Using OR Black Box Technology to Determine Quality Improvement Outcomes for In-situ Timeout and Debrief Simulation.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine quality improvement outcomes following the pilot implementation of an in-situ simulation designed to enhance surgical safety checklist performance. BACKGROUND: OR Black Box (ORBB) technology allows near real-time assessment for surgical safety checklist performance. Before our study, timeout quality was 73.3%, compliance was 99.9%, and engagement was 89.7% (n=1993 cases); Debrief Quality was 76.0%, compliance was 66.9%, and engagement was 66.7% (n=1842 cases). METHODS: This IRB-approved study used prospective convergent multi-methods. During 2 months, a 15-minute in-situ simulation, incorporating rapid cycle deliberate practice, was implemented for OR teams. ORBB analytics generated Timeout and Debrief scores for actual operations performed by surgeons who participated in simulation (Sim-group) versus those who did not (No-sim group) over 6 months, including 2 months pre-intervention, during-intervention, and post-intervention. Inductive content analysis was performed based on simulation discussions to determine team member perspectives. RESULTS: Thirty simulations with 163 interprofessional participants were conducted. ORBB data from 1570 cases were analyzed. Scores were significantly better for the Sim-group compared with the No-sim group for debrief quality (84% vs. 79% P<0.001, during-intervention), compliance (73% vs. 66%, P<0.001, post-intervention), and engagement (80% vs. 73%, P=0.012, during-intervention). There were no between-group differences for Timeout scores. Thematic analysis identified 2 primary categories: "culture of safety" and "policy." CONCLUSIONS: This simulation-based QI intervention created a psychologically safe training environment for OR teams. The novel use of ORBB technology facilitated outcome analysis and showed significantly better Debrief scores for simulation-trained surgeons compared with nontrained surgeons.

Quantifying improvement in symptoms, functioning, and quality of life after peripheral endovascular revascularization.

BACKGROUND: Patients with peripheral arterial disease often undergo peripheral endovascular revascularization (PER) to alleviate symptoms. Despite the growth of PER, little information exists quantifying the health status benefits after the procedure. METHODS AND RESULTS: From February 2001 to August 2004, 477 consecutive patients underwent PER for symptomatic peripheral arterial disease. Of these, 300 consented to participate in a longitudinal follow-up study of their health status. Health status was quantified with the disease-specific Peripheral Artery Questionnaire and the generic Short Form-12 and the EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ5D)questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100; higher scores represent fewer symptoms and better health status. The average age of the cohort was 68+/-11 years (mean+/-SD); 186 (62%) were male, 288 (96%) were white, and 118 (39%) were diabetic. Clinical follow-up was attained in 99% of patients; health status assessments were made in 86%. Mean Peripheral Artery Questionnaire summary scores improved significantly after revascularization from 31+/-19 to 62+/-27 at 1 year (P<0.0001). Generic health status scores also improved significantly (P<0.001 for all). Despite a technically successful procedure in 98% of patients, 21% of patients did not achieve the minimal clinically important improvement of an 8-point change in Peripheral Artery Questionnaire Summary score after PER (35+/-19 at baseline versus 31+/-16 at 1 year; P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: For most patients, significant and sustained improvements in symptoms, functioning, and quality of life occur after PER. Identifying and counseling patients less likely to benefit from PER is an important future research direction.

Reperfusion assessment using myocardial contrast echocardiography in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.

In this study, 29 patients underwent myocardial contrast echocardiography after presentation with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction but before coronary angiography using a continuous infusion of microbubbles and real-time imaging with a low mechanical index. Patients with transmural perfusion defects at presentation subsequently had much larger infarctions (as measured by peak creatine phosphokinase-MB fraction) than did those with normal perfusion, indicating that myocardial contrast echocardiography may be a useful means to determine adequacy of reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy and in the selection of patients for adjunctive treatment, such as "rescue angioplasty."

Exploring barriers to optimal anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation: interviews with clinicians.

BACKGROUND: Warfarin, the most commonly used antithrombotic agent for stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation (AF), requires regular monitoring, frequent dosage adjustments, and dietary restrictions. Clinicians' perceptions of barriers to optimal AF management are an important factor in treatment. Anticoagulation management for AF is overseen by both cardiology and internal medicine (IM) practices. Thus, gaining the perspective of specialists and generalists is essential in understanding barriers to treatment. We used qualitative research methods to define key issues in the prescription of warfarin therapy for AF by cardiology specialists and IM physicians. METHODS AND RESULTS: Clinicians were interviewed to identify barriers to warfarin treatment in a large Midwestern city. Interviews were conducted until thematic saturation occurred. Content analysis yielded several themes. The most salient theme that emerged from clinician interviews was use of characteristics other than the patient's CHADS(2) score to enact a treatment plan, such as the patient's social situation and past medication-taking behavior. Other themes included patient knowledge, real-world problems, breakdown in communication, and clinician reluctance. CONCLUSION: Warfarin treatment is associated with many challenges. The barriers identified by clinicians highlight the unmet need associated with stroke prophylaxis in AF and the opportunity to improve anticoagulation treatment in AF. Social and lifestyle factors were important considerations in determining treatment.