RNA language models predict mutations that improve RNA function.

Structured RNA lies at the heart of many central biological processes, from gene expression to catalysis. While advances in deep learning enable the prediction of accurate protein structural models, RNA structure prediction is not possible at present due to a lack of abundant high-quality reference data. Furthermore, available sequence data are generally not associated with organismal phenotypes that could inform RNA function. We created GARNET (Gtdb Acquired RNa with Environmental Temperatures), a new database for RNA structural and functional analysis anchored to the Genome Taxonomy Database (GTDB). GARNET links RNA sequences derived from GTDB genomes to experimental and predicted optimal growth temperatures of GTDB reference organisms. This enables construction of deep and diverse RNA sequence alignments to be used for machine learning. Using GARNET, we define the minimal requirements for a sequence- and structure-aware RNA generative model. We also develop a GPT-like language model for RNA in which triplet tokenization provides optimal encoding. Leveraging hyperthermophilic RNAs in GARNET and these RNA generative models, we identified mutations in ribosomal RNA that confer increased thermostability to the Escherichia coli ribosome. The GTDB-derived data and deep learning models presented here provide a foundation for understanding the connections between RNA sequence, structure, and function.

Assigning confidence to molecular property prediction.

Introduction: Computational modeling has rapidly advanced over the last decades. Recently, machine learning has emerged as a powerful and cost-effective strategy to learn from existing datasets and perform predictions on unseen molecules. Accordingly, the explosive rise of data-driven techniques raises an important question: What confidence can be assigned to molecular property predictions and what techniques can be used?Areas covered: The authors discuss popular strategies for predicting molecular properties, their corresponding uncertainty sources and methods to quantify uncertainty. First, the authors' considerations for assessing confidence begin with dataset bias and size, data-driven property prediction and feature design. Next, the authors discuss property simulation via computations of binding affinity in detail. Lastly, they investigate how these uncertainties propagate to generative models, as they are usually coupled with property predictors.Expert opinion: Computational techniques are paramount to reduce the prohibitive cost of brute-force experimentation during exploration. The authors believe that assessing uncertainty in property prediction models is essential whenever closed-loop drug design campaigns relying on high-throughput virtual screening are deployed. Accordingly, considering sources of uncertainty leads to better-informed validations, more reliable predictions and more realistic expectations of the entire workflow. Overall, this increases confidence in the predictions and, ultimately, accelerates drug design.