RESUMEN
Sudden cardiac death from ventricular arrhythmia kills about 350,000 people annually in the United States. This number has not improved since the widespread public availability of semi-automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and the teaching of nonbreathing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) procedures. When an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurs in a public space, lay witnesses do CPR in 40% of the cases and use AEDs on only 7.4% of the victims before emergency medical services (EMS) arrive. About 70% of sudden cardiac death occurs at home, where an AED is usually unavailable until EMS appears. The time from a 911 call to shock averages approximately 7 minutes in urban areas and is more than 14.5 minutes in rural environments. Because arrest onset is often not observed, arrest onset to shock times maybe even longer. Survival from cardiac arrest decreases by approximately 7 to 10% per minute of ventricular arrhythmia. A prearrest protocol is proposed for the at-home use of fully automated external defibrillators in select cardiac patients, which should reduce the arrest-to-shock interval to under 1 minute and may eliminate the need for CPR in some cases.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Arritmias CardíacasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the introduction of transcatheter aortic-valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States, requirements regarding procedural volume were mandated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as a condition of reimbursement. A better understanding of the relationship between hospital volume of TAVR procedures and patient outcomes could inform policy decisions. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry regarding procedural volumes and outcomes from 2015 through 2017. The primary analyses examined the association between hospital procedural volume as a continuous variable and risk-adjusted mortality at 30 days after transfemoral TAVR. Secondary analysis included risk-adjusted mortality according to quartile of hospital procedural volume. A sensitivity analysis was performed after exclusion of the first 12 months of transfemoral TAVR procedures at each hospital. RESULTS: Of 113,662 TAVR procedures performed at 555 hospitals by 2960 operators, 96,256 (84.7%) involved a transfemoral approach. There was a significant inverse association between annualized volume of transfemoral TAVR procedures and mortality. Adjusted 30-day mortality was higher and more variable at hospitals in the lowest-volume quartile (3.19%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.78 to 3.67) than at hospitals in the highest-volume quartile (2.66%; 95% CI, 2.48 to 2.85) (odds ratio, 1.21; P = 0.02). The difference in adjusted mortality between a mean annualized volume of 27 procedures in the lowest-volume quartile and 143 procedures in the highest-volume quartile was a relative reduction of 19.45% (95% CI, 8.63 to 30.26). After the exclusion of the first 12 months of TAVR procedures at each hospital, 30-day mortality remained higher in the lowest-volume quartile than in the highest-volume quartile (3.10% vs. 2.61%; odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.40). CONCLUSIONS: An inverse volume-mortality association was observed for transfemoral TAVR procedures from 2015 through 2017. Mortality at 30 days was higher and more variable at hospitals with a low procedural volume than at hospitals with a high procedural volume. (Funded by the American College of Cardiology Foundation National Cardiovascular Data Registry and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.).
Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Bajo Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/normas , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The optimal duration of oral anticoagulant therapy for patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains highly uncertain in clinical practice. It is essential to accurately assess the effect of anticoagulant therapy in reducing recurrent VTE against the risk of inducing major bleeding. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials were identified by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane library, reporting rates of recurrent VTE and major bleeding in patients taking Vitamin K Antagonists (VKA) with VTE and comparing different durations. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs with 3109 participants utilizing varied durations were included in the meta-analysis. Longer VKA therapy was associated with significantly lower rates of VTE recurrence compared with shorter duration of VKA therapy (OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.99), with significant difference noted in major bleeding risk (OR 2.31, 95%CI 1.17-4.56). During anticoagulation duration, patients treated by 6-month VKA had higher risk of major bleeding compared with 3-month VKA regimen (OR 33.45, 95%CI 2.00-559.67). CONCLUSIONS: Regimen longer than 6 months did not show statistical elevation of major bleeding risk. VKA treatment strongly reduces the risk of recurrent VTE during anticoagulation therapy. The absolute risk of recurrent VTE declines over time while the risk for major bleeding after 6 months' treatment did not demonstrate a continuous significant increase with extended duration of VKA therapy.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina K/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Esquema de Medicación , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Recurrencia , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aim to examine the effect of benchmarking on quality-of-care metrics in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) through the implementation of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ACTION Registry. DESIGN: From January 2005 to December 2017, 712 patients underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention PCI-499 before NCDR ACTION Registry implementation (prior to 2013) and 213 after implementation. SETTING: STEMI. PARTICIPANTS: 712 patients. INTERVENTION(S): Primary PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We examined hospital performance for the quality indicators in processes and outcomes of the management of patients presenting with STEMI. Outcome measures include door-to-balloon time (DBT), antiplatelet therapy and anti-ischemic drugs prescribed at discharge from pre-NCDR ACTION Registry to post-implementation. RESULTS: There was improvement in DBT, decreasing from 94 min in 2012 (before NCDR adoption) to reach a median of 47 min in 2017 (Ptrend < 0.001). The percentage of cases with the optimal DBT of < 90 min increased from 55.8% before to 90.1% after the implementation of the NCDR ACTION Registry (Ptrend < 0.001). The rate of aspirin (90.3-100%, P < 0.001), P2Y12 inhibitor (70.1-78.4%, P = 0.02), beta-blocker (76.8-100%, P < 0.001) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers (60.1-99.5%, P < 0.001) prescribed at discharge increased from pre-NCDR ACTION Registry to post-implementation. Adjusted mortality before and after NCDR ACTION Registry implementation showed significant change (from 9.04 to 5.92%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of the ACC NCDR ACTION Registry led to incremental gains in the quality in STEMI management through the benchmarking of process of care and clinical outcomes, achieving reduced DBT, improving guideline-directed medication adherence and increasing patient safety, treatment efficacy and survival.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking/métodos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/organización & administración , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/cirugía , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina , Brasil , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/mortalidad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are both commonly employed in the treatment of stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD), their ability to reduce subsequent heart attacks and death is currently in question. These procedures will come under increasing scrutiny as the healthcare reimbursement system moves away from the traditional fee for service model in favor of "pay for value". OBSERVATION: Both international and domestic data show wide variability in the use of PCI and CABG in patients with SIHD. There is evidence of ongoing quality improvement over the last 5 years in reducing the use of inappropriate procedures, but there is still room for improvement. We present ideas regarding health policy interventions that might help manage the transition to value-based payments in this area, including improvements in national registries, more rapid revision of appropriate use criteria, shared decision making, and evidence-based management of PCI in SIHD. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The use of revascularization procedures in patients with SIHD is potentially a model for how care might be improved with health care policy intervention. We suggest that the status quo, although apparently improved over the last 5 years, is still unacceptable when 25% of hospitals have a rate of unnecessary PCI in patients with SIHD that approaches 25%.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Política de Salud , Isquemia Miocárdica/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Seguro de Salud Basado en Valor , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/economía , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Toma de Decisiones , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/economía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Sistema de Registros , Mecanismo de Reembolso , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Procedimientos Innecesarios/economíaRESUMEN
Importance: The US Department of Justice (DOJ) conducted an investigation into implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) not meeting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination (NCD) criteria. Objective: To examine changes in the proportion of initial primary prevention ICDs that did not meet NCD criteria following the announcement of the DOJ investigation at hospitals that reached settlements (settlement hospitals) and those that did not (nonsettlement hospitals). Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, longitudinal, serial cross-sectional analysis of 300â¯151 initial primary prevention ICDs among Medicare beneficiaries from January 1, 2007, through December 31, 2015, at 1809 US hospitals in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR) ICD Registry, of which 452 hospitals (with 99â¯591 primary prevention ICDs) reached settlements with the DOJ. Exposures: The DOJ investigation announcement in 2010. Main Outcomes and Measures: Proportion of initial primary prevention ICDs not meeting NCD criteria. Results: In January 2007, the proportion of initial ICDs not meeting NCD criteria was 25.8% (95% CI, 24.7% to 26.8%) at settlement hospitals and 22.8% (95% CI, 22.1% to 23.5%) at nonsettlement hospitals (P < .001). Over the study period, there was a 62.7% (95% CI, 59.2% to 66.1%) relative decrease and 16.1% (95% CI, 14.8% to 17.5%) absolute decrease in the proportion of ICDs not meeting NCD criteria at settlement hospitals compared with a 53.2% (95% CI, 50.4% to 56.0%) relative decrease and 12.1% (95% CI, 11.2% to 13.0%) absolute decrease in proportion at nonsettlement hospitals (P < .001 for both; P for interaction < .001). Trends significantly differed between hospital groups only in the period following the announcement of the DOJ investigation (January 2010-June 2011) [corrected], with larger and more rapid decreases at settlement hospitals (P for interaction = .01). Over the study period, there was a 32.8% (95% CI, 29.9% to 35.7%) relative decrease and a 1703 ICDs (95% CI, 1520 to 1886) absolute decrease in the volume of primary prevention ICDs implanted at settlement hospitals compared with a 17.4% (95% CI, 14.8% to 20.0%) relative decrease and a 1495 ICDs (95% CI, 1249 to 1741) absolute decrease in volume at nonsettlement hospitals (P < .001 for both; P for interaction < .001), with more modest decreases or slight increases in secondary prevention ICD volume. These patterns were similar when examining ICD utilization among non-Medicare beneficiaries. Conclusions and Relevance: From 2007 through 2015, the volume of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and the proportion of devices not meeting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services National Coverage Determination criteria decreased at all hospitals with substantially larger decreases at hospitals that reached settlements in the US Department of Justice investigation. These patterns extended to implantable cardioverter-defibrillators placed in non-Medicare beneficiaries, which were not the focus of the US Department of Justice investigation.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Fraude/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro/legislación & jurisprudencia , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Uso Excesivo de los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Medicare , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Estudios Transversales , Desfibriladores Implantables/tendencias , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Prevención Primaria/tendencias , Estados Unidos , United States Government AgenciesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at high risk for recurrent ischemic events after coronary stenting. We assessed the effects of continued thienopyridine among patients with DM participating in the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) Study as a prespecified analysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: After coronary stent placement and 12 months treatment with open-label thienopyridine plus aspirin, 11 648 patients free of ischemic or bleeding events and who were medication compliant were randomly assigned to continued thienopyridine or placebo, in addition to aspirin, for 18 more months. After randomization, patients with DM (n=3391), in comparison with patients without DM (n=8257), had increased composite outcome of death, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke (6.8% versus 4.3%, P<0.001), increased death (2.5% versus 1.4%, P<0.001), and MI (4.2% versus 2.6%, P<0.001). Among patients with DM, in a comparison of continued thienopyridine versus placebo, rates of stent thrombosis were 0.5% versus 1.1%, P=0.06, and rates of MI were 3.5% versus 4.8%, P=0.058; and among patients without DM the rates were 0.4% versus 1.4%, P<0.001 (stent thrombosis, P interaction=0.21) and 1.6% versus 3.6%, P<0.001 (MI, P interaction=0.02). Bleeding risk with continued thienopyridine was similar among patients with or without DM (interaction P=0.61). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with DM, continued thienopyridine beyond 1 year after coronary stenting is associated with reduced risk of MI, although this benefit is attenuated in comparison with patients without DM. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00977938.
Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Two guidelines from the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and collaborating societies address the risk of aortic dissection in patients with bicuspid aortic valves and severe aortic enlargement: the "2010 ACCF/AHA/AATS/ACR/ASA/SCA/SCAI/SIR/STS/SVM Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Thoracic Aortic Disease" (Circulation. 2010;121:e266-e369) and the "2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease" (Circulation. 2014;129:e521-e643). However, the 2 guidelines differ with regard to the recommended threshold of aortic root or ascending aortic dilatation that would justify surgical intervention in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. The ACC and AHA therefore convened a subcommittee representing members of the 2 guideline writing committees to review the evidence, reach consensus, and draft a statement of clarification for both guidelines. This statement of clarification uses the ACC/AHA revised structure for delineating the Class of Recommendation and Level of Evidence to provide recommendations that replace those contained in Section 9.2.2.1 of the thoracic aortic disease guideline and Section 5.1.3 of the valvular heart disease guideline.
Asunto(s)
Comités Consultivos/normas , American Heart Association , Válvula Aórtica/anomalías , Cardiología/normas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Enfermedades de la Aorta/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Aorta/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Enfermedad de la Válvula Aórtica Bicúspide , Cardiología/métodos , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
The appropriate use criteria (AUC) has become an integral part of the cardiologist's daily practice and have evolved greatly since their inception over a decade ago. However, as health care costs continue to rise, the AUC has come to play an even more pivotal role in the way medicine-specifically cardiology-is practiced today. This editorial describes two opposing viewpoints commonly held by practicing clinicians of the AUC. Written from the perspective of two fellows-in-training looking ahead at the challenges and opportunities of clinical practice (under the auspices of several experienced clinicians and leaders of the American College of Cardiology), this article provides a fresh perspective on the impact AUC has on our patients, clinicians, and the health care system.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología/normas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Cardiología/economía , Ahorro de Costo , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Adhesión a Directriz/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Seguridad del Paciente/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Medición de Riesgo , Procedimientos Innecesarios/normasRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Introducing new medical devices into routine practice raises concerns because patients and outcomes may differ from those in randomized trials. OBJECTIVE: To update the previous report of 30-day outcomes and present 1-year outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in the United States. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology (STS/ACC) Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry were linked with patient-specific Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) administrative claims data. At 299 US hospitals, 12 182 patients linked with CMS data underwent TAVR procedures performed from November 2011 through June 30, 2013, and the end of the follow-up period was June 30, 2014. EXPOSURE: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: One-year outcomes including mortality, stroke, and rehospitalization were evaluated using multivariate modeling. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 84 years and 52% were women, with a median STS Predicted Risk of Operative Mortality (STS PROM) score of 7.1%. Following the TAVR procedure, 59.8% were discharged to home and the 30-day mortality was 7.0% (95% CI, 6.5%-7.4%) (n = 847 deaths). In the first year after TAVR, patients were alive and out of the hospital for a median of 353 days (interquartile range, 312-359 days); 24.4% (n = 2074) of survivors were rehospitalized once and 12.5% (n = 1525) were rehospitalized twice. By 1 year, the overall mortality rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 22.8%-24.5%) (n = 2450 deaths), the stroke rate was 4.1% (95% CI, 3.7%-4.5%) (n = 455 stroke events), and the rate of the composite outcome of mortality and stroke was 26.0% (25.1%-26.8%) (n = 2719 events). Characteristics significantly associated with 1-year mortality included advanced age (hazard ratio [HR] for ≥95 vs <75 years, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.24-2.09]; HR for 85-94 years vs <75 years, 1.35 [95% CI, 1.18-1.55]; and HR for 75-84 years vs <75 years, 1.23 [95% CI, 1.08-1.41]), male sex (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.12-1.31), end-stage renal disease (HR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.41-1.95), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.25-1.55), nontransfemoral access (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48), STS PROM score greater than 15% vs less than 8% (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.60-2.06), and preoperative atrial fibrillation/flutter (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27-1.48). Compared with men, women had a higher risk of stroke (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.15-1.71). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients undergoing TAVR in US clinical practice, at 1-year follow-up, overall mortality was 23.7%, the stroke rate was 4.1%, and the rate of the composite outcome of death and stroke was 26.0%. These findings should be helpful in discussions with patients undergoing TAVR.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Vigilancia de Productos Comercializados , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidadAsunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/normas , Cardiología/normas , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/normas , Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Consenso , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Humanos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/cirugía , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/normas , Válvula Aórtica/diagnóstico por imagen , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Consenso , Habilitación Profesional/normas , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades de las Válvulas Cardíacas/fisiopatología , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Selección de Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Diseño de Prótesis/normas , Factores de Riesgo , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/efectos adversos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga de Trabajo/normasRESUMEN
The American College of Cardiology Foundation along with key specialty and subspecialty societies, conducted an appropriate use review of common clinical presentations for stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD) to consider use of stress testing and anatomic diagnostic procedures. This document reflects an updating of the prior Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) published for radionuclide imaging (RNI), stress echocardiography (Echo), calcium scoring, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and invasive coronary angiography for SIHD. This is in keeping with the commitment to revise and refine the AUC on a frequent basis. A major innovation in this document is the rating of tests side by side for the same indication. The side-by-side rating removes any concerns about differences in indication or interpretation stemming from prior use of separate documents for each test. However, the ratings were explicitly not competitive rankings due to the limited availability of comparative evidence, patient variability, and range of capabilities available in any given local setting. The indications for this review are limited to the detection and risk assessment of SIHD and were drawn from common applications or anticipated uses, as well as from current clinical practice guidelines. Eighty clinical scenarios were developed by a writing committee and scored by a separate rating panel on a scale of 1-9, to designate Appropriate, May Be Appropriate, or Rarely Appropriate use following a modified Delphi process following the recently updated AUC development methodology. The use of some modalities of testing in the initial evaluation of patients with symptoms representing ischemic equivalents, newly diagnosed heart failure, arrhythmias, and syncope was generally found to be Appropriate or May Be Appropriate, except in cases where low pre-test probability or low risk limited the benefit of most testing except exercise electrocardiogram (ECG). Testing for the evaluation of new or worsening symptoms following a prior test or procedure was found to be Appropriate. In addition, testing was found to be Appropriate or May Be Appropriate for patients within 90 days of an abnormal or uncertain prior result. Pre-operative testing was rated Appropriate or May Be Appropriate only for patients who had poor functional capacity and were undergoing vascular or intermediate risk surgery with 1 or more clinical risk factors or an organ transplant. The exercise ECG was suggested as an Appropriate test for cardiac rehabilitation clearance or for exercise prescription purposes. Testing in asymptomatic patients was generally found to be Rarely Appropriate, except for calcium scoring and exercise testing in intermediate and high-risk individuals and either stress or anatomic imaging in higher-risk individuals, which were all rated as May Be Appropriate. All modalities of follow-up testing after a prior test or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within 2 years and within 5 years after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in the absence of new symptoms were rated Rarely Appropriate. Pre-operative testing for patients with good functional capacity, prior normal testing within 1 year, or prior to low-risk surgery also were found to be Rarely Appropriate. Imaging for an exercise prescription or prior to the initiation of cardiac rehabilitation was Rarely Appropriate except for cardiac rehabilitation clearance for heart failure patients.
Asunto(s)
Cardiología/normas , Angiografía Coronaria/normas , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Algoritmos , American Heart Association , Toma de Decisiones , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Miocardio/patología , Seguridad del Paciente , Medición de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines for triaging patients for cardiac catheterization recommend a risk assessment and noninvasive testing. We determined patterns of noninvasive testing and the diagnostic yield of catheterization among patients with suspected coronary artery disease in a contemporary national sample. METHODS: From January 2004 through April 2008, at 663 hospitals in the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular Data Registry, we identified patients without known coronary artery disease who were undergoing elective catheterization. The patients' demographic characteristics, risk factors, and symptoms and the results of noninvasive testing were correlated with the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease, which was defined as stenosis of 50% or more of the diameter of the left main coronary artery or stenosis of 70% or more of the diameter of a major epicardial vessel. RESULTS: A total of 398,978 patients were included in the study. The median age was 61 years; 52.7% of the patients were men, 26.0% had diabetes, and 69.6% had hypertension. Noninvasive testing was performed in 83.9% of the patients. At catheterization, 149,739 patients (37.6%) had obstructive coronary artery disease. No coronary artery disease (defined as <20% stenosis in all vessels) was reported in 39.2% of the patients. Independent predictors of obstructive coronary artery disease included male sex (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.64 to 2.76), older age (odds ratio per 5-year increment, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.30), presence of insulin-dependent diabetes (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% CI, 2.07 to 2.21), and presence of dyslipidemia (odds ratio, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.57 to 1.67). Patients with a positive result on a noninvasive test were moderately more likely to have obstructive coronary artery disease than those who did not undergo any testing (41.0% vs. 35.0%; P<0.001; adjusted odds ratio, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.37). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, slightly more than one third of patients without known disease who underwent elective cardiac catheterization had obstructive coronary artery disease. Better strategies for risk stratification are needed to inform decisions and to increase the diagnostic yield of cardiac catheterization in routine clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Ecocardiografía , Electrocardiografía , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Importance: Professional societies and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services suggest volume thresholds to ensure quality in transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Objective: To model the association of volume thresholds vs spoke-and-hub implementation of outcome thresholds with TAVI outcomes and geographic access. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients who enrolled in the US Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy registry. Site volume and outcomes were determined from a baseline cohort of adults undergoing TAVI between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2020. Exposures: Within each hospital referral region, TAVI sites were categorized by volume (<50 or ≥50 TAVIs per year) and separately by risk-adjusted outcome on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy 30-day TAVI composite during the baseline period (July 2017 to June 2020). Outcomes of patients undergoing TAVIs from July 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022, were then modeled as though the patients had been treated at (1) the nearest higher volume (≥50 TAVIs per year) or (2) the best outcome site within the hospital referral region. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the absolute difference in events between the adjusted observed and modeled 30-day composite of death, stroke, major bleeding, stage III acute kidney injury, and paravalvular leak. Data are presented as the number of events reduced under the above scenarios with 95% bayesian credible intervals (CrIs) and median (IQR) driving distance. Results: The overall cohort included 166 248 patients with a mean (SD) age of 79.5 (8.6) years; 74â¯699 (47.3%) were female and 6657 (4.2%) were Black; 158â¯025 (95%) were treated in higher-volume sites (≥50 TAVIs) and 75â¯088 (45%) were treated in best-outcome sites. Modeling a volume threshold, there was no significant reduction in estimated adverse events (-34; 95% CrI, -75 to 8), while the median (IQR) driving time from the existing site to the alternate site was 22 (15-66) minutes. Transitioning care to the best outcome site in a hospital referral region resulted in an estimated 1261 fewer adverse outcomes (95% CrI, 1013-1500), while the median (IQR) driving time from the original site to the best site was 23 (15-41) minutes. Directionally similar findings were observed for Black individuals, Hispanic individuals, and individuals from rural areas. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, compared with the current system of care, a modeled outcome-based spoke-and-hub paradigm of TAVI care improved national outcomes to a greater extent than a simulated volume threshold, at the cost of increased driving time. To improve quality while maintaining geographic access, efforts should focus on reducing site variation in outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Adulto , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Teorema de Bayes , Medicare , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiologíaAsunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Comités Consultivos , American Heart Association , Cardiología/organización & administración , Clasificación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/clasificación , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas , Estados UnidosAsunto(s)
American Heart Association , Cardiología/normas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Atención Perioperativa/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/epidemiología , Síndrome Coronario Agudo/terapia , Comités Consultivos/normas , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/normas , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Isquemia Miocárdica/diagnóstico , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiología , Isquemia Miocárdica/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/normas , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/uso terapéutico , Informe de Investigación/normas , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Electrocardiografía , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/fisiopatología , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Trombectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review all cases in the literature of erosion associated with atrial septal defect (ASD) occluder devices. BACKGROUND: Delayed erosion of the aortic or atrial wall is an infrequent but potentially lethal complication of percutaneous septal defect closure using an ASD device. The epidemiology is poorly understood. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched for cases of ASD occluder device-associated erosion. RESULTS: Twenty-five articles present erosion events associated with the AMPLATZER™ septal occluder (ASO) device (March 2002-June 2011), documenting 21 independent, surgically confirmed cases. Another 79 distinct events are reported in case series and review articles. Of all identified independent cases, 73 were reported in the United States. No articles associate the HELEX™ Septal occluder and erosions. Additional events are reported in association with FDA-unapproved percutaneous defect closure devices (n = 16). Estimation of ASO erosion incidence is unreliable because the numerator (number of erosion events) and denominator (number of patients with an implanted device) are unknown; estimates range from 0.1 to 0.3%. CONCLUSION: Cardiac erosion is a rare but serious complication of the ASO device. Erosion events are most often ascribed to device over-sizing or deficient retro-aortic rims; however, both consensus and evidence for a cogent risk factor(s) is lacking. Further assessment of the root cause of erosion and true incidence of this complication is required; analyses using control patients and/or device registry establishment represent logical next steps.