Financial toxicity in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in Germany-a cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Financial toxicity arises in cancer patients from subjective financial distress due to objective financial burden from the disease or treatment. Financial toxicity associates with worse outcomes. It has not been described in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Germany and its publicly funded health system. In this context, we therefore investigated the prevalence of financial toxicity, associated risk factors, and patient preferences on communication of financial burden. METHODS: We conducted a preregistered ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/KH6VX ) cross-sectional study surveying patients at the end of their course of radiotherapy in two institutions. Objective financial burden was assessed by direct costs and loss of income. Financial toxicity was measured by subjective financial distress per EORTC QLQ-C30. We used Spearman's correlation and Fisher's exact test for univariate analysis, an ordinal regression for multivariate analysis. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Of the 100 patients participating in the study, 68% reported direct costs, 25% loss of income, and 31% subjective financial distress. Per univariate analysis, higher subjective financial distress was significantly associated with active employment, lower quality of life, lower household income, higher direct costs, and higher loss of income. The latter three factors remained statistically significant in the multivariate analysis. A relative majority of the patients welcomed communication regarding financial burden with their radiation oncologist. CONCLUSION: Financial toxicity is prevalent in cancer patients treated with radiotherapy in Germany. The reported risk factors may help to identify patients at risk. Future studies should validate these results and investigate interventions for financial toxicity to potentially improve outcomes.

Radical dose escalation by high-dose-rate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer-Significance of prostate-specific antigen nadir level within 18 months as correlation for long-term biochemical control.

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for dose escalation in localized prostate cancer has been established as one standard treatment option. However, long-term results at followup (FU) ≥5 years are usually needed to ensure robustness of reported outcomes. Potential benefit of salvage therapy is, nevertheless, higher when relapse is diagnosed early. This study aimed to solve this dilemma by evaluating the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir for early prediction of long-term biochemical control. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Combined pelvis-external beam radiation/HDR-BT boost to EQD2 >100 Gy (α/ß = 3) was performed in 459 consecutively treated patients. These patients with an FU ≥ 24 months were analyzed and stratified in PSA nadir (nPSA)-groups by PSA nadir within 18 months after radiotherapy (nPSA18). Kaplan-Meier/log-rank tests and Cox-regression models were used to compare the study endpoints. RESULTS: The mean FU was 77 months. A PSA nadir within 18 months (nPSA18) <0.5 ng/mL was achieved in 222 patients with median time to reach nPSA18 of 7 months. The 5-year American Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) biochemical control (prostate-specific antigen disease-free survival) for the nPSA18 group <0.5 ng/mL was 89% and for the group ≥ 0.5 ng/mL, it was 78.6% (p = 0.011). nPSA18 was an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and biochemical control (ASTRO) (p = 0.026, p = 0.020, and p = 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The present results suggest that the PSA nadir level within 18 months after radiotherapy may serve as an early parameter for long-term biochemical control according to ASTRO definitions following radical dose escalation by HDR-BT for prostate cancer. Excellent outcomes were associated with nPSA18 < 0.5 ng/mL.

Introduction of inverse dose optimization for ultrasound-based high-dose-rate boost brachytherapy: how we do it in Kiel.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the introduction of inverse planning optimization for a two clinical target volume (CTV) concept in the online planning technique of temporary high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Dose-volume constraints were defined delivering a prescription dose of 8.5Gy for CTV1 (whole prostate) and 15Gy for CTV2 (peripheral zone). A total of 38 implants of 20 patients were inversely planned using the constraints and dose indices (D90 CTV1,2; V200 CTV1,2; D2 cc rectum; D0.1 cc urethra; dose nonhomogeneity ratio; and conformal index) compared against those derived from conventional planning (CP). RESULTS: The inversely planned (IP) treatment plans showed similar target volume coverage than by CP. The value of D90 CTV1 for CP was 5.62Gy and 5.63Gy for IPs. For CTV2, the D90 was also similar between both methods: 11.03Gy and 10.89Gy, respectively. Only V200 CTV2 was found to be significantly lower for CP than for IP: 5.76% vs. 8.14% (p<0.01). Values for D0.1 cc urethra were found to be: 9.57Gy and 9.02Gy, respectively. Rectal dosimetry: D2 cc Rectum was quite stable with 6.04Gy and 6.12Gy for CP and IP, respectively. The conformal index and dose nonhomogeneity ratio values for CTV1 and CTV2 for both planning types were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: After defining an objective second target volume CTV2 and introducing adequate IP constraints to the treatment planning system, clinically applicable treatment plans could be created by an IP approach. They feature user independency, time saving, and good preservation of the OARs.

The 15-year outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy for radical dose escalation in patients with prostate cancer - a benchmark for high-tech external beam radiotherapy alone?

PURPOSE: Dose escalation using high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) is an established treatment method for prostate cancer. First, long-term results were previously published (specific Kiel method). This study aims to evaluate 10-/15-year outcomes of Kiel Protocol 1 (1986-1992). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Conformal external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) was delivered to the pelvis (50 Gy per conventional fractionation) along with an HDR boost to the prostate amounting to a combined biologic equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction of 117.25 Gy (α/ß = 3). The HDR-BT was performed in two fractions of 15 Gy to the peripheral zone of McNeal. The EBRT-clinical target volume covered the full pelvis. The analyzed cohort totaled 122 patients. The reported end points were overall/cancer-specific survival, local recurrence/distant metastasis rates, and biochemical (BC) control rates according to American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology/Phoenix definitions. All end points were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test in univariate analyses. RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 116.8 months. The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 81%, 62.1%, and 45% for overall survival; 92.1%, 83.1%, and 75.3% for cancer-specific survival; 92.5%, 91.4%, and 83.9% for local recurrence-free survival; and 83.8%, 81.2%, and 69.8% for distant metastasis-free survival, respectively. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-defined BC tumor control rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 81.1%, 74%, and 67.8%, respectively. According to Phoenix, the BC control rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were 77.8%, 69%, and 63.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term results for the combination of HDR-BT and EBRT continue to show excellent results, providing high equivalent dose in 2 Gy per fraction and high disease control rates. These outcomes were reproducible for the extended follow-up period ranging up to 21.9 years.