Complications of Early Versus Delayed Total Elbow Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Distal Humerus Fractures.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of wound complications and heterotopic ossification (HO) between patients who underwent acute total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and those who underwent delayed TEA performed for the treatment of distal humerus fractures. Our hypothesis was that delayed surgery will have fewer wound complications but a higher rate of HO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 104 patients who had undergone TEA performed at 1 of 3 institutions following a distal humerus fracture. The acute cohort, comprising 69 patients, underwent TEA within 2 weeks; the delayed cohort, comprising 35 patients, received treatment between 2 weeks and 6 months. The rates of wound complications, HO, clinically relevant HO (requiring excision or resulting in loss of functional range of motion), and reoperation were recorded. These patients were followed up for an average of 52 (interquartile range, 18.5-117) weeks. RESULTS: Wound complications occurred in 10 patients (14.5%) in the early group and 7 (20.0%) in the delayed group. The overall rate of HO was 56.7% (59 patients). The rate of clinically relevant HO was 26.0% (27 patients), which was similar between the groups. Reoperation occurred in 20 patients (19.2%), which was similar between the groups. In the early group, 3 reoperations were performed for wound complications and 4 for HO. No patients required reoperation for these indications in the delayed group. The mean flexion-extension and supination-pronation arcs were 20°-130° and 80°-80°, respectively, which were similar between the groups. Rheumatoid arthritis and younger age were associated with increased odds of wound complications and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of reoperation, wound complications, and HO were overall higher than those previously reported; however, the study was underpowered to determine a difference between early and delayed treatment. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Heterotopic ossification formation after fractures about the elbow.

INTRODUCTION: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a well-known sequela after an elbow injury and is widely studied given the associated morbidity. The anatomic location of HO development for specific elbow injuries has not been reported. The purpose of this study was to describe the precise, anatomic location of HO development after different peri-articular elbow injuries. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with peri-articular elbow fracture and/or dislocation who underwent an elbow contracture release. The injuries were grouped into coronal shear distal humerus/AO 13.B3 (CSDH), distal humerus/AO 13.A, 13.B1, B2 or 13.C (DH), olecranon/AO 21.B1 (OL), radial head/AO 21.B2 (RH), extra-articular proximal radius and ulna/AO 21.A (EAPRU) fractures and elbow dislocations (DL). The HO location was determined by reviewing elbow radiographs and CT scans and were classified as anterior capsule, medial or lateral collateral ligaments, and posterior capsule/triceps insertion. RESULTS: The study consisted of 49 patients, such as 6 CSDH, 13 DH, 6 OL, 21 RH, 4 EAPRU fractures and 20 elbow DL. All CSDH and RH fractures and 19/20 elbow DL developed HO in the collateral ligaments, while 12/13 DH fractures developed an anterior capsule HO. All 6 OL fractures developed HO posteriorly, and 3/4 EAPRU fractures developed a proximal radioulnar synostosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that the location of HO development is specific to the injury type and is influenced by the soft tissues involved. This is consistent with the understanding that HO is the abnormal ossification of normal structures.

Utility of Ultrasound for Identifying Median Nerve Changes Indicative of Acute Carpal Tunnel Syndrome After Distal Radius Fracture.

Purpose: Ultrasound offers a fast and inexpensive way to evaluate the median nerve. However, there is a paucity of data assessing ultrasound in acute trauma. Our study aimed to characterize median nerve changes indicative of acute carpal tunnel syndrome (ACTS) in a cadaveric distal radius fracture (DRF) model. Methods: We used 10 upper-extremity specimens. We induced ACTS (carpal tunnel pressure >40 mm Hg) in a distraction-only model and then used a DRF model as a neutral position, under traction, or wrist extension. We measured the median nerve cross-sectional area (CSA), height, and width with ultrasound in each model. We used a novel calculation, height-width ratio (HWR), to describe nerve shape. A low HWR indicates an elliptical shape; as the HWR increases toward one, the shape becomes more circular. The CSA measurements and HWR at pressures >40 mm Hg were used to calculate a 95% confidence interval, which defined the threshold for ACTS. Results: Wrist distraction created carpal tunnel pressures >40 mm Hg in all specimens. Distraction increased CSA compared with baseline (9.1 ± 0.9 mm2 vs 6.3 ± 1.2 mm2, P < .001). Under ACTS-level pressures, the thresholds for CSA and HWR were 8.5 mm2 and 0.41, respectively. HWR significantly increased with distraction compared with baseline (0.47 ± 0.10 vs 0.28 ± 0.09, P = .006). Most neutral DRF models (n = 8, 80%) met the CSA threshold for ACTS, whereas all specimens with a DRF extended or under traction had CSAs above the ACTS threshold. Compared to the baseline, the shape of the median nerve was more circular in all DRFs, including neutral (0.28 ± 0.09 vs 0.39 ± 0.13), under traction (0.43 ± 0.09), and extended (0.45 ± 0.09). Conclusions: ACTS should be suspected in patients with median nerves demonstrating increased CSA and adopting a more circular shape. Fracture positioning impacts median nerve CSA with wrist extension, causing the greatest change. Median nerve HWR may offer an easier ultrasonographic alternative to CSA. Type of study/level of evidence: Diagnostic III.