Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Turk J Med Sci ; 51(5): 2621-2630, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34284536

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To detect the extent to which physical impairments are observed in patients with lung cancer awaiting lung surgery, exercise capacity, muscle strength, physical activity, dyspnea, and quality of life (QOL) were objectively compared between the patients and healthy individuals in current study. METHODS: Patients with lung cancer (n = 26) and healthy individuals (n = 21) were included. Exercise capacity, respiratory (maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP)) and quadriceps femoris muscle strength, physical activity, dyspnea and QOL were evaluated using 6-min walk test (6-MWT), a mouth pressure device, a hand-held dynamometer, a metabolic holter device, Modified Medical Research Council dyspnea scale and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire C30 version 3.0, respectively. RESULTS: The 6-MWT distance (mean difference: 78.97 m), percentages of predicted MIP and MEP values, physical activity parameters (energy expenditures, physical activity duration, average metabolic equivalent and number of steps) and QOL subscales scores (functional, social function and global health status) were significantly lower in the patients than healthy individuals (p < 0.05). Dyspnea perception and other QOL subscales scores (symptom and fatigue) were significantly higher in patients than healthy individuals (p < 0.05). No significant difference was prevalent in quadriceps femoris muscle strength (p > 0.05). Sixteen (66.7%) patients were sedentary. DISCUSSION: Severe reductions in exercise capacity, respiratory muscle strength, and physical activity level, poorer QOL and evident dyspnea exist in preoperative patients with lung cancer. Therefore, patients should be included in early protective rehabilitation program including aerobic exercise, respiratory muscle training and physical activity counseling before lung surgery.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Tolerancia al Ejercicio/fisiología , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Disnea , Ejercicio Físico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía
2.
Physiother Theory Pract ; : 1-14, 2024 Mar 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38469863

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary involvement is prevalent in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Arterial hypoxemia may reduce oxygen transferred to the skeletal muscles, possibly leading to impaired exercise capacity. Oxygen uptake may vary depending on the increased oxygen demand of the muscles during submaximal and maximal exercise. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare muscle oxygenation during submaximal and maximal exercise tests in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with pulmonary involvement. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients were included. Pulmonary function (spirometry), peripheral muscle strength (dynamometer), quadriceps femoris (QF) muscle oxygenation (Moxy® device), and submaximal exercise capacity (six-minute walk test (6-MWT)) were tested on the first day, maximal exercise capacity (cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET)) was tested on the second day. Physical activity level was evaluated using an activity monitor worn for five consecutive days. Cardiopulmonary responses and muscle oxygenation were compared during 6-MWT and CPET. RESULTS: Patients' minimum and recovery muscle oxygen saturation were significantly decreased; maximum total hemoglobin increased, heart rate, blood pressure, breathing frequency, dyspnea, fatigue, and leg fatigue at the end-of-test and recovery increased in CPET compared to 6-MWT (p < .050). Peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) was 18.15 ± 4.75 ml/min/kg, VO2peak; percent predicted < 80% was measured in 51.28% patients. Six-MWT distance and QF muscle strength were less than 80% predicted in 58.9% and 76.9% patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome with pulmonary involvement, muscle deoxygenation of QF is greater during maximal exercise than during submaximal exercise. Specifically, patients with lung impairment should be evaluated for deoxygenation and should be taken into consideration during pulmonary rehabilitation.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA