Pleural Metastasis in Head and Neck Cancer: Imaging Findings and Clinical Impact.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to present the imaging findings of pleural metastases from head and neck cancer and correlate them with prognosis for overall survival, which to our knowledge have not received much attention in radiology literature. METHODS: We reviewed 23 cases of head and neck cancer with pleural metastases that were seen on head and neck imaging. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography/CT imaging findings were reviewed. The location and cell type of the primary cancer were studied. The effect of the pleural metastases on patient survival was analyzed. RESULTS: Twelve (57%) of the 21 cases of pleural metastasis were missed initially on the neck CT but were visible in retrospect. Nine of 11 patients whom we had followed up for 1.5 years or longer have died, often within a few of months of presenting with pleural metastases. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of pleural metastasis in head and neck cancer is an extremely poor prognostic indicator for survival. They are potentially missed on the neck CT. Given its significant clinical impact, head and neck radiologists should specifically look for pleural metastasis when reviewing imaging studies of patients with head and neck cancer.

Radiologists remember mountains better than radiographs, or do they?

Expertise with encoding material has been shown to aid long-term memory for that material. It is not clear how relevant this expertise is for image memorability (e.g., radiologists' memory for radiographs), and how robust over time. In two studies, we tested scene memory using a standard long-term memory paradigm. One compared the performance of radiologists to naïve observers on two image sets, chest radiographs and everyday scenes, and the other radiologists' memory with immediate as opposed to delayed recognition tests using musculoskeletal radiographs and forest scenes. Radiologists' memory was better than novices for images of expertise but no different for everyday scenes. With the heterogeneity of image sets equated, radiologists' expertise with radiographs afforded them better memory for the musculoskeletal radiographs than forest scenes. Enhanced memory for images of expertise disappeared over time, resulting in chance level performance for both image sets after weeks of delay. Expertise with the material is important for visual memorability but not to the same extent as idiosyncratic detail and variability of the image set. Similar memory decline with time for images of expertise as for everyday scenes further suggests that extended familiarity with an image is not a robust factor for visual memorability.