Skin Testing and Drug Provocation Tests in Epidermal Necrolysis: A French Experience.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the use of skin testing, other than patch testing, and challenges in the evaluation of epidermal necrolysis (EN), including Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. OBJECTIVE: To report a French multicenter experience in skin testing and challenges in EN, and investigate the factors associated with tests' positivity. METHODS: All patients who were evaluated by patch tests (PTs), skin prick tests, intradermal tests (IDTs), or drug provocation tests (DPTs) for EN between 2010 and 2020 were retrospectively included through 2 French drug reaction networks. RESULTS: In total, 113 patients were included from 8 centers. Median (interquartile range) time from EN to hypersensitivity workup was 7.9 months (5.1-15 months). All patients had PTs, 17 (15%) had skin prick tests or IDTs with delayed readings and 32 (28.3%) had DPTs. One mild reaction occurred after a DPT. Overall, 22 patients (19.5%) had positive PTs, and the only factors associated with positivity were Algorithm of Drug Causality for Epidermal Necrolysis (ALDEN) score and drug class. Only 1 IDT was positive but considered irrelevant. The DPTs were never performed to prove responsibility of a highly suspected drug but were used to confirm current tolerance of needed medications. CONCLUSIONS: Allergological workup in EN, performed by specialists involved in EN, seems safe. Skin tests, although of limited sensitivity, can be helpful for considering the reintroduction of essential drugs according to a benefit-to-risk decision. We propose an algorithm for approaching hypersensitivity testing in patients with EN, to be adapted to each patient.

Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): Series of 49 French Pediatric Cases.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a rare and potentially fatal adverse reaction. It can be difficult to diagnose, even more so among children, because symptoms may mimic other commonly encountered pediatric conditions. OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical and laboratory features of DRESS syndrome in the pediatric population (age ≤18 years) and establish causative agents and treatment modalities. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of probable and definite DRESS cases (Registry of Sever Cutaneous Adverse Reaction score ≥ 4) in children hospitalized in 15 French university hospitals between 2000 and 2020. RESULTS: We included 49 cases. All children had fever and rash, 69.4% had lymphadenopathy, and 65.3% had facial edema. The most common organ affected was the liver (83.7%). Treatment consisted of topical corticosteroid in only 30.6% and systemic corticosteroid in 55.1%; 12.2% received intravenous immunoglobulin. Among probable and likely culprit drugs, 65% were antibiotics and 27.5% were antiepileptics, median time to DRESS symptom onset after initiation of 15 days (13 days with antibiotics and 21 days with antiepileptics). Twenty-seven children had allergy assessment for causative agents, 65.4% of whom had positive tests. CONCLUSIONS: Culprit drugs are frequently antibiotics and antiepileptic drugs, and onset is often less than 2 weeks after treatment starts, especially with antibiotics. Treatment with topical corticosteroids appears to be sufficient in the least severe cases. Treatment by systemic corticosteroid therapy remains the reference treatment in case of severe organ damage.

Antituberculosis Drug-Associated DRESS: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Although antituberculosis drug-associated drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is rarely reported, its diagnosis should not be dismissed. Its management implies an early withdrawal of suspected drugs. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to describe the characteristics of antituberculosis drug-associated DRESS and to identify the most likely involved drugs. METHODS: We searched for potential cases of DRESS with rifampicin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol reported from January 1, 2005, to July 30, 2015, in the French pharmacovigilance database. A literature review was also performed. RESULTS: Sixty-seven cases of antituberculosis drug-associated DRESS were analyzed (40 women and 27 men, median age of 61 years). Liver and kidneys were the most frequently involved organs. Two patients died from DRESS. Skin tests were performed in 11 patients and were positive in 8 cases. Discrepancies between epicutaneous tests and reintroduction of the culprit drugs were observed for 2 patients with a premature reintroduction of antituberculosis drugs in 1 case. Antituberculosis drugs were the only suspects in 20 cases. As for the literature data, rifampicin was the most suspected drug because of its larger indications, but in case of tuberculosis infections, isoniazid was the most suspected drug. CONCLUSIONS: We described the largest case series of first-line antituberculosis drug-associated DRESS in the literature. All antituberculosis drugs pose a risk of DRESS. An early withdrawal of the culprit drugs is essential. A drug allergy evaluation must be performed to optimize the second-line treatment of tuberculosis infection.

DRESS Syndrome in the ICU: When a Patient Is Treated with Multiple Drugs.

The Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is life-threatening. It associates a skin condition with hematological and visceral disorders. The DRESS syndrome diagnosis in the intensive care unit (ICU) is difficult as clinical features are nonspecific. Furthermore, the need to treat patients with multiple drugs usually prevents the identification of the causative drug. We report the case of a patient who developed two bouts of DRESS caused by piperacillin-tazobactam, the first being complicated with a distributive shock. Cases of DRESS occurring inside ICU are seldom reported. However, any intensivist may encounter this situation during his career and should be aware of its diagnostic and management specific aspects.