Fungal endophthalmitis: A 20-year experience at a tertiary referral centre.

IMPORTANCE: Fungal endophthalmitis is an uncommon and serious intraocular infection, often with poor outcomes. This study examines the trend in this disease over 20 years, to inform clinician decision-making and optimize patient outcomes. BACKGROUND: Due to infrequent presentation of fungal endophthalmitis, there is limited understanding to formulate a standardized approach to management. DESIGN: A prospective case series over the period January 1, 1999 to December 31, 2018. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with clinically diagnosed fungal endophthalmitis managed at the Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. METHODS: Review of the Victorian Endophthalmitis Registry for endophthalmitis episode of each patient. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, co-morbidities, visual acuity (VA) at presentation, aetiology, treatment, microbiology results and final VA outcome. RESULTS: Eighty-four cases of fungal endophthalmitis were identified over the study period with a median age of 43.5 years [IQR 30.8-63.0]. Then, 65.5% (n = 55) of patients were male; 81.0% (n = 68) of these cases were secondary to endogenous causes, of which 55.9% were associated with intravenous drug use (IVDU). Among the exogenous causes, penetrating eye injury (56.3%) was the most common aetiological factor. Thirty-nine patients (46.4%) grew Candida species from ocular fluid specimens, all of which were sensitive to fluconazole. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Our case series provides important insights into fungal endophthalmitis-a high degree of suspicion for fungal endophthalmitis in patients with history of IVDU, and relatively good outlook for vision when Candida is the causative organism. This should allow institutions to implement a standardized management strategy based on evidence.

Gram-negative endophthalmitis: A prospective study examining the microbiology, clinical associations and visual outcomes following infection.

IMPORTANCE: This is the largest Gram-negative endophthalmitis specific series and provides important evidence to guide management. BACKGROUND: Endophthalmitis is a sight-threatening emergency. Gram-negative infections are associated with poorer visual outcomes; however, there is limited literature pertaining to this uncommon condition. DESIGN: Prospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: All patients presenting with endophthalmitis to a tertiary institution over a 20-year period. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively and entered into a registry. Patients with microbiological evidence of Gram-negative infection were included in the analysis. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: Final visual acuity (VA), precipitating events, causative organisms, antibiotic sensitivity profiles and risk factors for poor visual outcomes were reported. RESULTS: One hundred Gram-negative organisms were isolated in 97 eyes. Final VA was worse than 6/60 in 65 (67.0%) eyes at follow-up and 29 (29.9%) eyes were eviscerated or enucleated. Microbial keratitis (26.8%, n = 26) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (34.0%, n = 34) were the most common precipitating event and causative organism, respectively. Eight (8.0%) isolates were third-generation cephalosporin resistant; of which, 7 (88.0%) were sensitive to ciprofloxacin. Preceding microbial keratitis (OR = 13.16, P = .015) or P. aeruginosa infections (OR = 3.40, P = .045) were strongly associated with poorer visual outcomes (worse than 6/60). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Visual outcomes following Gram-negative endophthalmitis are extremely poor, with almost 30% of patients being eviscerated or enucleated. A majority of ceftazidime resistant organisms are sensitive to ciprofloxacin, providing evidence to support the empirical use of quinolones. Clinicians should be mindful that infections secondary to P. aeruginosa or microbial keratitis carry a particularly poor prognosis.

Endophthalmitis: Microbiology and Organism Identification Using Current and Emerging Techniques.

Endophthalmitis is an ophthalmological emergency requiring timely and appropriate diagnosis and treatment. Microbiological methods of microscopy (Gram's staining) and culture are the current gold standard for organism identification. However, a significant proportion of endophthalmitis remains culture-negative-perhaps the inflammation is non-infectious in origin, results from a novel organism are unidentifiable or because the causative organism is non-culturable often due to pre-treatment with antibiotics. This review outlines the microbiological profile of endophthalmitis, current clinically used methods for organism identification, and the newer molecular techniques of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology as diagnostic tools for endophthalmitis. They offer the potential to improve organism identification rates and clinical outcomes in infectious diseases, representing an exciting future direction for organism identification in endophthalmitis. Based on the largest ophthalmic hospital in Australia, we highlight the key practical challenges faced by Australian diagnostic laboratories for their use in a clinical setting.

Cytokine Expression in Staphylococcal and Streptococcal Endophthalmitis.

Background: Endophthalmitis is an infection of ocular tissues, often with devastating outcomes for vision. Immunomodulation is an emerging avenue for therapeutic intervention in endophthalmitis, with the expression of cytokines central to potential mechanisms. This literature review with a systematic approach characterizes the cytokine expression in both animal and human staphylococcal and streptococcal endophthalmitis. Method and Results: Four online databases were searched for studies profiling cytokine levels in animal models or human populations with staphylococcal and/or streptococcal endophthalmitis. Of the 1,060 articles identified, 14 studies were included in this review comprising eight animal models and six human populations. Mouse, rat, and rabbit models of Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Streptococcus pneumoniae endophthalmitis had elevated levels of IL-1ß, IL-6, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-8, with earlier peaks observed in S. epidermidis infection. Human endophthalmitis demonstrated significantly increased mediator levels compared to controls for a range of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors. Several associations were established between cytokine concentrations and both initial visual acuity and visual prognosis, with no consistent correlations across trials. Conclusions: It may be that virulence factors and the combinations of toll-like receptors activated influence the pathogen-specific visual outcomes observed in endophthalmitis. Furthermore, disease severity and potential therapeutic targets may be dependent on synergistic and compensatory cytokine pathways and the expression of anti-inflammatory mediators. Future research should aim to better characterize the roles of inflammatory mediators and solidify associations between pathogens, inflammation, and endophthalmitis outcomes. This has exciting implications for the prevention and treatment of endophthalmitis in clinical settings.