Low-Grade Injury following Testicular Torsion: A Multicenter Study Confirming a Disturbing Possibility.

INTRODUCTION: There is an ongoing debate whether to perform orchiectomy or orchidopexy following testicular torsion (TT) in cases where the testis seems non-viable. The main problem is lack of objective criteria defining testicular viability. The aim of this study was to investigate the grade of injury in orchiectomy specimens obtained from cases of TT and its association with clinical findings. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study involved double-blinded reassessment of the patient files and the pathological specimens using Mikuz classification to analyze the relation between clinical and pathological findings. RESULTS: A total of 289 patient charts from 14 centers were reviewed and 228 were included in this study. Twenty (8.8%) patients had grade 1 injury which refers to reversible injury. The clinical findings of these 20 patients were compared to 208 patients with higher grades of injury. As expected, there was statistically significant difference regarding duration of symptoms (p < 0.001); however, range was wide in both groups (as long as 96 h for grade 1 and as short as 7 h for higher grades). There was no statistically significant difference in any other variable including age (median 14 for both, p = 0.531), symptoms (pain: 19/20 vs. 189/202, p = 0.801; swelling: 13/19 vs. 168/197, p = 0.094), absence of blood flow in Doppler US (15/19 vs. 164/197, p = 0.635), or degree of torsion (median 720° for both, p = 0.172). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed necessity for better criteria to define viability of testis following TT. Histopathological injury appeared to be reversible even in some patients with more severe perioperative findings, late admission, or high degree of twisting. Our findings support the tendency for testicular fixation instead of orchiectomy as none of the clinical or perioperative findings could be attributed to high-grade injury.

The management of testicular torsion: A survey of Turkish pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the approaches of pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists in Türkiye regarding the diagnosis and treatment of testicular torsion (TT) and their adherence to the European Association of Urology (EAU) pediatric urology guideline. METHODS: A survey consisting of 19 questions, accompanied by an annotation describing the objective of the study, was emailed to pediatric surgeons and pediatric urologists in June and July 2023. RESULTS: Of the 95 respondents, 62.1% had over 10 years of experience, and 48.4% treated more than five cases of TT annually. Of the participants, 87.4% stated that scrotal Doppler ultrasonography (US) was always used, and 12.6% stated that US was used in cases of doubtful diagnosis. Concerning treatment, 14.7% reported performing manual detorsion, 70.5% never did, and 14.7% did so only if the operating room was unavailable soon. A total of 92.6% of participants opted for emergency surgery. Among participants who perform manual detorsion, 71.4% perform surgery within 24 hours after successful manual detorsion. Regarding fixation of the contralateral testicle, 14.7% never performed it, and 27.4% did so only when they performed an orchiectomy on the torsion testicle. CONCLUSION: While most participants follow EAU pediatric urology guidelines by performing emergency surgery, the rate of manual detorsion is low. Few participants stated that emergency surgery may not be performed after manual detorsion. While all of the participants performed fixation of the torsion testicle in accordance with the guidelines, the same adherence was not observed in the contralateral testicle.

Investigation of the Effects of N-acetylcysteine and Selenium on Vesicoureteral Reflux Nephropathy: An Experimental Study.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the effects of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and selenium (Se) on vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) nephropathy. METHODS: A total of 44 rabbits in 7 groups, namely group 1 (Control), group 2 (VUR + sterile urine), group 3 (VUR + sterile urine + NAC), group 4 (VUR + sterile urine + Se), group 5 (VUR + infected urine), group 6 (VUR + infected urine + NAC) and group 7 (VUR + infected urine + Se), were used. 99mTc Dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan (DMSA), cystogram and urine culture were performed both at the beginning and end of the study. Left VUR was created surgically, and E. coli was inoculated in infected urine groups. NAC and Se were administered daily for 21 days. Malondialdehyde (MDA) measurement, inflammatory response scores (IRSs), and cicatrization response scores (CRSs) in renal tissues were evaluated. RESULTS: VUR did not reduce left renal uptake values in neither group 2 nor group 5. MDA levels of the left kidney were significantly higher in group 5 compared to group 1 (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in MDA levels between group 5 and group 6, and between group 5 and group 7. Left kidney IRSs were found to be higher in all other groups except group 2 compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Left kidney CRSs were significantly higher in group 5 compared to group 2 (p = 0.026), group 6 (p < 0.001) and group 7 (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: A decrease in renal functions was not observed in VUR, even if there was infection. When CRSs were evaluated, NAC and Se had protective effects in terms of scar formation in VUR nephropathy. TYPE OF STUDY: Experimental animal study. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Does pre-fellowship experience alter success rates of endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux during pediatric urology fellowship?

INTRODUCTION: Learning curve is a well-known factor that affects the success rate of endoscopic injection for vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). OBJECTIVE: To our knowledge, the significance of pre-fellowship training has not been studied. In the present study, our aim was to investigate the effect of pre-fellowship training on the endoscopic treatment success rates of pediatric urology fellows. DESIGN: A total of 78 patients aged 2-16 years (132 renal units) who underwent subureteric injection for the treatment of primary VUR by four pediatric urology fellows between 2014 and 2020 were retrospectively evaluated. Fellows were grouped into two as experienced and non-experienced according to the presence of pre-fellowship experience (defined as a minimum of 20 procedures). Patients in both groups were divided into two subgroups as non-dilating (grade I-II) and dilating VUR (grade III-V). Also, the change in success rate throughout the fellowship was analyzed. HIT or Double HIT method was used in all interventions. RESULTS: Experienced fellows carried out subureteric injection in 54 (40.9%) renal units while non-experienced fellows performed in 78 (59.1%). There was no success rate difference between experienced and non-experienced fellow groups in non-dilating VUR (100% vs. 88%, respectively p = 0.268), whereas the success rate of the experienced group was significantly higher in dilated VUR (78.9% vs. 50.9%, p = 0.006). Moreover, the amount of material used in the treatment of non-dilating VUR were similar between two fellow groups (0.6 ml vs. 0.6 ml, p = 0.500), while experienced group achieved higher success rates in dilating VUR by statistically significant less amount of injected volume (0.7 ml vs. 0.9 ml, p = 0.026).Overall complete VUR resolution rates were similar throughout the fellowship period in the experienced fellows (81.5% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.444), while it significantly increased in the non-experienced group implicating the completion of the learning curve (51.3% vs. 74.4%, p = 0.035). DISCUSSION: There has been no published reports on the effect of pre-fellowship experience on subureteric injection success. While many researchers reported on the importance of learning curve, various studies assessed the effect of injected volume on success rate implicating contradictory results. Furthermore, others indicated that the ideal technique providing accurate needle placement and obtaining proper depth during injection which is associated with surgical experience is more important than the injected volume in achieving success. CONCLUSION: Our results implicate that similar success rates in non-dilating VUR can be achieved regardless of previous subureteric injection training. However, higher failure rates may be expected when the procedures are performed by non-experienced pediatric urology fellows at the beginning of their fellowship in dilating VUR.