RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This randomized phase II study tested the hypothesis that schedule dependent chemo-immunotherapy with oregovomab improves progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in optimally resected, Stage III/IV ovarian cancer. METHODS: Patients from both academic centers and private practice in the US and Italy with Stage III/IV optimally cytoreduced ovarian cancer were randomized to standard six cycle IV carboplatin-paclitaxel chemotherapy (CP) versus CP plus four immunizations with oregovomab (CPO). A translational assessment of a cellular immune response was the primary endpoint; PFS and OS were measured as secondary endpoints. FINDINGS: 97 patients at thirteen centers were accrued to the protocol, 47 to CPO and 50 to CP. Technical issues led to inconsistent performance of the primary CA125 ELISPOT leading to unevaluable results. At a median follow up of 42 months, PFS and OS outcomes revealed an unexpectedly large treatment effect for CPO relative to CP alone, with median PFS of 41.8 months (95% C.I.: 21.8 - N.E.) for CPO and 12.2 months (10.4-18.6) for CP (p = 0.0027, HR 0.46, CI 0.28-0.7). For OS, the median for CPO has not yet been reached (NE) (45.2-NE) and for CP was 43.2 months (31.8-NE) (p = 0.043, HR 0.35, CI 0.16-0.74). The oregovomab treatment resulted in no change in toxicity profile from CP. INTERPRETATION: The previously identified potential clinical benefit of IV CP when administered with oregovomab was further refined in this randomized phase II study. Increases of PFS and OS of statistically and clinically significant magnitude were evident in this study of a front line chemo-immunotherapy treatment of ovarian cancer.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Inmunológicos/administración & dosificación , Carboplatino/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/inmunología , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/inmunología , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Nanoliposomal irinotecan showed activity in a phase 2 study in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapies. We assessed the effect of nanoliposomal irinotecan alone or combined with fluorouracil and folinic acid in a phase 3 trial in this population. METHODS: We did a global, phase 3, randomised, open-label trial at 76 sites in 14 countries. Eligible patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive web response system at a central location to receive either nanoliposomal irinotecan monotherapy (120 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks, equivalent to 100 mg/m(2) of irinotecan base) or fluorouracil and folinic acid. A third arm consisting of nanoliposomal irinotecan (80 mg/m(2), equivalent to 70 mg/m(2) of irinotecan base) with fluorouracil and folinic acid every 2 weeks was added later (1:1:1), in a protocol amendment. Randomisation was stratified by baseline albumin, Karnofsky performance status, and ethnic origin. Treatment was continued until disease progression or intolerable toxic effects. The primary endpoint was overall survival, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. The primary analysis was planned after 305 events. Safety was assessed in all patients who had received study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01494506. FINDINGS: Between Jan 11, 2012, and Sept 11, 2013, 417 patients were randomly assigned either nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid (n=117), nanoliposomal irinotecan monotherapy (n=151), or fluorouracil and folinic acid (n=149). After 313 events, median overall survival in patients assigned nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid was 6.1 months (95% CI 4.8-8.9) vs 4.2 months (3.3-5.3) with fluorouracil and folinic acid (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.92; p=0.012). Median overall survival did not differ between patients assigned nanoliposomal irinotecan monotherapy and those allocated fluorouracil and folinic acid (4.9 months [4.2-5.6] vs 4.2 months [3.6-4.9]; 0.99, 0.77-1.28; p=0.94). The grade 3 or 4 adverse events that occurred most frequently in the 117 patients assigned nanoliposomal irinotecan plus fluorouracil and folinic acid were neutropenia (32 [27%]), diarrhoea (15 [13%]), vomiting (13 [11%]), and fatigue (16 [14%]). INTERPRETATION: Nanoliposomal irinotecan in combination with fluorouracil and folinic acid extends survival with a manageable safety profile in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who previously received gemcitabine-based therapy. This agent represents a new treatment option for this population. FUNDING: Merrimack Pharmaceuticals.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/efectos adversos , Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/mortalidad , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/efectos adversos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Fatiga/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Irinotecán , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Leucovorina/efectos adversos , Liposomas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vómitos/inducido químicamente , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objectives of this phase I study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of a 24-hour continuous intravenous infusion of trabectedin administered to children and adolescents with refractory or relapsed solid tumors. PROCEDURE: Patients between the ages of 4 and 16 years old with refractory solid tumors received trabectedin as a 24-hour infusion every 21 days. Dexamethasone and prophylactic growth factor support were administered with each cycle. Pharmacokinetic studies were conducted during cycle 1. RESULTS: Patients (n = 12) median (range) age 14.5 (8-16) years received trabectedin at 1.1 (n = 3), 1.5 (n = 6), or 1.7 (n = 3) mg/m(2). At the 1.5 mg/m(2) dose level, one patient had dose limiting anorexia and fatigue. At 1.7 mg/m(2), two patients experienced dose limiting toxicity, dehydration, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase elevation. Non-dose limiting toxicities included elevated serum transaminases, myelosuppression, nausea, emesis, and fatigue. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were similar to historical data in adults. One partial response was observed in a patient with neuroendocrine carcinoma. Stable disease (≥6 cycles) was achieved in three patients (osteosarcoma n = 2, desmoplastic small round cell tumor n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of trabectedin in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors is 1.5 mg/m(2) IV over 24 hours every 21 days. Dexamethasone to ameliorate hepatic toxicity and prophylactic growth factor support are required.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Alquilantes , Dioxoles , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas , Adolescente , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/farmacocinética , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Niño , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Dioxoles/administración & dosificación , Dioxoles/efectos adversos , Dioxoles/farmacocinética , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/administración & dosificación , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/efectos adversos , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/farmacocinética , Factores de Tiempo , TrabectedinaRESUMEN
Purpose: To determine whether deposition characteristics of ferumoxytol (FMX) iron nanoparticles in tumors, identified by quantitative MRI, may predict tumor lesion response to nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI).Experimental Design: Eligible patients with previously treated solid tumors had FMX-MRI scans before and following (1, 24, and 72 hours) FMX injection. After MRI acquisition, R2* signal was used to calculate FMX levels in plasma, reference tissue, and tumor lesions by comparison with a phantom-based standard curve. Patients then received nal-IRI (70 mg/m2 free base strength) biweekly until progression. Two percutaneous core biopsies were collected from selected tumor lesions 72 hours after FMX or nal-IRI.Results: Iron particle levels were quantified by FMX-MRI in plasma, reference tissues, and tumor lesions in 13 of 15 eligible patients. On the basis of a mechanistic pharmacokinetic model, tissue permeability to FMX correlated with early FMX-MRI signals at 1 and 24 hours, while FMX tissue binding contributed at 72 hours. Higher FMX levels (ranked relative to median value of multiple evaluable lesions from 9 patients) were significantly associated with reduction in lesion size by RECIST v1.1 at early time points (P < 0.001 at 1 hour and P < 0.003 at 24 hours FMX-MRI, one-way ANOVA). No association was observed with post-FMX levels at 72 hours. Irinotecan drug levels in lesions correlated with patient's time on treatment (Spearman ρ = 0.7824; P = 0.0016).Conclusions: Correlation between FMX levels in tumor lesions and nal-IRI activity suggests that lesion permeability to FMX and subsequent tumor uptake may be a useful noninvasive and predictive biomarker for nal-IRI response in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 23(14); 3638-48. ©2017 AACR.
Asunto(s)
Camptotecina/análogos & derivados , Óxido Ferrosoférrico/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Camptotecina/administración & dosificación , Camptotecina/sangre , Camptotecina/química , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Óxido Ferrosoférrico/sangre , Óxido Ferrosoférrico/química , Humanos , Irinotecán , Liposomas/administración & dosificación , Liposomas/química , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nanopartículas/administración & dosificación , Nanopartículas/química , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias/patología , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
Lysosomal storage diseases are a group of disorders which have in common an inherited defect in lysosomal function-in most cases, a missing intralysosomal enzyme. Research into potential treatment options for this group of disorders has focused on enzyme replacement. Over the past two decades, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has been used with increasing frequency to treat patients with lysosomal storage disease by providing a population of cells with the capacity to produce the missing enzyme. The success of marrow transplantation depends on the specific enzyme deficiency and the stage of the disease. Generally, visceral symptoms can be improved, whereas skeletal lesions remain relatively unaffected. The effect on neurologic symptoms varies. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains a viable treatment option in those lysosomal storage diseases where data supportive of disease stabilization or amelioration are known. Early transplantation is the goal so that enzyme replacement may occur before extensive central nervous system injury becomes evident. When inadequate clinical data are available, the decision to perform transplantation requires experimental data demonstrating that the enzyme in question is both excreted from normal cells and taken up by affected cells as evidenced by elimination of storage material in vitro.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Médula Ósea , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/cirugía , Animales , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/métodos , Trasplante de Médula Ósea/tendencias , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas/tendencias , Humanos , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/clasificación , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/diagnóstico , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/fisiopatología , Enfermedades por Almacenamiento Lisosomal/terapia , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of trabectedin for advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In an open-label, phase II, multicenter study, women with advanced breast cancer previously treated with ≤ 2 lines of chemotherapy for advanced disease, including both anthracyclines and taxanes, were randomized (1:1) to 3-hour infusions of trabectedin 1.3 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks (1/3 treatment arm) or 0.58 mg/m(2) every week for 3 of 4 weeks (3/4 treatment arm). The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Fifty-two women (median age, 50 years; median chemotherapy agents, 4) were enrolled. Relative trabectedin dose intensities were 81% and 76% in the 1/3 and 3/4 treatment arms, respectively. Objective response rates were 12% (3 of 25) and 4% (1 of 27), respectively. Stable disease was observed in 14 (56%) and 11 (41%) patients in the 1/3 and 3/4 treatment arms, respectively, with median durations of 3.5 and 3.7 months. Median TTP and PFS were higher in the 1/3 treatment arm (3.1 months each) than in the 3/4 treatment arm (2.0 months each). At a median follow-up of 7 months in both treatment arms, median OS was not reached in the 1/3 treatment arm and was 9.4 months in the 3/4 treatment arm. The most frequent drug-related adverse events in the 1/3 and 3/4 treatment arms, respectively, were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level increases (68% vs. 63%), nausea (56% vs. 59%), and asthenia (56% vs. 48%). Neutropenia and increases in ALT levels were the most frequent grade 3/4 events. Both types of events were usually transient and reversible. CONCLUSION: In the population studied, trabectedin showed a manageable safety profile for both regimens analyzed. There were higher objective response rates and a longer PFS in the 1/3 treatment arm compared with the 3/4 treatment arm.