Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Blood ; 118(26): 6783-92, 2011 Dec 22.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22031867

RESUMEN

A primary HCMV infection or virus reactivation may cause severe disease in hosts with a deficient immune system. The virus can disturb both innate and adaptive immunity by targeting dendritic cell (DC) functions. Monocytes, the precursors of DCs in vivo (MoDCs), are the primary targets of HCMV; they can also harbor latent virus. The DCs generated from infected monocytes (CMV-MoDCs) have an altered phenotype and functional defects. We have shown that CMV-MoDCs do not secrete IL-12 in response to lipopolysaccharide stimulation, cannot ingest dead cells, induce T(H)1 differentiation, or the proliferation of naive allogeneic CD4(+) T cells. We found that the GM-CSF signaling in an entire population of CMV-MoDCs was impaired, although only half of the cells were productively infected, and that IL-6 secretion and suppressors of cytokine signaling 3 induction contributed to this bystander effect. We also showed that MoDCs derived ex vivo from monocytes of viremic patients had the same altered phenotype as CMV-MoDCs, including decreased STAT5 phosphorylation, indicating defective GM-CSF signaling. We have thus described a new mechanism of HCMV-induced immunosupression, indicated how infection may disturb both GM-CSF-dependent physiologic processes and proposed GM-CSF-based therapeutic approaches.


Asunto(s)
Citomegalovirus/inmunología , Células Dendríticas/inmunología , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/inmunología , Monocitos/inmunología , Western Blotting , Diferenciación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Diferenciación Celular/inmunología , Línea Celular , Células Cultivadas , Citomegalovirus/fisiología , Células Dendríticas/metabolismo , Células Dendríticas/virología , Citometría de Flujo , Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/metabolismo , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/farmacología , Interacciones Huésped-Patógeno/inmunología , Humanos , Inmunofenotipificación , Interleucina-13/inmunología , Interleucina-13/metabolismo , Interleucina-13/farmacología , Interleucina-6/inmunología , Interleucina-6/metabolismo , Interleucina-6/farmacología , Monocitos/metabolismo , Monocitos/virología , Comunicación Paracrina/inmunología , Fagocitosis/efectos de los fármacos , Fagocitosis/inmunología , Fosforilación/efectos de los fármacos , Interferencia de ARN , Receptores de Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/inmunología , Receptores de Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos y Macrófagos/metabolismo , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa , Factor de Transcripción STAT5/inmunología , Factor de Transcripción STAT5/metabolismo , Proteína 3 Supresora de la Señalización de Citocinas , Proteínas Supresoras de la Señalización de Citocinas/genética , Proteínas Supresoras de la Señalización de Citocinas/inmunología , Proteínas Supresoras de la Señalización de Citocinas/metabolismo , Linfocitos T/inmunología , Linfocitos T/metabolismo , Factores de Tiempo
2.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 40(3): 100879, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33965646

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Few studies assess postoperative outcomes after discharge in the ambulatory setting. The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative pain and adverse effects at 24 h and at 7 days after day surgery using an e-health follow-up smartphone-based application named SATELIA®. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, observational and monocentric cohort study was conducted at the University Hospital of Bordeaux. All eligible patients for SATELIA® follow-up between May 2018 and June 2019 were screened for the analysis. Data were extracted from two databases. Those with a missing primary outcome were excluded from the analysis. The main outcome was the worst pain score on POD 1, self-reported via SATELIA®. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of adverse effects on POD1, as well as the worst pain score and adverse effects on POD7. Quantitative data were reported by the median (IQR) and categorical data were presented as absolute numbers (%). RESULTS: A total of 2283 patients were screened for analysis, from which 592 were excluded due to missing data for the main outcome; 1691 patients were thus finally included. The median worst pain score at POD 1 was 3.0 (1.0-5.0); 35.5% (n = 601/1691) and 29.1% (n = 492/1691) of the patients reported moderate-to-severe pain at POD1 and POD7, respectively. CONCLUSION: This retrospective study shows that 35.5% of patients experience moderate-to-severe pain after day surgery. Even if SATELIA® should be further developed and evaluated, it also demonstrates the interest of using phone based software to follow patients after discharge and ensure a better personalised management.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ambulatorios , Teléfono Celular , Estudios de Cohortes , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA