RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Cyclophosphamide is an alkylating agent used in routine pulmonary practice, particularly in the management of connectivitis-related diffuse interstitial lung disease. Common side effects are gastrointestinal disorders and immunosuppression, and a sudden and exceptional adverse effect is severe hyponatremia. OBSERVATION: A 78-year-old female patient treated for NSIP-OP in the context of an anti-synthetase syndrome was treated with Cyclophosphamide 15mg/kg. Twenty-four hours after the end of the infusion, she was diagnosed at home in a coma with comitial seizures. Biological assessment revealed severe hyponatremia at 109 mmol/l with blood hypo-osmolarity. The patient's condition rapidly improved following correction of the ionic disorder. CONCLUSION: Hyponatremia induced by low-dose Cyclophosphamide is a rare but serious adverse effect that requires special attention.
Asunto(s)
Hiponatremia , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH , Anciano , Coma/inducido químicamente , Ciclofosfamida/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Hiponatremia/inducido químicamente , Hiponatremia/diagnóstico , Hiponatremia/terapia , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/inducido químicamente , Síndrome de Secreción Inadecuada de ADH/diagnóstico , Convulsiones/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of patients meeting the 2010 SPILF-AFSSAPS guiding criteria for Streptococcuspneumoniae in patients consulting at the emergency departments of four French university hospitals for acute community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) suspicion. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The PACSCAN study prospectively included 319 patients. Medical history, clinical, biological, and radiological presentations were collected. An adjudication committee retrospectively classified the diagnostic certainty based on the initial chest CT scan data and the follow-up data up to Day 28. S. pneumoniae was looked for according to the clinician's choice of blood culture, pneumococcal urinary antigen test, nasopharyngeal PCR, and/or sputum microbiological examination. RESULTS: All patients (100%) met at least one criterion for S. pneumoniae CAP and six (2%) met all criteria. The distribution of criteria ranged from 32% (chest pain criterion) to 86% (age≥40years criterion). These figures were respectively 100%, 3%, 38%, and 82% when the study population was restricted to the 139 patients with definite or probable CAP, according to the adjudication committee. Taking into account the microbiological results, the criteria taken one by one or combined did not make it possible to differentiate the 19 S. pneumoniae CAP from the other CAPs. CONCLUSION: The 2010 SPILF-AFSSAPS guiding criteria for S. pneumoniae CAP are found in very variable proportions and do not, in their current form, make it possible to accurately guide towards a pneumococcal etiology in patients included in the PACSCAN study.