Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Surg Endosc ; 28(9): 2690-4, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24737533

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mirizzi syndrome (MS) is a rare complication of gallstone disease. Despite the fact that successful laparoscopic treatments have been reported, open surgery remains the gold standard approach for this disease due to technical difficulties involved. METHODS: A minimally invasive strategy combining endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and robotic surgery for the management of MS was implemented in early 2012. This consisted of a preoperative ERCP for definitive diagnosis and endoscopic stent insertion. Robotic surgical approach was used during operation to facilitate gall bladder removal and suture of defect over common duct. ERCP was repeated postoperatively for stent removal. Patient demographics and treatment outcomes were collected prospectively. A historical cohort of patients with MS who underwent conventional surgery between 1999 and 2011 was identified for comparison of treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Five patients with MS were managed with this strategy. Robotic subtotal cholecystectomy was successfully performed in all the patients without conversion or morbidity. When compared with a historical cohort of 17 patients who underwent surgery for MS, this group of patients had significantly less conversion and shorter hospital stay though the operation time was longer. It also showed less blood loss and less postoperative complications but these were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Mirizzi syndrome can be effectively managed with a minimally invasive approach by adopting a robot-assisted surgery together with a planned pre- and postoperative ERCP.


Asunto(s)
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/métodos , Colecistectomía/métodos , Síndrome de Mirizzi/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Anciano , Colelitiasis/complicaciones , Endoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Stents , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Ann Surg ; 257(5): 922-8, 2013 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23001077

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver fibrosis and cirrhosis are well-known risk factors for morbidity after hepatectomy. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) using transient elastography is a new method for detection of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis with high accuracy. Whether LSM can predict posthepatectomy outcomes has not been studied. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in which consecutive patients underwent hepatectomy for various indications from February 2010 to July 2011. All patients received detailed preoperative assessments including LSM and indocyanine green (ICG) clearance test. The primary outcome was major postoperative complication. RESULTS: One hundred five patients with a mean age of 59 years were included; 75 (71.4%) had chronic viral hepatitis and 76 (72.4%) had hepatocellular carcinoma. Thirty-four patients (32.4%) received major hepatectomy. The median ICG retention rate at 15 minutes was 4.2 (0.1%-32%) and the median LSM was 9.4 (3.3-75 kPa). For posthepatectomy outcomes, only LSM but not ICG showed significant correlation with major postoperative complications on receiver operating characteristic curves, with area under the curve of 0.79 (P < 0.001). Using the calculated cutoff at 12.0 kPa, LSM had sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 71.8% in the prediction of major postoperative complications. It was also an independent prognostic factor for major postoperative complications by multivariate analysis. The operative blood loss and transfusion rate were also significantly higher in patients with LSM >12.0 kPa. CONCLUSIONS: High LSM (>12.0 kPa) predicted worse posthepatectomy outcomes. Preoperative LSM was better than ICG test in the prediction of major postoperative complications. It was a useful preoperative investigation for risk stratification before hepatectomy.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad , Hepatectomía , Hepatitis Viral Humana/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/complicaciones , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Hepatitis Viral Humana/complicaciones , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Pruebas de Función Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas/complicaciones , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Estudios Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
HPB (Oxford) ; 15(8): 595-601, 2013 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23458320

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastases for more than 10 years with promising early outcomes. Preliminary results comparing percutaneous and surgical approaches have shown no difference in short-term outcomes. In this study, the longer-term outcomes were presented. METHODS: Patients with liver malignancies treated by RFA were prospectively studied from 2003 to 2011. Post-ablation assessment by computed tomography (CT) scan and serum biochemistry was performed at regular intervals. Recurrence rates and long-term survival were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 233 patients with liver malignancies (75.5% HCC and 24.5% liver metastases) were analysed. Three RFA approaches were used (percutaneous 58.4%, laparoscopic 9.4% and open 32.2%). The median follow-up time was 29 months. Complete ablation was achieved in 83.7%, with no difference between the two approaches. More wound and chest complications were observed in the surgical group. Intra-hepatic recurrences were observed in 69.5%; extra-hepatic recurrences were detected in 22.3%, with no difference between the two groups. There was no statistical difference between the two approaches in overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival. CONCLUSION: An extended period of follow-up in patients with liver malignancies showed that RFA is an effective treatment. No difference was demonstrated between the percutaneous and surgical approach, in terms of recurrence and survival.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/sangre , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
World J Surg ; 35(10): 2268-74, 2011 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21842300

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) is established as a safe and feasible treatment option for liver tumors. However, whether the adoption of laparoscopic approach for malignant tumors, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), will compromise the long-term result is still unknown. This study was designed to evaluate the long-term results of LH compared with a cohort of case-matched open hepatectomy (OH). METHODS: Thirty-three patients who underwent LH for HCC in our institution between June 2004 and March 2010 were recruited. A group of 50 patients who underwent OH for HCC during the same period was identified by matching to magnitude of operation, size of tumor, site of tumor, and the absence of concomitant local ablation or major procedure. The perioperative outcomes, disease recurrence, and survival of the two groups of patients were determined and compared. RESULTS: LH resulted in less operative complications (6.1% vs. 24%, P = 0.033) and shorter median hospital stay (5 vs. 7 days, P < 0.0005) but required longer operative time compared with OH (225 vs. 195 min, P = 0.019). There was no difference between LH and OH in recurrence rate (45.5% vs. 38%, P = 0.499). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 86.9%, 81.8%, and 76% for LH and 98%, 80.6%, and 76.1% for OH respectively (P = 0.646). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival were 78.8%, 51%, and 45.3% for LH and 69.2%, 55.9%, and 55.9% for OH, respectively (P = 0.849). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with OH, LH for HCC has similar long-term outcomes, but it has short-term advantages of less operative complications and shorter hospital stay.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
HPB (Oxford) ; 13(6): 431-7, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21609377

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate any change in the operative and survival outcomes in patients undergoing a right hepatectomy after adoption of the no-clamp technique using a radiofrequency dissecting sealer (TissueLink™) in liver resection. METHODS: In all, 58 consecutive patients who underwent a right hepatectomy from July 2003 to December 2007 (Group 1) were compared with 66 consecutive patients who underwent a right hepatectomy from January 1999 to June 2003 (Group 2). In group 1, a liver transection was performed with a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) and TissueLink™ without hilar clamping whereas in group 2, a liver transection was performed with CUSA and diathermy with routine continuous hilar clamping. RESULTS: For the operative outcomes, there was significantly less blood loss (median 450 vs. 900 ml, P < 0.001) in group 1. The complication rate was also significantly lower in group 1 (22.4% vs. 47.0%, P = 0.004). In subgroup analysis for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the overall survival rate was significantly better in group 1; 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were 78%, 72% and 57% in group 1 vs. 72%, 44% and 39% in group 2, respectively (P = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: When compared with the retrospective cohort, a right hepatectomy utilizing TissueLink™ without hilar clamping was feasible with potential benefits in surgical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatopatías/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Transfusión Sanguínea , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Constricción , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Electrocoagulación , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hemostasis Quirúrgica , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Hong Kong , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación , Hepatopatías/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Terapia por Ultrasonido , Adulto Joven
8.
HPB (Oxford) ; 11(1): 75-80, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19590627

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) is still a common disease in East Asia. The present study reviews the operative results for this disease in a single centre. METHODS: The records of 85 patients who underwent surgical treatment for RPC from August 1995 to March 2008 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Patients included 35 men and 50 women with a median age of 61 years. Types of surgery included: hepatectomy (65.9%); hepatectomy plus drainage (9.4%); drainage alone (14.1%), and percutaneous choledochoscopy (10.6%). There was no operative mortality. Complications occurred in 40% of patients and half the complications involved wound infections. The overall incidences of residual stone, stone recurrence and biliary sepsis recurrence were 21.2%, 16.5% and 21.2%, respectively, over a median follow-up of 45.4 months. The drainage-alone group and percutaneous choledochoscopy group had higher incidences of residual stone, stone recurrence and biliary sepsis recurrence. In hepatectomy patients, regardless of whether or not a drainage procedure had been performed, rates of residual stone, stone recurrence and biliary sepsis recurrence were 15.6%, 7.8% and 9.4%, respectively, over a median follow-up of 42.7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatectomy is safe and yields the best treatment outcome for RPC. It should be considered as the treatment of choice for suitable patients with RPC.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA