Care pathway analysis and evidence gaps in adult-onset Still's disease: interviews with experts from the UK, France, Italy, and Germany.

Introduction: Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is a rare systemic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology. Published AOSD data are limited, and clinical guidelines were lacking until recently. Managing AOSD remains largely empirical with uncertainties and high variability about the optimal care pathway. Therefore, we used a qualitative approach to collect clinical judgments from the UK, Italy, France and Germany to inform the development of an agreed care pathway. Our work aimed to decrease the uncertainty associated with clinical practice, inform future research in AOSD, and help identify standardized definitions and outcomes in this population. Methods: Semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis were conducted. Eleven clinicians were interviewed between May and July 2022: four were based in Italy, three in the UK, two in France, and two in Germany. Results: In this work, we identified the structure of the typical care pathway for AOSD patients, which can be used to inform future economic models in AOSD. The general structure of the pathway was similar across countries. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are prescribed during the diagnostic workup while an additive approach is commonly used in confirmed cases: corticosteroids, conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, then biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) (dose increased before switching). For severe presentations, more aggressive approaches with higher doses and early use of bDMARDs are used. The main elements of variation among countries and clinicians were the criteria used for diagnosis; order of bDMARDs and preferential treatments for articular and systemic patients; and tests for patient monitoring. There is also a lack of standardized outcome measures making comparisons and evidence synthesis challenging. Conclusion: We identified important evidence gaps for clinical practice, e.g., reliable tests or scores predictive of disease progression and treatment outcome, and recommendations for research, e.g., reporting of compliance rates and use of the Yamaguchi criteria for clinical study inclusion. Consensus is needed around the use of the Systemic score in clinical practice and the clinical utility of this score. A standardized definition of remission is also required in AOSD, and further research should look to identify and validate the specific laboratory markers to be considered when assessing remission.

Systematic review on the use of biologics in adult-onset still's disease.

This systematic review (SR) describes the efficacy and safety of biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) for patients with adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD). Three randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one retrospective case series of multiple interventions, and 17 case series of single interventions met the inclusion criteria for this SR. Comparisons of biologic therapy in AOSD were only available against conventional DMARDs in one RCT and against placebo in two RCTs. There was a lack of common assessment criteria, meaning treatment efficacy across studies could not be compared. Uncontrolled retrospective case series suggested that bDMARDs have an effect for patients with AOSD, but these studies did not provide comparative data to show whether bDMARDs were more effective than other interventions or, whether any bDMARD was more effective than another bDMARD. However, there was evidence that bDMARDs could reduce steroid dose. Safety data from all included studies showed that bDMARDs appear to be a safe alternative to conventional DMARDs. This SR has highlighted the need for larger comparative studies in AOSD and has shown the need to standardize the definition of therapeutic response in AOSD. This would allow comparisons between studies in order to gain clarity on which bDMARDs may be more effective treatments for AOSD.

Burden of adult-onset Still's disease: A systematic review of health-related quality of life, utilities, costs and resource use.

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) poses a not well estimated burden on patients and healthcare systems. To assess this burden, a systematic review (SR) was undertaken to identify health-related quality of life (HRQoL), utilities, costs and healthcare resource use data. Searches of twelve databases, four conferences, and three key technology assessment and regulatory agency websites were conducted in August 2022. Reference lists of retrieved SRs published since 2017 were also checked. Overall, 16 studies were eligible for inclusion. Eight studies reported HRQoL outcomes, one of which also reported utilities data. Two studies reported direct costs outcomes, and seven reported healthcare resource use data. No indirect costs were identified. A range of outcomes were reported, thus limiting the comparability of results across studies. SF-36 data were impaired in AOSD on most scales, especially those concerning physical activity. Mean SF-36 data were lower across all subscales in patients with active AOSD compared with inactive AOSD. Biologic therapy showed improvements in the SF-36 physical health summary. Utility scores (one study) were significantly lower for AOSD than for healthy controls. Limited direct economic costs data were identified but were substantial where reported. Hospital length of stay ranged from 6.1 to 23.5 days. The SR showed there is a paucity of research reporting the HRQoL and cost burden of AOSD.