Implementation Process and Evolution of a Laparotomy-Assisted 2-Port Fetoscopic Spina Bifida Closure Program.

INTRODUCTION: Prenatal closure of open spina bifida via open fetal surgery improves neurologic outcomes for infants in selected pregnancies. Fetoscopic techniques that are minimally invasive to the uterus aim to provide equivalent fetal benefits while minimizing maternal morbidities, but the optimal technique is undetermined. We describe the development, evolution, and feasibility of the laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopic technique for prenatal closure of fetal spina bifida in a newly established program. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women consented for laparotomy-assisted fetoscopic closure of isolated fetal spina bifida. Inclusion and exclusion criteria followed the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS). Team preparation involved observation at the originating center, protocol development, ancillary staff training, and surgical rehearsal using patient-matched models through simulation prior to program implementation. The primary outcome was the ability to complete the repair fetoscopically. Secondary maternal and fetal outcomes to assess performance of the technique were collected prospectively. RESULTS: Of 57 women screened, 19 (33%) consented for laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopy between February 2017 and December 2019. Fetoscopic closure was completed in 84% (16/19) cases. Over time, the technique was modified from a single- to a multilayer closure. In utero hindbrain herniation improved in 86% (12/14) of undelivered patients at 6 weeks postoperatively. Spontaneous rupture of membranes occurred in 31% (5/16) of fetoscopic cases. For completed cases, median gestational age at birth was 37 (range 27-39.6) weeks and 50% (8/16) of women delivered at term. Vaginal birth was achieved in 56% (9/16) of patients. One newborn had a cerebrospinal fluid leak that required postnatal surgical repair. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a laparotomy-assisted 2-port fetoscopic spina bifida closure program through rigorous preparation and multispecialty team training may accelerate the learning curve and demonstrates favorable obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Factors that influence flow through intravascular catheters: the clinical relevance of Poiseuille's law.

BACKGROUND: The physics of ideal fluid flow is well characterized. However, the effect of catheter size, tubing types, injection port adjuncts, and viscosity on flow is not well described. We used a simulated environment to determine how various permutations of common elements affect fluid flow. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We tested 16 peripheral and central venous catheters to assess flow through several standard infusion sets and a rapid infuser set; tested flow through standard and blood infusion sets with the addition of intravenous extension tubing, stopcocks, and a needleless connector; and compared the relative viscosity of commonly used blood products and colloids to that of normal saline. RESULTS: The maximal flow rate was 200 mL/min for the standard infusion set but 800 mL/min for the rapid infusion set. Choice of infusion tubing was the rate-limiting component for many larger catheters. A 14-gauge, single-lumen central venous catheter (CVC) and 18-gauge peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) had equivalent flow rates with all infusion sets. A 16-gauge single-lumen CVC allowed a flow rate that was slower than that of a 20-gauge PIV, and faster than that of a 22-gauge PIV. The addition of adjuncts slowed flow rate. Needleless connectors had the greatest impact, reducing flow by 75% for the blood infusion set. Packed red blood cells had a viscosity 4.5 times that of normal saline and thereby reduced flow. CONCLUSION: Catheter and tubing choice, adjuncts, and fluid viscosity influence flow rates. Our results will help inform adequate vascular access planning in the perioperative environment.

Association of anesthesia handovers with perioperative and short-term outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Anesthesiologists transition patient care to combat clinician fatigue and accommodate shift limitations. Studies exploring the association of increased handovers with patient outcomes have conflicting findings. Here, we investigate the association of anesthesia handovers with perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy at a single institution from 2017 to 2022 were stratified by the number of anesthesia attending and nonattending (nurse anesthetist/resident) handovers (0-1 or ≥2). Primary outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, in addition to 30-day serious morbidity. Logistic and negative binomial regression models were adjusted for covariates related to patient and case complexity. RESULTS: A total of 182 patients were included. Median operative time was 720 minutes (interquartile range, 540-900 minutes). Most cases had fewer than 2 attending handovers (n = 147, 81% vs ≥2 handovers n = 35, 19%) and 2 nonattending handovers (n = 120, 71% vs ≥2 handovers n = 53, 29%). In adjusted models, there were no differences in 30-day serious morbidity and intensive care unit or hospital length of stay between the attending handover groups (0-1 vs ≥2). Patients with ≥2 non-attending handovers had similar odds of 30-day serious morbidity compared with the 0-1 group (odds ratio, 1.613, 95% confidence interval, 0.733-3.550, P = .235), but a longer total hospital (incidence rate ratio, 1.301, 95% confidence interval, 1.071-1.579, P = .008) and intensive care unit length of stay (incidence rate ratio 1.548, 95% confidence interval, 1.038-2.049, P = .030). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple anesthesia handovers were not associated with an increased risk of serious morbidity for patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. However, increased handovers (≥2) between nonattending providers was associated with longer hospital and intensive care unit length of stays.

A Case Report of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Under General Anesthesia in a Patient With a Large Cerebral Aneurysm.

Cerebral aneurysms are rarely encountered in pregnancy. Their antepartum and intrapartum management remain clinically challenging, primarily due to concern regarding potential rupture. We present a case of a patient in preterm labor at risk for imminent delivery with a 10mm cerebral aneurysm. She was recommended for cesarean section (CS), yet delivered via spontaneous vaginal delivery in the operating room after induction of general anesthesia for the intended CS. Her aneurysm and neurologic function remained intact postpartum. Cerebral aneurysms <5mm are unlikely to undergo significant growth during pregnancy. The presence of a cerebral aneurysm is not automatically a contraindication to the Valsalva maneuver. The recommendation for which patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms should deliver by CS, operative vaginal delivery, or unassisted vaginal delivery (i.e., which patients should avoid Valsalva maneuver intrapartum), is complex and requires multidisciplinary discussion.

Brain Tumor, Pheochromocytoma, and Pregnancy: A Case Report of a Cesarean Delivery in a Patient With Von Hippel-Lindau Disease.

A young woman first diagnosed with von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) during pregnancy underwent an uncomplicated cesarean delivery despite having multiple classic VHL tumors, including a large cerebellopontine brain mass and vasoactive pheochromocytoma. Patients with VHL may have multiple tumors of the central nervous system and viscera that greatly impact anesthetic management. This case highlights the anesthetic considerations for a parturient with pheochromocytoma and elevated intracranial pressure, as well as the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach.