RESUMEN
Figures 2 and 3 in the published version of this article contained a mistake. CCP and DCP should have been FEG and NFEG. Correct figures are presented here.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of foraminal enlargement on the healing of induced apical periodontitis in a rat model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Periapical lesions were bilaterally induced in mandibular first molars of 24 Wistar rats, through root canals exposure to the oral environment during 3 weeks. Endodontic treatment was performed in the mesial canal of right molars, which were separated into two experimental groups (n = 12/group). The foraminal enlargement group (FEG) received instrumentation in the entire root canal length, including the cemental canal, while in the non-foraminal enlargement group (NFEG), instrumentation was carried out 1 mm short of the apical foramen. Root canals were filled with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer, in the same visit, 1 mm short of the apical foramen in both experimental groups. Left molars were not treated and served as a baseline control group. The animals were killed after 4 weeks, and their hemi-mandibles were prepared for radiographic and histological analysis. Data were analyzed by Student's t test and ANOVA. RESULTS: Only FEG presented lower areas of periapical radiolucency compared to the control (p < .05). Both FEG and NFEG allowed decreased inflammation intensity (p < .0001 and p < .01) and higher scores of cementum neoformation when compared to non-treated samples (p < .0001). FEG was more effective than NFEG in promoting biological seal, i.e., apical closure with cementum (p < .01). FEG, but not NFEG, showed lower scores of root resorption than the control. CONCLUSIONS: Foraminal enlargement during root canal preparation improved periapical healing in rat molars. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Foraminal enlargement has been suggested to improve disinfection at the apical portion of root canals. This procedure may favor the healing of chronic periapical lesions.
Asunto(s)
Diente Molar/patología , Periodontitis Periapical/terapia , Materiales de Obturación del Conducto Radicular , Preparación del Conducto Radicular , Ápice del Diente/patología , Animales , Desinfección , Resinas Epoxi , Gutapercha , Ratas , Ratas WistarRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate if the apical third enlargement of root canal is the determinant factor for the repair of periapical lesions in endodontic treatment. METHODS: Eighty upper and lower incisors, canines and premolars with periapical lesions were randomly divided in 2 groups and were treated by undergraduate students. Canals were instrumented with up to 3 files in group I (n = 40) and up to 4 files in group II (n = 40) 1 mm short of the apex and were filled with a calcium hydroxide dressing. After removing calcium hydroxide 14 days later, both groups were filled using the lateral condensation technique. In the 2-year follow-up, a few patients did not return, and some cases did not present conditions for accurate comparisons. Therefore, only 43 patients (24 in group I and 19 in group II) presented conditions for radiographic comparisons. Data were statistically analyzed using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Comparison of the initial and follow-up radiographs showed that 22 out of 24 (91.67%) patients in group I and 17 out of 19 patients (89.47%) in group II showed repair. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences between the groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that the apical third enlargement did not alter the outcome of endodontic treatment of teeth with periapical lesion performed by undergraduate students.