How Much Does Prosthetic Joint Infection and Its Successful Treatment Affect Patient-reported Quality of Life?

BACKGROUND: Uncomplicated joint replacement improves pain and other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) such as joint function scores and quality-of-life measures. However, the overall impact of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and its successful treatment on PROMs is poorly defined. In this study, we describe quality-of-life scores using the 12-item Short Form survey, version 2 (SF-12v2), collected as part of a large, prospective, observational study of PJI. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with newly diagnosed PJI have lower quality-of-life scores than the general age-matched population? (2) Are lower quality-of-life scores for patients with PJI sustained for ≥ 12 months? (3) What factors are associated with a good functional outcome at 12 months, defined by achieving a physical component summary (PCS) score of > 50 on the SF-12v2 (that is, above the age-adjusted population mean) or an increase of > 8.9 or more from baseline? METHODS: The PIANO (Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational study) cohort was a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter cohort study of 783 patients with newly diagnosed PJI recruited across 27 centers between July 2014 and December 2017. All participants were followed for 2 years. SF-12v2 scores were collected at diagnosis (baseline) and 3, 12, and 24 months after diagnosis. Treatment success was defined as being alive with no clinical or microbiological evidence of infection and no ongoing use of antibiotics for the index joint. RESULTS: After exclusion of 6.6% (52) who had died, 4.2% (33) with PJI of joints other than hips and knees, and those with incomplete data sets (200 [25.5%]), 498 patients had complete SF-12v2 data sets available. At baseline, the median (IQR) PCS score was 37 (30 to 46), which increased to 41 (34 to 49; p < 0.001) at 12 months. Both measures were lower than those for the general age-matched population norm. There was no further improvement in PCS scores between 12 and 24 months. By contrast, the median (IQR) mental component summary score of the SF-12v2 was similar to age-adjusted population norms (48 [37 to 57]) at baseline. Only 40% of patients with PJI achieved a good functional outcome at 12 months. After adjustment for other factors, treatment success of PJI increased the odds of a good functional outcome by 67% (95% CI 11% to 154%; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: PJIs have a large effect on the PCS score of the SF-12v2 quality-of-life measure at baseline, which is sustained for at least 2 years. Successful treatment of PJI increases the likelihood of a good functional outcome. These data can be used to set expectations for patients presenting with PJI and can be used to inform future clinical studies in which quality-of-life measures are incorporated into clinical endpoints. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, therapeutic study.

Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee: A Longitudinal, Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: The role of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as tools for monitoring the impact and outcomes of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is not well described. This study analyzed the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) or Oxford Knee Score (OKS) in a prospective observational cohort of patients with hip or knee PJI. METHODS: The PIANO (Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational study) cohort prospectively enrolled patients with newly diagnosed PJI from multiple centers. The OHS and OKS were evaluated at PJI diagnosis (baseline) and at 3, 12, and 24 months. Scores and score changes were examined according to PJI type, patient characteristics, and management. A successful functional outcome at 12 months was defined as an OHS of >38 or OHS of >36 and/or an improvement from baseline of >12 or >9, respectively. RESULTS: Of the 741 participants, PROMs were available at 12 months for 233 with hip and 342 with knee PJI. Significant improvements (p < 0.0001) were seen at 12 months for both the OHS (24.5 to 36) and OKS (25 to 34), with no further improvement at 24 months. Patients with late-acute PJI had a higher median baseline OHS (35; interquartile range [22 to 46]) and OKS (30 [18 to 41]) than those with early PJI (OHS: 19 [15 to 29]; OKS: 22 [16 to 29.5]) or chronic PJI (OHS: 23 [14 to 34]; OKS 22 [14 to 28]). Logistic regression showed that a clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.76, p = 0.001) and early PJI (aOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.64 to 4.07, p < 0.0001) independently predicted a successful functional outcome. Chronic renal impairment (aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.71, p = 0.007), congestive cardiac failure (aOR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.17 to 0.95, p = 0.04), and clinical signs of inflammation (aOR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.33 to 0.85, p = 0.009) at diagnosis independently predicted failure to achieve a successful functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The OHS and OKS varied significantly at baseline and 12 months according to PJI type, emphasizing the need to consider the PJI type when evaluating treatment success. This study highlights superior functional outcomes associated with early PJI and with achievement of a clinical cure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary infections among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 or post-COVID-19 conditions in Victoria, 2020-2023.

OBJECTIVES: Estimates of secondary infections are variedly reported, with few studies done in Australia. We investigated the occurrence and impact of secondary infections complicating COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 admissions in Victoria, Australia, 2020-2023. METHODS: We used linked population-wide data sets and specific International Classification of Disease, 10th Revision codes to identify and estimate the occurrence of secondary infections. Using hospital/intensive care unit length of stay in negative binomial regression and mortality, we examined the impact of secondary infections. RESULTS: Secondary infections were identified in 6.9% (13,467 of 194,660) of COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 admissions: 6.0% (11,651 of 194,660) bacterial, 0.9% (1691 of 194,660) viral, and 0.2% (385 of 194,660) fungal. Prevalence was highest during the pre-Delta (10.4%) and Omicron-BA2 (8.1%) periods. Sepsis and pneumonia were the most reported syndromes; the occurrence of sepsis declined gradually over time. The odds of secondary infections were higher among the ≥70-year-olds (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.43-4.14, vs 20-29-year-olds), individuals with chronic conditions (aOR 3.15, 95% CI 2.88-3.45, vs those without), the unvaccinated (aOR 1.59, 95% CI 1.45-1.75), and the lowest socioeconomic group (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.05-1.19). Patients with secondary infections had 2.43 times longer hospital length of stay and 9.60 times longer intensive care unit length of stay than those without secondary infections. The mortality risk was 2.17 times higher in those with secondary infections. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary infections occurred in 69 per 1000 COVID-19-associated hospital admissions in Victoria, mostly in high-risk groups, and were associated with severe outcomes.

Demographic Characteristics of Unvaccinated Asymptomatic and Symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Cases in Barwon South West, Victoria, Australia.

We investigated 328 SARS-CoV-2 cases in Barwon South West, Victoria, Australia, in the 2020 pre-vaccination period, comparing infections with symptoms to those that remained asymptomatic. De-identified self-reported data on case characteristics and symptom progression from three sequential questionnaires were examined. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model associations between demographic profiles and symptoms. Asymptomatic infections were more than three times as likely to be seen in ethnic minority groups than the Caucasian population after adjusting for gender and age [OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.5-6.7, p < 0.01] and were more common among cases of Asian background [OR 2.8, 95%CI 1.2-6.4]. Asymptomatic infections were also more common in youth and younger adults, but cases were approximately seven times more likely to be in seniors (≥65 years) compared with those 24 years of age or younger after adjusting for sex and ethnicity [OR 6.9, 95% CI 1.3-35.8]. The overrepresentation of ethnic minority groups among asymptomatic infections is suggestive of genetic haplotype variability by ethnic group, conferring greater cross-protection from other coronaviruses in the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Replication of this analysis in the post-vaccination era and reassessment of symptom expression according to ethnicity in a community with established vaccine and infection-induced immunity would determine whether this is a sustained association or one confined to the early stages of a pandemic in an immunologically naive population. These findings may, in part, reflect differences in testing patterns by ethnicity and true differences in disease expression, both of which are important to understand in order to inform transmission prevention strategies and tailored risk messaging according to ethnic background.

Predictors of Treatment Success After Periprosthetic Joint Infection: 24-Month Follow up From a Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study of 653 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating condition and there is a lack of evidence to guide its management. We hypothesized that treatment success is independently associated with modifiable variables in surgical and antibiotic management. METHODS: The is a prospective, observational study at 27 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. Newly diagnosed large joint PJIs were eligible. Data were collected at baseline and at 3, 12, and 24 months. The main outcome measures at 24 months were clinical cure (defined as all of the following: alive, absence of clinical or microbiological evidence of infection, and not requiring ongoing antibiotic therapy) and treatment success (clinical cure plus index prosthesis still in place). RESULTS: Twenty-four-month outcome data were available for 653 patients. Overall, 449 patients (69%) experienced clinical cure and 350 (54%) had treatment success. The most common treatment strategy was debridement and implant retention (DAIR), with success rates highest in early postimplant infections (119 of 160, 74%) and lower in late acute (132 of 267, 49%) and chronic (63 of 142, 44%) infections. Selected comorbidities, knee joint, and Staphylococcus aureus infections were independently associated with treatment failure, but antibiotic choice and duration (including rifampicin use) and extent of debridement were not. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment success in PJI is associated with (1) selecting the appropriate treatment strategy and (2) nonmodifiable patient and infection factors. Interdisciplinary decision making that matches an individual patient to an appropriate management strategy is a critical step for PJI management. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the role of rifampicin in patients managed with DAIR and the optimal surgical strategy for late-acute PJI.

Clinical Characteristics, Etiology, and Initial Management Strategy of Newly Diagnosed Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Multicenter, Prospective Observational Cohort Study of 783 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a devastating complication of joint replacement surgery. Most observational studies of PJI are retrospective or single-center, and reported management approaches and outcomes vary widely. We hypothesized that there would be substantial heterogeneity in PJI management and that most PJIs would present as late acute infections occurring as a consequence of bloodstream infections. METHODS: The Prosthetic joint Infection in Australia and New Zealand, Observational (PIANO) study is a prospective study at 27 hospitals. From July 2014 through December 2017, we enrolled all adults with a newly diagnosed PJI of a large joint. We collected data on demographics, microbiology, and surgical and antibiotic management over the first 3 months postpresentation. RESULTS: We enrolled 783 patients (427 knee, 323 hip, 25 shoulder, 6 elbow, and 2 ankle). The mode of presentation was late acute (>30 days postimplantation and <7 days of symptoms; 351, 45%), followed by early (≤30 days postimplantation; 196, 25%) and chronic (>30 days postimplantation with ≥30 days of symptoms; 148, 19%). Debridement, antibiotics, irrigation, and implant retention constituted the commonest initial management approach (565, 72%), but debridement was moderate or less in 142 (25%) and the polyethylene liner was not exchanged in 104 (23%). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to most studies, late acute infection was the most common mode of presentation, likely reflecting hematogenous seeding. Management was heterogeneous, reflecting the poor evidence base and the need for randomized controlled trials.