RESUMEN
Patients needing the assistance of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at risk of hemodilution and, in some instances, may require exposure to large amounts of allogeneic blood products. Patient outcomes can be improved by taking steps to reduce transfusions and hemodilution. Currently, modified ultrafiltration (MUF) is used across the world to reduce hemodilution after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Another common technique during bypass initiation is autologous priming. By applying modified versions of these techniques, ECMO patients may potentially benefit. Usually, patients requiring immediate transition from CPB to ECMO are not stable enough to tolerate MUF. Through alterations of the CPB and ECMO circuit tubing, MUF can be performed once on ECMO. Another technique to potentially lower the transfusion requirements for ECMO patients is a complete circuit blood transfer during an ECMO circuit exchange. While selective component changes are preferred if possible, occasionally a complete circuit change must be done. To minimize hemodilution or prevent priming with blood products, the original ECMO circuit's blood can be transferred to the new ECMO circuit before connecting to the patient. Both of these techniques, in our opinion, helped to reduce the number of transfusions that our ECMO patients have seen during these critical time periods.
Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Hemodilución , Hemofiltración , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Diseño de Equipo , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentación , Hemodilución/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemofiltración/instrumentación , Hemofiltración/métodos , Humanos , Ultrafiltración/instrumentación , Ultrafiltración/métodos , Dispositivos de Acceso VascularRESUMEN
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to treat severe hypoxemic respiratory failure and as a rescue therapy for patients with cardiopulmonary arrest within a narrow window of time. A failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to analyze the clinical and operational processes leading to delays in initiating ECMO. FMEA determined these highest-risk failure modes that were contributing to process failure: (1) ECMO candidacy not determined in time, (2) no or incomplete evaluation for ECMO prior to consult or arrest, (3) ECMO team not immediately available, and (4) cannulation not completed in time. When implemented collectively, a total of 4 interventions addressed more than 95% of the system failures. These interventions were (1) ECMO response pager held by a team required for decision, (2) distribution of institutionally defined inclusion/exclusion criteria, (3) educational training for clinicians consulting the ECMO team, and (4) establishment of a mobile ECMO insertion cart.