Access to school-based eye health programs in Central Region, Malawi: a qualitative case study.

Vision impairment among children is associated with lower levels of educational attainment. School-based eye health programs have the potential to provide high-quality and cost-effective services that assist in the prevention of blindness and uncorrected vision impairment, particularly in low-resources settings. The aim of this study was to identify key factors that inhibit or facilitate the provision of school-based eye health programs, including referral to eye care services, for Malawian children in the Central Region. In-depth interviews (n = 10) and focus groups (n = 5) with children, parents, school staff, eye care practitioners, government and NGO workers (total participants n = 44) in rural and urban contexts within central region, Malawi, were conducted. Taking a rights-based approach, we used the AAAQ (availability, accessibility, acceptability, quality) framework to identify barriers and enablers to school eye health programs. Complex factors shape access to school-based eye health programs. While intersectoral collaboration between ministries was present, infrastructure and resourcing restricted the delivery of school eye health programs. School staff were supportive of being trained as vision screeners. Parents voiced geographic access to follow up eye care, and spectacle cost as a barrier; and children revealed experiences of stigma related to spectacle as barriers to uptake. School-based eye care may be facilitated through teachers, community informants and health workers through; the provision of school vision screening; increased awareness of the impact of vision impairment on education and future employment; and through educational approaches that seek to decrease stigma and misconceptions associated with wearing spectacles.

Indicators for Assessing the Quality of Refractive Error Care.

SIGNIFICANCE: Quality refractive error care is essential for reducing vision impairment. Quality indicators and standardized approaches for assessing the quality of refractive error care need to be established. PURPOSE: This study aimed to develop a set of indicators for assessing the quality of refractive error care and test their applicability in a real-world setting using unannounced standardized patients (USPs). METHODS: Patient outcomes and three quality of refractive error care (Q.REC) indicators (1, optimally prescribed spectacles; 2, adequately prescribed spectacles; 3, vector dioptric distance) were developed using existing literature, refraction training standards, and consulting educators. Twenty-one USPs with various refractive errors were trained to visit optical stores across Vietnam to have a refraction, observe techniques, and order spectacles. Spectacles were assessed against each Q.REC indicator and tested for associations with vision and comfort. RESULTS: Overall, 44.1% (184/417) of spectacles provided good vision and comfort. Of the spectacles that met Q.REC indicators 1 and 2, 62.5 and 54.9%, respectively, provided both good vision and comfort. Optimally prescribed spectacles (indicator 1) were significantly more likely to provide good vision and comfort independently compared with spectacles that did not meet any indicator (good vision: 94.6 vs. 85.0%, P = .01; comfortable: 66.1 vs. 36.3%, P < .01). Adequately prescribed spectacles (indicator 2) were more likely to provide good comfort compared with spectacles not meeting any indicator (57.7 vs. 36.3%, P < .01); however, vision outcomes were not significantly different (85.9 vs. 85.0%, P = .90). Good vision was associated with a lower mean vector dioptric distance (P < .01) but not with comfort (P = .52). CONCLUSIONS: The optimally prescribed spectacles indicator is a promising approach for assessing the quality of refractive error care without additional assessments of vision and comfort. Using USPs is a practical approach and could be used as a standardized method for evaluating the quality of refractive error care.

Using quality improvement strategies to strengthen regional systems for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander eye health in the Northern Territory.

PROBLEM: In the Katherine region, Northern Territory, barriers to eye care for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people include unclear eye care referral processes, challenges coordinating patient eye care between various providers, complex socioeconomic determinants and a lengthy outpatient ophthalmology waiting list. DESIGN: Mixed methods participatory approach using a regional needs analysis, clinical file audit and stakeholder survey, to develop, implement and monitor quality improvement strategies. SETTING: Collaboration with Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services and regional eye care stakeholders in the Katherine region. KEY MEASURES FOR IMPROVEMENT: Clinical audit data captured frequency and rates of primary eye checks, ophthalmology referrals and spectacle prescriptions. A survey was developed and applied to assess stakeholder perspectives of regional eye care systems. STRATEGY FOR CHANGE: Quality improvement strategies informed by regional data (clinical audits and survey) included increasing service delivery to match eye care needs, primary eye care training for Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services staff, updating Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services primary care templates and forming a regional eye care coalition group. EFFECTS OF CHANGE: Post-implementation, rates and frequency of recorded optometry examinations, number of spectacles prescribed and rates of annual dilated fundus examinations for patients with diabetes increased. There was a decrease in the number of patients with diabetes who had never had an eye examination. Eye care stakeholders perceived a marked improvement in the effectiveness of the regional eye care system. LESSONS LEARNT: Our findings highlight the importance of engaging services and stakeholders to ensure a systems approach that is evidence-informed, contextually appropriate and reflects commitment to improved eye health outcomes.

Interventions to improve school-based eye-care services in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review interventions improving eye-care services for schoolchildren in low- and middle-income countries. METHODS: We searched online databases (CINAHL, Embase®, ERIC, MEDLINE®, ProQuest, PubMed® and Web of ScienceTM) for articles published between January 2000 and May 2018. Eligible studies evaluated the delivery of school-based eye-care programmes, reporting results in terms of spectacle compliance rates, quality of screening or attitude changes. We considered studies to be ineligible if no follow-up data were reported. Two authors screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles, and we extracted data from eligible full-text articles using the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality rights-based conceptual framework. FINDINGS: Of 24 559 publications screened, 48 articles from 13 countries met the inclusion criteria. Factors involved in the successful provision of school-based eye-care interventions included communication between health services and schools, the willingness of schools to schedule sufficient time, and the support of principals, staff and parents. Several studies found that where the numbers of eye-care specialists are insufficient, training teachers in vision screening enables the provision of a good-quality and cost-effective service. As well as the cost of spectacles, barriers to seeking eye-care included poor literacy, misconceptions and lack of eye health knowledge among parents. CONCLUSION: The provision of school-based eye-care programmes has great potential to reduce ocular morbidity and developmental delays caused by childhood vision impairment and blindness. Policy-based support, while also attempting to reduce misconceptions and stigma among children and their parents, is crucial for continued access.

Quality of refractive error care (Q.REC) in Cambodia, Malaysia and Pakistan: protocol for a cross-sectional unannounced standardised patient study.

INTRODUCTION: There are 161 million people living with vision impairment, due to uncorrected refractive errors. A further 510 million people are living with near-vision impairment. There is a need for clearly defined indicators that capture the quality of refractive error service outputs and outcomes and provide insights to shape, change and stimulate action. This study aims to evaluate the quality of refractive error care (Q.REC) in Cambodia, Malaysia and Pakistan, by using unannounced standardised patients (USPs) to identify the proportion of prescribed and dispensed spectacles appropriate for people's refractive error needs and pinpoint/detail opportunities for quality improvement. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A cross-sectional Q.REC study will be conducted in randomly selected optical services in Cambodia (180 services, 900 USP visits), the Klang Valley in Malaysia (66 services, 198 USP visits) and in Jhang, Sahiwal and Khanewal districts of Punjab region/state in Pakistan (64 services, 256 USP visits). USPs will receive baseline refractions by three skilled study optometrists/refractionists trained in the Q.REC protocol. USPs will then visit individual optical services, undergo a refraction, purchase spectacles or lenses (if recommended) and record observations about which elements of a refraction and dispensing were conducted. The study optometrist/refractionist will assess each pair of dispensed spectacles by examining the USP's aided visual acuity and visual comfort at distance and/or near and compare the lens prescription to the averaged baseline refraction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the University of New South Wales Human Research Ethics Committee (HC210102), the National Ethics Committee for Health Research in Cambodia (043 NECHR), National Medical Research Registry and the Medical Research and Ethics Committee (NMRR-21-689-59279) in Malaysia and the College of Ophthalmology & Allied Vision Sciences Ethical Review Board (COAVS 545/2021) in Pakistan. Written informed consent will be obtained from USPs. Service owners will have the opportunity to opt-out verbally or in writing. Results will be disseminated locally through workshops including the relevant local ministry of health personnel and stakeholders, published in peer-reviewed publications and presented at national and international conferences.

3-D printed spectacles: potential, challenges and the future.

Three-dimensional (3-D) printing offers the potential to custom-produce a wide range of manufactured objects and improve manufacturing processes. The additive manufacturing process involves material (resin, metal, ceramics or biological cells) being deposited layer upon layer, which is fused to create a 3-D object. While 3-D printing has been readily available in the aerospace and automotive industries, and is being used increasingly in the medical field, its potential for optometry and ophthalmic optics has rarely been discussed in depth. 3-D printing of spectacles has the potential to provide customised experiences, to cater for those who do not fit standardised frames or for those with irregular prescriptions, and to reduce delivery times and inventory with the opportunity of increasing access to underserved populations. Here we review available 3-D printing technologies, and the current 3-D printed spectacle market, including testing three commercially available spectacle frames to assess compliance with ISO:12870 standards. The article then explores the challenges faced and environmental impact of implementing 3-D printing of spectacles.

Eye care delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous people in high-income countries: protocol for a scoping review.

INTRODUCTION: Globally, there are an estimated 370 million Indigenous people across 90 countries. Indigenous people experience worse health compared with non-Indigenous people, including higher rates of avoidable visual impairment. Countries such as Australia and Canada have service delivery models aimed at improving access to eye care for Indigenous people. We will conduct a scoping review to identify and summarise these service delivery models to improve access to eye care for Indigenous people in high-income countries. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An information specialist will conduct searches on MEDLINE, Embase and Global Health. All databases will be searched from their inception date with no language limits used. We will search the grey literature via websites of relevant government and service provider agencies. Field experts will be contacted to identify additional articles, and reference lists of relevant articles will be searched. All quantitative and qualitative study designs will be eligible if they describe a model of eye care service delivery aimed at Indigenous populations. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full-text articles; and complete data extraction. For each service delivery model, we will extract data on the context, inputs, outputs, Indigenous engagement and enabling health system functions. Where models were evaluated, we will extract details. We will summarise findings using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required, as our review will include published and publicly accessible data. This review is part of a project to improve access to eye care services for Maori in Aotearoa New Zealand. The findings will be useful to policymakers, health service managers and clinicians responsible for eye care services in New Zealand, and other high-income countries with Indigenous populations. We will publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal and develop an accessible summary of results for website posting and stakeholder meetings.

Delivery of Eye and Vision Services in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Primary Healthcare Centers.

BACKGROUND: Routine eye and vision assessments are vital for the detection and subsequent management of vision loss, which is particularly important for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who face higher rates of vision loss than other Australians. In order to guide improvements, this paper will describe patterns, variations, and gaps in these eye and vision assessments for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. METHODS: Clinical audits from 124 primary healthcare centers (sample size 15,175) from five Australian states and territories were conducted during 2005-2012. Main outcome measure was adherence to current guidelines for delivery of eye and vision assessments to adults with diabetes, those without a diagnosed major chronic disease and children attending primary healthcare centers. RESULTS: Overall delivery of recommended eye and vision assessments varied widely between health centers. Of the adults with diabetes, 46% had a visual acuity assessment recorded within the previous 12 months (health center range 0-88%) and 33% had a retinal examination recorded (health center range 0-73%). Of the adults with no diagnosed major chronic disease, 31% had a visual acuity assessment recorded within the previous 2 years (health center range 0-86%) and 13% had received an examination for trichiasis (health center range 0-40%). In children, 49% had a record of a vision assessment (health center range 0-97%) and 25% had a record of an examination for trachoma within the previous 12 months (health center range 0-100%). CONCLUSION: There was considerable range and variation in the recorded delivery of scheduled eye and vision assessments across health centers. Sharing the successful strategies of the better-performing health centers to support focused improvements in key areas of need may increase overall rates of eye examinations, which is important for the timely detection, referral, and treatment of eye conditions affecting Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, especially for those with diabetes.

Access to school-based eye health programs: a qualitative case study, Bogotá, Colombia

[ABSTRACT]. Objectives. To identify barriers and enablers to accessing school-based eye health programs in Bogotá, Colombia. Methods. We undertook a qualitative case study that explored how structural factors, and social and cultural norms influence access to school-based eye health programs. We conducted focus groups discussions and interviews with a purposive sample of 37 participants: government stakeholders (n = 4), representatives from nongovernmental organizations (n = 3), and an eye-care practitioner, as well as teachers (n = 7), a school nurse, parents (n = 7), and children (n = 14) from private and public schools. Data were analyzed using a priori themes from the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality framework. Results. Routine vision screening in schools is not currently provided nor is there a budget to support it. Lack of collaboration between the health and education ministries and the absence of national planning affected the delivery of eye care in schools. Factors related to acceptability of school-based eye health programs included: poor acceptance of training teachers as vision screeners; stigma related to wearing spectacles; and distrust of health services. The cost of spectacles and poor access to eye health information were identified as barriers to positive child eye health outcomes by socioeconomically disadvantaged parents and children. Conclusion. Our findings suggest the need for a national school eye health plan and improved cooperation between health and education ministries. Interventions to improve trust in health services, tackle the lack of human resources while respecting professional qualifications, and raise awareness of the importance of eye health are recommended.

[RESUMEN]. Objetivo. Determinar los obstáculos y los elementos facilitadores para acceder a los programas de salud ocular en las escuelas en Bogotá (Colombia). Métodos. Se llevó a cabo un estudio cualitativo de casos que exploró cómo influyen los factores estructurales y las normas sociales y culturales en el acceso a la atención oftalmológica. Se realizaron entrevistas y grupos de opinión con una muestra intencionada de 37 participantes: interesados directos gubernamentales (n = 4), representantes de organizaciones no gubernamentales (n = 3) y un profesional de atención oftalmológica, así como docentes (n = 7), una enfermera escolar, padres (n = 7) y niños (n = 14) de escuelas privadas y públicas. Se analizaron los datos empleando temas determinados a priori sobre la disponibilidad, la accesibilidad, la aceptabilidad y el marco de calidad. Resultados. Actualmente, no se proporciona un tamizaje sistemático de la visión en las escuelas, ni se dispone de presupuesto para respaldarlo. La falta de colaboración entre los ministerios de salud y de educación, y la falta de planificación a nivel nacional tuvo repercusiones sobre la prestación de atención oftalmológica en las escuelas. Entre los factores relacionados con la aceptabilidad de los programas de salud ocular en las escuelas se encuentran una escasa aceptación de la posibilidad de capacitar a los docentes para que examinen la visión; el estigma relacionado con el uso de anteojos y la desconfianza de los servicios de salud. Los padres y los niños en una situación socioeconómica desfavorable indicaron que el costo de las gafas y el acceso limitado a la información sobre la salud ocular eran obstáculos para obtener resultados positivos de salud ocular en los niños. Conclusiones. Los resultados indican la necesidad de un plan nacional de salud ocular en las escuelas y una mejor cooperación entre los ministerios de salud y de educación. Se recomiendan intervenciones para mejorar la confianza en los servicios de salud, abordar la falta de recursos humanos al tiempo que se respetan las cualificaciones profesionales y concientizar sobre la importancia de la salud ocular.

[RESUMO]. Objetivos. Identificar barreiras e facilitadores para o acesso a programas escolares de saúde ocular em Bogotá, Colômbia. Métodos. Estudo de caso qualitativo que explorou como fatores estruturais e normas socioculturais influenciam o acesso aos cuidados com a visão. Realizamos discussões em grupos focais e entrevistas com uma amostra intencional de 37 participantes: partes interessadas do governo (n = 4), representantes de organizações não governamentais (n = 3) e um oftalmologista, bem como professores (n = 7), uma enfermeira escolar, pais de alunos (n = 7) e alunos (n = 14) de escolas públicas e particulares. Os dados foram analisados de acordo com temas escolhidos a priori, a partir do marco de disponibilidade, acessibilidade, aceitabilidade e qualidade. Resultados. O exame de visão de rotina não é realizado atualmente nas escolas, nem há espaço orçamentário para fazê-lo. A falta de colaboração entre os Ministérios da Saúde e da Educação e a ausência de planejamento em escala nacional afetaram a prestação de cuidados oftalmológicos nas escolas. Fatores relacionados à aceitabilidade dos programas escolares de saúde ocular incluíram baixa aceitação do treinamento de professores para realizar triagem de problemas visuais, estigma relacionado ao uso de óculos e desconfiança nos serviços de saúde. O custo dos óculos e o acesso limitado a informações sobre saúde ocular foram identificados como barreiras para desfechos positivos de saúde ocular infantil em pais e crianças em situação de desvantagem socioeconômica. Conclusão. Os resultados sugerem a necessidade de um plano nacional de saúde ocular nas escolas e de uma melhor cooperação entre os Ministérios da Saúde e da Educação. Recomendam-se intervenções para aumentar a confiança nos serviços de saúde, combater a falta de recursos humanos (respeitando as qualificações profissionais) e aumentar a conscientização sobre a importância da saúde ocular.