RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that magnesium may have hemostatic effects. FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium) was a pragmatic clinical trial of magnesium sulfate administered prehospital for acute clinical stroke syndromes and included patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. Exploratory secondary analysis by the treatment group found no reduction in hematoma expansion (HE) associated with magnesium treatment in intracerebral hemorrhage but did not consider serum magnesium levels achieved. We analyzed FAST-MAG intracerebral hemorrhage data for associations between serum magnesium level, HE, and early neurological deterioration, accounting for groupwise biases. METHODS: HE was defined as hematoma volume increase ≥3 mL within 24 hours and early neurological deterioration as ≥1-point Glasgow Coma Scale decline from arrival to hospital day 4. Comparing treatment and placebo groups confirmed biased availability of neuroimaging data. Therefore, HE and neurological deterioration were analyzed and stratified by treatment and placebo groups using univariate tests and adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage was present in 381 patients. Placebo patients had fewer serial neuroimaging studies available (123 [65.4%] versus 145 [75.1%]; P=0.038). Necessary data were available in 104 magnesium- and 85 placebo-treated patients (age, 64.9 [13.0] years; 67.7% male). In the magnesium group, higher magnesium level was associated with less HE (adjusted odds ratio, 0.64 per mg/dL [95% CI, 0.42-0.93]) and less neurological deterioration (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54 per mg/dL [95% CI, 0.33-0.82]). In the placebo group, magnesium level was not associated with either HE or neurological deterioration. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium may exhibit a hemostatic effect that was only observable in the FAST-MAG magnesium treatment group. Equipoise should be maintained, and specific trials are needed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00059332.
Asunto(s)
Hemostáticos , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Hematoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Hematoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemostáticos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Long-term disability after stroke is standardly assessed 3 months post-onset, using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The value of an early, day 4 mRS assessment for projecting the 3-month disability outcome has not been formally investigated. METHODS: In this cohort of patients with acute cerebral ischemia and intracranial hemorrhage, we analyzed day 4 and day 90 mRS assessments in the NIH Field Administration of Stroke Therapy- Magnesium (FAST-MAG) Phase 3 trial. The performance of day 4 mRS, alone and as part of multivariate models, in predicting day 90 mRS was assessed using correlation coefficients, percent agreement, and the kappa statistics. RESULTS: Among the 1573 acute cerebrovascular disease (ACVD) patients, 1206 (76.7%) had acute cerebral ischemia (ACI), while 367 (23.3%) had intracranial hemorrhage. Among all 1573 ACVD patients, day 4 mRS and day 90 mRS correlated strongly, Spearman's rho=0.79, in unadjusted analysis with weighted kappa of 0.59. For dichotomized outcomes, simple carry-forward of the day 4 mRS performed fairly well in agreeing with day 90 mRS: mRS 0-1 (kappa=0.67), 85.4%; mRS 0-2 (k=0.59), 79.5%; fatal outcome, 88% (k=0.33). Correlations of 4d and 90d mRS were stronger for ACI than ICH patients, 0.76 vs 0.71. CONCLUSIONS: In this acute cerebrovascular disease patient cohort, assessment of global disability performed on day 4 is highly informative regarding long-term, 3-month mRS disability outcome, alone, and even more strongly in combination with baseline prognostic variables. The day 4 mRS is a useful measure for imputing the final patient disability outcome in clinical trials and quality improvement programs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many stroke recovery interventions are most beneficial when started 2-14d post-stroke, a time when patients become eligible for inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) and neuroplasticity is often at its peak. Clinical trials focused on recovery need to expand the time from this plasticity to later outcome timepoints. METHODS: The disability course of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) enrolled in Field Administration of Stroke Therapy Magnesium (FAST-MAG) Trial with moderate-severe disability (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 3-5) on post-stroke day4 who were discharged to IRF 2-14d post-stroke were analyzed. RESULTS: Among 1422 patients, 446 (31.4%) were discharged to IRFs, including 23.6% within 2-14d and 7.8% beyond 14d. Patients with mRS 3-5 on day4 discharged to IRFs between 2-14d accounted for 21.7% (226/1041) of AIS patients and 28.9% (110/381) of ICH patients, (p < 0.001). Among these AIS patients, age was 69.8 (± 12.7), initial NIHSS median 8 (IQR 4-12), and day4 mRS = 3 in 16.4%, mRS = 4 in 50.0%, and mRS = 5 in 33.6%. Among these ICH patients, age was 62.4 (± 11.7), initial NIHSS median 9 (IQR 5-13), day 4 mRS = 3 in 9.4%, mRS = 4 in 45.3%, and mRS = 5 in 45.3% (p < 0.01 for AIS vs ICH). Between day4 to day90, mRS improved ≥ 1 levels in 72.6% of AIS patients vs 77.3% of ICH patients, p = 0.3. For AIS, mRS improved from mean 4.17 (± 0.7) to 2.84 (± 1.5); for ICH, mRS improved from mean 4.35 (± 0.7) to 2.75 (± 1.3). Patients discharged to IRF beyond day14 had less improvement on day90 mRS compared with patients discharged between 2-14d. CONCLUSIONS: In this acute stroke cohort, nearly 1 in 4 patients with moderate-severe disability on post-stroke day4 were transferred to IRF within 2-14d post-stroke. ICH patients had nominally greater mean improvement on mRS day90 than AIS patients. This course delineation provides a roadmap for future rehabilitation intervention studies.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemorragias Intracraneales/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos como AsuntoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To delineate diurnal variation onset distinguishing ischemic from hemorrhagic stroke, wake from sleep onset, and weekdays from weekends/holidays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed patients enrolled in the FAST-MAG trial of field-initiated neuroprotective agent in patients with hyperacute stroke within 2h of symptoms onset. Stroke onset times were analyzed in 1h, 4h, and 12h time blocks throughout the 24h day-night cycle. Patient demographic, clinical features, stroke severity, and prehospital workflow were evaluated for association with onset times. RESULTS: Among 1615 acute cerebrovascular disease patients, final diagnoses were acute cerebral ischemia in 76.5% and Intracerebral hemorrhage in 23.5%. Considering all acute cerebrovascular disease patients, frequency of wake onset times showed a bimodal pattern, with peaks on onsets at 09:00-13:59 and 17:00-18:59 and early morning (00:00-05:59) onset in only 3.8%. Circadian rhythmicity differed among stroke subtypes: in acute cerebral ischemia, a single broad plateau of elevated incidences was seen from 10:00-21:59; in Intracerebral hemorrhage, bimodal peaks occurred at 09:00 and 19:00. The ratio of Intracerebral hemorrhage to acute cerebral ischemia occurrence was highest in early morning, 02:00-06:59. Marked weekday vs weekends pattern variation was noted for acute cerebral ischemia, with a broad plateau between 09:00 and 21:59 on weekdays but a unimodal peak at 14:00-15:59 on weekends. CONCLUSIONS: Wake onset of acute cerebrovascular disease showed a marked circadian variation, with distinctive patterns of a broad elevated plateau among acute cerebral ischemia patients; a bimodal peak among intracerebral hemorrhage patients; and a weekend change in acute cerebral ischemia pattern to a unimodal peak.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular Hemorrágico/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Hemorragia Cerebral/epidemiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the trajectory of recovery and long-term functional outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). Most ICH trials have conventionally assessed outcomes at 3 months following the footsteps of ischemic stroke. The i-DEF trial (Intracerebral Hemorrhage Deferoxamine Trial) assessed modified Rankin Scale (mRS) longitudinally at prespecified time points from day 7 through the end of the 6-month follow-up period. We evaluated the trajectory of mRS among trial participants and examined the effect of deferoxamine on this trajectory. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of the i-DEF trial, a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, futility-design, phase 2 clinical trial, based on the actual treatment received. Favorable outcome was defined as mRS score of 0-2. A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate the outcome trajectory over time, as well as whether the trajectory was altered by deferoxamine, after adjustments for randomization variables, presence of intraventricular hemorrhage, and ICH location. RESULTS: A total of 291 subjects were included in analysis (145 placebo and 146 deferoxamine). The proportion of patients with mRS score of 0-2 continually increased from day 7 to 180 in both groups (interaction P<0.0001 for time in main effects model), but treatment with deferoxamine favorably altered the trajectory (interaction P=0.0010). Between day 90 and 180, the deferoxamine group improved (P=0.0001), whereas there was not significant improvement in the placebo arm (P=0.3005). CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of patients continue to improve up to 6 months after ICH. Future ICH trials should assess outcomes past 90 days for a minimum of 6 months. In i-DEF, treatment with deferoxamine seemed to accelerate and alter the trajectory of recovery as assessed by mRS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02175225.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia Cerebral , Deferoxamina , Humanos , Hemorragia Cerebral/terapia , Deferoxamina/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Inutilidad Médica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is the deadliest form of stroke. In observational studies, lower serum magnesium has been linked to more hematoma expansion (HE) and intracranial hemorrhage, implying that supplemental magnesium sulfate is a potential acute treatment for patients with ICH and could reduce HE. FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy - Magnesium) was a clinical trial of magnesium sulfate started prehospital in patients with acute stroke within 2 hours of last known well enrolled. CT was not required prior to enrollment, and several hundred patients with acute ICH were enrolled. In this ancillary analysis, we assessed the effect of magnesium sulfate treatment upon HE in patients with acute ICH. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data that were prospectively collected in the FAST-MAG study. Patients received intravenous magnesium sulfate or matched placebo within 2 hours of onset. We compared HE among patients allocated to intravenous magnesium sulfate or placebo with a Mann-Whitney U. We used the same method to compare neurological deficit severity (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) and global disability (modified Rankin Scale) at 3 months. RESULTS: Among 268 patients with ICH meeting study entry criteria, mean 65.4±13/4 years, 33% were female, and 211 (79%) had a history of hypertension. Initial deficit severities were median (interquartile range) of 4 (3-5) on the Los Angeles Motor Scale in the field and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 16 (9.5-25.5) early after hospital arrival. Follow-up brain imaging was performed a median of 17.1 (11.3-22.7) hours after first scan. The magnesium and placebo groups did not statistically differ in hematoma volume on arrival, 10.1 (5.6-28.7) versus 12.4 (5.6-28.7) mL (P=0.6), or HE, 2.0 (0.1-7.4) versus 1.5 (-0.2 to 8) mL (P=0.5). There was no difference in functional outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 3-6), 59% versus 50% (P=0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium sulfate did not reduce HE or improve functional outcomes at 90 days. A benefit for patients with initial hypomagnesemia was not addressed. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT00059332.
Asunto(s)
Sulfato de Magnesio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia Cerebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Hematoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To emphasize treatment speed for time-sensitive conditions, emergency medicine has developed not only the concept of the golden hour, but also the platinum half-hour. Patients with acute stroke treated within the first half-hour of onset have not been previously characterized. METHODS: In this cohort study, we analyzed patients enrolled in the FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium) trial, testing paramedic prehospital start of neuroprotective agent ≤2 hours of onset. The features of all acute cerebral ischemia, and intracranial hemorrhage patients with treatment starting at ≤30 m of last known well were compared with later-treated patients. RESULTS: Among 1680 patients, 203 (12.1%) received study agents within 30 minutes of last known well. Among platinum half-hour patients, median onset-to-treatment time was 28 minutes (interquartile range, 25-30), and final diagnoses were acute cerebral ischemia in 71.8% (ischemic stroke, 61.5%, TIA 10.3%); intracranial hemorrhage in 26.1%; and mimic in 2.5%. Clinical features among platinum half-hour patients were largely similar to later-treated patients and included age 69 (interquartile range, 57-79), 44.8% women, prehospital Los Angeles Motor Scale median 4 (3-5), and early-postarrival National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale deficit 8 (interquartile range, 3-18). Platinum half-hour acute cerebral ischemia patients did have more severe prehospital motor deficits and younger age; platinum half-hour intracranial hemorrhage patients had more severe motor deficits, were more often female, and less often of Hispanic ethnicity. Outcomes at 3 m in platinum half-hour patients were comparable to later-treated patients and included freedom-from-disability (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-1) in 35.5%, functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) in 53.2%, and mortality in 17.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital initiation permits treatment start within the platinum half-hour after last known well in a substantial proportion of acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients, accounting for more than 1 in 10 enrolled in a multicenter trial. Hyperacute platinum half-hour patients were largely similar to later-treated patients and are an attainable target for treatment in prehospital stroke trials.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/terapia , Masculino , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéutico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Trombectomía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The choice of drugs for patients with status epilepticus that is refractory to treatment with benzodiazepines has not been thoroughly studied. METHODS: In a randomized, blinded, adaptive trial, we compared the efficacy and safety of three intravenous anticonvulsive agents - levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate - in children and adults with convulsive status epilepticus that was unresponsive to treatment with benzodiazepines. The primary outcome was absence of clinically evident seizures and improvement in the level of consciousness by 60 minutes after the start of drug infusion, without additional anticonvulsant medication. The posterior probabilities that each drug was the most or least effective were calculated. Safety outcomes included life-threatening hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia, endotracheal intubation, seizure recurrence, and death. RESULTS: A total of 384 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive levetiracetam (145 patients), fosphenytoin (118), or valproate (121). Reenrollment of patients with a second episode of status epilepticus accounted for 16 additional instances of randomization. In accordance with a prespecified stopping rule for futility of finding one drug to be superior or inferior, a planned interim analysis led to the trial being stopped. Of the enrolled patients, 10% were determined to have had psychogenic seizures. The primary outcome of cessation of status epilepticus and improvement in the level of consciousness at 60 minutes occurred in 68 patients assigned to levetiracetam (47%; 95% credible interval, 39 to 55), 53 patients assigned to fosphenytoin (45%; 95% credible interval, 36 to 54), and 56 patients assigned to valproate (46%; 95% credible interval, 38 to 55). The posterior probability that each drug was the most effective was 0.41, 0.24, and 0.35, respectively. Numerically more episodes of hypotension and intubation occurred in the fosphenytoin group and more deaths occurred in the levetiracetam group than in the other groups, but these differences were not significant. CONCLUSIONS: In the context of benzodiazepine-refractory convulsive status epilepticus, the anticonvulsant drugs levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate each led to seizure cessation and improved alertness by 60 minutes in approximately half the patients, and the three drugs were associated with similar incidences of adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; ESETT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01960075.).
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Levetiracetam/uso terapéutico , Fenitoína/análogos & derivados , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Método Doble Ciego , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/inducido químicamente , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Levetiracetam/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenitoína/efectos adversos , Fenitoína/uso terapéutico , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) currently publicly reports hospital-quality, risk-adjusted mortality measure for ischemic stroke but not intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The NIHSS, which is captured in CMS administrative claims data, is a candidate metric for use in ICH risk adjustment and has been shown to predict clinical outcome with accuracy similar to the ICH Score. Correlation between early NIHSS and initial ICH volume would further support use of the NIHSS for ICH risk adjustment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Among 372 ICH patients enrolled in a large multicenter trial (FAST-MAG), the relation between early NIHSS and early ICH volume was assessed with correlation and linear trend analysis. RESULTS: Overall, there was strong correlation between NIHSS and ICH volume, r = 0.77 (p < 0.001), and for every 10cc increase in ICH the NIHSS increased by 4.5 points. Correlation coefficients were comparable in all subgroups, but magnitude of NIHSS increase with ICH unit volume increase was greater with left than right hemispheric ICH, with presence rather than absence of IVH, with imaging done within the first hour than second hour after last known well, with men than women, and with younger than older patients. CONCLUSION: Early NIHSS neurologic deficit severity values correlate strongly with initial ICH hematoma volume. As with ischemic stroke, lesion volume increases produce greater NIHSS change in the left than right hemisphere, reflecting greater NIHSS sensitivity to left hemisphere function. These findings provide further support for the use of NIHSS in risk-adjusted mortality measures for intracerebral hemorrhage.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Hemorragia Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Hematoma , Humanos , Masculino , Medicare , National Institutes of Health (U.S.) , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A survival advantage among individuals with higher body mass index (BMI) has been observed for diverse acute illnesses, including stroke, and termed the obesity paradox. However, prior ischemic stroke studies have generally tested only for linear rather than nonlinear relations between body mass and outcome, and few studies have investigated poststroke functional outcomes in addition to mortality. METHODS: We analyzed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke enrolled in a 60-center acute treatment trial, the NIH FAST-MAG acute stroke trial. Outcomes at 3 months analyzed were (1) death; (2) disability or death (modified Rankin Scale score, 2-6); and (3) low stroke-related quality of life (Stroke Impact ScaleAsunto(s)
Adiposidad/fisiología
, Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/terapia
, Obesidad/complicaciones
, Resultado del Tratamiento
, Anciano
, Índice de Masa Corporal
, Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos
, Femenino
, Humanos
, Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones
, Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/mortalidad
, Sulfato de Magnesio/uso terapéutico
, Masculino
, Persona de Mediana Edad
, Factores de Riesgo
, Terapia Trombolítica/métodos
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepine-refractory, or established, status epilepticus is thought to be of similar pathophysiology in children and adults, but differences in underlying aetiology and pharmacodynamics might differentially affect response to therapy. In the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT) we compared the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate in established status epilepticus, and here we describe our results after extending enrolment in children to compare outcomes in three age groups. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, response-adaptive, randomised controlled trial, we recruited patients from 58 hospital emergency departments across the USA. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 2 years or older, had been treated for a generalised convulsive seizure of longer than 5 min duration with adequate doses of benzodiazepines, and continued to have persistent or recurrent convulsions in the emergency department for at least 5 min and no more than 30 min after the last dose of benzodiazepine. Patients were randomly assigned in a response-adaptive manner, using Bayesian methods and stratified by age group (<18 years, 18-65 years, and >65 years), to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, or valproate. All patients, investigators, study staff, and pharmacists were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was absence of clinically apparent seizures with improved consciousness and without additional antiseizure medication at 1 h from start of drug infusion. The primary safety outcome was life-threatening hypotension or cardiac arrhythmia. The efficacy and safety outcomes were analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01960075. FINDINGS: Between Nov 3, 2015, and Dec 29, 2018, we enrolled 478 patients and 462 unique patients were included: 225 children (aged <18 years), 186 adults (18-65 years), and 51 older adults (>65 years). 175 (38%) patients were randomly assigned to levetiracetam, 142 (31%) to fosphenyltoin, and 145 (31%) were to valproate. Baseline characteristics were balanced across treatments within age groups. The primary efficacy outcome was met in those treated with levetiracetam for 52% (95% credible interval 41-62) of children, 44% (33-55) of adults, and 37% (19-59) of older adults; with fosphenytoin in 49% (38-61) of children, 46% (34-59) of adults, and 35% (17-59) of older adults; and with valproate in 52% (41-63) of children, 46% (34-58) of adults, and 47% (25-70) of older adults. No differences were detected in efficacy or primary safety outcome by drug within each age group. With the exception of endotracheal intubation in children, secondary safety outcomes did not significantly differ by drug within each age group. INTERPRETATION: Children, adults, and older adults with established status epilepticus respond similarly to levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, and valproate, with treatment success in approximately half of patients. Any of the three drugs can be considered as a potential first-choice, second-line drug for benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus. FUNDING: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Levetiracetam/administración & dosificación , Fenitoína/análogos & derivados , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Levetiracetam/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenitoína/administración & dosificación , Fenitoína/efectos adversos , Ácido Valproico/efectos adversos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Combination antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin may reduce the rate of recurrent stroke during the first 3 months after a minor ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). A trial of combination antiplatelet therapy in a Chinese population has shown a reduction in the risk of recurrent stroke. We tested this combination in an international population. METHODS: In a randomized trial, we assigned patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA to receive either clopidogrel at a loading dose of 600 mg on day 1, followed by 75 mg per day, plus aspirin (at a dose of 50 to 325 mg per day) or the same range of doses of aspirin alone. The dose of aspirin in each group was selected by the site investigator. The primary efficacy outcome in a time-to-event analysis was the risk of a composite of major ischemic events, which was defined as ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, or death from an ischemic vascular event, at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 4881 patients were enrolled at 269 international sites. The trial was halted after 84% of the anticipated number of patients had been enrolled because the data and safety monitoring board had determined that the combination of clopidogrel and aspirin was associated with both a lower risk of major ischemic events and a higher risk of major hemorrhage than aspirin alone at 90 days. Major ischemic events occurred in 121 of 2432 patients (5.0%) receiving clopidogrel plus aspirin and in 160 of 2449 patients (6.5%) receiving aspirin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.95; P=0.02), with most events occurring during the first week after the initial event. Major hemorrhage occurred in 23 patients (0.9%) receiving clopidogrel plus aspirin and in 10 patients (0.4%) receiving aspirin plus placebo (hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.10 to 4.87; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk TIA, those who received a combination of clopidogrel and aspirin had a lower risk of major ischemic events but a higher risk of major hemorrhage at 90 days than those who received aspirin alone. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; POINT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00991029 .).
Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Ataque Isquémico Transitorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Prevención Secundaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Clopidogrel , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Isquemia/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación , Ticlopidina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are limited treatments for progressive multiple sclerosis. Ibudilast inhibits several cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases, macrophage migration inhibitory factor, and toll-like receptor 4 and can cross the blood-brain barrier, with potential salutary effects in progressive multiple sclerosis. METHODS: We enrolled patients with primary or secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in a phase 2 randomized trial of oral ibudilast (≤100 mg daily) or placebo for 96 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the rate of brain atrophy, as measured by the brain parenchymal fraction (brain size relative to the volume of the outer surface contour of the brain). Major secondary end points included the change in the pyramidal tracts on diffusion tensor imaging, the magnetization transfer ratio in normal-appearing brain tissue, the thickness of the retinal nerve-fiber layer, and cortical atrophy, all measures of tissue damage in multiple sclerosis. RESULTS: Of 255 patients who underwent randomization, 129 were assigned to ibudilast and 126 to placebo. A total of 53% of the patients in the ibudilast group and 52% of those in the placebo group had primary progressive disease; the others had secondary progressive disease. The rate of change in the brain parenchymal fraction was -0.0010 per year with ibudilast and -0.0019 per year with placebo (difference, 0.0009; 95% confidence interval, 0.00004 to 0.0017; P=0.04), which represents approximately 2.5 ml less brain-tissue loss with ibudilast over a period of 96 weeks. Adverse events with ibudilast included gastrointestinal symptoms, headache, and depression. CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 trial involving patients with progressive multiple sclerosis, ibudilast was associated with slower progression of brain atrophy than placebo but was associated with higher rates of gastrointestinal side effects, headache, and depression. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke and others; NN102/SPRINT-MS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01982942 .).
Asunto(s)
Encéfalo/patología , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Atrofia/prevención & control , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Depresión/inducido químicamente , Imagen de Difusión Tensora , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Cefalea/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/patología , Inhibidores de Fosfodiesterasa/efectos adversos , Piridinas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to describe patterns of benzodiazepine use as first-line treatment of status epilepticus (SE) and test the association of benzodiazepine doses with response to second-line agents in patients enrolled in the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT). METHODS: Patients refractory to an adequate dose of benzodiazepines for the treatment of SE were enrolled in ESETT. Choice of benzodiazepine, doses given prior to administration of second-line agent, route of administration, setting, and patient weight were characterized. These were compared with guideline-recommended dosing. Logistic regression was used to determine the association of the first dose of benzodiazepine and the cumulative benzodiazepine dose with the response to second-line agent. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty patients were administered 1170 doses of benzodiazepines (669 lorazepam, 398 midazolam, 103 diazepam). Lorazepam was most frequently administered intravenously in the emergency department, midazolam intramuscularly or intravenously by the emergency medical services personnel, and diazepam rectally prior to ambulance arrival. The first dose of the first benzodiazepine (N = 460) was lower than guideline recommendations in 76% of midazolam administrations and 81% of lorazepam administrations. Among all administrations, >85% of midazolam and >76% of lorazepam administrations were lower than recommended. Higher first or cumulative benzodiazepine doses were not associated with better outcomes or clinical seizure cessation in response to second-line medications in these benzodiazepine-refractory seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Benzodiazepines as first-line treatment of SE, particularly midazolam and lorazepam, are frequently underdosed throughout the United States. This broad and generalizable cohort confirms prior single site reports that underdosing is both pervasive and difficult to remediate. (ESETT ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01960075.).
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Niño , Diazepam/administración & dosificación , Diazepam/uso terapéutico , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Lorazepam/administración & dosificación , Lorazepam/uso terapéutico , Midazolam/administración & dosificación , Midazolam/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Telemedicine may be particularly well-suited for myasthenia gravis (MG) due to the disorder's need for specialized care, its hallmark fluctuating muscle weakness, and the potential for increased risk of virus exposure among patients with MG during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic during in-person clinical visits. A disease-specific telemedicine physical examination to reflect myasthenic weakness does not currently exist. METHODS: This paper outlines step-by-step guidance on the fundamentals of a telemedicine assessment for MG. The Myasthenia Gravis Core Exam (MG-CE) is introduced as a MG-specific, telemedicine, physical examination, which contains eight components (ptosis, diplopia, facial strength, bulbar strength, dysarthria, single breath count, arm strength, and sit to stand) and takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. RESULTS: Pre-visit preparation, remote ascertainment of patient-reported outcome scales and visit documentation are also addressed. DISCUSSION: Additional knowledge gaps in telemedicine specific to MG care are identified for future investigation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Miastenia Gravis/diagnóstico , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Examen Físico/métodos , Médicos , Telemedicina/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Miastenia Gravis/terapia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Examen Físico/normas , Médicos/normas , Telemedicina/normasRESUMEN
Background and Purpose- The prehospital setting is a promising site for therapeutic intervention in stroke, but current stroke screening tools do not account for the evolution of neurological symptoms in this early period. We developed and validated the Paramedic Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scale in a large, prospective, randomized trial. Methods- In the prehospital FAST-MAG (Field Administration of Stroke Therapy-Magnesium) randomized trial conducted from 2005 to 2013, EMS providers were asked to complete the PGIC Scale (5-point Likert scale values: 1-much improved, 2-mildly improved, 3-unchanged, 4-mildly worsened, 5-much worsened) for neurological symptom change during transport for consecutive patients transported by ambulance within 2 hours of onset. We analyzed PGIC concurrent validity (compared with change in Glasgow Coma Scale, Los Angeles Motor Scale), convergent validity (compared with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale severity measure performed in the emergency department), and predictive validity (of neurological deterioration after hospital arrival and of final 90-day functional outcome). We used PGIC to characterize differential prehospital course among stroke subtypes. Results- Paramedics completed the PGIC in 1691 of 1700 subjects (99.5%), among whom 635 (37.5%) had neurological deficit evolution (32% improvement, 5.5% worsening) during a median prehospital care period of 33 (IQR, 27-39) minutes. Improvement was associated with diagnosis of cerebral ischemia rather than intracranial hemorrhage, milder stroke deficits on emergency department arrival, and more frequent nondisabled and independent 3-month outcomes. Conversely, worsening on the PGIC was associated with intracranial hemorrhage, more severe neurological deficits on emergency department arrival, more frequent treatment with thrombolytic therapy, and poor disability outcome at 3 months. Conclusions- The PGIC scale is a simple, validated measure of prehospital patient course that has the potential to provide information useful to emergency department decision-making. Registration- URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00059332.
Asunto(s)
Técnicos Medios en Salud , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Hemorragias Intracraneales/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Sistema Nervioso/etiología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Transporte de Pacientes , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Agonism of protease-activated receptor (PAR) 1 by activated protein C (APC) provides neuro- and vasculoprotection in experimental neuroinjury models. The pleiotropic PAR1 agonist, 3K3A-APC, reduces neurological injury and promotes vascular integrity; 3K3A-APC proved safe in human volunteers. We performed a randomized, controlled, blinded trial to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of 3K3A-APC in ischemic stroke patients. METHODS: The NeuroNEXT trial, RHAPSODY, used a novel continual reassessment method to determine the MTD using tiers of 120, 240, 360, and 540 µg/kg of 3K3A-APC. After intravenous tissue plasminogen activator, intra-arterial mechanical thrombectomy, or both, patients were randomized to 1 of the 4 doses or placebo. Vasculoprotection was assessed as microbleed and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rates. RESULTS: Between January 2015 and July 2017, we treated 110 patients. Demographics resembled a typical stroke population. The MTD was the highest-dose 3K3A-APC tested, 540 µg/kg, with an estimated toxicity rate of 7%. There was no difference in prespecified ICH rates. In exploratory analyses, 3K3A-APC reduced ICH rates compared to placebo from 86.5% to 67.4% in the combined treatment arms (p = 0.046) and total hemorrhage volume from an average of 2.1 ± 5.8 ml in placebo to 0.8 ± 2.1 ml in the combined treatment arms (p = 0.066). INTERPRETATION: RHAPSODY is the first trial of a neuroprotectant for acute ischemic stroke in a trial design allowing thrombectomy, thrombolysis, or both. The MTD was 540 µg/kg for the PAR1 active cytoprotectant, 3K3A-APC. A trend toward lower hemorrhage rate in an exploratory analysis requires confirmation. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trial Registration-URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02222714. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:125-136.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Proteína C/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes/administración & dosificación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía/métodos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico por imagen , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Método Simple Ciego , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
The Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial was a blinded, comparative-effectiveness study of fosphenytoin, levetiracetam, and valproic acid in benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus. The primary outcome was clinical seizure cessation and increased responsiveness without additional anticonvulsant medications. Weight-based dosing was capped at 75 kg. Hence, patients weighing >75 kg received a lower mg/kg dose. Logistic regression models were developed in 235 adults to determine the association of weight (≤ or >75 kg, ≤ or >90 kg), sex, treatment, and weight-normalized dose with the primary outcome and solely seizure cessation. The primary outcome was achieved in 45.1% and 42.5% of those ≤75 kg and >75 kg, respectively. Using univariate analyses, the likelihood of success for those >75 kg (odds ratio [OR] = 0.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.54-1.51) or >90 kg (OR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.42-1.66) was not statistically different compared with those ≤75 kg or ≤90 kg, respectively. Similarly, other predictors were not significantly associated with primary outcome or clinical seizure cessation. Our findings suggest that doses, capped at 75 kg, likely resulted in concentrations greater than those needed for outcome. Studies that include drug concentrations and heavier individuals are needed to confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/administración & dosificación , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Levetiracetam/administración & dosificación , Fenitoína/análogos & derivados , Estado Epiléptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Ácido Valproico/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Peso Corporal/fisiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fenitoína/administración & dosificación , Método Simple Ciego , Estado Epiléptico/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Because "time is brain," acute stroke trials are migrating to the prehospital setting. The impact upon enrollment in post-arrival trials of earlier recruitment in a prehospital trial requires delineation. METHODS: We analyzed all patients recruited into acute and prevention stroke trials during an 8-year period when an academic medical center (AMC) was participating in a prehospital treatment trial - the NIH Field Administration of Stroke Treatment - Magnesium (FAST-MAG) study. RESULTS: During the study period, in addition to FAST-MAG, the AMC participated in 33 post-arrival stroke trials: 27 for acute cerebral ischemia, one for intracerebral hemorrhage, and 5 secondary prevention trials. Throughout the study period, the AMC was recruiting for at least 3 concurrent post-arrival acute trials. Among 199 patients enrolled in acute stroke trials, 98 (49%) were in FAST-MAG and 101 (51%) in concurrent, post-arrival acute trials. Among FAST-MAG patients, 67% were not eligible for any concurrent acute, post-arrival trial. Of 134 patients eligible for post-arrival acute trials, 101 (76%) were enrolled in post-arrival trials and 32 (24%) in FAST-MAG. Leading reasons FAST-MAG patients were ineligible for post-arrival acute trials were: NIHSS too low (23.4%), intracranial hemorrhage (17.9%), IV tPA used in standard management (9.0%), NIHSS too high (7.1%), and age too high (5.2%). CONCLUSIONS: A prehospital hyperacute stroke trial with wide entry criteria reduced only modestly, by one-fourth, enrollment into concurrently active, post-arrival stroke trials. Simultaneous performance of prehospital and post-arrival acute and secondary prevention stroke trials in research networks is feasible.
Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Admisión del Paciente , Selección de Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Determinación de la Elegibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de la Muestra , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The IRIS trial (Insulin Resistance Intervention after Stroke) demonstrated that pioglitazone reduced the risk for a composite outcome of stroke or myocardial infarction among nondiabetic patients with insulin resistance and a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack. The current planned secondary analysis uses updated 2013 consensus criteria for ischemic stroke to examine the effect of pioglitazone on stroke outcomes. METHODS: Participants were randomly assigned to receive pioglitazone (45 mg/d target dose) or placebo within 180 days of a qualifying ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack and were followed for a maximum of 5 years. An independent committee, blinded to treatment assignments, adjudicated all potential stroke outcomes. Time to first stroke event was compared by treatment group, overall and by type of event (ischemic or hemorrhagic), using survival analyses and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Among 3876 IRIS participants (mean age, 63 years; 65% male), 377 stroke events were observed in 319 participants over a median follow-up of 4.8 years. Pioglitazone was associated with a reduced risk for any stroke at 5 years (8.0% in comparison with 10.7% for the placebo group; hazard ratio [HR], 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.60-0.94; log-rank P=0.01). Pioglitazone reduced risk for ischemic strokes (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.57-0.91; P=0.005) but had no effect on risk for hemorrhagic events (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.50-2.00; P=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone was effective for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke in nondiabetic patients with insulin resistance. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00091949.