The MINDMAP project: mental well-being in urban environments : Design and first results of a survey on healthcare planning policies, strategies and programmes that address mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention for older people in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The MINDMAP consortium (2016-2019) aims to identify opportunities provided by the urban environment for the promotion of mental well-being and functioning of older people in Europe by bringing together European cities with urban longitudinal ageing studies: GLOBE, HAPIEE, HUNT, LASA, LUCAS, RECORD, Rotterdam Study, Turin Study. A survey on mental healthcare planning policies and programmes dedicated to older persons covering the range from health promotion to need of nursing care was performed for profound data interpretation in Amsterdam, Eindhoven, Hamburg, Helsinki, Kaunas, Krakow, London, Nord-Trøndelag, Paris, Prague, Rotterdam and Turin. OBJECTIVES: To collect detailed information on healthcare planning policies and programmes across these European cities to evaluate variations and to delineate recommendations for sciences, policies and planners using experience from evidence-based practice feedback from the MINDMAP cities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The MINDMAP partners identified experts in the 12 cities with the best background knowledge of the mental health sector. After pretesting, semi-structured telephone interviews (1-2 h) were performed always by the same person. A structured evaluation matrix based on the geriatric functioning continuum and the World Health Organization (WHO) Public Health Framework for Healthy Ageing was applied. RESULTS: A complete survey (12 out of 12) was performed reporting on 41 policies and 280 programmes on the city level. It appeared from extensive analyses that the focus on older citizens, specific target groups, and multidimensional programmes could be intensified. CONCLUSION: There is a broad variety to cope with the challenges of ageing in health, and to address both physical and mental capacities in older individuals and their dynamic interactions in urban environments.

Correction to: The MINDMAP project: mental well-being in urban environments : Design and first results of a survey on healthcare planning policies, strategies and programmes that address mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention for older people in Europe.

Correction to: Z Gerontol Geriat 2017 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-017-1290-7 The article "The MINDMAP project: mental well-being in urban environments. Design and first results of a survey on healthcare planning policies, strategies and programmes that address mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention for older people in …The original article was corrected.

[Acceptance of preventive home visits among frail elderly persons : Participants an non-participants in a Follow-up after 2 and 4 years within the LUCAS longitudinal study]. / Akzeptanz des präventiven Hausbesuchs bei älteren Personen mit Frailty : Teilnehmende und Nichtteilnehmende im Zwei- und Vierjahres-Follow-up im Rahmen der LUCAS-Langzeitstudie.

BACKGROUND: The objective of preventive home visits (PHV) is to support independent living of elderly people. The target group is a matter of discussion and acceptance so far seems to have been low. The target group favored in studies were persons with functional impairments living independently; therefore, acceptance of this offer by frail persons and characteristics of participants and non-participants were studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All participants classified as frail in the longitudinal urban cohort ageing study (LUCAS; BMBF Fkz 01ET0708-13/01, ET1002A-D/01EL1407) were randomized (RCT) in 2007/2008 into an intervention group (174 persons) and a control group (379 persons). Participants in the intervention group were offered the option of a PHV. Sociodemographic and health-related characteristics were compared between the participants with a PHV, non-participants and controls at baseline and after 2 and 4 years. Non-participants who refused the offer of the PHV were asked about their reasons. RESULTS: There were 64 persons (36.8 %) in the intervention group classified as frail who accepted the offer of a PHV. Of these, significantly more lived alone, tended to be female with a higher educational level and with less need of care. After 2 years significantly more persons in the group without PHV had died and after 4 years more participants with PHV reported a depressive mood. There were no other significant differences between the groups. Half of the reasons not to accept the PHV that were reported by the non-participants were because of health-related or psychological problems and one third because of lack of interest or need for PHV. CONCLUSION: The offer of PHV to frail elderly persons with an unlimited age was associated with a relatively high acceptance. The high number of refusals by non-participants with functional impairments is remarkable and needs further investigation.

[Resources and risks in old age: the LUCAS-I marker set for a classification of elderly people as fit, pre-frail and frail. First results on validity from the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS), Hamburg]. / Ressourcen und Risiken im Alter: Die LUCAS-I Marker zur Klassifizierung älterer Menschen als FIT, pre-FRAIL und FRAIL. Validierung und erste Ergebnisse aus der Longitudinalen Urbanen Cohorten-Alters-Studie (LUCAS).

BACKGROUND: There is a need for a simple self-administered instrument to assess frailty in community-dwelling seniors. METHODS: We present a new marker set to assess the functional state of seniors. Contrary to current literature, we focus not only on risks, but also include resources. The questions relate to facts (ways to do things), rather than on subjective information (e.g. exhaustion). It was developed in the context of the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS) in Hamburg, Germany. RESULTS: The classification based on these questions proposes operational definitions of the terms fit, pre-frail and frail and is predictive for need for nursing care as well as mortality. A wealth of results establishes the validity of the categorisation compared to other health questions. One of the classification questions concerns cycling. For areas where cycling is not suitable, we propose to replace this question with one about independently walking 500 m. However, the cycling question appears to indicate frailty earlier. CONCLUSION: The self-administered questionnaire provides a simple, cost-effective way to screen seniors for early signs of declining function in order to start preventive action.

[Health and competence: detection and decoding using comprehensive assessments in the Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS)]. / Grauzonen von Gesundheit und Handlungsfähigkeit: Erfassung und Aufschlüsselung durch erweiterte Assessments in der Longitudinalen Urbanen Cohorten-Alters-Studie (LUCAS).

PURPOSE: The goal of this work was to characterise and distinguish persons without (fit), with earliest signs (pre-frail) or accelerated functional decline (frail) during self-referral (geriatric centre) or preventive home visits. METHODS: After screening independently living older people in an urban longitudinal cohort (n = 1,995) using a self-administered questionnaire, they were functionally classified as fit, pre-frail or frail. In 10% randomly selected samples of these cohort parts a comprehensive extended gerontological-geriatric assessment (EGGA) was administered. RESULTS: Fit, pre-frail and frail samples are significantly different regarding comorbidity, medication, mobility, fall risk, instrumental activities of daily living and use of social support but not nutrition. The best indicator to discriminate fit versus frail was exhaustion (mobility tiredness). CONCLUSION: Competence is essential regarding health in old age. Identification of resources and risks by comprehensive assessment is useful before planning interventions to prevent frailty or its progression.

[Rehabilitation instead of nursing care. Current state and future demand of geriatric rehabilitation]. / Rehabilitation vor Pflege. Stand und zukünftiger Bedarf geriatrischer Rehabilitation.

In Germany, the term "rehabilitation instead of nursing care" represents an established legal claim and is also an imperative part within the general concept of comprehensive healthcare provision, reflecting the ongoing demographic and epidemiological developments. This report gives an overview on the rationale, the principles, and organizational conception of geriatric rehabilitation. This is completed by an assessment of existing structures for service provision and future demands of specific geriatric rehabilitation and geriatric care. There are well-established possibilities and facilities to realize the legal claim "rehabilitation instead of nursing care." However, these possibilities have to be further optimized in order to detect need earlier and to make adequate use of the potential resources in the growing number of old-aged persons.

The LUCAS* consortium: objectives of interdisciplinary research on selected aspects of ageing and health care for older people in an urban community.

BACKGROUND: Decline in functional competence is a major determinant of older persons' needs, the development of dependency, use of care, clinical outcome and mortality. The interactions between rising life expectancy and changes in morbidity and disability warrant interdisciplinary research on functional disability, health promotion and prevention. The LUCAS (Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study) research consortium was established to study particular aspects of functional competence, its changes with ageing, to detect preclinical signs of functional decline, and to address questions on how to maintain functional competence and to prevent adverse outcome. The questions originate from problems encountered in practical health care provision in different settings, i.e. community, hospital and nursing home. METHODS: The subprojects apply a longitudinal cohort follow-up study, an embedded randomised controlled intervention, cross-sectional comparative, and prospective intervention studies. CONCLUSION: The results will provide instruments to screen for preclinical signs of functional decline and concrete recommendations to sustain independence and prevent adverse outcomes in older age in daily practice.

[The Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study (LUCAS)]. / Die Longitudinal-Urban-Cohort-Ageing-Studie (LUCAS).

BACKGROUND: The interactions between rising life expectancy, morbidity and development of disability warrant interdisciplinary research on functional disability, health promotion and prevention as well as healthcare provision for older people. Therefore, the interdisciplinary LUCAS (Longitudinal Urban Cohort Ageing Study) research consortium of university and non-university institutions was established and is coordinated by the research department of the Albertinen-Haus at the University of Hamburg. The aim is to study particular aspects of functional competence, the changes with ageing, to detect pre-clinical signs of functional decline and to address questions on how to maintain functional competence and to prevent adverse outcomes. The research questions have their origin in problems of practical healthcare provision in the different settings of communities, hospitals and nursing homes. The articles of LUCAS subprojects report selected results from the first project phase (2007-2010) which was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) (Research program"Health in the elderly").). METHODS: The LUCAS subprojects 1-7 applied a true cohort study design with embedded randomized controlled intervention studies and cross-sectional studies for comparative purposes and to prepare intervention studies to be performed in the second project phase. CONCLUSIONS: Results from the first project phase provided new instruments to screen and to assess functional competence in older people (population-based screening). In the second project phase these will be evaluated according to practicability and usefulness. Furthermore, parts of the results will be used by the health reporting system in Hamburg and for intervention studies performed by LUCAS subprojects during the second project phase (LUCAS II).

Health Promotion and Preventive Care Intervention for Older Community-Dwelling People: Long-Term Effects of a Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT) within the LUCAS Cohort.

OBJECTIVES: An RCT of a health promotion and preventive care intervention was done in 2001-2002. Here, long-term analyses based on 12 years of follow-up of survival and of change in functional competence between intervention and control group are presented. Positive 1-year results (significantly higher use of preventive services and better health behaviour) were presented earlier. DESIGN: Parallel group randomised controlled trial (RCT) with 878 participants in the intervention and 1,702 participants in the control group. SETTING: The study took place in Hamburg, Germany and made use of health care structures and professionals of a geriatrics centre. PARTICIPANTS: Study participants were initially community-dwelling, aged 60 years and older and without B-ADL-restrictions, cognitive impairment, or need of nursing care, with sufficient command of the German language. INTERVENTIONS: Health promotion and preventive care interventions relied on an extensive health questionnaire and the subsequent offer to participate in multi-topic personal reinforcement performed in small group sessions or at preventive home visits. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: Survival time; in some analyses, adjustments were made for gender, age and self-perceived health. Secondary outcome: Functional competence (LUCAS Functional Ability Index) based on responses to self-administered questionnaires at 1-year follow-up and 12 years after 1-year follow-up (2013/2014). RESULTS: Mean time under observation was 10.3 years. 38.3% (987/2,580) of the participants died; intervention group (IG): 35.7% (313/878), control group (CG): 39.6% (674/1,702); HR=0.89; p=0.09. Functional competence at 1-year follow-up: IG: ROBUST 67.4% (391/580), FRAIL 11.9% (69/580) vs. CG: ROBUST 62.9% (861/1,368), FRAIL 14.8% (203/1,368); p=0.12. 12-years after 1-year follow-up: IG: ROBUST 50.0% (160/320), FRAIL 30.9% (99/320) vs. CG: ROBUST 48.9% (307/628), FRAIL 34.1% (214/628); p=0.56. CONCLUSIONS: Insignificant but consistent effects on survival and the dynamics of functional competence suggest effectivity of the complex intervention. We plan to take a closer look at the effect of each reinforcement separately.

[A multidimensional questionnaire as a component of preventive geriatric assessment: comparison of self-assessment version with the interview version]. / Ein multidimensionaler Fragebogen als Bestandteil eines präventiven geriatrischen Assessments: Vergleich der Selbstausfüllerversion mit der Interviewversion.

In an earlier study we have shown good internal consistency and test-retest-reliability of a newly developed German-language instrument in the interviewer-administered version. The aim of this study was to test the reliability of a self-administered version compared to the original interviewer-administered version of our newly developed German-language instrument. We recruited a group of 50 over 75-year-old community-dwelling persons in Hamburg, Germany (N = 25) and Berne, Switzerland (N = 25). The questionnaire contains items on: self-perceived health, chronic conditions, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, nutrition, recent falls, pain, the social support/network and preventive-care measures. In addition, the Functional Status Questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index, the Visual Function Questionnaire, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Cohen's Kappa (self-administered version compared to the interviewer-administered version) was good to excellent (0.69-1.0) with only three exceptions (physical activity kappa = 0.49, basic activities kappa = 0.54 and oral health kappa = 0.54). For the domains activities of daily living, oral health, visual function and depression the self-administered version detected significantly more problems than the interview. In the future the self-administered version of this assessment instrument can be used for various purposes, e.g. (annual) preventive geriatric assessment for outpatients and other community-dwelling persons and epidemiological studies in older persons.

[Impact of fall risk and fear of falling on mobility of independently living senior citizens transitioning to frailty: screening results concerning fall prevention in the community]. / Einfluss von Sturzgefährdung und Sturzangst auf die Mobilität selbstständig lebender, älterer Menschen am Ubergang zur Gebrechlichkeit: Screeningergebnisse zur kommunalen Sturzprävention.

PROBLEM: There is a strong relation between mobility, walking safety and living independently in old age. People with walking problems suffer from fear of falling and tend to restrict their mobility and performance level in the community environment--even before falls occur. This study was planned to test the validity and prognostic value of a fall risk screening instrument ("Sturz-Risiko-Check") that has already shown its feasibility, acceptance and reliability, targeting independently living senior citizens. METHODS: The study sample was recruited from a sheltered housing complex in Hamburg (with written consent). Persons with need of professional care ("Pflegestufe" in Germany) were excluded. The residents were asked to fill in the multidimensional questionnaire ("Sturz-Risiko- Check"). In a second step, a trained nurse asked the participants in a phone call about their competence in the instrumental activities of daily living (I-ADL mod. from Lawton, Brody 1969) and about their usual mobility performance level (e.g. frequency and distance of daily walks, use of public transport). According to the number and weight of self-reported risk factors for falling, three groups: "low fall risk", "medium fall risk" and "high fall risk" were classified. Finally, this classification was re-tested after one year, asking for falls and fall related injuries. RESULTS: A total of 112 senior citizens without need of personal care, living in a sheltered housing facility were asked to participate. Acceptance was high (76.1%). Self-reported data from 79 participants concerning falls, fall-risk, mobility and instrumental activities of daily living were included in the statistical analyses. Mean age was 78 (64 to 93) years and associated by a high percentage of women (75.9%) in this sample. The older participants reported 0 to 13 different factors (mean 5) related to a high risk of future falls. Most participants (78.5%) quit cycling because of fear of falling. There was a high incidence in the study sample and over the three risk groups of chronic disorders like cardiac failure (75.9%) and disturbed vision or hearing (64.6%). According to the rising risk of falling over the three risk groups (low, medium and high), there were symptoms of fast functional decline or frailty like diminished walking speed (6.3 vs 36.8 vs 72.0%), sarcopenia (failed chairrise test: 0 vs 18.4 vs 28%) or already perceived fall events (0 vs 5.3 vs 56.0%) and ongoing restriction in basic activities. Those results were proven by the data on fall frequencies after one year (follow-up). We found an increase in falls over all three risk groups (12.5 vs 31.6 vs 28%) with fall-related severe injuries (fractures) in two persons classified in the high fall-risk group. DISCUSSION: The results of the fall-risk screening were useful to classify groups with different probability to fall in the near future. Fear-offalling and symptoms of frailty were related to an increasing risk of falling and loss of mobility and autonomy in still independently living senior citizens. CONCLUSION: The fall-risk screening instrument ("Sturz-Risiko-Check" questionnaire) was useful and valid to predict risk of falling and functional decline in independently living senior citizens transitioning to frailty. This screening will be part of a prevention approach in the City of Hamburg to offer primary and secondary prevention interventions adapted to special target groups of community- dwelling elder people (robust in contrast to frail elderly). The implementation should be accompanied by training sessions for physicians in the primary care sector and health improvement programmes for elder citizens.

[Geriatric health promotion and prevention for independently living senior citizens: programmes and target groups]. / Geriatrische Gesundheitsförderung und Prävention für selbstständig lebende Senioren: Angebote und Zielgruppen.

BACKGROUND: Nearly all diseases in old age that are epidemiologically important can be reduced or prevented successfully through consequent changes in individual lifestyle, a systematic provision of measures in primary prevention (i.e. vaccination programmes) and the creation of health promoting settings. However, at the moment the amount of potential for preventative interventions is neither systematically nor sufficiently utilised in Germany. METHODS: Two different preventative approaches: a) multidimensional advice session in small groups through an interdisciplinary team at a geriatric centre (seniors come to seek advice offered at a centre) or b) multidimensional advice at the seniors home through one member of the interdisciplinary team from the geriatric centre (expert takes advice to seniors home) were tested simultaneously with a well-described study sample of 804 independent community-dwelling senior citizens aged 60 years or over, without need of care and cognitive impairments recruited from general practices. Information about target group specific approaches in health promotion and prevention for senior citizens were retrieved from analyses of sociodemographic, medical, psychological and spacial characteristics of this study sample. RESULTS: The majority of the study sample (580 out of 804 or 72.1%) decided to participate: a) 86.7% (503 out of 580) attended at the geriatric centre and sought advice in group sessions and b) 13.3% (77 out of 580) decided to receive advice in a preventive home visit. A total of 224 seniors (224 out of 804 or 27.9%) refused to participate at all. These three target groups were characterised on the basis of their age, gender, education, social background, health status, health behaviour, use of preventive care, self perceived health, functional disabilities, social net and social participation and distance or accessibility of preventative approaches. The 503 senior citizens who participated in small group sessions at the geriatric centre were characterised as "investors into their health resources". They were mobile and participated actively in their environment. They were open for health promoting advice and capable of understanding and incorporating it into their daily routines (health literacy). Those 224 seniors who refused any participation were characterised as "consumers of their health resources". They did not differ in age and gender from the health investors, but showed less self-efficacy and less self-responsibility and typical behaviour that endangers health in an active way, i.e. smokers or in a passive way, i.e. low physical activity. The 77 seniors who received a preventive home visit were characterised as "people with exhausted health resources". Their mobility was clearly restricted and autonomy was confined to their home environment. This group represented frail elderly people with many risk factors in different domains. CONCLUSION: The strongest reason to refuse participation in health promoting programmes was the personal attitude related to one's own personal health. Taking account of needs and wants of the seniors who refused to participate more people expressed the reason "no interest" in the preventive home visit than in the small group session at the geriatric centre. To strengthen the integration of the GP as a trustworthy person would seem to be more successful to motivate senior citizens to participate in health promoting and preventative programmes in the future. This could succeed in a cooperation with geriatric centres to establish community centres for generally healthy senior citizens.

[Drug use and self-perceived health as reported by community-dwelling elderly persons in Hamburg]. / Arzneimittelgebrauch und gesundheitliche Selbsteinschätzung selbstständig lebender, älterer Hamburger.

Self-perceived health as reported by elderly persons is of prognostic value and corresponds with morbidity and mortality. In the present study, information about the utilisation of medication, visits to the doctor, and self-perceived health was provided by standardised self-reports. The study sample included 804 independent community-dwelling persons 60 years and older. These persons were recruited from the patient lists of 14 general practices in Hamburg. Exclusion criteria were dementive disorders and the need of personal care. On average, there were 3 prescribed drugs and 1 over-the-counter medication per person. The number of medications corresponds to a mean of 2 chronic disorders. Almost 50% of the participants reported suffering from pain, with more than one-third rating their pain intensity as moderate or high. Furthermore, nearly half of the study population stated their self-reported health as moderate or poor, and one-fifth reported symptoms of depressed mood. There were discrepancies between the reports of pain or depressed mood and the corresponding use of medication. It seems that self-reported symptoms and self-perceived health in elderly persons should be considered more often in drug prescribing.

[Preventative home visits by a specially trained nurse for 60-year olds and elderly in Hamburg]. / Präventive Hausbesuche durch eine speziell fortgebildete Pflegefachkraft bei 60-jährigen und älteren Personen in Hamburg.

There is increasing interest in home visits by phycisians, nurses or occupational therapists which offer health promotion or preventive care to older people. However, the practical performance of home visits, the targeting, and the effectiveness are ambigious. The collaboration in the EU-study 'disability prevention' gave the opportunity to recruit non-selected people 60 years and older from 14 general practitioners' patient lists in Hamburg. The study participants were offered different programs of health promotion, i. e., group sessions at the geriatric center and preventive home visits. The home visits were made by a nurse who received special training, and a curriculum was established. Seventy-seven elderly persons were visited because they were not able to attend the group sessions at the geriatric center due to self-reported problems in mobility. The investigations revealed combined risks for development of functional decline and dependency in the majority of these community dwelling elderly persons. These findings were unknown to the general practitioners. For example, the risk of falling as recorded by assessment was elevated in more than half of the persons visited. Screening and assessment are useful for planing measures of health promotion and prevention. There are still questions open to discussion. The targeting, practicability, and prerequisites in structure of service provision are considered with regard to the present study's results and an upto date literature review.

Feasibility and yield of a self-administered questionnaire for health risk appraisal in older people in three European countries.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of a self-administered questionnaire for health risk appraisal in older people. METHODS: A scientifically updated and culturally adapted English and German language version of the Health Risk Appraisal for Older Persons self-administered questionnaire identifying risk factors for functional impairment in older people was administered to three samples of older people (UK: Urban-based general practitioner list, n=348; Switzerland: Community-based lists in rural/suburban area, n=213; Germany: Occupants of residential care facilities, n=149). RESULTS: The majority of people judged the questionnaire as easy to comprehend (UK 81.4%; Switzerland 97.2%; Germany 93.1%) and to complete (83.2%, 95.8%, 91.4%). Prevalence of risk factors was higher than 10% at each site for excessive fat intake (25-54%), lack of social activity (15-47%), low physical activity (28-46%), impaired vision (17-38%), impaired hearing (23-25%), and urinary incontinence (13-37%). Uptake of recommended preventive health measures, including screening and vaccination was below 50% in more than half of recommended items, with large variations between sites. DISCUSSION: Acceptance of the adapted Health Risk Appraisal for Older Persons questionnaire was high and its feasibility supported. The findings identified a high prevalence of potentially modifiable risk factors for ill health and disability in older people with large variations in prevalence rates and awareness between sites. The yield supports the further development and evaluation of the approach.

[Preventive home visits for elderly patients: development and pilot testing of a multidimensional assessment instrument]. / Präventive Hausbesuche im Alter: Entwicklung und Pilottestung eines multidimensionalen Abklärungsinstruments.

Preventive home visits with multidimensional geriatric assessment have been shown to delay or prevent the onset of disability and reduce nursing home admissions in older people. The purpose of the present study was to develop and test a multidimensional instrument for in-home preventive assessments in older persons. In developing the instrument, we conducted a systematic literature review of risk factors for functional status decline and of appropriate instruments for measuring these risk factors. Based on an Expert Panel using a modified Delphi process [1] the risk factor domains for functional status decline were chosen, [2] the instruments for evaluating each of the included risk factor domains were selected, and [3] the individual instruments were combined into one comprehensive assessment instrument. A German language version of the original English version of the instrument was developed based on translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation. The feasibility of use of the new instrument was evaluated in a field test in 150 people aged 75 years and older in Hamburg, Ulm, Germany, and Bern, Switzerland. The instrument was well accepted by the older persons. The prevalence of risk factors for functional status decline in these populations (e.g., physical inactivity, urinary incontinence, vision impairment) was high. There was also a high prevalence of underuse of preventive care measures (e.g., no pneumococcal vaccination in over 95 percent of persons). These preliminary results support the possible usefulness of this instrument for conducting preventive home visits or for epidemiological purposes (e.g., prevention surveillance). In a next phase, the test-retest reliability of the instrument, and the feasibility and reliability of self-administration as compared to interviewer administration will be described in a separate paper.

[Geriatric care in Germany--results of an empirical study]. / Geriatrische Versorgung in Deutschland--Ergebnisse einer empirischen Untersuchung.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, the situation of geriatric medicine has improved significantly over the past few years. Until now, though, there was little information available on the structure of the clinical geriatric departments. Since this information is vital to assess whether these departments can provide high-quality services, the German Federal Association of Clinical Geriatric Departments conducted a survey among its members. The goal was to gain deeper insight into the structure of the geriatric acute hospitals and rehabilitation units. METHODS: In 1999, member institutions were mailed a standardized questionnaire and all institutions (100%) returned the questionnaire to the association's central office. To increase data quality, data were screened and reports were generated for each institution. These reports were returned to the institutions which were asked to verify them. RESULTS: This article shows that in 1998 acute geriatric hospitals (n = 89), rehabilitation units (n = 52), acute day clinics (n = 45) and rehabilitation day clinics (n = 26) had--on average--60/60/15.3/14 beds/places and 828.15/677.3/164.2/125.9 patients. Occupancy rates averaged out at 88.7%/84.3%/86.4%/63.7% and daily hospital rates at DM 401.4/322.4/293.8/243.2. Basically, all geriatric institutions included in this survey had a multi-professional geriatric team. Patient-to-staff ratios for psychologists, social workers, ergo-, physio- and speech therapists were better in day clinics than in in-patient clinics and better in rehabilitation units than in acute hospitals. Geriatric institutions mainly focused on the treatment of neurological deficits. Most patients were admitted from other hospitals and discharged to their private residence. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey indicate that especially the acute hospitals are often not sufficiently staffed. Moreover, further efforts are necessary to clarify the indications for and modalities of geriatric day clinic treatment and rehabilitation. The data also show that a categorical distinction between geriatric acute hospitals and rehabilitation units is not possible. However, further data collection and more detailed analyses are needed.

[Test-retest reliability of a German language multidimensional assessment instrument in elderly probands]. / Test-Retest-Reliabilität eines deutschsprachigen multidimensionalen Assessmentinstruments bei älteren Personen.

Most geriatric assessment instruments have been developed in the English language. Translated versions might differ in their psychometric properties. We analyzed the test-retest reliability and internal consistency of a German instrument for multidimensional geriatric assessment that was based on a newly developed English version. A group of 100 over 75-year-old community-dwelling persons (mean age 83.0 years, 81% women) in Hamburg (n = 26) and Ulm (n = 51), Germany, and Berne (n = 23), Switzerland was interviewed twice by the same trained interviewers with a one week interval. We administered questions on general health, chronic disorders, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, urinary incontinence, nutrition, falls, pain, the social support/network and preventive care measures. In addition, the Functional Status Questionnaire, the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly, the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index, the Visual Function Questionnaire, the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly and the Geriatric Depression Scale were administered. Cohen's kappa was good to excellent (0.64 < or = kappa < or = 0.89) with only three exceptions (pain questions, kappa = 0.53; questions on preventive care services, kappa = 0.51; and one of the questions on recent falls, kappa = 0.44). Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) was good to excellent for all domains (0.76 < or = alpha < or = 0.95). The study results confirm good test-retest reliability of the German version of this multidimensional geriatric assessment instrument. Adapted versions of this instrument can be used for different purposes, e.g., preventive home visits, outpatient geriatric assessments or epidemiological studies in older persons.