Piperacillin-tazobactam dosing in anuric acute kidney injury patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

INTRODUCTION: To determine appropriate dosing of piperacillin-tazobactam in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS: The databases of PubMed, Embase, and ScienceDirect were searched. We used the Medical Subject Headings of "piperacillin-tazobactam," "CRRT," and "pharmacokinetics" or related terms or synonym to identify the studies for reviews. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was conducted to predict piperacillin levels for the initial 48 h of therapy. The pharmacodynamic target was 50% of free drug level above the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and 4 times of the MIC. The dose that achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment was defined as an optimal dose. RESULTS: Our simulation study reveals that the dosing regimen of piperacillin-tazobactam 12 g/day is appropriate for treating Pseudomonal infection with KDIGO recommended effluent rate of 25-35 mL/kg/h. The MIC values of each setting were an important factor to design piperacillin-tazobactam dosing regimens. CONCLUSION: The Monte Carlo simulation can be a useful tool to evaluate drug dosing in critically ill acute kidney injury patients receiving CRRT when limited pharmacokinetic data are a concern. Clinical validation of these results is needed.

The Role of Erythropoietin Levels in Predicting Long-Term Outcomes following Severe Acute Kidney Injury.

INTRODUCTION: Acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors are at an increased risk of chronic kidney disease, end-stage kidney disease, and mortality. Little is known about the effect of erythropoietin (EPO), a kidney-producing hormone, in post-AKI setting. We aimed to investigate the role of EPO as a predictor of long-term outcomes in post-severe AKI survivors. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of post-AKI cohort conducted between August 2018 and December 2021. Adults who survived severe AKI stages 2-3 were enrolled. Serum EPO was obtained at 1 month after hospital discharge. We explored whether EPO level could predict long-term kidney outcomes at 12 months including mortality, kidney replacement therapy, doubling serum creatinine, and major adverse kidney events at 365 days. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled. Median EPO level was significantly higher in non-survivors than survivors (28.9 [interquartile range: 16.2-50.7] versus 11.6 mU/mL [7.5-22.3], p = 0.003). The best EPO level cut-off was 16.2 mU/mL (sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 62.1%). Serum EPO predicted 12-month mortality with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.69. Combining clinical model using age, baseline, and discharge kidney function with serum EPO improved prediction with AUC of 0.74. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that high-level of EPO group had significantly higher mortality compared with low-level EPO group (15.2% vs. 3.0%, p = 0.020). Hematocrit was significantly lower in high-level EPO group compared with low-level EPO group at 12 months (33.4 ± 1.1% vs. 36.0 ± 0.9%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Plasma EPO appears to be a useful marker for predicting long-term outcome in post-severe AKI survivors.

Optimal Meropenem Dosing Regimens in Patients Undergoing Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy: Systematic Review and Monte Carlo Simulations.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal meropenem dosing regimens in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) concepts are not well established. This study aimed to (1) gather the available published pharmacokinetic studies conducted in septic patients receiving CRRT and (2) to define the optimal meropenem dosing regimens in these populations via Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: We used Medical Subject Headings "meropenem," "continuous renal replacement therapy," and "pharmacokinetics" or related terms to identify studies for systematic review. A one-compartment pharmacokinetic model was conducted to predict meropenem levels for the initial 48 h of therapy. The PD targets were 40% of free drug above a threshold of 1 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (40% fT > MIC), 4 times the MIC (40% fT > 4MIC), and an additional target of free drug level above 1 times MIC 100% of the time (fT > MIC). The dose that achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment (PTA) was defined as an optimal dose. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles were included for our systematic review. The necessary pharmacokinetic parameters such as volume of distribution and CRRT clearance were cited in 90.5 and 71.4% of articles, respectively. None of the published studies reported completed necessary parameters. A regimen of 750 mg q 8 h was found to be the optimal dose for pre-dilution continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis modality using two effluent rates (25 and 35 mL/kg/h) which achieved the PD target of 40% fT > 4MIC. CONCLUSION: None of the published studies showed the necessary pharmacokinetic parameters. PD target significantly contributed to meropenem dosage regimens in these patients. Differing effluent rates and types of CRRT shared similar dosing regimens. Clinical validation of the recommendation is suggested.

Levetiracetam dosing in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The study was aimed to define appropriate levetiracetam dosing regimens from available published pharmacokinetics (PK) studies in critically ill patients with and without cirrhosis receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) via Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). METHODS: Mathematical pharmacokinetic models were developed using published demographic and PK data in adult critically ill patients with known variability and correlations between PK parameters. CRRT modalities (continuous venovenous hemofiltration and continuous venovenous hemodialysis) with different effluent rates were modeled. Levetiracetam regimens from available clinical resources were evaluated on the probability of target attainment (PTA) using pharmacodynamics (PD) target of the trough concentrations and area under the time-concentration curve within a range of 6-20 mg/L and 222-666 mg × hour/L for the initial 72 hours of therapy, respectively. Optimal regimens were defined from regimens that yielded the highest PTA. Each regimen was tested in a group of different 10,000 virtual patients. RESULTS: Our results showed the optimal levetiracetam dosing regimen of 750-1000 mg every 12 hours is recommended for adult patients receiving both CRRT modalities with two different effluent rates of 25 and 35 mL/kg/h. Child-Pugh class C cirrhotic patients undergoing CRRT required lower dosing regimens of 500-750 mg every 12 ours due to smaller non-renal clearance. Of interest, some of literature-based dosing regimens were not able to attain the PK and PD targets. SIGNIFICANCE: Volume of distribution, non-renal clearance, CRRT clearance, and body weight were significantly correlated with the PTA targets. Dosing adaptation in this vulnerable population should be concerned. Clinical validation of our finding is absolutely needed.

Comprehensive versus standard care in post-severe acute kidney injury survivors, a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Currently, there is a lack of evidence to guide optimal care for acute kidney injury (AKI) survivors. Therefore, post-discharge care by a multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) may improve these outcomes. This study aimed to demonstrate the outcomes of implementing comprehensive care by a MDCT in severe AKI survivors. METHODS: This study was a randomized controlled trial conducted between August 2018 to January 2021. Patients who survived severe AKI stage 2-3 were enrolled and randomized to be followed up with either comprehensive or standard care for 12 months. The comprehensive post-AKI care involved an MDCT (nephrologists, nurses, nutritionists, and pharmacists). The primary outcome was the feasibility outcomes; comprising of the rates of loss to follow up, 3-d dietary record, drug reconciliation, and drug alert rates at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included major adverse kidney events, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and the amount of albuminuria at 12 months. RESULTS: Ninety-eight AKI stage 3 survivors were enrolled and randomized into comprehensive care and standard care groups (49 patients in each group). Compared to the standard care group, the comprehensive care group had significantly better feasibility outcomes; 3-d dietary record, drug reconciliation, and drug alerts (p < 0.001). The mean eGFR at 12 months were comparable between the two groups (66.74 vs. 61.12 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.54). The urine albumin: creatinine ratio (UACR) was significantly lower in the comprehensive care group (36.83 vs. 177.70 mg/g, p = 0.036), while the blood pressure control was also better in the comprehensive care group (87.9% vs. 57.5%, p = 0.006). There were no differences in the other renal outcomes between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive care by an MDCT is feasible and could be implemented for severe AKI survivors. MDCT involvement also yields better reduction of the UACR and better blood pressure control. Trial registration Clinicaltrial.gov: NCT04012008 (First registered July 9, 2019).

Ex vivo Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Clearance during Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine ceftolozane/tazobactam transmembrane clearances (CLTM) in continuous hemofiltration (CHF) and continuous hemodialysis (CHD) and to determine optimal ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing regimens for patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHOD: Validated, ex vivo CHF and CHD bovine blood models using polysulfone (HF1400) and AN69 (Multiflow 150-M) hemofilters were used to evaluate adsorption and CLTM at different effluent flow rates. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) using pharmacokinetic parameters from published studies and CLTM from this study were used to generate ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing for patients receiving CRRT. RESULTS: CHF and CHD CLTM did not differ at equivalent effluent rates. CLTM approximated effluent flow rates. No adsorption of ceftolozane/tazobactam occurred for either hemofilter. Effluent flow was the most important determinant of MCS-derived doses. CONCLUSION: CRRT clearances of ceftolozane/tazobactam depended on effluent flow rates but not hemofilter types. MCS-derived ceftolozane/tazobactam doses of 750 (500/250)-1,500 (1,000/500) mg every 8 h met pharmacodynamic targets for virtual patients receiving CRRT at contemporary effluent rates.

We Underdose Antibiotics in Patients on CRRT.

Appropriate antibiotic dosing in critically ill, infected, patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Severe sepsis and septic shock result in changes in pharmacokinetic parameters, including increased volume of distribution, hypoalbuminemia, and changes in renal and nonrenal clearances. The lack of CRRT standardization, nonrecognition of how CRRT variability affects antibiotic removal, fear of antibiotic toxicity, and limited drug dosing resources all contribute to suboptimal antibiotic therapy. Even when antibiotic CRRT pharmacokinetic studies are available, they are often based on old CRRT methodologies that do not exist in contemporary CRRT practice, resulting in unhelpful/inaccurate dosing recommendations. Application of these older doses in Monte Carlo simulation studies reveals that many of the recommended dosing regimens will never attain pharmacodynamic targets. In this review, using cefepime as an example, we illustrate whether clinicians are likely to achieve pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets when the recommended dosing regimens are prescribed in this patient population. We encourage clinicians to aggressively dose antibiotics with large loading dose and higher maintenance doses to reach the targets.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous piperacillin/tazobactam among patients with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis.

Currently, pharmacokinetic information on intravenous (IV) piperacillin/tazobactam in patients with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PD peritonitis) is limited. This study employed a prospective single-dose pharmacokinetic design to assess the pharmacokinetics of IV piperacillin/tazobactam in these patients. Four patients with PD peritonitis who received an IV loading dose of 4000 mg/500 mg piperacillin/tazobactam were enrolled in this study. The concentrations of piperacillin and tazobactam in plasma, peritoneal dialysis fluid (PDF) and urine were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Non-compartmental methods were used for pharmacokinetic analysis. During a 6-h dwell time for chronic ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), 9.23 ± 4.01% of the piperacillin was recovered in the PDF. This result is greater than that observed in patients without peritonitis in prior research. Piperacillin's PD clearance (CLPD), steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) and terminal half-life (t 1/2) were 5.79 ± 2.55 mL/min, 24.35 ± 11.26 L and 5.74 ± 1.53 h, respectively. These values are also higher than those of patients without peritonitis in a prior study. Eight hours following the loading dosage, the plasma and PDF piperacillin concentrations of all patients (98.25 ± 26.03 and 52.70 ± 22.99 mg/L, respectively) surpassed the Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacterales Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute susceptible breakpoints. In summary, the CLPD, Vss and t 1/2 for piperacillin were found to be greater in patients with PD peritonitis than in CAPD patients without peritonitis when compared with the results of a previous study. The IV loading dose of 4000 mg/500 mg piperacillin/tazobactam is sufficient to treat peritonitis caused by susceptible P. aeruginosa and Enterobacterales. The multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of IV piperacillin and tazobactam in this specific patient group should be further investigated.

Recommendations of Gentamicin Dose Based on Different Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Targets for Intensive Care Adult Patients: A Redefining Approach.

Background: In addition to the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) to the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ratio, the 24-hour area under the concentration-time curve (AUC24h) to MIC has recently been suggested as pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets for efficacy and safety in once-daily dosing of gentamicin (ODDG) in critically ill patients. Purpose: This study aimed to predict the optimal effective dose and risk of nephrotoxicity for gentamicin in critically ill patients for two different PK/PD targets within the first 3 days of infection. Methods: The gathered pharmacokinetic and demographic data in critically ill patients from 21 previously published studies were used to build a one-compartment pharmacokinetic model. The Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) method was conducted with the use of gentamicin once-daily dosing ranging from 5-10 mg/kg. The percentage target attainment (PTA) for efficacy, Cmax/MIC ~8-10 and AUC24h/MIC ≥110 targets, were studied. The AUC24h >700 mg⋅h/L and Cmin >2 mg/L were used to predict the risk of nephrotoxicity. Results: Gentamicin 7 mg/kg/day could achieve both efficacy targets for more than 90% when the MIC was <0.5 mg/L. When the MIC increased to 1 mg/L, gentamicin 8 mg/kg/day could reach the PK/PD and safety targets. However, for pathogens with MIC ≥2 mg/L, no studied gentamicin doses were sufficient to reach the efficacy target. The risk of nephrotoxicity using AUC24h >700 mg⋅h/L was small, but the risk was greater when applying a Cmin target >2 mg/L. Conclusion: Considering both targets of Cmax/MIC ~8-10 and AUC24h/MIC ≥110, an initial gentamicin dose of 8 mg/kg/day should be recommended in critically ill patients for pathogens with MIC of ≤1 mg/L. Clinical validation of our results is essential.

What is the right gentamicin dose for multiple trauma patients? A Monte Carlo simulation exploration study.

Background: The appropriate dose of gentamicin is important to prevent and treat infections. The study aimed to determine the optimal dose of gentamicin to achieve the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK) targets for efficacy and safety in multiple trauma patients. Methods: PK parameters of gentamicin in multiple trauma patients were gathered to develop a one-compartment PK model for prediction. The Monte Carlo simulation method was performed. The 24-h area under the concentration time curve to the minimum inhibitory concentration ratio (AUC24h/MIC) ≥50 was defined for the infection prevention target. AUC24h/MIC ≥110 or the maximum serum concentration to MIC ratio ≥8-10 was for the treatment of serious Gram-negative infection target. The risk of nephrotoxicity was the minimum serum concentration ≥2 mg/L. The optimal dose of gentamicin was determined when the efficacy target was >90% and the risk of nephrotoxicity was lowest. Results: The optimal gentamicin dose to prevent infection when the MIC was <1 mg/L was 6-7 mg/kg/day. A higher dose of gentamicin up to 10 mg/kg/day could not reach the target for treating serious Gram-negative infection when the expected MIC was ≥1 mg/L. The probability of nephrotoxicity was minimal at 0.2-4% with gentamicin doses of 5-10 mg/kg/day for 3 days. Conclusions: Once daily gentamicin doses of 6-7 mg/kg are recommended to prevent infections in patients with multiple trauma. Gentamicin monotherapy could not be recommended for serious infections. Further clinical studies are required to confirm our results.

Lacosamide dosing in patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

BACKGROUND: Lacosamide is one of the anticonvulsants used in critically ill patients. This study aimed to suggest appropriate lacosamide dosing regimens in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) via Monte Carlo simulations. METHODS: Mathematical models were created using published demographic and pharmacokinetics in adult critically ill patients. CRRT modalities with different effluent rates were added into the models. Lacosamide regimens were evaluated on the probability of target attainment (PTA) using pharmacodynamic targets of trough concentrations and area under the curve within a range of 5-10 mg/L and 80.25-143 and 143-231 mg*h/L for the initial 72 h-therapy, respectively. Optimal regimens were defined from regimens that yielded the highest PTA. Each dosing regimen was tested in a group of different 10,000 virtual patients. RESULTS: Our results revealed the optimal lacosamide dosing regimen of 300-450 mg/day is recommended for adult patients receiving both CRRT modalities with 20-25 effluent rates. The dose of 600 mg/day was suggested in higher effluent rate of 35 mL/kg/h. Moreover, a patient with body weight > 100 kg was less likely to attain the targets. CONCLUSIONS: Volume of distribution, total clearance, CRRT clearance and body weight were significantly contributed to lacosamide dosing. Clinical validation of the finding is strongly indicated.

Kidney Function Assessment in African American Patients: A Narrative Review for Pharmacists.

Recent recognitions of longstanding societal inequity in kidney function assessments have prompted the call to eliminate race as part of the algorithm to assess estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Previous equations for eGFR estimation adopted race as part of the calculation. Incorporating race within eGFR equations results in overestimating and underestimating Black and nonblack patients, respectively. The inclusion of race is controversial. In September 2021, the National Kidney Foundation (NKF) and the American Society of Nephrology (ASN) combined task force recommended estimating the kidney function without using a race variable. The task force endorsed race-free creatinine-cystatin C equations to be more accurate than the creatinine-only equations. Before the application of NKF-ASN revised recommendations, major healthcare disparities influenced daily clinical practice. Those disparities include the delay in initiating medications that have reanl or cardio-protective effects, such as sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs). Clinical judgment should be employed when dose adjusting medications. Combining the eGFR with other clinical assessment tools such as urinary output, the expanded use of confirmatory tests, and the eGFR trend is suggested for a better kidney function assessment. Additionally, creatinine-cystatin C is recommended when feasible, and when institutions have the laboratory abilities.

Citrate pharmacokinetics in critically ill liver failure patients receiving CRRT.

Citrate has been proposed as anticoagulation of choice in continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). However, little is known about the pharmacokinetics (PK) and metabolism of citrate in liver failure patients who require CRRT with regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA). This prospective clinical PK study was conducted at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between July 2019 to April 2021, evaluating seven acute liver failure (ALF) and seven acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients who received CRRT support utilizing RCA as an anticoagulant at a citrate dose of 3 mmol/L. For evaluation of the citrate PK, we delivered citrate for 120 min and then stopped for a further 120 min. Total body clearance of citrate was 152.5 ± 50.9 and 195.6 ± 174.3 mL/min in ALF and ACLF, respectively. The ionized calcium, ionized magnesium, and pH slightly decreased after starting citrate infusion and gradually increased to baseline after stopping citrate infusion. Two of the ACLF patients displayed citrate toxicity during citrate infusion, while, no ALF patient had citrate toxicity. In summary, citrate clearance was significantly decreased in critically ill ALF and ACLF patients receiving CRRT. Citrate use as an anticoagulation in these patients is of concern for the risk of citrate toxicity.

Optimal levofloxacin dosing regimens in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

PURPOSES: To determine appropriate dosing of levofloxacin in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT). METHODS: All necessary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters from critically ill patients were obtained to develop mathematical models with first order elimination. Levofloxacin concentration-time profiles were calculated to determine the efficacy based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) of AUC24h/MIC ≥50 for Gram-positive and AUC24h/MIC ≥125 for Gram-negative infections. A group of 5000 virtual patients was simulated and tested using Monte Carlo simulations for each dose in the models. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as the dose achieved target PTA at least 90% of the virtual patients. RESULTS: No conventional, FDA approved regimens achieved at least 90% of PTA for Gram-negative infection with Pseudomonas aeruginosa at MIC of 2 mg/L. The successful dose (1750 mg on day 1, then 1500 mg q 24 h) was far exceeded the maximum FDA-approved doses. For Gram-positive infections, a levofloxacin 750 mg q 24 h was sufficient to attain PTA target of ~90% at the MIC of 2 mg/L for Streptococcus pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin cannot be recommended as an empiric monotherapy for serious Gram-negative infections in patients receiving CRRT due to suboptimal efficacy.

Meropenem dosing recommendations for critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy.

PURPOSES: To gather available meropenem pharmacokinetics and define drug dosing regimens for Asian critically ill patients receiving CRRT. METHODS: All necessary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data from Asian population were gathered to develop mathematic models with first order elimination. Meropenem concentration-time profiles were calculated to evaluate efficacy based on the probability of target attainment (PTA) of 40%fT>4MIC. A group of 5000 virtual patients was created and tested using Monte Carlo simulations for each dose in the models. The optimal dosing regimens were defined as the doses achieved at least 90% of the PTA. RESULTS: The recommended meropenem dosing regimen for Asian critically ill patients receiving CRRT with standard (20-25 mL/kg/h) and high (35 mL/kg/h) effluent rates was 750 mg q 8 h to manage Gram negative infections with expected MIC < 2 mg/L in virtual Asian patients. Some meropenem dosages from available clinical resources could not achieve the aforementioned target. The volume of distribution, body weights and nonrenal clearance significantly contributed to drug dosing adaptation especially in the specific population. CONCLUSIONS: A meropenem regimen of 750 mg q 8 h was recommended for Asian critically ill patients receiving 2 different CRRT modalities with standard and high effluent rates. Clinical validation of these results is needed.

Antiviral Dosing Modification for Coronavirus Disease 2019-Infected Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Therapy.

Previous literature regarding coronavirus disease 2019 outlined a presence of organ dysfunction including acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute kidney injury that are linked to mortality. Several patients require extracorporeal therapy. This review aims to gather available published resources including physicochemical and pharmacokinetic properties and suggests antiviral drug dosing adaptation for coronavirus disease 2019-infected critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal therapy. A literature search was performed using PubMed, clinical trial registries, and bibliographic review of textbooks and review articles. Unfortunately, no standard of pharmacologic management and recommendations of drug dosing for coronavirus disease 2019 infection for critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal therapy exist due to the limited data on pharmacokinetic and clinical studies. All available extracted data were analyzed to suggest the appropriate drug dosing adjustment. Antiviral drug dosing adjustments for critically ill patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and continuous renal replacement therapy are presented in this review. Considering pathophysiologic changes, drug properties, and extracorporeal modalities, applying our suggestions is recommended.

Optimal vancomycin dosing regimens for critically ill patients with acute kidney injury during continuous renal replacement therapy: A Monte Carlo simulation study.

PURPOSE: This study aims to determine the optimal vancomycin dosing in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) using Monte Carlo simulation. METHODS: A one compartment pharmacokinetic model was conducted to define vancomycin deposition for the initial 48hours of therapy. Pharmacokinetic parameters were gathered from previously published studies. The AUC24/MIC ratio of at least 400 and an average of AUC0-24 at > 700mgh/L were utilized to evaluate efficacy and nephrotoxicity, respectively. The doses achieved at least 90% of the probability of target attainment (PTA) with the lowest risk of nephrotoxicity defined as the optimal dose. RESULTS: The regimens of 1.75grams every 24hours and 1.5grams loading followed by 500mg every 8hours were recommended for empirical therapy of an MRSA infection with expected MIC ≤1mg/L, and definite therapy with actual MIC of 1mg/L. The probabilities of nephrotoxic results from these regimens were 35%. CONCLUSIONS: A higher dose of vancomycin than the current literature-based recommendation was needed in CRRT patients.

The effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge on meropenem in critically ill patients requiring renal support.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of direct hemoperfusion with polymyxin B immobilized cartridge (DHP-PMX) on meropenem pharmacokinetics in critically ill patients with sepsis requiring continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: After intravenous infusion of 1 g meropenem over 3 h repeated every 8 h for at least 3 doses, 2 serial blood and ultrafiltration fluid samples were collected: one over a dose interval of meropenem with DHP-PMX therapy; and the other on the following day over a dose interval of meropenem with no DHP-PMX therapy. Meropenem concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Pharmacokinetic parameters of meropenem and extraction ratio of DHP-PMX were calculated. RESULTS: Mean AUC0-8 of meropenem on DHP-PMX day was comparable to that of the DHP-PMX free day (285.2 ±â€¯138.2 vs 297.8 ±â€¯130.2 mg ∗ h/L; paired t-test, p = .618). No statistical significance of peak and trough concentrations, volume of distribution, sieving coefficient, or half-life were found. Extraction ratio of DHP-PMX on meropenem was 0 [0-0.03] and clearance by DHP-PMX was 0.04 [0-0.2] L/h which was not considered clinically significant. CONCLUSIONS: No significant effect of DHP-PMX on meropenem pharmacokinetics was observed among severe sepsis/septic shock patients during CVVH treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registry detail: NCT registry: 02413541 (First registered March 3, 2015, last update October 16, 2017).

Cefepime dosing regimens in critically ill patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy: a Monte Carlo simulation study.

BACKGROUND: Cefepime can be removed by continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) due to its pharmacokinetics. The purpose of this study is to define the optimal cefepime dosing regimens for critically ill patients receiving CRRT using Monte Carlo simulations (MCS). METHODS: The CRRT models of cefepime disposition during 48 h with different effluent rates were developed using published pharmacokinetic parameters, patient demographic data, and CRRT settings. Pharmacodynamic target was the cumulative percentage of a 48-h period of at least 70% that free cefepime concentration exceeds the four times susceptible breakpoint of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (minimum inhibitory concentration, MIC of 8). All recommended dosing regimens from available clinical resources were evaluated for the probability of target attainment (PTA) using MCS to generate drug disposition in a group of 5000 virtual patients for each dose. The optimal doses were defined as achieving the PTA at least 90% of virtual patients with lowest daily doses and the acceptable risk of neurotoxicity. RESULTS: Optimal cefepime doses in critically ill patients receiving CRRT with Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recommended effluent rates were a regimen of 2 g loading dose followed by 1.5-1.75 g every 8 h for Gram-negative infections with a neurotoxicity risk of < 17%. Cefepime dosing regimens from this study were considerably higher than the recommended doses from clinical resources. CONCLUSION: All recommended dosing regimens for patients receiving CRRT from available clinical resources failed to achieve the PTA target. The optimal dosing regimens were suggested based on CRRT modalities, MIC values, and different effluent rates. Clinical validation is warranted.

Preparation times and costs for various solutions used for continuous renal replacement therapy.

PURPOSE: Results of a study to determine time and cost requirements for final preparation of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) products are reported. METHODS: A 3-phase observational study was conducted at a tertiary care university hospital to evaluate costs associated with manual addition of phosphate and/or potassium to 3 commercial 5-L CRRT products. In the first phase of the study, pharmacy workflow processes for solution preparation were established; in the second phase, pharmacist and pharmacy technician time spent in the CRRT workflow and all materials used were observed and recorded. In the third phase, time and personnel requirements were analyzed in economic terms to estimate final preparation costs. RESULTS: Through direct observation over 35 days, the CRRT workflow was observed and work times recorded for 511 bag preparations. The main cost contributors were the base CRRT solution and electrolyte additive prices. Technician compounding time differed substantially by solution brand and the need for electrolyte addition. Pharmacist verification time did not differ meaningfully by product. CONCLUSION: Preparation and verification of premade CRRT solutions that contained physiological electrolyte concentrations required less technician and pharmacist time than solutions that needed addition of electrolytes in the pharmacy. Personnel costs, which were a small part of the total cost of dispensed CRRT bags, were higher for technicians than pharmacists. The baseline costs of the solutions and the electrolyte additives, if needed, were the main contributors to total cost.