Patients with trochanteric hip fractures and pre-existing osteoarthritis can be treated with nailing osteosynthesis without significant decrease in functional status.

PURPOSE: Functional outcome in patients after trochanteric fracture fixation with pre-existing radiographic osteoarthritis (OA) is unclear. Analyzing their function and independence, before and after fracture, could optimize their treatment and decrease the socioeconomic burden in this particular group. METHODS: The influence of pre-existing radiographic hip OA on functional outcome was retrospectively analyzed with a cohort of patients undergoing proximal femoral nailing for trochanteric fracture. OA was graded according to the Tonnis classification. Functional outcome was assessed preoperatively and 12 months after surgery by the Parker Mobility Score (PMS). We consider a meaningful reduction a difference between preoperatively PMS and 12 months after surgery ≥ 2. In order to evaluate if OA is related to PMS reduction ≥ 2, we calculate the SubHazard ratio (SHR) performing a competing risk regression model considering death as a competing risk event, adjusting by confounders. Death, reoperations, readmissions, surgical time, and fracture reduction quality in patients with and without osteoarthritis were recorded. RESULTS: 375 trochanteric hip fractures treated with cephalomedullary nails were included, from which 80 (21% CI95% 17%-21%) were classified as Tonnis 2 or 3. This group of patients with pre-existing OA was significantly older (mean age of 88.6 [SD 5.65] vs 85.5 years [SD 6.95]) than the group without OA. The preoperatively PMS score was 6.28 (2.71) in non-OA patients and 5.69 (2.67) in OA patients. The mean PMS reduction 12 months after surgery was 1.3 (SD 2.05) in OA patients and 1.07 (SD 2.2) in non-OA patients (p = 0.43). Competing risks analysis, adjusted by confounders had an SHR of 1.15 (IC95% 0.77 - 1.69). Death, readmission, reoperations, surgical time, and fracture reduction quality did not differ in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pre-existing radiographic OA treated with femoral nailing have a similar reduction in functional outcomes compared to the non-OA group at one-year follow-up. Further studies will be needed to compare the results of the functional outcome in arthroplasty with those of femoral nailing for the treatment of trochanteric femur fractures in patients with OA.

Impact of anticoagulants in elderly patients who suffer a hip fracture. Should we have a different approach?

INTRODUCTION: Hip fracture in the elderly is a frequent problem. Chronic treatment with anticoagulants is common in these patients, and may delay surgery. OBJECTIVES: To compare time to surgery, hospital stay, in-hospital and 90 days complications between anticoagulated (A) and non-anticoagulated (NA) groups. METHODS: Retrospective cohort of >64 years-old patients with acute hip fracture. Period June-2014 to December 2019. We estimated crude and adjusted OR (95%CI) for in-hospital complications with logistic regression model. We report the crude and adjusted HR for readmission and 90-day mortality with Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 1058 patients, 123 (11%) were anticoagulated. Time to surgery was 26.4 hours (IIQ 13.9-48) in A and 24 hours (IIQ 2.3-48) in NA, p0.001. Hospital stay was 7 days (IIQ 5-9) in A and 6 days (IIQ 5-10.5) NA, p0,000. In-hospital complications were 17 (14%) in A and 81 (9%) in NA, p0.064. The adjusted OR was 1.53 (95%CI 0.8-2.7) p0.138. For 90-day readmission, the crude HR was 1.51 (95%CI 0.99-2.29) p0.053 and the adjusted HR was 1.31 (95%CI 0.85-2.00) p0,09. For 90-day mortality, the crude HR was 0.80 (95%CI 0.45-1.43) p0.464 and the adjusted HR was 0.70 (95% CI 0.39-1.25) p0.239. DISCUSSION: While we found differences between groups in time to surgery and hospital statistics, their clinical relevance should be reviewed.

Tasa de reinternaciones y factores asociados en ancianos luego de una internación por fractura de cadera / Rate of re-experiences and associated factors in the elderly after hospitalization due to hip fracture

INTRODUCCIÓN: El anciano con fractura de cadera tiene alto riesgo de complicaciones y mortalidad hospitalaria. Las estadías hospitalarias cortas y el alta temprana con problemas clínicos activos pueden llevar a reinternaciones. OBJETIVOS: conocer la tasa de reinternaciones, los motivos y las variables predictoras de las mismas en los sujetos que tuvieron fracturas de cadera. MÉTODOS: Se trabajó una cohorte retrospectiva. Se incluyó a todos los pacientes ingresados en el Registro Institucional de Ancianos con Fractura de Cadera entre julio de 2014 y julio de 2017. Se describió la tasa de reinternación y su IC95%. Se utilizó un modelo de riesgo proporcional de Cox para describir factores de riesgo y el tiempo a la reinternación. RESULTADOS: Se incluyó a 858 pacientes. La mediana de días de internación fue de 6 (rango intercuartil [RIC 5-9]). El 86% (737) de los pacientes era de sexo femenino, con una mediana de edad de 86 años (RIC 81-89). La tasa de reinternación a los 30 días fue de 10% (IC95%: 8,3-12,5) y al año, de 39% (IC95%: 34,8-42,6). La principal causa fue la infección (30%). Los factores asociados fueron: edad (>85 años) Razón de Hazard o Hazard ratio (HR)1,3 (IC95%: 1-1,7; p 0,03), sexo femenino HR 0,5 (IC95%: 0,4-0,7; p<0,01), fragilidad HR 1,4 (IC95%: 1,1-1,8; p<0,01), score de Charlson (≥2) HR 1,6 (IC95%: 1,3-2,1; p<0,01), días de internación (>7 días) HR 1,4 (IC95%: 1,2-1,9; p<0,01). CONCLUSIONES: La reinternación después de una fractura de cadera tiene alta incidencia. El cuidado perioperatorio de los pacientes con fractura de cadera es esencial para reducir las complicaciones.

INTRODUCTION: Elderly patients with hip fracture are at high risk for complications and in-hospital mortality. Short hospital stay and early discharge with still active clinical problems may lead to readmissions. OBJECTIVES: to know the rate of readmissions, the reasons and the predictive variables in patients who had hip fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed, with all patients included in the institutional registry of elderly patients with hip fracture between July 2014 and July 2017. Readmission rates and their CI95% were described. A proportional risk Cox model was used to describe risk factors and time-toreadmission. RESULTS: A total of 858 patients were included with a median hospital stay of 6 days (interquartile range [IQR] 5-9), 86% (737) of female patients and a median age of 86 years (IQR 81-89). Readmission rates were 10% (CI95%: 8.3-12.5) at 30 days and 39% (CI95%: 34.8-42.6) at 12 months. The main cause was infection (30%). Associated factors were: age (>85 years) HR 1.3 (CI95%: 1-1.7; p 0.03), female gender HR 0.5 (CI95%: 0.4-0.7; p<0.01), fragility HR 1.4 (CI95%: 1.1-1.8; p<0.01), Charlson score (≥2) HR 1.6 (CI95%: 1.3-2.1; p<0.01), hospital stay (>7 days) HR 1.4 (CI95%: 1.2- 1.9, p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission after hip fracture has a high incidence. Perioperative care of patients with hip fracture is essential to reduce complications.