RESUMEN
Approximately 158,500 adults and adolescents in the United States live with undiagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Missed or delayed diagnoses adversely affect disease management and outcomes. This is particularly salient for patients receiving immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapy for the management of chronic inflammatory conditions, in which additional immunosuppression may increase the risk and severity of opportunistic infections. Despite this risk, comprehensive HIV testing before the initiation of immunosuppressive therapy is not yet the norm. We describe a case series containing the narratives of three patients recently treated with immunosuppressive agents, who presented with signs concerning for HIV-associated kidney diseases and who were found to have undiagnosed HIV later in the treatment course, which, unfortunately, resulted in poor outcomes. Screening for HIV or related illnesses, such as viral hepatitis or mycobacterial co-infections including tuberculosis, is essential before initiating biologic immunosuppression.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Inmunosupresores , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefropatía Asociada a SIDA/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/complicaciones , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
The KDIGO 2021 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Glomerular Diseases represents the first update to this set of recommendations since the initial set of KDIGO guideline recommendations was published in 2012. The pace of growth in our molecular understanding of glomerular disease has quickened and a number of newer immunosuppressive and targeted therapies have been introduced since the original set of guideline recommendations, making such an update necessary. Despite these updates, many areas of controversy remain. In addition, further updates since the publication of KDIGO 2021 have occurred which this guideline does not encompass. With this commentary, the KDOQI work group has generated a chapter-by-chapter companion opinion article that provides commentary specific to the implementation of the KDIGO 2021 guideline in the United States.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales , Humanos , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: End-stage kidney disease patients on dialysis are particularly susceptible to COVID-19 infection due to comorbidities, age, and logistic constraints of dialysis making social distancing difficult. We describe our experience with hospitalized dialysis patients with COVID-19 and factors associated with mortality. METHODS: From March 1, 2020, to May 31, 2020, all dialysis patients admitted to 4 Emory Hospitals and tested for COVID-19 were identified. Sociodemographic information and clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the medical record. Death was defined as an in-hospital death or transfer to hospice for end-of-life care. Patients were followed until discharge or death. RESULTS: Sixty-four dialysis patients with COVID-19 were identified. Eighty-four percent were African-American. The median age was 64 years, and 59% were males. Four patients were on peritoneal dialysis, and 60 were on hemodialysis for a median time of 3.8 years, while 31% were obese. Fever (72%), cough (61%), and diarrhea (22%) were the most common symptoms at presentation. Thirty-three percent required admission to intensive care unit, and 23% required mechanical ventilation. The median length of stay was 10 days, while 11 patients (17%) died during hospitalization and 17% were discharged to a temporary rehabilitation facility. Age >65 years (RR 13.7, CI: 1.9-100.7), C-reactive protein >100 mg/dL (RR 8.3, CI: 1.1-60.4), peak D-dimer >3,000 ng/mL (RR 4.3, CI: 1.03-18.2), bilirubin >1 mg/dL (RR 3.9, CI: 1.5-10.4), and history of peripheral vascular disease (RR 3.2, CI: 1.2-9.1) were associated with mortality. Dialysis COVID-19-infected patients were more likely to develop thromboembolic complications than those without COVID-19 (RR 3.7, CI: 1.3-10.1). CONCLUSION: In a predominantly African-American population, the mortality of end-stage kidney disease patients admitted with COVID-19 infection was 17%. Age, C-reactive protein, D-dimer, bilirubin, and history of peripheral vascular disease were associated with worse survival.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/mortalidad , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Anciano , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/etnología , Femenino , Georgia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tromboembolia/virologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent data suggests an association between blood hyperviscosity and both propensity for thrombosis and disease severity in patients with COVID-19. This raises the possibility that increased viscosity may contribute to endothelial damage and multiorgan failure in COVID-19, and that therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to decrease viscosity may improve patient outcomes. Here we sought to share our experience using TPE in the first 6 patients treated for COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six critically ill COVID-19 patients with plasma viscosity levels ranging from 2.6 to 4.2 centipoise (cP; normal range, 1.4-1.8 cP) underwent daily TPE for 2-3 treatments. RESULTS: TPE decreased plasma viscosity in all six patients (Pre-TPE median 3.75 cP, range 2.6-4.2 cP; Post-TPE median 1.6 cP, range 1.5-1.9 cP). TPE also decreased fibrinogen levels in all five patients for whom results were available (Pre-TPE median 739 mg/dL, range 601-1188 mg/dL; Post-TPE median 359 mg/dL, range 235-461 mg/dL); D-dimer levels in all six patients (Pre-TPE median 5921 ng/mL, range 1134-60 000 ng/mL; Post-TPE median 4893 ng/mL, range 620-7518 ng/mL); and CRP levels in five of six patients (Pre-TPE median 292 mg/L, range 136-329 mg/L; Post-TPE median 84 mg/L, range 31-211 mg/L). While the two sickest patients died, significant improvement in clinical status was observed in four of six patients shortly after TPE. CONCLUSIONS: This series demonstrates the utility of TPE to rapidly correct increased blood viscosity in patients with COVID-19-associated hyperviscosity. Large randomized trials are needed to determine whether TPE may improve clinical outcomes for patients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Viscosidad Sanguínea , COVID-19 , Intercambio Plasmático , SARS-CoV-2/metabolismo , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/sangre , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Emory Dialysis serves an urban and predominantly African American population at its four outpatient dialysis facilities. We describe COVID-19 infection control measures implemented and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 in the Emory Dialysis facilities. METHODS: Implementation of COVID-19 infection procedures commenced in February 2020. Subsequently, COVID-19 preparedness assessments were conducted at each facility. Patients with COVID-19 from March 1-May 31, 2020 were included; with a follow-up period spanning March-June 30, 2020. Percentages of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 were calculated, and characteristics of COVID-19 patients were summarized as medians or percentage. Baseline characteristics of all patients receiving care at Emory Dialysis (i.e. Emory general dialysis population) were presented as medians and percentages. RESULTS: Of 751 dialysis patients, 23 (3.1%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. The median age was 67.0 years and 13 patients (56.6%) were female. Eleven patients (47.8%) were residents of nursing homes. Nineteen patients (82.6%) required hospitalization and 6 patients (26.1%) died; the average number of days from a positive SARS-CoV-2 (COVID) test to death was 16.8 days (range 1-34). Two patients dialyzing at adjacent dialysis stations and a dialysis staff who cared for them, were diagnosed with COVID-19 in a time frame that may suggest transmission in the dialysis facility. In response, universal masking in the facility was implemented (prior to national guidelines recommending universal masking), infection control audits and re-trainings of PPE were also done to bolster infection control practices. CONCLUSION: We successfully implemented recommended COVID-19 infection control measures aimed at mitigating the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Most of the patients with COVID-19 required hospitalizations. Dialysis facilities should remain vigilant and monitor for possible transmission of COVID-19 in the facility.
Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/normas , Negro o Afroamericano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Diálisis Renal/normas , Poblaciones Vulnerables/etnología , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/etnología , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Georgia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicina , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients on dialysis are physically inactive, with most reporting activity levels below the fifth percentile of healthy age-matched groups. Several small studies have reported efficacy of diverse exercise interventions among persons with CKD and those on dialysis. However, no single intervention has been widely adopted in real-world practice, despite a clear need in this vulnerable population with high rates of mortality, frailty, and skilled nursing hospitalizations. METHODS/DESIGN: We describe a pragmatic clinical trial for an exercise intervention among patients transitioning to dialysis. We will use an existing framework - Exercise is Medicine (EIM) - developed by the American College of Sports Medicine. After undertaking formative qualitative research to tailor the EIM framework to the advanced CKD population (eGFR < 30 ml/min/1.73m2), we will randomize 96 patients from two regions-Atlanta and Bay Area-in two intervention arms with incremental levels of clinical-community integration: physical activity assessment during Nephrology clinical visit, brief counseling at pre-dialysis education, and physical activity wearable (group 1) versus group 1 intervention components plus a referral to a free, EIM practitioner-led group exercise program over 16 weeks (group 2; 8 week core intervention; 8-week follow up). We will assess efficacy by comparing between group differences in minutes/week of objectively measured moderate intensity physical activity. To evaluate implementation, we will use questionnaires for assessing barriers to referral, participation and retention along the path of the intervention. Further we will have a plan for dissemination of the intervention by partnering with relevant stakeholders. DISCUSSION: The overall goal is to inform the development of a practical, cost-conscious intervention "package" that addresses barriers and challenges to physical activity commonly faced by patients with advanced CKD and can be disseminated amongst interested practices. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (Dated:10/17/2017): NCT03311763 .
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico/fisiología , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Transferencia de Pacientes/métodos , Diálisis Renal/métodos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Transferencia de Pacientes/tendencias , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to lupus nephritis (LN-ESRD) may be followed by multiple providers (nephrologists and rheumatologists) and have greater opportunities to receive recommended ESRD-related care. We aimed to examine whether LN-ESRD patients have better quality of ESRD care compared to other ESRD patients. METHODS: Among incident patients (7/05-9/11) with ESRD due to LN (n = 6,594) vs. other causes (n = 617,758), identified using a national surveillance cohort (United States Renal Data System), we determined the association between attributed cause of ESRD and quality-of-care measures (pre-ESRD nephrology care, placement on the deceased donor kidney transplant waitlist, and placement of permanent vascular access). Multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: LN-ESRD patients were more likely than other ESRD patients to receive pre-ESRD care (71% vs. 66%; OR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.57-1.78) and be placed on the transplant waitlist in the first year (206 vs. 86 per 1000 patient-years; HR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.34-1.52). However, only 24% had a permanent vascular access (fistula or graft) in place at dialysis start (vs. 36%; OR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.59-0.67). CONCLUSIONS: LN-ESRD patients are more likely to receive pre-ESRD care and have better access to transplant, but are less likely to have a permanent vascular access for dialysis, than other ESRD patients. Further studies are warranted to examine barriers to permanent vascular access placement, as well as morbidity and mortality associated with temporary access, in patients with LN-ESRD.
Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Trasplante de Riñón/normas , Nefritis Lúpica/terapia , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Diálisis Renal/normas , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Trasplante de Riñón/tendencias , Modelos Logísticos , Nefritis Lúpica/complicaciones , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Diálisis Renal/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
Most pretransplant malignancies require a tumor-free waiting period before transplantation. End-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have an increased risk of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), which is mostly detected from routine screening during pre-kidney transplant evaluation. RCC must be quiescent prior to kidney transplantation. However, the tumor-free waiting period for RCC varies depending on the types of RCC. Multilocular cystic RCC (MCRCC), one subtype of clear cell RCC, has low malignant potential and may not require a tumor-free waiting period. We report a case of an ESRD patient with a newly diagnosed MCRCC that was found during routine pre-kidney transplant evaluation. A plan for kidney transplantation within 6 months of successful tumor removal by nephrectomy was made. The literature regarding MCRCC in kidney transplantation is reviewed.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Renales/patología , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Neoplasias Renales/patología , Trasplante de Riñón , Carcinoma de Células Renales/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Renales/cirugía , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Neoplasias Renales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A substantial proportion of patients undergoing hemodialysis carry Staphylococcus aureus in their noses, and carriers are at increased risk of S. aureus bloodstream infections. Our pragmatic clinical trial implemented nasal povidone-iodine (PVI) decolonization for the prevention of bloodstream infections in the novel setting of hemodialysis units. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify pragmatic strategies for implementing PVI decolonization among patients in outpatient hemodialysis units. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: Outpatient hemodialysis units affiliated with five US academic medical centers. Units varied in size, patient demographics, and geographic location. INTERVIEWEES: Sixty-six interviewees including nurses, hemodialysis technicians, research coordinators, and other personnel. METHODS: We conducted interviews with personnel affiliated with all five academic medical centers and conducted thematic analysis of transcripts. RESULTS: Hemodialysis units had varied success with patient recruitment, but interviewees reported that patients and healthcare personnel (HCP) found PVI decolonization acceptable and feasible. Leadership support, HCP engagement, and tailored patient-focused tools or strategies facilitated patient engagement and PVI implementation. Interviewees reported both patients and HCP sometimes underestimated patients' infection risks and experienced infection-prevention fatigue. Other HCP barriers included limited staffing and poor staff engagement. Patient barriers included high health burdens, language barriers, memory issues, and lack of social support. CONCLUSION: Our qualitative study suggests that PVI decolonization would be acceptable to patients and clinical personnel, and implementation is feasible for outpatient hemodialysis units. Hemodialysis units could facilitate implementation by engaging unit leaders, patients and personnel, and developing education for patients about their infection risk.
RESUMEN
Introduction: Patients with primary glomerular disease (GN) have unique management needs. We describe the design of a user-centered, patient-facing electronic health (eHealth) tool to support GN management. Methods: We surveyed patients and GN expert nephrologists on disease management tasks, educational needs, and barriers and facilitators of eHealth tool use. Results were summarized and presented to patients, nephrologists, engineers, and a behavioral and implementation science expert in stakeholder meetings to jointly design an eHealth tool. Key themes from the meetings are described using rapid qualitative analysis. Results: Sixty-six patients with minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, IgA nephropathy, and membranous nephropathy responded to the survey, as well as 25 nephrologists from the NIH-funded Cure Glomerulonephropathy study network. Overall, patients performed fewer management tasks and acknowledged fewer informational needs than recommended by nephrologists. Patients were more knowledgeable about eHealth tools than nephrologists. Nine patient stakeholders reflected on the survey findings and noted a lack of awareness of key recommended management tasks and receiving little guidance from nephrologists on using eHealth. Key themes and concepts from the stakeholder meetings about eHealth tool development included the need for customizable design, trustworthy sources, seamless integration with other apps and clinical workflow, and reliable data tracking. The final design of our eHealth tool, the UrApp System, has 5 core features: "Profile" generates personalized data tracking, educational information, facilitation with provider discussions and inputting other preferences; "Data Tracking" displays patient health data with the ability to communicate important trends to patients and nephrologists; "Resources" provides trusted education information in a personalized manner; "Calendar" displays key events and generate reminders; and "Journal" facilitates information documentation using written or audio notes. Conclusion: Our theory- and evidenced-based, stakeholder-engaged design process created designs for an eHealth tool to support the unique needs of patients with GN, optimized for effectiveness and implementation.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lupus nephritis (LN) is diagnosed by biopsy, but longitudinal monitoring assessment methods are needed. Here, in this preliminary and hypothesis-generating study, we evaluate the potential for using urine proteomics as a non-invasive method to monitor disease activity and damage. Urinary biomarkers were identified and used to develop two novel algorithms that were used to predict LN activity and chronicity. METHODS: Baseline urine samples were collected for four cohorts (healthy donors (HDs, n=18), LN (n=42), SLE (n=17) or non-LN kidney disease biopsy control (n=9)), and over 1 year for patients with LN (n=42). Baseline kidney biopsies were available for the LN (n=46) and biopsy control groups (n=9). High-throughput proteomics platforms were used to identify urinary analytes ≥1.5 SD from HD means, which were subjected to stepwise, univariate and multivariate logistic regression modelling to develop predictive algorithms for National Institutes of Health Activity Index (NIH-AI)/National Institutes of Health Chronicity Index (NIH-CI) scores. Kidney biopsies were analysed for macrophage and neutrophil markers using immunohistochemistry (IHC). RESULTS: In total, 112 urine analytes were identified from LN, SLE and biopsy control patients as both quantifiable and overexpressed compared with HDs. Regression analysis identified proteins associated with the NIH-AI (n=30) and NIH-CI (n=26), with four analytes common to both groups, demonstrating a difference in the mechanisms associated with NIH-AI and NIH-CI. Pathway analysis of the NIH-AI and NIH-CI analytes identified granulocyte-associated and macrophage-associated pathways, and the presence of these cells was confirmed by IHC in kidney biopsies. Four markers each for the NIH-AI and NIH-CI were identified and used in the predictive algorithms. The NIH-AI algorithm sensitivity and specificity were both 93% with a false-positive rate (FPR) of 7%. The NIH-CI algorithm sensitivity was 88%, specificity 96% and FPR 4%. The accuracy for both models was 93%. CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal predictions suggested that patients with baseline NIH-AI scores of ≥8 were most sensitive to improvement over 6-12 months. Viable approaches such as this may enable the use of urine samples to monitor LN over time.
Asunto(s)
Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico , Nefritis Lúpica , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnóstico , Nefritis Lúpica/patología , Riñón/metabolismo , Lupus Eritematoso Sistémico/patología , Biomarcadores/orina , BiopsiaRESUMEN
Background: Rapid fluid removal during hemodialysis has been associated with increased mortality. The limit of ultrafiltration rate (UFR) monitored by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services is 13 ml/kg per hour. It is not clear if the proportion of treatments with high UFR is associated with higher mortality. We examined the association of proportion of dialysis treatments with high UFR and mortality in end stage kidney failure patients receiving hemodialysis. Methods: This was a retrospective study of incident patients initiating hemodialysis between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2019, at Emory dialysis centers. The proportion of treatments with high UFR (>13 ml/kg per hour) per patient was calculated using data from the initial 3 months of dialysis therapy. Patients were categorized on the basis of quartiles of proportion of dialysis sessions with high UFR. Risk of death and survival probabilities were calculated and compared for all quartiles. Results: Of 1050 patients eligible, the median age was 59 years, 56% were men, and 91% were Black. The median UFR was 6.5 ml/kg per hour, and the proportion of sessions with high UFR was 5%. Thirty-one percent of patients never experienced high UFR. Being a man, younger age, shorter duration of hemodialysis sessions, lower weight, diabetic status, higher albumin, and history of heart failure were associated with a higher proportion of sessions with high UFR. Patients in the higher quartile (26% dialysis with high UFR, average UFR 9.8 ml/kg per hour, median survival of 5.6 years) had a higher risk of death (adjusted hazard ratio 1.54; 95% CI, 1.13 to 2.10) compared with those in the lower quartile (0% dialysis with high UFR, average UFR 4.7 ml/kg per hour, median survival 8.8 years). Conclusions: Patients on hemodialysis who did not experience frequent episodes of elevated UFR during the first 3 months of their dialysis tenure had a significantly lower risk of death compared with patients with frequent episodes of high UFR.
Asunto(s)
Diálisis Renal , Ultrafiltración , Anciano , Albúminas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Black patients are disproportionately affected by COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to compare risks of hospitalization of Black and non-Black COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department and, of those hospitalized, to compare mortality and acute kidney injury. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 831 adult COVID-19 patients (68.5% Black) who presented to the emergency departments of four academic hospitals, March 1, 2020-May 31, 2020. The primary outcome was risk of hospitalization among Blacks vs. non-Blacks. Secondary outcomes were mortality and acute kidney injury, among hospitalized patients. RESULTS: The crude odds of hospitalization were not different in Black vs. non-Black patients; however, with adjustment for age, Blacks had 55% higher odds of hospitalization. Mortality differed most in the model adjusted for age alone. Acute kidney injury was more common in the Black hospitalized patients, regardless of adjustment. Stratified analyses suggested that disparities in the risk of hospitalization and of in-hospital acute kidney injury were highest in the youngest patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our report shows that Black and non-Black patients presenting to the emergency department with COVID-19 had similar risks of hospitalization and, of those who were hospitalized, similar mortality when adjusted for multiple factors. Blacks had higher risk of acute kidney injury. Our results suggest that examination of disparities without exploration of the individual effects of age and comorbidities may mask important patterns. While stratified analyses suggest that disparities in outcomes may differ substantially by age and comorbid conditions, further exploration among these important subgroups is needed to better target interventions to reduce disparities in COVID-19 clinical outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Humanos , Grupos Raciales , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Población BlancaRESUMEN
RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE: We aimed to test interventions to improve physical activity in persons with advanced chronic kidney disease not yet receiving dialysis. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial with parallel-group design. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: We embedded a pragmatic referral to exercise programming in high-volume kidney clinics servicing diverse populations in San Jose, CA, and Atlanta, GA. We recruited 56 participants with estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. INTERVENTIONS: We randomly assigned participants to a mobile health (mHealth) group-wearable activity trackers and fitness professional counseling, or an Exercise is Medicine intervention framework (EIM) group-mHealth components plus twice-weekly small-group directed exercise sessions customized to persons with kidney disease. We performed assessments at baseline, 8 weeks at the end of active intervention, and 16 weeks after passive follow-up and used multilevel mixed models to assess between-group differences. OUTCOMES: Activity tracker total daily step count. RESULTS: Of 56 participants, 86% belonged to a racial/ethnic minority group; randomly assigned groups were well balanced on baseline step count. In intention-to-treat analyses, the EIM and mHealth groups both experienced declines in daily step counts, but there was an attenuated reduction in light intensity physical activity (standard error 0.2 [5.8] vs -8.5 [5.4] min/d; P = 0.08) in the EIM compared with the mHealth group at 8 weeks. In as-treated analyses, total daily step count, distance covered, and light and moderate-vigorous activity minutes per day improved in the EIM group and declined in the mHealth group at 8 weeks (standard error +335 [506] vs -884 [340] steps per day; P = 0.05; P < 0.05 for secondary measures), but group differences faded at 16 weeks. There were no differences in quality-of-life and mental health measures during the study. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, limited duration of study, assessment of intermediate outcomes (steps per day). CONCLUSIONS: A clinic-integrated referral to small-group exercise sessions is feasible, safe, and moderately effective in improving physical activity in an underserved population with high comorbid conditions. FUNDING: Normon S Coplon Applied Pragmatic Clinical Research program. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03311763.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: African Americans progress from early to late-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) at a rate that is three times that of Whites. Given research that implicates social stress in poor kidney outcomes, there is a need to examine whether race-related stress contributes to these disparities. Through experimental manipulation, this study sought to determine whether acute race-related stress was associated with autonomic arousal and an inflammatory marker, which are well-established pathways to poor kidney outcomes. Further we tested the hypothesis that expectations of racism may moderate this relationship. METHOD: Fifty-two African American patients along the CKD continuum were randomized to recall a general or race-related stressful experience. Before, during, and after the recall, patients' blood pressure and Interleukin-6 (IL-6) were monitored. Prior to the experimental manipulation, participants completed self-reported measures of expectations of racism. RESULTS: Across both study conditions, change in self-reported distress from baseline to stress was associated with both systolic and diastolic reactivity (both ps <.01), but not change in IL-6 responses (all ps > 0.05). A significant interaction revealed that those who were randomized to recall a race-related stressor demonstrated less diastolic blood pressure reactivity (F=4.80, p<.05) if they scored lower in expectations of racism as compared to those who scored high. Moreover, those who were randomized to the race-related stressor demonstrated greater increase in IL-6 from 45 to 90 min post-recall than those who recalled a general stressor (F=6.35, p<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Acute race-related stress may be associated with autonomic arousal and inflammatory response among African American patients along the CKD continuum, suggesting the need to further understand its role in racial disparities in CKD progression.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Racismo , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Humanos , Interleucina-6/sangre , Racismo/psicología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/etnologíaRESUMEN
Background: Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in <40% of patients with SLE. Reliable biomarkers of kidney damage are needed to identify patients with SLE at risk of developing LN to improve screening, treat the disease earlier, and halt progression to kidney failure. Novel biomarkers of extracellular matrix remodeling were evaluated as markers of kidney fibrosis and disease activity in patients with LN. Methods: Biomarkers of the interstitial collagen type III (PRO-C3) and type VI (PRO-C6) formation and of collagen type III (C3M) degradation were evaluated in the serum and urine of 40 patients with LN, 20 patients with SLE but without LN, 20 healthy controls, and ten biopsy controls (histologic kidney inflammation/damage without SLE). Their association with histologic markers of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy, with inflammatory cell infiltration and with disease activity and chronicity in the patients with LN was assessed. Results: Despite PRO-C3 (serum) and PRO-C6 (serum and urine) being significantly elevated in patients with LN compared with healthy controls, the markers did not differentiate patients with LN from those with SLE. C3M (urine) levels were not different in LN compared with the other groups. C3M (urine) strongly correlated and PRO-C6 (serum and urine) inversely correlated with kidney function (eGFR). The biomarkers of interstitial collagen turnover PRO-C6 (serum) and C3M (urine) correlated with histologic markers of interstitial fibrosis, tubular atrophy, and monocyte infiltration. Conclusions: Noninvasive collagen turnover biomarkers are promising tools to identify patients with SLE with kidney histologic modifications.
Asunto(s)
Colágeno Tipo III , Nefritis Lúpica , Biomarcadores , Fibrosis , Humanos , Riñón/patología , Nefritis Lúpica/diagnósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Approximately 38% of haemodialysis patients carry Staphylococcus aureus in their noses, and carriers have a nearly four-fold increased risk of S. aureus access-related bloodstream infections (BSIs) compared with non-carriers. Our objective is to determine the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of a novel intervention using nasal povidone-iodine (PVI) to prevent BSIs among patients in haemodialysis units. We will survey patients and conduct qualitative interviews with healthcare workers to identify barriers and facilitators to implementing the intervention. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will perform an open-label, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial to assess the effectiveness of nasal PVI compared with standard care. Sixteen outpatient haemodialysis units will participate in the study. The 3-year trial period will be divided into a 4-month baseline period and eight additional 4-month time blocks. The primary outcome of the study will be S. aureus BSI, defined as a S. aureus positive blood culture collected in the outpatient setting or within one calendar day after a hospital admission. The study team will evaluate characteristics of individual patients and the clusters by exposure status (control or intervention) to assess the balance between groups, and calculate descriptive statistics such as average responses separately for control and intervention survey questions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has received IRB approval from all study sites. A Data Safety and Monitoring Board will monitor this multicentre clinical trial. We will present our results at international meetings. The study team will publish findings in peer-reviewed journals and make each accepted peer-reviewed manuscript publicly available. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04210505.
Asunto(s)
Sepsis , Infecciones Estafilocócicas , Humanos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Povidona Yodada/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Diálisis Renal , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/prevención & control , Staphylococcus aureusRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The American Society of Nephrology's (ASN) Workforce Committee created a unique program called the Kidney Mentoring and Awareness Program for Students to engage medical students in the fight against kidney diseases and interest them in careers in nephrology. METHODS: The program provided a framework and 2 years of funding to three medical schools to organize and carry out health screenings in underserved areas of their communities as well as a structure for student mentoring by the practicing nephrologists. RESULTS: The Workforce Committee identified three medical schools (Emory University, Atlanta, GA; Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY) and engaged faculty at each school to serve as advisors. The ASN committed funding to the groups for 2 years, after which the groups became self-sufficient. Three nephrologists participated in each chapter, building on existing relationships with community groups to identify sites and carry out kidney screening events. CONCLUSIONS: We report here the experience of those chapters and a blueprint for other schools interested in setting up a similarly structured program to interest students in nephrology while working with community groups to spread awareness of the major underlying causes of kidney disease.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The relationship between mortality and pre-ESRD (end-stage renal disease) nephrology care in incident ESRD patients with multiple myeloma (MM) as the primary cause of renal failure has not been examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 439,206 incident US hemodialysis patients with MM as the primary cause of ESRD (June 1, 2005 to May 31, 2009) identified using the US Renal Data System, adjusted odds ratios (OR) for reported pre-ESRD nephrology care for ESRD due to MM (n=4561) versus other causes (n=434,645) were calculated. The association of pre-ESRD nephrology care with subsequent mortality in MM-ESRD patients was examined. RESULTS: MM-ESRD patients were less likely to have any predialysis nephrology care in the year before initiation of dialysis (34.8% vs. 58.5%; OR=0.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34-0.43) compared with patients with ESRD due to other causes. MM-ESRD patients compared with others were more likely to have catheters on first dialysis (91.8% vs. 75.6%; OR=4.15; 95% CI, 3.54-4.86). Incident MM-ESRD patients receiving predialysis care for ≥6 months had significantly lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97 and 0.88; 95% CI, 0.80-0.96, respectively), relative to those without this care. A catheter for dialysis access was associated with a 1.6-fold increase in 1-year mortality in incident MM-ESRD (hazard ratio 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.83). CONCLUSIONS: MM-ESRD patients were less likely to have predialysis nephrology care and more likely to use catheters on first dialysis. However, predialysis care is independently associated with lower mortality in MM-ESRD patients. Predialysis care should be prioritized in MM patients approaching ESRD.
Asunto(s)
Intervención Médica Temprana , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Diálisis Renal , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Lupus nephritis (LN) is a serious organ manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus. Histologic overlap is relatively common in the six pathologic classes (I to VI) of LN. For example, mixed proliferative LN (MPLN) often includes features of classes III & V or classes IV & V combined. We performed a comparative evaluation of renal outcomes in patients with MPLN to patients with pure proliferative LN (PPLN) against pre-specified renal outcomes, and we also identified predictor of clinical outcomes among those with PPLN and MPLN. HYPOTHESIS: Individuals with MPLN will have worse short-term renal outcomes compared to those with PPLN. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 278 adult LN patients (≥18 years old) identified from an Emory University Hospital registry of native renal biopsies performed between January 2000 and December 2011. The final analytic sample consisted of individuals with a diagnosis of PPLN (n = 60) and MPLN (n = 96). We analyzed differences in clinical and laboratory characteristics at baseline. We also assessed associations between LN category and renal outcomes (complete remission and time to ESRD) with logistic and Cox proportional hazards models within two years of baseline. RESULTS: The study population was predominantly female (83.97%) and African American (71.8%) with a mean age of 33.4 years at baseline. Over a median follow up of 1.02 years, we did not find any statistically significant associations between MPLN and the development of ESRD or remission when compared to patients with PPLN (adjusted HR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.07, 1.26). CONCLUSION: There was no association between mixed or pure histopathologic features of LN at presentation and rate of complete or partial remission but higher baseline eGFR was associated with a lower probability of complete remission among patients with lupus nephritis.