RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Oral SERDs are a novel drug class that have been developed to counteract resistance due to ESR1 mutations. Several SERDs have emerged from phase 2 and 3 trials, with the FDA limiting approval for Elacestrant to patients with ESR1mt tumours despite PFS benefit in the overall population. However, questions remain on whether patients with ESR1wt tumours stand to benefit from oral SERDs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Manuscripts and conference presentations of Randomised Controlled Trials were extracted after a systematic search of Embase, PubMed and Cochrane from inception until January 21,2023. RCTs investigating the efficacy of oral SERDs versus endocrine therapy for ER positive, HER2 negative advanced breast cancer, and which reported the Kaplan Meier (KM) curves of PFS in the overall and ESR1 mutant (ESR1mt) population were selected. A graphical reconstructive algorithm was applied to estimate time-to-event outcomes from reported KM curves in all overall and ESR1mt cohorts. A bipartite matching algorithm, KMSubtraction, was used to derive survival data for unreported (ESR1wt) subgroups. An individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis was then pursued, pooling data by ESR1 mutation status in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane Guidelines for IPD. RESULTS: The randomized clinical trials ACELERA, AMEERA-3, EMERALD and SERENA-2 were included, totalling 1290 patients. In the pooled analysis of the overall cohort, PFS benefit was observed with oral SERDs when compared with treatment of physicians choice (TPC) (HR 0.783, 95%CI 0.681-0.900, p<0.001). In the ESR1mt subgroup, oral SERDs demonstrated improved PFS (HR 0.557, 95%CI 0.440-0.705, p<0.001) compared to TPC. In the ESR1wt subgroup, oral SERDs demonstrated no significant PFS benefit (HR 0.944, 95%CI 0.783-1.138, p=0.543) when compared to TPC. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this IPD meta-analysis suggests that PFS benefit in the overall population is mainly driven by the ESR1mt subgroup.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the extent of pathologic response in patients with HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer treated with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with or without trastuzumab (H), according to hormone receptor (HR) status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We included 199 patients with HER2+ breast cancer from three successive cohorts of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of paclitaxel (Taxol) (P) administered weekly (w) or three weekly (3-w), followed by 5-fluorouracil (F), doxorubicin (A) or epirubicin (E), and cyclophosphamide (C). Residual cancer burden (RCB) was determined from pathologic review of the primary tumor and lymph nodes and was classified as pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimal (RCB-I), moderate (RCB-II), or extensive (RCB-III) residual disease. RESULTS: In HR-positive (HR+) cancers, a higher rate of pathologic response (pCR/RCB-I) was observed with concurrent H + 3-wP/FEC (73%) than with 3-wP/FEC (34%, P = 0.002) or wP/FAC (47%; P = 0.02) chemotherapy alone. In HR-negative (HR-) cancers, there were no significant differences in the rate of pathologic response (pCR/RCB-I) from 3-wP/FAC (50%), wP/FAC (68%), or concurrent H + 3-wP/FEC (72%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HR+/HER2+ breast cancer obtained significant benefit from addition of trastuzumab to P/FEC chemotherapy; pathologic response rate was similar to that seen in HR-/HER2+ breast cancers.