A phase 2 randomized multicenter study of 2 extended dosing schedules of oral ezatiostat in low to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Ezatiostat is a glutathione analog prodrug glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1) inhibitor. This study evaluated 2 extended dose schedules of oral ezatiostat in 89 heavily pretreated patients with low to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Patients were randomized by 1 stratification factor-baseline cytopenia (anemia only vs anemia with additional cytopenias)-to 1 of 2 extended dosing schedules. Multilineage hematologic improvement (HI) responses were assessed by International Working Group 2006 criteria. RESULTS: Overall, 11 of 38 (29%) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients had HI-Erythroid (HI-E) response. The median duration of HI-E response was 34 weeks. Multilineage responses were observed. There was 1 cytogenetic complete response in a del (5q) MDS patient. An important trend was the effect of prior therapy on response. A 40% HI-E rate (6 of 15 patients) was observed in patients who had prior lenalidomide and no prior hypomethylating agents (HMAs), with 5 of 11 (45%) patients achieving significant RBC transfusion reduction and 3 of 11 (27%) achieving transfusion independence. A 28% HI-E rate (5 of 18 patients) was observed in patients who were both lenalidomide and HMA naive, with 4 of 8 (50%) patients achieving clinically significant RBC transfusion reductions. Most common ezatiostat-related adverse events were grade 1 and 2 gastrointestinal including: nausea (45%, 17%), diarrhea (26%, 7%), and vomiting (30%, 12%). CONCLUSIONS: Ezatiostat is the first GSTP1-1 inhibitor shown to cause clinically significant and sustained reduction in RBC transfusions, transfusion independence, and multilineage responses in MDS patients. The tolerability and activity profile of ezatiostat may offer a new treatment option for patients with MDS.

Phase 1 multicenter dose-escalation study of ezatiostat hydrochloride (TLK199 tablets), a novel glutathione analog prodrug, in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

Phase 1 testing of ezatiostat, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 inhibitor, for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome was conducted in a multidose-escalation study. Patients received 10 dose levels (200, 400, 1000, 1400, 2000, 2400, 3000, 4000, 5000, and 6000 mg) of ezatiostat tablets in divided doses on days 1 to 7 of a 21-day cycle for a maximum of 8 cycles. The safety and pharmacokinetics of ezatiostat were evaluated. Forty-five patients with low to intermediate-2 International Prognostic Scoring System risk myelodysplastic syndrome were enrolled. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed. The most common grade 1 or 2, respectively, treatment-related adverse events were nonhematologic: nausea (56%, 9%), diarrhea (36%, 7%), vomiting (24%, 7%), abdominal pain (9%, 0%), constipation (4%, 9%), anorexia (3%, 7%), and dyspepsia (3%, 7%). Concentration of the primary active metabolite, TLK236, increased proportionate to ezatiostat dosage. Seventeen hematologic improvement (HI) responses by International Working Group criteria were observed at dose levels of 200 to 6000 mg/day with 11 HI responses at doses of 4000 to 6000 mg/day. HI responses occurred in all lineages including 3 bilineage and 1 complete cytogenetic response. Decreased number of red blood cell and platelet transfusions and in some cases transfusion independence were attained. Extended dose schedules of ezatiostat tablets are under investigation.

Randomized phase III study of canfosfamide in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin compared with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin alone in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of canfosfamide in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS: Patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant (primary or secondary) OC were randomized to receive canfosfamide at 1000 mg/m² and PLD at 50 mg/m² intravenously or PLD alone at 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 28 days until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points were objective response rate and safety. The study was originally planned for 244 patients. The trial was temporarily placed on hold after 125 patients were randomized while the results of another trial were being reviewed and the sponsor decided not to resume enrollment. The interim analysis became the final analysis. RESULTS: The median PFS was 5.6 months for canfosfamide + PLD (n = 65) versus 3.7 months for PLD (n = 60) (hazards ratio, 0.92; P = 0.7243). A preplanned subgroup analysis showed that 75 patients with platinum-refractory or primary platinum-resistant OC had a median PFS of 5.6 months for canfosfamide + PLD versus 2.9 months for PLD (hazards ratio, 0.55; P = 0.0425). Hematologic adverse events were 66% on the canfosfamide + PLD arm versus 44% on the PLD arm, manageable with dose reductions. Nonhematologic adverse events were similar for both arms. The incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitiswas lower on canfosfamide + PLD(23%, 31%, respectively) versus (39%, 49%, respectively) on PLD. CONCLUSIONS: Overall median PFS showed a positive trend but was not statistically significant. The median PFS in the platinum-refractory and primary platinum-resistant OC patients was significantly longer for canfosfamide + PLD versus PLD. Canfosfamide may ameliorate the palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitis known to be associated with PLD. Further study of this active well-tolerated regimen in platinum-refractory and primary platinum-resistant OC is planned. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00350948.

Phase 1 study of TLK286 (Telcyta) administered weekly in advanced malignancies.

PURPOSE: To determine the dose-limiting toxicities, maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics of TLK286, a novel cancer prodrug, administered weekly. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced malignancies were treated with TLK286 administered weekly by i.v. infusion over 30 min in escalating doses 60-960 mg/m(2). A treatment cycle was defined as 3 weekly treatments. Patients underwent tumor assessments on day 43, and those patients receiving clinical benefit continued on treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Safety was assessed by the WHO criteria. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients received 111 cycles of TLK286 at eight dose levels (median, 3 cycles; range, 1-16 cycles). In this study, TLK286 given weekly at 960 mg/m(2) was well tolerated without dose-limiting toxicities. TLK286-related toxicities included grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting, fatigue and anemia. Nine of 31 evaluable patients continued therapy beyond day 43 and received a median of 5 cycles (range of 3-16 cycles) and experienced durable stable disease or minor tumor regression. Pharmacokinetic characteristics of TLK286 are described by an optimized two-compartment model. Mild to moderate renal or hepatic organ dysfunction did not impact the elimination of TLK286. CONCLUSIONS: TLK286 administered weekly at doses up to 960 mg/m(2) were well tolerated. The safety and antitumor activity observed in a broad range of cancer types supports Phase 2 disease-specific investigations of TLK286 given weekly at 960 mg/m(2).

Phase I study of TLK286 (glutathione S-transferase P1-1 activated glutathione analogue) in advanced refractory solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), the maximum tolerated dose, and the pharmacokinetics of the novel glutathione analog TLK286 administered by i.v. infusion. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with advanced malignancies received i.v. TLK286 administered as a 30-min constant rate infusion once every 3 weeks in escalating doses from 60 to 1280 mg/m(2). Patients underwent tumor assessment on day 43 and continued on treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were treated with 109 cycles of TLK286. At 1280 mg/m(2), 3 of 5 patients developed one of two observed dose limiting toxicities (DLTs). The DLTs were: mild pancreatitis (1 of 5) and bladder symptoms (2 of 5) consisting of hematuria, dysuria, and urinary frequency. All of the patients with DLTs continued on TLK286 treatment at 960 mg/m(2) (one dose below maximum tolerated dose) without recurrence of DLTs. DLTs were transient, resolved without sequelae, and noncumulative. TLK286-related toxicities included grade 1-2 nausea, vomiting, fatigue, transient microscopic hematuria, and anemia. Of 31 evaluable patients, 10 patients continued therapy (median six cycles; range, four to nine cycles). Pharmacokinetic studies of TLK286 on cycle 1 revealed a mean elimination half-life of 18 min (95% confidence interval, 16.1-19.9). Dose-proportional increases in both maximum blood concentrations and area under the blood-concentration-time curve were observed over the dose range of 60-960 mg/m(2). CONCLUSION: TLK286 was well tolerated in this study. TLK286 safety and pharmacokinetics support disease-specific evaluations of TLK286 at doses <1280 mg/m(2) administered once every three weeks in the treatment of patients with advanced malignancies.

Phase 1 dose-ranging study of ezatiostat hydrochloride in combination with lenalidomide in patients with non-deletion (5q) low to intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).

BACKGROUND: Ezatiostat, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 inhibitor, promotes the maturation of hematopoietic progenitors and induces apoptosis in cancer cells. RESULTS: Ezatiostat was administered to 19 patients with non-deletion(5q) myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) at one of two doses (2000 mg or 2500 mg/day) in combination with 10 mg of lenalidomide on days 1-21 of a 28-day cycle. No unexpected toxicities occurred and the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) were consistent with that expected for each drug alone. The most common non-hematologic AEs related to ezatiostat in combination with lenalidomide were mostly grade 1 and 2 fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting; hematologic AEs due to lenalidomide were thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia. One of 4 evaluable patients (25%) in the 2500/10 mg dose group experienced an erythroid hematologic improvement (HI-E) response by 2006 MDS International Working Group (IWG) criteria. Four of 10 evaluable patients (40%) in the 2000 mg/10 mg dose group experienced an HI-E response. Three of 7 (43%) red blood cell (RBC) transfusion-dependent patients became RBC transfusion independent, including one patient for whom prior lenalidomide monotherapy was ineffective. Three of 5 (60%) thrombocytopenic patients had an HI-platelet (HI-P) response. Bilineage HI-E and HI-P responses occurred in 3 of 5 (60%), 1 of 3 with HI-E and HI-N (33%), and 1 of 3 with HI-N and HI-P (33%). One of 3 patients (33%) with pancytopenia experienced a complete trilineage response. All multilineage responses were observed in the 2000/10 mg doses recommended for future studies. CONCLUSIONS: The tolerability and activity profile of ezatiostat co-administered with lenalidomide supports the further development of ezatiostat in combination with lenalidomide in MDS and also encourages studies of this combination in other hematologic malignancies where lenalidomide is active.

Oral ezatiostat HCl (Telintra®, TLK199) and idiopathic chronic neutropenia (ICN): a case report of complete response of a patient with G-CSF resistant ICN following treatment with ezatiostat, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 (GSTP1-1) inhibitor.

Idiopathic chronic neutropenia (ICN) describes a heterogeneous group of hematologic diseases characterized by low circulating neutrophil levels often associated with recurrent fevers, chronic mucosal inflammation, and severe systemic infections. The severity and risk of complications, including serious infections, are inversely proportional to the absolute neutrophil count (ANC), with the greatest problems occurring in patients with an ANC of less than 0.5 × 109/L. This case report describes a 64-year-old female with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis who subsequently developed ICN with frequent episodes of sepsis requiring hospitalization and prolonged courses of antibiotics over a 4-year period. She was treated with granulocyte colony stimulating factors (G-CSF) but had a delayed, highly variable, and volatile response. She was enrolled in a clinical trial evaluating the oral investigational agent ezatiostat. Ezatiostat, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 inhibitor, activates Jun kinase, promoting the growth and maturation of hematopoietic progenitor stem cells. She responded by the end of the first month of treatment with stabilization of her ANC (despite tapering and then stopping G-CSF), clearing of fever, and healing of areas of infection. This ANC response to ezatiostat treatment has now been sustained for over 8 months and continues. These results suggest potential roles for ezatiostat in the treatment of patients with ICN who are not responsive to G-CSF, as an oral therapy alternative, or as an adjunct to G-CSF, and further studies are warranted.

Phase 2 study of canfosfamide in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in platinum and paclitaxel refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian cancer.

BACKGROUND: Canfosfamide is a novel glutathione analog activated by glutathione S-transferase P1-1. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of canfosfamide in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum resistant ovarian cancer. Patients with platinum resistant ovarian carcinoma and measurable disease received canfosfamide at 960 mg/m2 in combination with PLD at 50 mg/m2, intravenously day 1 in every 28 day cycles until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicities. The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: Canfosfamide plus PLD combination therapy was administered at 960/50 mg/m2, respectively. Thirty-nine patients received a median number of 4 cycles (range 1.0-18.0). The ORR was 27.8% (95% CI, 14.2-45.2) with a disease stabilization rate of 80.6% (95% CI, 64.0-91.8) in the evaluable population. The CA-125 marker responses correlated with the radiological findings of complete response or partial response. The median PFS was 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.2-7.9) and median survival was 17.8 months. The combination was well tolerated. Myelosuppression was managed with dose reductions and growth factor support. Grade 3 febrile neutropenia was observed in 2 patients (5.1%). Non-hematologic adverse events occurred at the expected frequency and grade for each drug alone, with no unexpected or cumulative toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: Canfosfamide in combination with PLD is well tolerated and active in platinum and paclitaxel refractory or resistant ovarian cancer. A randomized phase 3 study was conducted based on this supportive phase 2 study.

Phase 1-2a multicenter dose-escalation study of ezatiostat hydrochloride liposomes for injection (Telintra, TLK199), a novel glutathione analog prodrug in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Ezatiostat hydrochloride liposomes for injection, a glutathione S-transferase P1-1 inhibitor, was evaluated in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). The objectives were to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics, and hematologic improvement (HI) rate. Phase 1-2a testing of ezatiostat for the treatment of MDS was conducted in a multidose-escalation, multicenter study. Phase 1 patients received ezatiostat at 5 dose levels (50, 100, 200, 400 and 600 mg/m2) intravenously (IV) on days 1 to 5 of a 14-day cycle until MDS progression or unacceptable toxicity. In phase 2, ezatiostat was administered on 2 dose schedules: 600 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 5 or days 1 to 3 of a 21-day treatment cycle. RESULTS: 54 patients with histologically confirmed MDS were enrolled. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2, respectively, chills (11%, 9%), back pain (15%, 2%), flushing (19%, 0%), nausea (15%, 0%), bone pain (6%, 6%), fatigue (0%, 13%), extremity pain (7%, 4%), dyspnea (9%, 4%), and diarrhea (7%, 4%) related to acute infusional hypersensitivity reactions. The concentration of the primary active metabolites increased proportionate to ezatiostat dosage. Trilineage responses were observed in 4 of 16 patients (25%) with trilineage cytopenia. Hematologic Improvement-Erythroid (HI-E) was observed in 9 of 38 patients (24%), HI-Neutrophil in 11 of 26 patients (42%) and HI-Platelet in 12 of 24 patients (50%). These responses were accompanied by improvement in clinical symptoms and reductions in transfusion requirements. Improvement in bone marrow maturation and cellularity was also observed. CONCLUSION: Phase 2 studies of ezatiostat hydrochloride liposomes for injection in MDS are supported by the tolerability and HI responses observed. An oral formulation of ezatiostat hydrochloride tablets is also in phase 2 clinical development. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00035867.

Phase 1-2a multicenter dose-ranging study of canfosfamide in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of canfosfamide in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: This was a phase 1-2a, multicenter, dose-ranging trial that enrolled patients with stage IIIB or IV non-small cell lung cancer with measurable disease. Patients received canfosfamide in doses ranging from 400 to 1000 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) with carboplatin at area under the curve 6 IV and paclitaxel at 200 mg/m2 IV day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was objective response rate, and the secondary endpoints were safety and progression-free survival. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-nine patients were treated with canfosfamide at dose levels of 400 (n = 3), 500 (n = 51), 750 (n = 54), and 1000 mg/m2 (n = 21). Objective tumor responses by RECIST were observed in 40 patients [34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26-44)], the median progression-free survival was 4.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-5.2) and the median survival 9.9 months (95% CI, 7.7-11.9). The percent of patients alive at 1 year was 43.1%. The overall safety profile of the combination was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents. In an exploratory analysis, patients receiving the optional maintenance canfosfamide therapy had a prolonged median survival of 16.8 months compared with those eligible for but not receiving maintenance therapy at 8.8 months (hazard ratio = 0.38, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of canfosfamide with carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy is well tolerated and active. Maintenance canfosfamide may further improve outcomes. This regimen is worthy of additional study.