Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Radiol ; 97(1158): 1132-1138, 2024 May 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627253

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Prostate multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) with subsequent targeted biopsy of suspicious lesions has a critical role in the diagnostic workup of prostate cancer. The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of systematic biopsies, targeted biopsies, and the combination of both in prostate cancer detection. METHODS: From January 1, 2013 to June 1, 2022, biopsy-naïve and prior biopsy-negative patients who underwent both systematic and targeted biopsies were included. MRIs were evaluated according to PI-RADS with biopsy threshold set at PI-RADS ≥3. Systematic biopsies consisted of 8-12 cores, based on prostate volume. Overall prostate cancer and clinically significant cancer (Gleason Score ≥3 + 4) detection rates were stratified based on PI-RADS and location within the prostate, and compared between biopsy types using McNemar test. RESULTS: Among 867 patients, 615 had prostate cancer, with 434 clinically significant cases. Overall detection rates were: PI-RADS 3 48%, PI-RADS 4 72%, and PI-RADS 5 90%. Detection rates for clinically significant cancer were 21%, 53%, and 72%, respectively. The combination of biopsy methods was most accurate in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (P < .001). Targeted biopsies alone detected more clinically significant prostate cancer than systematic biopsies alone (43.1% vs 40.3%, P = .046). For posterior PI-RADS 5 lesions, no statistically significant difference was found between all biopsy methods. CONCLUSIONS: In the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, the combination of systematic and targeted biopsies proves most effective. Targeted biopsies rarely missed significant cancer for posterior PI-RADS 5 lesions, suggesting systematic biopsies could be reserved for instances where targeted biopsy results are negative. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study emphasizes on the efficacy of mpMRI and targeted biopsies in suspected prostate cancer in real-world clinical context. For PI-RADS 5 lesions, systematic biopsies provide limited clinical benefit and may only be necessary when targeted biopsy results are negative.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Próstata , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/métodos , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Próstata/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Imágenes de Resonancia Magnética Multiparamétrica/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Imagen Multimodal/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética Intervencional/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA