178); 24 to 72 hours 45.8% (nâ¯=â¯5,434); >72 hours 35.8% (nâ¯=â¯4,240). Patients waiting longer for PCI were older (62.6 ± 12.2 vs 64.8 ± 12.6 vs 67.0 ± 12.7, p <0.001), more likely to be female (23.1% vs 24.2% vs 26.4%, pâ¯=â¯0.007), and have diabetes (18.6% vs 21.1% vs 27.1%, p <0.001). Multivariate logistic regression found that as compared with PCI <24 hours, PCI 24 to 72 hours and PCI >72 hours of symptom onset were associated with a decreased risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.55; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.86, pâ¯=â¯0.008 and odds ratio 0.64; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 1.01, pâ¯=â¯0.053, respectively). There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between groups following exclusion of patients presenting with cardiogenic shock or out of hospital cardiac arrest requiring intubation. In conclusion, many registry patients undergo PCI outside the 24-hour window following NSTEMI. This delay is at odds with current guideline recommendations but does not appear to be associated with an increased mortality risk.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio sin Elevación del ST/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Clopidogrel's anti-platelet effects may be attenuated by a pharmacokinetic interaction with co-prescribed proton pump inhibitors, which inhibit oxidative pathways that convert clopidogrel into its active metabolites. Despite this, the impact of PPIs on cardiovascular risk in the absence of clopidogrel is not well defined. AIM: To report on a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between PPIs and cardiovascular risk, independent of clopidogrel. METHODS: The databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched in October 2017. The primary outcome was association between PPI monotherapy and any adverse cardiovascular event. The secondary outcome was association between proton pump inhibitor monotherapy and acute myocardial infarction. Studies were excluded if they reported or did not adjust for concomitant anti-platelet therapy or involved participants aged less than 18 years. RESULTS: A total of 22 studies were included in the systematic review. Data from 16 studies were included in the meta-analysis (involving 447 408 participants). Of these, eight were randomised controlled trials, seven were observational studies and one was a retrospective analysis of a randomised controlled trial. An increased risk of any adverse cardiovascular event with PPI monotherapy was observed using pooled data from observational studies (risk ratio 1.25, 95% CI 1.11-1.42, I2 81%, P < 0.001), but not from randomised controlled trials (risk ratio 0.89, 95% CI 0.34-2.33, I2 0%, P = 0.85). CONCLUSION: There is no clear evidence of an association between PPI monotherapy and increased cardiovascular risk.