RESUMEN
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) share many histopathological features; therefore, markers for differentiation are of diagnostic interest and may add to the understanding of the underlying mechanisms. The nitrergic system is upregulated in GERD and probably also in EoE. Esophageal biopsies of patients with EoE (n = 20), GERD (n = 20), and healthy volunteers (HVs) (n = 15) were exposed to antibodies against inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), nitrotyrosine, eosinophilic peroxidase, eotaxin-3, and galectin-3. The stained object glasses were randomized, digitized, and blindly analyzed regarding the expression of DAB (3,3'-diaminobenzidine) by a protocol developed in QuPath software. A statistically significant overexpression of iNOS was observed in patients with any of the two inflammatory diseases compared with that in HVs. Eotaxin-3 could differentiate HVs versus inflammatory states. Gastroesophageal reflux patients displayed the highest levels of nitrotyrosine. Neither iNOS nor nitrotyrosine alone were able to differentiate between the two diseases. For that purpose, eosinophil peroxidase was a better candidate, as the mean levels increased stepwise from HVs via GERD to EoE. iNOS and nitrotyrosine are significantly overexpressed in patients with EoE and GERD compared with healthy controls, but only eosinophil peroxidase could differentiate the two types of esophagitis. The implications of the finding of the highest levels of nitrotyrosine among gastroesophageal reflux patients are discussed.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is associated with generalised airway inflammation. Few studies have addressed the relationship between CRS and chronic bronchitis (CB). METHODS: This prospective study over a five-year period aims to investigate the risk of developing CB in subjects reporting CRS at the beginning of the study. A random sample of 7393 adult subjects from Telemark County, Norway, answered a comprehensive respiratory questionnaire in 2013 and then 5 years later in 2018. Subjects reporting CB in 2013 were excluded from the analyses. New cases of CB in 2018 were analysed in relation to having CRS in 2013 or not. RESULTS: The prevalence of new-onset CB in 2018 in the group that reported CRS in 2013 was 11.8%. There was a significant increase in the odds of having CB in 2018 in subjects who reported CRS in 2013 (OR 3.8, 95% CI 2.65-5.40), adjusted for age, sex, BMI, smoking and asthma. CONCLUSION: In this large population sample, CRS was associated with increased odds of developing CB during a five-year follow-up. Physicians should be aware of chronic bronchitis in patients with CRS.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Bronquitis Crónica , Rinitis , Sinusitis , Adulto , Humanos , Bronquitis Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sinusitis/complicaciones , Sinusitis/epidemiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Asma/complicaciones , Asma/epidemiología , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinitis/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Topical corticosteroids are considered a cornerstone in the treatment of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of using mometasone furoate spray versus placebo on dysphagia and health-related quality of life in these patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Consecutive, newly diagnosed adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis were randomized and treated with either 200 micrograms of orally administered topical mometasone furoate or placebo 4 times daily for 8 weeks. Symptoms and quality of life were evaluated using questionnaires including the Watson Dysphagia Scale, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life-Oesophageal Module 18 and the Short Form-36 before and after treatment. RESULTS: In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 36) the Watson Dysphagia Scale score after mometasone treatment was reduced by 6.5 (median, p < .01) compared with 0 (median, ns) in the placebo group. The benefit of mometasone over placebo was significant (p < .05). In the per-protocol analysis (n = 33) the Watson Dysphagia Scale score was reduced by 5 (median, p = .01) after mometasone treatment compared with 0 (median, ns) in the placebo group. The advantage of mometasone over the placebo was significant (p < .05). The benefit of using mometasoneas evaluated by the two quality of life questionnaires was, however, insignificant. CONCLUSIONS: Our finding suggests that in adult patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, topical mometasone furoate exerts a beneficial effect compared with placebo regarding the main symptom, i.e., dysphagia. A corresponding benefit could not be verified regarding the various quality of life measurements. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Mometasone-furoate for Treatment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis - a Randomized Placebo Controlled Study ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT02113267).
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Pregnadienodioles , Adulto , Trastornos de Deglución/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Furoato de Mometasona , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition with eosinophilic infiltration of the esophageal mucosa. The most prominent symptom is dysphagia, which may result in esophageal bolus impaction in need of surgical extraction. To investigate whether an earlier reported seasonal variation in esophageal bolus impaction present only in a subgroup of patients with EoE and atopic disorders could be confirmed in this larger study. A single center retrospective chart review of patients who were diagnosed with esophageal bolus impaction between January 2004 and December 2017 was performed. Clinical, epidemiological and histologic data were collected. A total of 755 cases with esophageal bolus impaction were reviewed. A significantly higher occurrence of soft bolus impaction in summer and fall was shown in cases with confirmed EoE and in cases with atopy but not in the nonatopic group or in the group with a negative biopsy result. EoE was found in 48% of biopsied patients. A significant seasonal variation in cases with esophageal bolus impaction and concomitant atopy and EoE is confirmed, but the study design does not allow a causative role of allergens to be established.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución , Esofagitis Eosinofílica , Estaciones del Año , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/epidemiología , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad Inmediata , Incidencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with several co-morbidities and non-infectious rhinitis (NIR) has emerged as a new possible co-morbidity. The primary aim of this study is to confirm a previously reported association between NIR and COPD in a multicentre population over time. The secondary aim is to investigate the course over time of such an association through a comparison between early- and late-onset COPD. METHODS: This study is part of the European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS). A random adult population from 25 centres in Europe and one in Australia was examined with spirometry and answered a respiratory questionnaire in 1998-2002 (ECRHS II) and in 2008-2013 (ECRHS III). Symptoms of non-infectious rhinitis, hay fever and asthma, and smoking habits were reported. Subjects reporting asthma were excluded. COPD was defined as a spirometry ratio of FEV1/FVC < 0.7. A total of 5901 subjects were included. RESULTS: Non-infectious rhinitis was significantly more prevalent in subjects with COPD compared with no COPD (48.9% vs 37.1%, p < 0.001) in ECRHS II (mean age 43) but not in ECHRS III (mean age 54). In the multivariable regression model adjusted for COPD, smoking, age, BMI, and gender, non-infectious rhinitis was associated with COPD in both ECRHS II and III. CONCLUSION: Non-infectious rhinitis was significantly more common in subjects with COPD at a mean age of 43. Ten years later, the association was weaker. The findings indicate that NIR could be associated with the early onset of COPD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Rinitis , Adulto , Australia/epidemiología , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Unión Europea , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/epidemiología , EspirometríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The healthy human esophagus is colonized by bacteria similar to that of the oral mucosa. However, little is known about the microbiome of the esophagus in esophagitis or the possible role of bacteria in the inflammatory response. AIM: To survey bacterial diversity and compare the microbiome of the esophagus in subjects with gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seventeen subjects diagnosed with GERD and 10 with EoE underwent endoscopic examination with brush sampling and biopsies from the oral cavity, upper and lower esophagus. The samples were cultivated on agar plates, and bacterial growth was identified to the genus or species level and semi-quantified. RESULTS: Significantly higher numbers of bacterial groups or species were found in specimens from the lower esophagus in subjects with EoE compared to subjects with GERD (median 4 (range 1-7) vs. 2 (range 0-6), p < .0014). Sixteen vs. 14 different bacterial groups or species were found in subjects with GERD and EoE, respectively, mostly in sparse or very sparse amounts. Alfa-streptococci (viridans streptococci) were the most common bacteria in both groups. Streptococci were present in all of the EoE-subjects but only in approximately 75% in lower esophagus of the GERD-subjects, regardless of the sampling method. CONCLUSION: Subjects with GERD had significantly less bacterial diversity in both oral and esophageal samples than EoE-subjects. Whether this discrepancy might be explained by an effect on the protective mucosal biofilm by the acidic content of the reflux in subjects with GERD remains unclear.
Asunto(s)
Bacterias/clasificación , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/microbiología , Esófago/microbiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/microbiología , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Adulto , Anciano , Bacterias/crecimiento & desarrollo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Membrana Mucosa/patología , Suecia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic immune/antigen-mediated disease, with dysphagia as the main symptom. The aim of this study was to survey symptoms and health-related quality of life in adult patients with EoE at least 1 year after diagnosis and a 2-month course of topical corticosteroids. Forty-seven consecutive patients [79 % males, mean age 49 years (range 18-90 years)] were evaluated using three different questionnaires at three different occasions: the Watson Dysphagia Scale (WDS), the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Oesophageal Module 18 (EORTC QLQ-OES18) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36). The median time from diagnosis to the long-term follow-up was 23 months (range 12-34 months). The WDS scores and the EORTC QLQ-OES18 Dysphagia and Eating scale scores were improved after 2 months of treatment (p = 0.00007, p = 0.01, p = 0.004, respectively), as were the long-term follow-up scores (p = 0.01, p = 0.03, p = 0.005, respectively), relative to the scores at diagnosis. In addition, the EORTC QLQ-OES18 Choking scores were improved after the steroid course (p = 0.003) but not after the long-term follow-up. No significant differences were detected with respect to the SF-36 scores. In summary, EoE seems to be associated with a substantial burden of symptoms that improve significantly after treatment. A partial remission persists more than 1 year after diagnosis and the discontinuation of medication. The WDS and the EORTC QLQ-OES18 appear to be sensitive instruments appropriate for surveillance in these patients.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/complicaciones , Esofagitis Eosinofílica/psicología , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Trastornos de Deglución/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer (HNC) patients have a high risk of developing malnutrition. This randomized study aimed to compare the effect of weekly cisplatin or cetuximab combined with radiotherapy on weight loss at 3 months after treatment was started. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of malnutrition using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, feeding tube dependence and health related quality of life from a nutritional perspective. METHODS: Patients from the ARTSCAN III study with advanced HNC were assessed for weight, body composition, enteral tube dependence and selected quality-of-life scores (EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35) at diagnosis and 6 weeks 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation. RESULTS: Of the 80 patients, 38 and 42 were randomized to receive cetuximab and cisplatin treatment, respectively. There was no significant difference in weight loss at 3 months between the two study groups. However, the cetuximab group had significantly less weight loss, fewer enteral feeding tubes and better physical functioning at the end of treatment but more pain-related problems 3 months after treatment initiation. No differences between the groups were found at 6 and 12 months. The prevalence of malnutrition was not significantly different at any time point. CONCLUSION: The hypothesized benefit of concomitant treatment with cetuximab over cisplatin regarding the prevalence of malnutrition was not supported by this study.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Desnutrición , Humanos , Cetuximab/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Desnutrición/epidemiología , Desnutrición/etiología , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Fatigue due to cancer is a challenging symptom that might be long-lasting after cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to follow the development of fatigue among head and neck cancer (HNC) patients prospectively and longitudinally and to analyze predictors for acute and chronic fatigue. METHODS: HNC patients treated with curative intent were included at diagnosis and completed the following questionnaires multiple times, up to 5 years after treatment: the EORTC QLQ-FA12 for fatigue, EORTC QLQ-C30, and HNC-specific EORTC QLQ-H&N35 together with an anxiety and depression questionnaire. Predictors of fatigue were evaluated at 3 months and 5 years after treatment. RESULTS: Of the 311 study participants, 74% responded at the 5-year follow-up. Physical fatigue was significantly worse 3 months after treatment, while emotional and cognitive fatigue were the worst at diagnosis and at 3 months. All fatigue domains were significantly better after 1 year, and the fatigue scores remained stable from 1 until 5 years after treatment. Three months after chemoradiotherapy, physical fatigue was more significant, but no long-term differences due to treatment modalities were found. Depression and anxiety were predictors for chronic emotional fatigue, and local HN pain and swallowing problems were predictors for chronic physical fatigue. Better global quality of life at diagnosis was associated with less physical and emotional fatigue. CONCLUSION: Fatigue was worst in the short term for HNC patients and improved after 1 year, and long-term fatigue remained stable up to 5 years after treatment. A few predictors for chronic fatigue were found. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2211-2221, 2023.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Síndrome de Fatiga Crónica , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Humanos , Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Sobrevivientes , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to validate the Swedish version of the dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, the M. D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI). Patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia due to neurologic disease (n = 30) and head and neck (H&N) cancer patients with post-treatment subjective dysphagia (n = 85) were compared to an age- and gender-matched nondysphagic control group (n = 115). A formal forward-backward translation was performed and followed international guidelines. Validity and reliability were tested against the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Internal-consistency reliability was calculated by means of Cronbach's α coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intraclass correlation (ICC). Convergent and discriminant validity were assessed by correlations between MDADI, SF-36, and HADS. Known-group validity was examined and statistically tested. Of 126 eligible patients, 115 agreed to participate (response rate = 91.3%). The age of the participants ranged between 37 and 92 years. Most of the MDADI items showed good variability and only minor floor or ceiling effects in solitary items were found. The internal-consistency reliability (Cronbach's α) of the MDADI total score was 0.88 (after correction for systematic errors in the subjects' responses to two reversed questions). All estimates reached over the satisfactory >0.70 reliability standard for group-level comparison. ICC ranged between 0.83 and 0.97 in the test-retest. The mean MDADI total score was 66.9 (SD = 14.7) for the H&N cancer patients, 65.0 (16.9) for the neurologic patients, and 97.5 (4.4) for the control group (P < 0.001; study patients vs. controls). The MDADI was also sensitive to disease severity as measured by different food textures. The Swedish version of the MDADI showed good psychometric properties and is a valid instrument to assess dysphagia-related quality of life. It was also shown to be a reliable instrument after correction for systematic errors in the subjects' responses to two reversed questions. Its known-group validity enables the differentiation between dysphagic and nondysphagic patients for group-level research.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/psicología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/complicaciones , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/psicología , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the effect of age on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC), treated with curative intent, in the Western healthcare region of Sweden. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 311 HNC patients completed quality of life questionnaires for cancer (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-H&N35) and for older patients with cancer (EORT QLQ-ELD14) at diagnosis and 3, 6, and 12 months after start of treatment. Mean scores for patients ≥70 years old were compared to younger patients (50 to 69 years old) to assess differences in HRQOL. RESULTS: Of the 311 study participants, 105 patients were ≥70 years old (median age 76.7), of which 32 were ≥80 years of age. Most HRQOL scores were equal or better for older adult patients at 3 months after treatment, but physical function was better for younger adult patients up to 12 months after treatment. At 6 months the HRQOL was similar (older patients had less appetite loss and financial difficulties), while the oldest patients (≥80 years) had worse fatigue, role function, and feeling ill at 12 months. For the EORTC-ELD-14 questionnaire, older patients scored better for worries at diagnosis and reported more difficulties in maintaining purpose at 12 months after treatment. CONCLUSION: When curative treatment is administered, older adult patients with HNC have similar or even better HRQOL compared to younger adult patients, except for physical function, during the first year.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Calidad de Vida , Anciano , Fatiga , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare levels of postoperative pain after traditional (cold steel with bipolar cautery) and Coblation tonsillectomies. METHODS: Patients with recurrent or chronic tonsillitis, including tonsillar hyperplasia, were randomized to undergo tonsillectomies using either a traditional cutting technique or the Coblation technique. Patients and staff on the relevant wards were blinded regarding patient allocation. Pain, odynophagia, and activity limitations were recorded on a visual analog scale. Analgesics were self-administered, and daily analgesic consumption by patients was reported. All complications were also registered. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (between 6 and 57 years of age) completed the study. No significant difference was found between the two techniques with regard to reported pain, odynophagia, activity limitations, or use of analgesics. A slight tendency toward decreased pain and decreased use of analgesics in the Coblation group reached statistical significance only when the adult patients were analyzed separately. Two cases of hospital readmission occurred because of postoperative bleeding following Coblation tonsillectomies. CONCLUSIONS: Overall,the two methods are equivalent in terms of postoperative pain,including the use of analgesics. The risk of postoperative bleeding after the Coblation method requires further evaluation with specifically designed studies.
Asunto(s)
Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Tonsilectomía/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dysphagia is common in head and neck cancer. A percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube is used to facilitate nutrition; however, some retrospective studies have indicated that the PEG tube causes dysphagia. METHODS: A randomized study of patients with head and neck cancer was conducted with up to 10 years of follow-up. Patients were randomized to either the prophylactic PEG tube group (study group) or the common clinical nutritional support group (control group). At each follow-up, a dietician assessed the oral intake, noted the patients' weight, and if the patients used a PEG tube. Dysphagia was also assessed by the quality of life questionnaire, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 Head and Neck 35-questions (EORTC-QLQ-H&N35). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four patients were included in this study. There was no significant difference in swallowing function between the groups after 12 months, 24 months, and 8 years based on the EORTC-QLQ-H&N35, the oral intake scale, tube dependence, esophageal intervention, weight, body mass index (BMI), and overall survival. CONCLUSION: A prophylactic PEG tube can be used without an increased risk of long-term dysphagia in patients with head and neck cancer. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 39: 908-915, 2017.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/prevención & control , Endoscopía , Gastrostomía , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apoyo Nutricional , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer of unknown primary (HNCUP) is rare and prospective studies are lacking. The impact of different prognostic factors such as age and N stage is not completely known, the optimal treatment is not yet established, and the reported survival rates vary. In the last decade, human papilloma virus (HPV) has been identified as a common cause of and important prognostic factor in oropharyngeal cancer, and there is now growing interest in the importance of HPV for HNCUP. The aim of the present study on curatively treated HNCUP was to investigate the prognostic importance of different factors, including HPV status, treatment, and overall survival. METHODS: A search for HNCUP was performed in the Swedish Cancer Registry, Western health district, between the years 1992-2009. The medical records were reviewed, and only patients with squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma treated with curative intent were included. The tumor specimens were retrospectively analyzed for HPV with p16 immunostaining. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included. The mean age was 59 years. The majority were males, and had N2 tumors. Sixty-nine percent of the tumors were HPV positive using p16 staining. Patients who were older than 70 years, patients with N3-stage tumors, and patients with tumors that were p16 negative had a significantly worse prognosis. The overall 5-year survival rate for patients with p16-positive tumors was 88% vs 61% for p16-negative tumors. Treatment with neck dissection and postoperative radiation or (chemo) radiation had 81 and 88% 5-year survival rates, respectively. The overall and disease-free 5-year survival rates for all patients in the study were 82 and 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Curatively treated HNCUP had good survival. HPV infection was common. Independent prognostic factors for survival were age over 70 years, HPV status and N3 stage. We recommend that HPV analysis should be performed routinely for HNCUP. Treatment with neck dissection and postoperative radiation or (chemo) radiation showed similar survival rates.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma/mortalidad , Carcinoma/secundario , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/mortalidad , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/secundario , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/diagnóstico , Anciano , Carcinoma/virología , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/virología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , SueciaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to prospectively and longitudinally compare the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes between head and neck (HN) cancer patients treated with parotid-sparing intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and patients treated with 3-dimensional conventional radiation therapy (3D-CRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Before and up to 12 months after treatment, HRQOL was recorded in patients with HN cancer who were referred to the Department of Oncology at Sahlgrenska University Hospital for curative IMRT. The study group's HRQOL was compared with a matched group of patients from previous descriptive HRQOL studies treated with 3D-CRT. Both groups' HRQOL was measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer QLQ-C30 and European Organization for Research and Treatment for Cancer QLQ-HN35 at 6 time points in the first year after diagnosis. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven patients were included, 111 treated with IMRT and 96 matched controls treated with 3D-CRT. Both groups' HRQOL deteriorated during and after treatment. Just after treatment, worse HRQOL scores were observed in the IMRT group regarding insomnia (38 vs 27; P = .032), appetite loss (64 vs 50; P = .019), senses (54 vs 41; P = .017), and coughing (39 vs 26, P = .009). At 12 months, however, significantly better HRQOL scores were observed in the IMRT group regarding problems with dry mouth (72 vs 62; P = .018), pain (28 vs 20; P = .018), sexuality (37 vs 23; P = .016), social contacts (10 vs 6; P = .026), cognitive functioning (79 vs 87; P = .0057), and financial difficulties (12 vs 20; P = .0019). CONCLUSIONS: This study further supports the hypothesis that the introduction of IMRT has improved the long-term quality of life of HN cancer patients who have been treated with radiation therapy, but might cause more acute side effects. Longer follow-up is needed to study late complications.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is one of the most prevalent esophageal diseases and the leading cause of dysphagia and food impaction in children and young adults. This underlines the importance of optimizing diagnosys and treatment of the condition, especially after the increasing amount of knowledge on EoE recently published. Therefore, the UEG, EAACI ESPGHAN, and EUREOS deemed it necessary to update the current guidelines regarding conceptual and epidemiological aspects, diagnosis, and treatment of EoE. METHODS: General methodology according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used in order to comply with current standards of evidence assessment in formulation of recommendations. An extensive literature search was conducted up to August 2015 and periodically updated. The working group consisted of gastroenterologists, allergists, pediatricians, otolaryngologists, pathologists, and epidemiologists. Systematic evidence-based reviews were performed based upon relevant clinical questions with respect to patient-important outcomes. RESULTS: The guidelines include updated concept of EoE, evaluated information on disease epidemiology, risk factors, associated conditions, and natural history of EoE in children and adults. Diagnostic conditions and criteria, the yield of diagnostic and disease monitoring procedures, and evidence-based statements and recommendation on the utility of the several treatment options for patients EoE are provided. Recommendations on how to choose and implement treatment and long-term management are provided based on expert opinion and best clinical practice. CONCLUSION: Evidence-based recommendations for EoE diagnosis, treatment modalities, and patients' follow up are proposed in the guideline.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this population-based study was to investigate the risk of developing noninfectious rhinitis (NIR) in subjects with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a longitudinal population-based study comprising 3,612 randomly selected subjects from Gothenburg, Sweden, aged 25-75 years. Lung function was measured at baseline with spirometry and the included subjects answered a questionnaire on respiratory symptoms. At follow-up, the subjects answered a questionnaire with a response rate of 87%. NIR was defined as symptoms of nasal obstruction, nasal secretion, and/or sneezing attacks without having a cold, during the last 5 years. COPD was defined as a spirometry ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second divided by forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) <0.7. Subjects who reported asthma and NIR at baseline were excluded from the study. The odds ratios for developing NIR (ie, new-onset NIR) in relation to age, gender, body mass index, COPD, smoking, and atopy were calculated. RESULTS: In subjects with COPD, the 5-year incidence of NIR was significantly increased (10.8% vs 7.4%, P=0.005) and was higher among subjects aged >40 years. Smoking, atopy, and occupational exposure to gas, fumes, or dust were also associated with new-onset NIR. COPD, smoking, and atopy remained individual risk factors for new-onset NIR in the logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal population-based study of a large cohort showed that COPD is a risk factor for developing NIR. Smoking and atopy are also risk factors for NIR. The results indicate that there is a link present between upper and lower respiratory inflammation in NIR and COPD.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Rinitis/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Incidencia , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Longitudinales , Pulmón/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Rinitis/diagnóstico , Rinitis/fisiopatología , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Espirometría , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Suecia/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Capacidad VitalAsunto(s)
Gastritis/microbiología , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/microbiología , Infecciones por Helicobacter/microbiología , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica/microbiología , Adenocarcinoma/etiología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Esófago de Barrett/etiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Mucosa Gástrica/microbiología , Gastritis/complicaciones , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/complicaciones , Infecciones por Helicobacter/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/patología , Helicobacter pylori/aislamiento & purificación , Humanos , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Erosión de los Dientes/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Gastroesophageal reflux disease has in recent years been linked to a variety of extraesophageal conditions including laryngeal cancer. However, whether a causal relationship exists is still under debate. The present study aimed to compare the occurrence and severity of gastroesophago-hypopharyngeal reflux in patients with laryngeal cancer with those of healthy volunteers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, controlled study. METHODS Forty-one consecutive patients with newly diagnosed laryngeal cancer were examined by esophageal manometry and an ambulatory, 24-hour, double-probe pH monitoring. Their results were compared with those of 40 healthy volunteers. RESULTS: Hypopharyngeal acid exposure was registered mainly in the upright body position. A pathological acid exposure, as compared with the upper levels of normality among the healthy volunteers, was found in the hypopharynx in six (16%) patients with laryngeal cancer and in the distal esophagus in 10 (25%) patients. Pathological acid exposure in either location was found in 15 (37%) patients and in both locations in 1 (3%) patient. However, the mean acid exposure time and the mean value of the number of reflux events did not differ significantly between cancer patients and control subjects at either location. The exclusion of meal periods from the analysis did not alter these observations. Nonsmoking cancer patients (n = 5) and nonsmoking control subjects (n = 36) had similar acid exposure both in the hypopharynx and in the distal esophagus. CONCLUSION: The present results do not support gastroesophago-hypopharyngeal reflux as being an independent risk factor for laryngeal cancer.