Differences in presentation, treatment, and outcomes among minority head and neck cancer patient groups in Los Angeles County.

IMPORTANCE: While minorities represent around 20 % of all HNC patients, these demographics are largely understudied. Furthermore, trends in national studies may not always be fully replicated in locoregional populations, indicating a need for more nuanced study. OBJECTIVE: To better understand our patient population, we sought to understand differences in presentation, management, and outcome between Caucasians and minority groups with HNC. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis of the Los Angeles County Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. SETTING: Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: All patients in Los Angeles County diagnosed with cancer of the head and neck from January 1, 1988 to December 31, 2018. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome in our study was significant differences between racial and ethnic groups in age of diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic quintile, insurance status, stage at diagnosis, treatment modality, time to first treatment, and cancer-specific cause of death. RESULTS: Our 18,510-patient cohort was largely male (64.35 %), white (69.57 %), and were on average 62.84 years old (SD = 20.07). When stratifying patients by race and ethnicity, significant differences were found in average age at diagnosis, sex, socioeconomic quintile, insurance status, and stage at diagnosis, treatment modalities utilized, and time to first treatment (all p < 0.001). Relative to all other head and neck patients, minority groups were significantly younger, had lower proportions of male patients, were less likely to pursue surgery, were more likely to pursue chemotherapy or radiation, and endorsed longer time to first treatment (all p < 0.001). The distribution of socioeconomic quintile (all p < 0.001), insurance status (all p < 0.001), and stage at diagnosis (all p < 0.05) also significantly varied between minority and reference groups. Only African Americans exhibited significantly higher rates of cancer-specific cause of death relative to non-African Americans (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pervasive socioeconomic disparities between Caucasian HNC patients and those of other minority racial and ethnic groups in Los Angeles County that likely and significantly impact the diagnosis and management of HNC and its resultant outcomes. We encourage others to similarly examine their local populations to tailor the quality of care provided to patients.

Knowledge of HPV vaccination and associated HNC and treatment decision-making among minority populations.

OBJECTIVE: Understand vaccination knowledge and barriers to vaccination among minority adults. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Otolaryngology clinics at a safety net hospital and a tertiary academic center and a head and neck cancer screening event. METHODS: Survey was administered to consenting patients. Descriptive statistics and significance testing were used to characterize the data, with non-minority respondents as controls. Multivariate logistic regression was used to understand factors associated with vaccination. RESULTS: HPV vaccination among our 241 respondents (n = 41, 17.67 %) and their qualifying children (n = 52, 33.55 %) was low. Non-vaccinated minorities were significantly more likely to express interest in HPV vaccination (28.66 % vs 8.66 %, p = 0.016). Minority patients were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV causing cervical (88.64 % vs 72.45 %, p = 0.024) and head and neck (68.18 % vs 44.90 %, p = 0.005) cancer and were also less aware of HPV infection (95.45 % vs 81.12 %, p = 0.020) among non-women. Lack of knowledge about the HPV vaccine was the most cited reason why minority patients did not or were uninterested in vaccination for themselves or their children. In a multivariable logistic regression of factors associated with HPV vaccination, only increased age demonstrated a significant association with vaccination likelihood (OR = 0.91, 95 % CI = [0.88-0.95], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reported HPV vaccination rates were low for both white and minority patients but did not significantly vary on univariate or multivariate analysis. However, minority respondents were significantly less knowledgeable about HPV and its manifestations; they most often cited inadequate knowledge as why did not receive or were uninterested in HPV vaccination. As such, HPV vaccination educational interventions may raise vaccination rates among minority populations.

Assessing Laryngectomy Patient Education on YouTube: Investigating Quality and Reliability.

Objective: This study aimed to characterize the quality of laryngectomy-related patient education on YouTube and understand factors impacting video content quality. Study Design: Cross-sectional cohort analysis. Setting: Laryngectomy-related videos on YouTube. Methods: YouTube was anonymously queried for various laryngectomy procedure search terms. Video quality was evaluated using the validated DISCERN instrument which assesses treatment-related information quality. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize our cohort. Univariate and multivariable linear regression were used to assess factors associated with increased DISCERN score. Significance was set at P < .05. Results: Our 78-video cohort exhibited moderate levels of engagement, averaging 13,028.40 views (SD = 24,246.93), 69.79 likes (SD = 163.75), and 5.27 comments (SD = 18.81). Videos were most frequently uploaded to accounts belonging to physicians (43.59%) or health care groups (41.03%) and showcased operations (52.56%) or physician-led education (20.51%). Otolaryngologists were featured in most videos (85.90%), and most videos originated outside the United States (67.95%). Laryngectomy videos demonstrated poor reliability (mean = 2.35, SD = 0.77), quality of treatment information (mean = 1.92, SD = 0.86), and overall video quality (mean = 1.97, SD = 1.12). In multivariable linear regression, operative videos were associated with lower video quality relative to nonoperative videos (ß = -1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] = [-2.03 to -1.24], P < .001); the opposite was true for videos from accounts with higher subscriber counts (ß = 0.02, 95% CI = [0.01-0.03], P = .005). Conclusion: The quality and quantity of YouTube's laryngectomy educational content is limited. There is an acute need to increase the quantity and quality of online laryngectomy-related content to better support patients and caregivers as they cope with their diagnosis, prepare for, and recover from surgery.

Prospective Outcomes After Serial Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Injection in Vocal Fold Scar and Sulcus.

OBJECTIVE: Vocal fold scar and sulcus pose significant treatment challenges with no current optimal treatment. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), an autologous concentration of growth factors, holds promise for regenerating the superficial lamina propria. This study aims to evaluate the potential benefits of serial PRP injections on mucosal wave restoration and vocal function. METHODS: In a prospective clinical trial across two institutions, patients with vocal fold scar underwent four serial PRP injections, one month apart. Blinded independent laryngologists and expert listeners used pretreatment and one-month post-fourth injection videostroboscopy and CAPE-V assessments to evaluate mucosal wave and voice quality changes, respectively. Additionally, patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were evaluated. RESULTS: In the study, 15 patients received 55 PRP injections without adverse effects. Eight patients (53.3%) had mild, three patients (20%) had moderate, and four patients (26.7%) had severe scar. There was an average reduction of 8.7 points in post-treatment VHI-10 scores (p = 0.007). The raters observed an improvement in post-treatment voice in 73.4% of cases, and CAPE-V scores showed a reduction of 18.8 points on average (p = 0.036). The videostroboscopic VALI ratings showed an improvement in mucosal wave rating from 2.0 to 4.0. On average, the raters perceived the post-PRP exams to be better in 56.7% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: PRP has been validated as a safe autologous option for treatment of vocal fold scar. While results for mucosal wave and voice quality varied, there was a consistent improvement in PROMs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3: Prospective cohort study, with blinded analysis Laryngoscope, 2024.