RESUMEN
Trabectedin is a marine-derived anticancer drug approved for the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Here, we aimed to analyze its use in a large cohort of STS patients treated in Italy in a real-world setting. Data on STS patients treated with trabectedin in Italy were prospectively collected from January 2013 to December 2019 by the national drug regulator, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Time-to-off-treatment (TToT) was defined as the time between the initial prescription of trabectedin and the date of treatment discontinuation for any cause. The impact of the different baseline covariates, including the initial prescribed dose of trabectedin, on TToT was evaluated using an accelerated failure time (AFT) models with log-logistic distribution. In total, we analyzed data from 2633 sarcoma patients and 14 950 individual cycles of trabectedin. The median number of cycles of trabectedin received per patient was 3 (interquartile range 2-7). The labeled 1.5 mg/sqm dose was used in 27.3% of all first prescriptions. Overall, the median TToT was 93 days. In the final AFT model, the variables significantly associated to longer TToT were female gender (+13% increase in TToT); ECOG performance status 0 (+50%); histological diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma (+22%), well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (+72%) or myxoid liposarcoma (+61%); receiving treatment in a high-volume center (+23%). In this large real-world cohort of STS patients treated with trabectedin, our findings support the use of trabectedin in STS patients, in particular in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma patients, and highlight the role of treatment center volume in their management.
Asunto(s)
Leiomiosarcoma , Liposarcoma Mixoide , Sarcoma , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Trabectedina/efectos adversos , Leiomiosarcoma/patología , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Dioxoles/uso terapéutico , Tetrahidroisoquinolinas/uso terapéutico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/patología , Liposarcoma Mixoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Real-world data on daily practice management, treatment modifications and outcome of a large cohort of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) patients treated with ponatinib was performed through monitoring Registries of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Overall, 666 CML subjects were included in the ponatinib registry from February 2015 to December 2020 and were eligible for analysis: 515 in chronic phase (CP), 50 in accelerated phase (AP) and 101 in blast crisis (BC). Median age at baseline was 58.7 years with a predominance of male subjects (57.1%). The median time from diagnosis to start of ponatinib was 2.35 years: 259 (38.9%) subjects had received two previous lines of treatment, 260 (39.0%) three lines and 147 (22.1%) four or more lines. A molecular response [from major molecular response (MMR) to a score of ≤0.01% on the international reporting scale (IS)] was reported for 59% of patients out of 593 patients analysed. With a median follow-up of 14.4 months, 136 subjects (20.4%) required at least one dose reduction due to adverse events (AEs), whereas 309 patients (46.4%) required dose reduction in the absence of any evidence of side effects. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 261 patients (39%). This real-life analysis shows that dose reductions were made primarily as a precaution rather than due to the occurrence of adverse reactions.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Imidazoles , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Piridazinas , Sistema de Registros , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has improved the overall survival of chronic myeloid leukemia patients in chronic phase (CP-CML) and reduced the rate of disease-related mortality. Conflicting results have been however reported between data emerged from sponsored clinical trials and from population-based registries. Moreover, no data are so far available for patients treated with frontline second-generation TKIs, excluding those from sponsored studies. We analyzed the mortality rate of 2315 CP-CML patients treated with frontline second-generation TKIs through the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) registries and compared it with the ISTAT mortality rate of the general population. The estimated differences show that the increased rate of mortality in CP-CML patients is less than 1% for the class 0-29 years, stable around 2% for the intervals 30-44 years and 45-59 years, and 1.4% for the interval 60-74 years; interestingly this rate is reduced for patients aged 75 years and more as compared to the general population (- 0.65%). The difference between potential and estimated deaths is higher among women in the age classes between 30 and 74 years.
Asunto(s)
Bases de Datos Factuales , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Sistema de Registros , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Italia/epidemiología , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoAsunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva , Piridazinas , Humanos , Leucemia Mielógena Crónica BCR-ABL Positiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Piridazinas/efectos adversos , Sistema de Registros , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100912.].
RESUMEN
Background: Generalizability of registrative clinical trials to real-world clinical practice is influenced by comparability of patients in the two settings. We compared characteristics of cancer patients in registrative trials with real-world clinical practice in Italy. Methods: Data on age, sex and performance status (PS) were derived from web-based monitoring registries developed by Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) and corresponding registrative trials reported in the European Public Assessment Reports (EPAR) of European Medicines Agency (EMA). Weighted means were calculated in registries and trials and differences were described. Multivariate analysis was performed using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis. Findings: From January, 2013 to April, 2023, 419,461 unique pairs of patients and therapeutic indications were recorded in 129 AIFA registries. Within 140 related trials, 87,452 patients had been enrolled. Median age and rate of elderly (≥65 years old) patients were higher in monitoring registries than in clinical trials [mean difference of median age 5.3 years, p < 0.001; mean difference of elderly rate 17.17% (95% CI 1.06, 1.48)]. Overall, rate of female patients was not different between registries and trials [mean difference -0.55% (95% CI -1.06, -0.05)]. Mean rate of patients with deteriorated PS was low both in trials (3.1%) and in registries (4.3%) with a mean difference of 1.27% (95% CI 1.06, 1.48). Two clusters were identified with multivariate analysis: one including more registries (higher median age and elderly rate, lower female rate, higher rate of deteriorated patients), the other more trials (lower median age and elderly rate, higher female rate, lower rate of deteriorated patients). Interpretation: This study supports that cancer patients enrolled in trials do only partially represent those who have been treated in Italy in clinical practice. Inclusiveness of registrative trials should be increased to ensure generalizability of results to real-world population. Funding: Partially supported by Italian Ministry of Health.
RESUMEN
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2024.100912.].
RESUMEN
Background Information on the real-world use of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 inhibitors (PCKS9is) in familial hypercholesterolemia are limited. We evaluated the pattern of prescription and the long-term efficacy of alirocumab and evolocumab in Italian patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in clinical practice. Methods and Results The data set for analysis was extracted from the PCKS9i Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) registry and included 2484 patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) and 62 patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) who were prescribed PCKS9is from February 2017 to December 2021. As the follow-up schedules were not prespecified and could vary, persistence and adherence as well as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) changes during 2 years of treatment were analyzed in a final cohort of 1299 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. At baseline, 53.8% of patients with HeFH and 69.4% of patients with HoFH were receiving maximally tolerated lipid-lowering therapies, while 45.9% of patients with HeFH and 30.7% of patients with HoFH reported statin intolerance; mean LDL-C was 197.7±52.3 mg/dL in HeFH and 252.0±106.2 mg/dL in HoFH. The 6-month persistence and adherence to therapy were >85%, and LDL-C reduction reached 58.6% (to 79.7 mg/dL) in HeFH and 57.6% (to 95.1 mg/dL) in HoFH after 24 months of treatment. The European Atherosclerosis Society/European Society of Cardiology LDL-C goals were achieved in 43.3% of patients with HeFH and 37.5% of patients with HoFH. Conclusions PCKS9i prescribed to patients with familial hypercholesterolemia in clinical practice showed LDL-C-lowering efficacy similar to that observed in controlled trials. However, 2 of 5 HeFH cases and 2 of 6 HoFH cases achieved the recommended LDL-C goals. The full achievement of European Atherosclerosis Society/European Society of Cardiology LDL-C goals should require a lower threshold for PCKS9i initiation and a combination of multiple therapies.
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes , Aterosclerosis , Hipercolesterolemia Familiar Homocigótica , Hipercolesterolemia , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Humanos , Inhibidores de PCSK9 , LDL-Colesterol , Proproteína Convertasa 9 , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
In this analysis we describe the effectiveness of first-line ibrutinib in 747 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and TP53 aberrations in a nationwide study with a 100% capture of patients who received the study drug. Median age was 71 years (range 32-95). An estimated treatment persistence rate of 63.4% (95% CI 60.0%-67.0%) and survival rate of 82.6% (95% CI 79.9-85.4%) were recorded at 24 months. Disease progression or death were the reasons for discontinuation in 182/397 patients (45.8%). A higher risk of treatment discontinuation was found to be associated with age, ECOG-PS and pre-existing heart disease, whereas ECOG ≥ 1, age ≥ 70 years and male sex were associated with an increased risk of death. Median post-progression overall survival (OS) was 12.2 months (95% CI 9.2-22.0). Post-discontinuation median OS in patients who discontinued ibrutinib for other reasons was not reached (95% CI 42.3 months - NA). Ibrutinib was an effective first-line treatment for CLL and TP53 aberrations in patients treated at large academic centers and community practice hospitals. Clinical characteristics at baseline may influence the effectiveness of ibrutinib, whereas the experience of prescribing centers and multi-hit or single-hit TP53 aberrations had no impact on outcome in this high-risk population.
Asunto(s)
Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Leucemia Linfocítica Crónica de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Piperidinas , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genéticaRESUMEN
Background: Comparative data on mortality in COVID-19 patients treated with molnupiravir or with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir are inconclusive. We therefore compared all-cause mortality in community-dwelling COVID-19 patients treated with these drugs during the Omicron era. Methods: Data collected in the nationwide, population-based, cohort of patients registered in the database of the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) were used. To increase completeness of the recorded deaths and date correctness, a cross-check with the National Death Registry provided by the Ministry of the Interior was performed. We included in this study all patients infected by SARS-CoV-2 treated within 5 days after the test date and symptom onset between February 8 and April 30, 2022. All-cause mortalities by day 28 were compared between the two treatment groups after balancing for baseline characteristics using weights obtained from a gradient boosting machine algorithm. Findings: In the considered timeframe, 17,977 patients treated with molnupiravir and 11,576 patients with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir were included in the analysis. Most patients (25,617/29,553 = 86.7%) received a full vaccine course including the booster dose. A higher crude incidence rate of all-cause mortality was found among molnupiravir users (51.83 per 100,000 person-days), compared to nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir users (22.29 per 100,000 person-days). However, molnupiravir-treated patients were older than those treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir and differences between the two populations were found as far as types of co-morbidities were concerned. For this reason, we compared the weight-adjusted cumulative incidences using the Aalen estimator and found that the adjusted cumulative incidence rates were 1.23% (95% CI 1.07%-1.38%) for molnupiravir-treated and 0.78% (95% CI 0.58%-0.98%) for nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir-treated patients (adjusted log rank p = 0.0002). Moreover, the weight-adjusted mixed-effect Cox model including Italian regions and NHS centers as random effects and treatment as the only covariate confirmed a significant reduced risk of death in patients treated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir. Lastly, a significant reduction in the risk of death associated with nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir was confirmed in patient subgroups, such as in females, fully vaccinated patients, those treated within day 2 since symptom onset and patients without (haemato)-oncological diseases. Interpretation: Early initiation of nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir was associated for the first time with a significantly reduced risk of all-cause mortality by day 28 compared to molnupiravir, both in the overall population and in patient subgroups, including those fully vaccinated with the booster dose. Funding: This study did not receive funding.
RESUMEN
Remdesivir is the first drug approved for treatment of COVID-19 but current evidence for recommending its use for the treatment of moderate-to-severe disease is still controversial among clinical guidelines. We performed a nationwide, registry-based study including all Italian hospitalized patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir to assess the impact of major confounders on crude 15-day and 29-day mortality. Mortality was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimator and the Cox proportional-hazards model was applied to analyze the risks by patient's baseline features. In total, 16,462 patients treated with remdesivir from 29 October 2020 to 17 December 2020 were entered in the study. Crude 15-day and 29-day mortality were 7.1% (95% CI, 6.7-7.5%) and 11.7% (95% CI, 11.2-12.2%), respectively. Being treated within two days of admission reduced the risk of death by about 40% (HR 1.4, 95% CI, 1.2-1.6). Results from the largest cohort of remdesivir-treated patients suggests that mortality in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalized patients is substantially influenced by the days between SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and drug prescription. Current recommendations and future clinical trials for remdesivir alone or in combination should carefully consider the target population and timing for best efficacy of treatment.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adenosina Monofosfato/análogos & derivados , Alanina/análogos & derivados , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Until recently, no drug was labeled for AL amyloidosis. In 2011, the Italian Medicines Agency started a program to grant access to upfront bortezomib to patients with AL amyloidosis. All subjects were enrolled in a prospective online registry. Response was evaluated after two cycles to assess the possibility of continuing treatment. A total of 764 patients were included until 2019, and 615 were evaluable. Sixteen percent of patents had advanced (stage-IIIb) heart involvement, and 27% had severe or end-stage renal failure. Bortezomib delivery was possible in stage-IIIb patients at a reduced dose. Bortezomib discontinuation was associated with increasing age, advanced heart involvement and bi-weekly administration. Fifty-nine percent of subjects attained a hematologic response and 14% a cardiac response. Bortezomib-based therapy tends to be discontinued early in elderly patients and in advanced disease. Nevertheless, early response to therapy is possible in this challenging population.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas , Anciano , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Bortezomib , Dexametasona , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/tratamiento farmacológico , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS: The present study sought to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown measures on the prescription of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure (HF) in Italy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA) monitoring registries were analysed. The sacubitril/valsartan monitoring registry is based on 6-month prescriptions. A monthly aggregation on new activations throughout the observational period was computed. From March to December 2020, the initiation of new HF patients on sacubitril/valsartan decreased by nearly 40% with prescriptions dropping to values similar to 2018 when the registry was still operated off-line. A slight increase in prescriptions was observed after the lockdown measures were lifted, but prescriptions remained constantly below the pre-lockdown period. CONCLUSION: A marked and worrisome decline during the COVID-19 pandemic in the activation of a life-saving treatment such as sacubitril/valsartan was observed. This decline was clearly linked to the lockdown measures instated to counteract the COVID-19 pandemic. Upcoming studies should analyse the occurrence of new cases of HF as well as the severity of patients admitted to hospitals and their mortality compared to pre-pandemic levels.