Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol ; 64(Pt 12): 4120-4128, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25242540

RESUMEN

Two Gram-negative, non-motile, non-spore-forming coccoid bacteria (strains F8/08-60(T) and F8/08-61) isolated from clinical specimens obtained from baboons (Papio spp.) that had delivered stillborn offspring were subjected to a polyphasic taxonomic study. On the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities, both strains, which possessed identical sequences, were assigned to the genus Brucella. This placement was confirmed by extended multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA), where both strains possessed identical sequences, and whole-genome sequencing of a representative isolate. All of the above analyses suggested that the two strains represent a novel lineage within the genus Brucella. The strains also possessed a unique profile when subjected to the phenotyping approach classically used to separate species of the genus Brucella, reacting only with Brucella A monospecific antiserum, being sensitive to the dyes thionin and fuchsin, being lysed by bacteriophage Wb, Bk2 and Fi phage at routine test dilution (RTD) but only partially sensitive to bacteriophage Tb, and with no requirement for CO2 and no production of H2S but strong urease activity. Biochemical profiling revealed a pattern of enzyme activity and metabolic capabilities distinct from existing species of the genus Brucella. Molecular analysis of the omp2 locus genes showed that both strains had a novel combination of two highly similar omp2b gene copies. The two strains shared a unique fingerprint profile of the multiple-copy Brucella-specific element IS711. Like MLSA, a multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) showed that the isolates clustered together very closely, but represent a distinct group within the genus Brucella. Isolates F8/08-60(T) and F8/08-61 could be distinguished clearly from all known species of the genus Brucella and their biovars by both phenotypic and molecular properties. Therefore, by applying the species concept for the genus Brucella suggested by the ICSP Subcommittee on the Taxonomy of Brucella, they represent a novel species within the genus Brucella, for which the name Brucella papionis sp. nov. is proposed, with the type strain F8/08-60(T) ( = NCTC 13660(T) = CIRMBP 0958(T)).


Asunto(s)
Brucella/clasificación , Papio/microbiología , Filogenia , Animales , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Brucella/genética , Brucella/aislamiento & purificación , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Femenino , Genes Bacterianos , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Tipificación de Secuencias Multilocus , Hibridación de Ácido Nucleico , ARN Ribosómico 16S/genética , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN
2.
Croat Med J ; 51(4): 314-9, 2010 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20718084

RESUMEN

AIM: To evaluate competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for its suitability as an additional serological test for the diagnosis of animal brucellosis. METHODS: cELISA, which was developed at the Veterinary Laboratories Agency, has been evaluated for its accuracy and suitability as an additional serological test for the diagnosis of animal brucellosis. Samples from naturally and experimentally infected animals and those from Brucella-free flocks and herds were tested. RESULTS: Data obtained since 1991 were analyzed from routine surveillance, animals experimentally infected with Brucella, and stored sera to validate cELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella in cows, small ruminants, and pigs. The sensitivity of the test ranged from 92.31% to 100%, in comparison with 77.14% to 100% for the complement fixation test (CFT). Specificities for cELISA, indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and CFT were greater than 90%. CONCLUSION: cELISA can be used on a variety of animal species, and an added advantage is its suitability for use on poor-quality samples such as those affected by hemolysis.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Brucella/inmunología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Ganado , Animales , Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/biosíntesis , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/inmunología , Antígenos Bacterianos/inmunología , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/inmunología , Bovinos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/normas , Cabras , Humanos , Salud Pública , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ovinos , Porcinos , Zoonosis
3.
J Immunol Methods ; 337(1): 7-15, 2008 Aug 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18579152

RESUMEN

The control and eradication of brucellosis is highly desirable but heavily resource intensive as high throughput serological testing is required. The aim of this study was to meet the needs of high throughput screening laboratories involved in this process through the development of a new assay. An existing cELISA used for the serodiagnosis of brucellosis in ruminants was converted to an AlphaLISA homogenous proximity based assay. This assay requires no separation steps and can be performed in low volume microtitre format. The Brucella AlphaLISA was validated on a panel of bovine, ovine and caprine sera from infected and uninfected animals. The diagnostic sensitivities (>96%) and specificities (>98%) obtained compared well to those from cELISA, iELISA and FPA performed on the same samples. The AlphaLISA met the testing criteria set for ELISAs as defined by the OIEELISA standards and had an analytical sensitivity similar to that of the parent cELISA. The method was also used on a small panel of serum samples from cattle that were experimentally infected with Yersinia enterocolitica O:9. Some false positive reactions were obtained as was also the case with results from FPA, iELISA, cELISA, CFT and SAT. Despite this, the methodological advantages of the AlphaLISA mean that this assay is well suited to high throughput serodiagnosis. This report is the first description of the use of AlphaLISA to detect pathogen specific antibodies. Furthermore, the relative ease with which the cELISA was converted to this platform indicates that this technology is ready to meet the high throughput testing requirements for the diagnosis of many other diseases.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Brucella abortus/inmunología , Brucelosis Bovina/diagnóstico , Brucelosis/diagnóstico , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Cabras/diagnóstico , Pruebas Serológicas/veterinaria , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/diagnóstico , Animales , Especificidad de Anticuerpos , Brucelosis/microbiología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Brucelosis Bovina/microbiología , Bovinos , Reacciones Cruzadas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Enfermedades de las Cabras/microbiología , Cabras , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Ovinos , Enfermedades de las Ovejas/microbiología , Yersinia enterocolitica/inmunología
4.
J Wildl Dis ; 42(2): 290-300, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16870851

RESUMEN

Harbor seals (Phoca vitulina richardsi) were captured in the coastal regions of Southeast Alaska, Gulf of Alaska, Prince William Sound (PWS), and Kodiak Island during 1976-1999. Blood was collected from 286 seals. Sera were tested for evidence of exposure to Brucella spp., phocid herpesvirus-1 (PhoHV-1), phocid herpesvirus-2 (PhHV-2), and phocine distemper virus (PDV). Antibody prevalence rates were 46% (46/100) for Brucella spp., 93% (225/243) for PhoHV-1, 0% (0/286) for PhHV-2, and 1% (2/160) for PDV. Antibody prevalence for Brucella spp. was directly related to host age. Antibody prevalence for PhoHV-1 was higher in PWS as compared to the other three regions. No evidence of mortality attributable to these four agents was observed during the course of this study. Based on the results of this survey, none of these agents is considered a significant mortality factor in harbor seals from the four regions of coastal Alaska included in the study.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antibacterianos/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Virus del Moquillo Focino/inmunología , Phoca/microbiología , Phoca/virología , Factores de Edad , Alaska/epidemiología , Animales , Brucella/inmunología , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Brucelosis/veterinaria , Moquillo/epidemiología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/veterinaria , Herpesviridae/inmunología , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Herpesviridae/veterinaria , Phoca/inmunología , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos
5.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 36(1): 66-8, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20022474

RESUMEN

The prophylactic potential of the azalide azithromycin as well as the fluoroquinolones trovafloxacin and grepafloxacin was assessed for the control of infection with Brucella melitensis in an experimental mouse model, determined by reduction in splenic bacterial burden. Trovafloxacin showed limited protective efficacy when administered 2h following a low-dose B. melitensis challenge, whereas grepafloxacin was ineffective. In comparison, azithromycin provided significant control of infection both following low- and high-dose challenges. Overall, the data confirm the potential utility of azithromycin in the prophylaxis of brucellosis and suggest that neither trovafloxacin nor grepafloxacin would likely be valuable for post-exposure prophylaxis of Brucella infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Brucella melitensis/efectos de los fármacos , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Naftiridinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Brucella melitensis/aislamiento & purificación , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Bazo/microbiología
6.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 34(5): 474-6, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19500948

RESUMEN

The prophylactic potential of ciprofloxacin was assessed in comparison with doxycycline, an established therapeutic antibiotic, to limit or control infection by Brucella melitensis in an experimental mouse model. Ciprofloxacin treatment reduced bacterial loads in the spleens of challenged mice when administered prior to or at the same time as the bacterial challenge. In comparison, doxycycline provided much greater reductions in bacterial counts, even when treatment was initiated after infection. Doxycycline was able to protect against B. melitensis when administered for 5 days from 24 h after infection and for at least 28 days after cessation of the antibiotic. Overall, these results confirm that ciprofloxacin is less effective than doxycycline but suggest that it may have some utility in providing protection against low-level infections. Combination studies are indicated.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Animales , Brucella melitensis/efectos de los fármacos , Brucelosis/microbiología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Femenino , Humanos , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Bazo/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 34(5): 471-3, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19682862

RESUMEN

The prophylactic potential of moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin was assessed in comparison with doxycycline, an established therapeutic antibiotic, to limit or control infection by Brucella melitensis in an experimental mouse model, determined by reduced bacterial burden in the spleen. Although moxifloxacin was found to have a small protective effect when administered 6 h following infection, neither moxifloxacin nor gatifloxacin showed significant efficacy in vivo. In comparison, doxycycline provided significant protection when prophylaxis was started at 6 h, 7 days or 14 days following infection. Overall, these results confirm the utility of doxycycline in the prophylaxis of brucellosis and suggest that neither moxifloxacin nor gatifloxacin are likely to be valuable for post-exposure prophylaxis of Brucella infection.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Compuestos Aza/uso terapéutico , Brucelosis/prevención & control , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Brucella melitensis/efectos de los fármacos , Brucelosis/microbiología , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Doxiciclina/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Gatifloxacina , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Moxifloxacino , Bazo/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Clin Microbiol ; 44(6): 1982-93, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16757588

RESUMEN

Members of the genus Brucella infect many domesticated and wild animals and cause serious zoonotic infection in humans. The availability of discriminatory molecular typing tools to inform and assist conventional epidemiological approaches would be invaluable in controlling these infections, but efforts have been hampered by the genetic homogeneity of the genus. We report here on a molecular subtyping system based on 21 variable-number tandem-repeat (VNTR) loci consisting of 13 previously unreported loci and 8 loci previously reported elsewhere. This approach was applied to a collection of 121 Brucella isolates obtained worldwide and representing all six classically recognized Brucella species. The size of repeats selected for inclusion varied from 5 to 40 bp giving VNTR loci with a range of diversities. The number of alleles detected ranged from 2 to 21, and Simpson's diversity index values ranged from 0.31 to 0.92. This assay divides the 121 isolates into 119 genotypes, and clustering analysis results in groups that, with minor exceptions, correspond to conventional species designations. Reflecting this, the use of six loci in isolation was shown to be sufficient to determine species designation. On the basis of the more variable loci, the assay could also discriminate isolates originating from restricted geographical sources, indicating its potential as an epidemiological tool. Stability studies carried out in vivo and in vitro showed that VNTR profiles were sufficiently stable such that recovered strains could readily be identified as the input strain. The method described here shows great potential for further development and application to both epidemiological tracing of Brucella transmissions and in determining relationships between isolates worldwide.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Brucella/clasificación , Marcadores Genéticos , Repeticiones de Minisatélite , Animales , Animales Domésticos/microbiología , Animales Salvajes/microbiología , Brucella/genética , Brucella/aislamiento & purificación , Brucelosis/epidemiología , Brucelosis/microbiología , Bovinos , Perros , Variación Genética , Humanos , Datos de Secuencia Molecular , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Especificidad de la Especie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA