Long-term outcome of pulmonary involvement in patients with coronavirus disease 2019: The role of high-resolution computed tomography and functional status - A prospective single-center observational study.

BACKGROUND: Since its first outbreak, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has led to a great deal of published literature highlighting the short-term determinants of morbidity and mortality. Recently, several studies have reported radiological and functional sequelae from 3 months to 1 year among hospitalized COVID-19 survivors; however, long-term (more than 1 year) respiratory consequences in this population remain to be evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term radiological and pulmonary function outcomes of patients with COVID-19 2 years after resolution of the initial infection. METHODS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients with moderate to severe disease who survived acute illness were included in this prospective and partially retrospective study. Clinical assessment, laboratory tests, high-resolution computed tomography scans, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) were performed at baseline, followed by radiological and lung function assessments at 6 and 24 months. RESULTS: Among 106 enrolled participants (mean age 62 ± 13.5 years; males: 61), 44 (41.5%) and 27 (25.4%) underwent radiological assessment at 6 and 24 months, respectively. Overall, 22.6% (24) of patients had residual radiological abnormalities. Overt fibrosis was observed in 12.2% of patients. Computed tomography disease severity and extent diminished significantly at 6 (13 ± 6, P < 0.001) and 24 months (11 ± 6, P < 0.001) from baseline. PFTs were performed in 65 (61.3%), 22 (20.7%), and 34 (32%) patients at baseline, 6 and 24 months, respectively. Impaired diffusion capacity (median diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide: 60%, interquartile range [IQR]: 51-80), restrictive lung defect (mean total lung capacity: 73.4% ± 18% predicted), and reduced exercise tolerance (median 6-min walk distance: 360 m, IQR: 210-400) were the predominant features at baseline. With the exception of exercise tolerance, a statistically significant improvement was observed in lung function parameters at the extended follow-up (2 years). CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 survivors are at increased risk of developing long-term pulmonary complications, including lung fibrosis. A protocol-based approach to the management of post-COVID-19 patients is mandatory to improve future outcomes.

The future of medical thoracoscopy in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Medical thoracoscopy (MT) has changed how we manage exudative pleural effusion. It is a minimally invasive procedure used as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in pleural disease. Here, we report a case of a lymphocytic exudative pleural effusion that needed a pleural biopsy for diagnosis. Medical thoracoscopy was performed, a biopsy was taken, and adhesiolysis was performed. Medical thoracoscopy has been practiced for a while worldwide, but it has not been utilized in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and as we believe that it is useful in diagnosing exudative pleural effusions. It limits patients in hospital-stay and it may be less costly than surgical procedures. It is especially helpful in diagnosing and treating pleural effusions in elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. Such procedures are needed to ease ongoing financial constraints, and with the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, less time in the hospital means better utilization of beds during the pandemic. Spreading the knowledge about this procedure and its availability in the country will improve the health services provided to the patients.

Survey of flexible bronchoscopy practice in adults in Saudi Arabia.

OBJECTIVES: To assess current adherence to international guidelines for practitioners of bronchoscopy in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted in Saudi Arabia between December 2016 and March 2017. Pulmonologists, thoracic surgeons, and intensivists were invited to answer an emailed self-administered questionnaire survey seeking information on how they performed flexible bronchoscopy in adults. The data collected were compared between the 3 specialties. Results: Eighty-two (18%) of 456 invited practitioners completed the survey. Fifty-eight (72%) of the 82 respondents were pulmonologists. Forty (53%) of 76 respondents (93%) who had received bronchoscopy training received it abroad. Twenty-seven respondents (33%) had also received training in endobronchial ultrasound, electrocautery, brachytherapy, stent insertion, and laser procedures. Fifty-eight respondents (70%) preferred patients to undergo fasting for at least 4 hours before the procedure. Lidocaine was used for topical anesthesia, mainly by aerosol spray or nebulization. Midazolam was used by 62%, fentanyl by 50%, and propofol by 12% of respondents. Ninety percent of pulmonologists reported requesting a chest radiograph after transbronchial lung biopsy. Safety procedures for bronchoscopists, for example, wearing masks and eye protection, and for patients, for example, availability of anesthetic reversal agents, were not universally applied. Conclusion: Bronchoscopy is not standardized in Saudi Arabia. National guidelines for the indications and practice of bronchoscopy are required.