RESUMEN
Traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI) is a major cause of severe and permanent disability in young adults. Overweight and obesity are commonly observed among patients affected with SCI, with reports of a prevalence of over 60 and 30% respectively. Case report: A 34 year-old woman suffering from tetraplegia after sustaining a traumatic injury to C5-C6 at age 23 as a result of a motor vehicle accident was presented to our hospital's multidisciplinary bariatric team due to class II obesity. At the time of presentation to the team, eleven years after the accident, her BMI was calculated to be 39 Kg/m2 (weight 97 kg, height 1.57 meters). She was diagnosed with infertility while seeking pregnancy, and referred to our bariatric unit for weight loss. In addition, she had overcome the physical limitations of her injury, had a regular job and was engaged in regular physical activities such as swimming. In May 2017, she underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) without complications and was discharged on postoperative day 2. 17 months following LSG, with a normal BMI, she became naturally pregnant. She had emergency cesarean at 35 weeks due to pneumonia but both patient and child recovered without sequelae. Currently, 4 years after surgery she maintains 37.11% total weight loss (weight 61 kg). She reports having a better quality of life with fewer medical intercurrencies. Conclusions: Patients with SCI and obesity, particularly women seeking to conceive, may be benefited by being referred to bariatric teams for assessment and treatment to improve results associated with sustained weight reduction.
Asunto(s)
Gastrectomía , Infertilidad , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Infertilidad/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/cirugía , Cuadriplejía/complicaciones , Cuadriplejía/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Pérdida de PesoRESUMEN
RESUMEN Antecedentes: Aun en estado de cuarentena, las patologías de urgencia de Cirugía General requieren una evaluación y resolución inmediata. Objetivo: Analizar los ingresos, los resultados quirúrgicos y la gravedad de la enfermedad en los ingresos sin COVID-19, durante los primeros meses de la pandemia. Objetivos secundarios, subanálisis de patologías quirúrgicas habituales, como apendicitis, enfermedad de las vías biliares, diverticulitis y tumores complicados. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó un estudio observacional, ambispectivo, sobre una cohorte prospectiva de pacientes que consultaron por patología quirúrgica de guardia y requirieron hospitalización entre el 20 de marzo y el 31 de julio de 2020 correspondiente al Grupo Pandemia (GP), analizados y comparados con una cohorte del mismo período de 2019, Grupo Control (GC). Resultados: En el GP, en comparación con el GC, se registró un aumento en el número de pacientes ingresados (346 versus 305, p = 0,157), un aumento en el porcentaje de casos moderados-graves (58,1% versus 48,8%, p= 0,018), en el tiempo transcurrido desde el inicio de la presentación de los síntomas hasta la consulta (48 versus 24 horas, p< 0,001, en el tiempo desde el diagnóstico hasta la cirugía (23 versus 7 horas, p< 0,001), y en el tiempo operatorio (75 versus 60 minutos, p< 0,001). No hubo diferencias significativas en las complicaciones posoperatorias. Conclusión: Durante la pandemia se observaron cambios desfavorables en las características de la población analizada en relación a la pre pandemia, pero sin impacto en la morbimortalidad posoperatoria, demostrando que fue posible mantener los resultados quirúrgicos a pesar del retraso en la consulta.
ABSTRACT Background: Emergency general surgery conditions require immediate evaluation and timely resolution, even during quarantine. Objective: to analyze variations in admissions, surgical outcomes and severity of the disease in non- COVID-19 emergency admissions during the first months of the pandemic. Secondary objectives, to performed a sub-analysis of common surgical conditions, as appendicitis, biliary tract disease, diverticulitis and complicated tumors. Material and methods: An observational, ambispective study was carried out on a prospective cohort of patients who consulted with on-call surgical pathology and required hospitalization from March 20th, 2020 until July 31, 2020 referred to as Pandemic Group (PG), analyzed and compared with the same period of 2019, Control Group (CG). Results: We experienced an increase in the number of patients admitted at the ED during the pandemic PG vs CG (346 versus 305, p 0.157). Patients in the PG were found to be significantly more ill (58.1% versus 48,8%, p 0.018). A significant delay was found globally in both, time from onset of symptoms presentation to consultation (48 hours versus 24 hours, p < 0.001), and time from diagnosis to surgery (23 hours versus 7 hours, p < 0.001) in the PG, and an increase in the mean operative time (75 versus 60 minutes, p= 0,001). There was no significant difference in postoperative complications. Conclusion: During the pandemic we observed an increase in urgent surgical procedures due to biliary pathology and gastrointestinal tumors. The patients consulted with more advanced stages of disease, but this had no impact on postoperative morbidity or mortality, demonstrating that it was possible to maintain surgical outcomes despite delayed consultation.
RESUMEN
Introducción: La cirugía bariátrica (CB) es un tratamiento quirúrgico de la obesidad, cuyo objetivo es lograr el descenso de peso, de masa grasa y alcanzar un impacto metabólico a largo plazo. Se ha observado que ciertos pacientes no responden tan efectivamente a la cirugía, teniendo un descenso de peso inefectivo o recuperando peso tardíamente, y los mecanismos por lo que esto ocurre aún no están bien caracterizados. La microbiota intestinal tiene un rol esencial en varios de los procesos metabólicos asociados a la obesidad. El objetivo de este estudio fue caracterizar el metagenoma intestinal de pacientes candidatos para CB y otros que fueron operados, así como también evaluar las diferencias entre aquellos pacientes que tuvieron un resultado exitoso de la CB y los que no. Material y método: Se extrajo el ADN de 200 mg de heces de pacientes que cumplen criterios de CB, divididos en 3 grupos, basal (preoperatorio), 12 meses y más de 24 meses postoperatorios, con el fin de estudiar y comparar el perfil taxonómico de las comunidades bacterianas de la microbiota intestinal. Resultados: Mientras que la riqueza específica de los grupos de estudio no presentó diferencias significativas, la diversidad beta, que considera las abundancias relativas de los miembros de las comunidades bacterianas estudiadas, evidenció una composición global significativamente diferente entre los grupos de estudio. Sin embargo, nuestro análisis no identificó taxones específicos que pudieran dar explicación a la distinta evolución postoperatoria de los pacientes. Discusión: En la estructura de las comunidades microbianas, se observaron diferencias numéricas entre los grupos en cuanto a la riqueza y abundancia de taxones así como la comparación cuanti y cualitativa. Esta última presentó significativa disimilitud. Los resultados muestran que la principal diferencia entre los grupos de estudio se basó en la abundancia relativa de los gérmenes, cuyo estudio integral podría revelar patrones más consistentes y significativos vinculados a los mecanismos de respuesta terapéutica en sujetos sometidos a CB
Introduction: Bariatric surgery (BS) is a surgical treatment of obesity, which aims to achieve weight loss, fat mass loss and achieve a long-term metabolic impact. It has been observed that certain patients do not respond as effectively to surgery, having ineffective weight loss or regaining weight late, and the mechanisms by which this occurs are not yet well characterized. The intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in several of the metabolic processes associated with obesity. The objective of our study was to characterize the intestinal metagenome of candidate patients for CB and others who underwent surgery, as well as evaluate the differences between those patients who had a successful outcome from CB and those who did not. Material and method: DNA was extracted from 200 mg of feces from patients who met the criteria for surgical indication divided into 3 groups, baseline (preoperative), 12 months and more than 24 months postoperatively, in order to analyze and compare the taxonomic profile of the bacterial communities of the intestinal microbiota. Results: While the specific richness of the study groups did not present significant differences, beta diversity, which considers the relative abundances of the members of the bacterial communities studied, showed a significantly different global composition between the study groups. Nevertheless, our study did not identify specific taxa that could explain the different postoperative evolution of the patients. Discussion: In the structure of the microbial communities, numerical differences were observed between the groups in terms of the richness and abundance of taxa as well as the quantitative and qualitative comparison. The latter evidenced significant dissimilarity. The results show that the main difference between the study groups was based on the relative abundance of the germs, whose comprehensive study could reveal more consistent and significant patterns linked to the therapeutic response mechanisms in subjects subjected to CB. Bariatric surgery (BS) is a surgical treatment of obesity, whose objective is to achieve weight loss, fat mass and achieve a longterm metabolic impact. However, it has been observed that certain patients do not respond as effectively to surgery, having ineffective weight loss or late weight regain, and the mechanisms by which this occurs are not yet well characterized. The intestinal microbiota plays an essential role in several of the metabolic processes associated with obesity. The aim of this study was to characterize the intestinal metagenome of patients who will and who underwent BS, as well as to assess the differences between those patients who had a successful BS outcome and those who did not. Our results did not identify specific taxa that could explain the different evolution of the patients. While the specific richness of the study groups did not present significant differences, the beta diversity, which considers the relative abundances of the members of the studied bacterial communities, showed a significantly different global composition between the study groups
Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica , Obesidad Mórbida , Adulto , MetagenomaRESUMEN
RESUMEN Objetivo: describir las percepciones de los cirujanos en formación durante la fase inicial de la pandemia por COVID-19. Material y métodos: se realizó el análisis transversal de una encuesta de 51 preguntas a médicos en formación de un Servicio de Cirugía General en un hospital de la Argentina. Se abarcaron 5 ámbitos: institucional, asistencial, académico, doméstico y emocional. Resultados: en total 55 médicos completaron la encuesta (91,7%): 35 residentes y 20 becarios de perfeccionamiento; 56,4% eran hombres. El 98,1% consideró suficiente la información brindada por el hospital y el servicio sobre las medidas tomadas con respecto al COVID-19. Si bien el 98,1% consideró satisfactorios los instructivos sobre los equipos de protección personal, el 38% informó inconvenientes en su utilización. El 92,5% de los residentes estuvo de acuerdo con el esquema de guardias implementado. El 94,5% incrementó el tiempo dedicado a actividades académicas. El 75% consideró útil el cronograma de clases virtuales implementado. El 72,7% de los encuestados consideró que contaba con espacios donde manifestar sus preocupaciones. El 60% consideró adecuada la supervisión. El 81,81% manifestó preocupación por perder habilidad manual. El 53% dijo sentirse frustrado y el 54% manifestó temor de contagiar a su familia/pareja. Conclusión: conocer las percepciones de los cirujanos en formación en la fase inicial de la pandemia por COVID-19 permitió detectar oportunidades de mejora e incorporar nuevas estrategias educativas para afrontar las fases siguientes, asegurando el aprendizaje y priorizando su bienestar físico y psicosocial.
ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study is to describe the perceptions of surgeons in training during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Material and methods: A 51-question survey was conducted among physicians in training from a department of surgery in an Argentine hospital. Five domains were explored: institutional, healthcare, academic, domestic and emotional. Results: The survey was completed by 55 physicians (91.7%): 35 residents and 20 fellows. Among the respondents, 98.1% considered the information provided by the hospital and the department about the measures implemented in the COVID-19 stetting was sufficient. 98.1% considered that the instructions about personal protective equipment were satisfactory, but 38% reported difficulties to use them. 92.5% of the residents agreed with the system implemented for on-call shifts, 94.5% increased the time dedicated to academic activities, 75% considered the virtual class schedule implemented as very useful and 72.72% perceived that they had spaces to express their concerns. The supervision was considered adequate by 60%; 81.81% were worried to lose manual dexterity; 53% felt frustrated and 54% were afraid of infecting their family/partner. Conclusion: Understanding the perceptions of surgeons in training in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic made it possible to detect opportunities for improvement and incorporate modifications to address the following phases, ensuring learning and prioritizing their physical and psychosocial well-being.
RESUMEN
La aparición de esta nueva enfermedad por coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) ha generado un gran impacto dentro de los equipos de salud, obligando a realizar cambios profundos en la actividad diaria. Estas modificaciones están orientadas a promover un ambiente de trabajo seguro para el personal médico y no médico. Sin embargo, algunos de esos cambios pueden tener consecuencias sobre el proceso de aprendizaje de los médicos en formación. El desafío que enfrenta un Servicio de Cirugía de un Hospital Universitario es mantener la continuidad de los programas formativos asegurando a la vez la seguridad de los médicos residentes. En este comunicado se describen los cambios realizados en el Programa de la Residencia de Cirugía General en un Hospital Universitario, orientados a brindar la misma calidad educativa, en un entorno seguro durante el transcurso de esta pandemia.
The appearance of this new coronavirus 2019 disease (COVID-19) has generated a great impact within health teams, forcing profound changes in the daily activity. These modifications are aimed at promoting a safe work environment for medical and non-medical personnel. However, some of these changes may have consequences on the learning process of doctors in training. The challenge faced by a Surgery Service of a University Hospital is to maintain the continuity of the training programs while ensuring the safety of Residents. This report describes the changes made to the General Surgery Residency Program at a university hospital, aimed at providing the same educational quality, in a safe environment during the course of this pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Cirugía General/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Internado y Residencia/organización & administración , Cirugía General/normas , Telemedicina , Capacitación Profesional , Hospitales UniversitariosRESUMEN
Introducción: La endometriosis intestinal es una forma severa de esta entidad, afectando hasta un 12% de estas pacientes. Su tratamiento quirúrgico resulta difícil debido a la distorsión anatómica que genera, más aún cuando el abordaje es el laparoscópico. Objetivo: Analizar la factibilidad y seguridad terapéutica de las resecciones colorrectales laparoscópicas por endometriosis severa. Diseño: Observacional retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva. Material y métodos: Pacientes operadas con diagnóstico de endometriosis con compromiso colorrectal a las cuales se les realizó una resección intestinal entre enero de 2003 y septiembre de 2013. Resultados: De 1343 casos operados, 17 pacientes fueron intervenidas por endometriosis severa con compromiso colorrectal. Edad media 35 años (rango 23 - 47), IMC medio 22 kg/m2 (rango 18 35).El segmento frecuentemente afectado fue el recto (52%) y la unión rectosigmoidea (30%).En 9 pacientes se realizó una resección anterior baja, 4 de ellas requirieron ostomía derivativa; 5 pacientes recibieron una Resección anterior alta y 3 pacientes una hemicolectomía derecha. Tiempo operatorio medio 187 min (rango 60 - 360) y el sangrado operatorio medio 90cc (rango 20 - 500). Índice de conversión 11%. No se registraron complicaciones intraoperatorias. Estadía hospitalaria media 4 días (rango 2 - 10).Morbilidad global 23%.Se observaron complicaciones postoperatorias mayores en 1 caso (dehiscencia anastomótica) y menores en 3 casos (retención urinaria). No se registró readmisión hospitalaria y la mortalidad fue nula. Conclusiones: El tratamiento laparoscópico de la endometriosis intestinal severa es una opción factible y segura. En centros entrenados, puede ser adoptada como primera opción en el manejo de la endometriosis pelviana con severo compromiso colorrectal.
Background: Deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel involvement is an aggressive form of endometriosis with an incidence up to 12%.It´s surgical management represents a challenge because of the distortion of the anatomy this entity produces, even more so when the approach is laparoscopical. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and security of colorectal laparoscopic resections for bowel endometriosis. Materials and methods: All patients presenting to the Department of Colorectal Surgery with bowel endometriosis from January 2003 to September 2013 were identified from a prospective database and retrospectively analyzed. Results: From 1343 colorectal laparoscopic procedures, 17 patients received surgery because of bowel endometriosis. Median age 35 years (range 23 to 47) and median BMI 22 kg/m2 (range 18 to 35). The most affected segments included Rectum 52% and the Rectosigmoid junction 30%. Resections included 9 low anterior resections (4 of them required fecal diversion), 5 High anterior resections and 3 Right Hemicolectomies. Median operating time was 187 minutes (range 60 to 360). Conversion rate 11%. Median length of stay was 4 days (range 2 to 10). There were none intraoperative complications. Global morbidity rate was 23%. Postoperative major complications occurred in 5.8%: one patient presented an anastomotic leak. There were 3 minor complications consistent of urinary retentions. There were no readmissions and mortality rate was nule. Conclusions: Laparoscopic surgery of bowel endometriosis is a feasible and safe therapeutic option. In trained centers, it can be adopted as the first option in the management of deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis with bowel involvement.