RESUMEN
With the emerging popularity of electronic cigarettes, oncology nurses need to be well informed in order to guide patients in making choices that support a healthy lifestyle. Essential information is provided in this article through a review of conventional and electronic cigarette use and current recommendations. Concerns associated with electronic cigarettes are discussed including nicotine addiction, lack of regulation, and lack of evidence as a smoking cessation aid. The potential for harm reduction is also highlighted. Suggestions are provided for how patients with cancer can be guided regarding e-cigarette use.
RESUMEN
Providing cancer patients with more information regarding their treatments allows them to feel more in control, increases self efficacy, and can decrease anxiety. The aims of the present study were to develop an interprofessional group education session and to evaluate the usefulness and acceptability of this session. In addition, informational distress levels pre- and post-education were evaluated. A prostate radiation therapy (RT) education session was developed and facilitated by an interprofessional team. Topics discussed included how RT works, side effects and management, and support services available. Prior to the education session, participants reported their informational RT distress levels using the validated Distress Thermometer (DT). Post-education session, the DT was readministered. In addition, participants completed an acceptability survey to assess format, structure, and usefulness of the education session. Participants agreed that the session contained valuable and useful information helping them understand expectations during treatment, including resource availability, side effects and management, as well as procedural expectation during treatment. All stated they would recommend the session to other patients. The interprofessional nature of the sessions was deemed useful. Suggested areas for improvement included addition of a dietitian, information on long-term side effects, statistics of radiotherapy side effects, impact of radiotherapy on sexual function, and overall quality of life. The group education session significantly improved informational distress levels (p = 0.04). Educating prostate cancer patients utilizing an interprofessional group format can decrease anxiety and stress related to their RT treatment. Future development of group education sessions for other disease site groups may be valuable.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Cooperativa , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Anciano , Ansiedad/prevención & control , Depresión/prevención & control , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Calidad de Vida , Autoeficacia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The overall aim of this study was to explore current remote symptom support training programs provided to nurses in ambulatory oncology programs across Canada, using a survey-methods environmental scan. Of 36 delivered invitations, 28 programs responded (77.8%) representing 10 provinces. Of 25 programs that offer telephone symptom support, 17 provide symptom support training, seven do not, and one did not say. Seven programs shared training materials with the investigators and elements of training included: symptom management guidelines (n = 6), telephone triage process/principles (n = 5), competent telephone practices (n = 4), documentation (n = 4), professional standards (n = 3), role-play (n = 3), communication skills/etiquette (n = 3), and monitoring quality (n = 1). Formats included: presentations (n = 3), paper-based resources (n = 3), or e-learning modules (n = 1). No training programs were rigorously evaluated. Training in telephone nursing symptom support across oncology programs is variable. Opportunities exist to identify core competencies and evaluate if training programs enhance delivery of remote cancer symptom support.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/organización & administración , Educación Continua en Enfermería/métodos , Cuidados para Prolongación de la Vida/organización & administración , Enfermería Oncológica/educación , Canadá , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Internet , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , TeléfonoRESUMEN
The present study investigated health professionals' opinions about important questions that should be discussed with patients who may require post-prostatectomy radiotherapy. A 74-question survey was conducted among radiation oncologists, urologists, nurses, and radiation therapists involved in the care of prostate cancer patients. Survey questions covered six domains: understanding my situation and prostate cancer diagnosis, making a decision, radiotherapy: procedures involved, potential benefits, side effects, and my support network during radiation treatment. Respondents rated the importance of addressing these questions as either essential, important, no opinion, or avoid with a hypothetical post-prostatectomy case. The majority of questions were rated as either essential or important. There was disagreement between professions on essential questions, mostly between nurses and urologists in the side-effects domain. There was agreement between all professions regarding which questions should be avoided.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Testimonio de Experto/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/normas , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/psicología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Especialización , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lung cancer patients who continue to smoke after diagnosis are at increased risk of treatment toxicity, residual/recurrent disease, future malignancies, and all-cause mortality. Guidelines including those from National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Cancer Care Ontario advocate for screening, counseling, and access to smoking cessation services for all cancer patients; however, barriers from both patient and health care professional (HCP) perspectives contribute to lack of implementation. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to identify the different perspectives among patients and HCPs in how the promotion of person-centred approaches may be used when offering smoking cessation services to patients who are receiving care within a regional cancer centre. METHODS: Qualitative data were generated using various methods, including focus groups with HCPs and interviews with patients. In total, 16 HCPs participated in three focus groups: including nine radiation therapists, five registered nurses, one registered dietitian, and one physiotherapist. Of 55 patients accrued, 19 were interviewed. Both focus groups and interviews were audio recorded, and the recordings were transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were then analyzed using narrative thematic analysis to define and identify themes. RESULTS: The identified themes were categorized into three topic areas: knowledge (eg, impact of smoking on illness and why they should not smoke); individual decision to quit (eg, motivators), and the social unacceptability of smoking (eg, the public perception of smoking over the last 40 years). HCP-identified themes included identification of smokers, triggers to start a conversation, approach, gaps and barriers to cessation, rationale for cessation, and judgment. Patient-identified themes included knowledge, individual decision to quit, and the social unacceptability of smoking. CONCLUSION: Understanding patient and HCP perspectives on smoking cessation will help influence practice to ensure that patients are not judged, assumptions are not made, and individualized and person-centred care is provided. HCP awareness of these themes and the patient perspective may challenge assumptions and values.