RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: In advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC), the issue of whether Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) should be stopped or not after clinical complete response (cCR) achievement remains an unmet clinical need. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study across 7 Italian dermato-oncology units including patients with BCC who continued vismodegib after cCR between 2012 and 2019. We assessed the relationship between the duration of vismodegib intake (days to cCR [DTCR], days to stop after cCR [DTS], total treatment days [TTD]), and disease-free survival (DFS). Reasons to stop vismodegib were (R1) toxicity and (R2) disease recurrence. The relationship between DTCR, DTS, TTD, and DFS in the whole population and in R1 subgroup was assessed by Pearson's correlation coefficient (Pâ <â .05) and Bayesian statistics (BF10). RESULTS: Sixty-eight BCC patients with a median (m) age of 75.5 years (39-100) were included. Most patients were male (Nâ =â 43, 63%), without Gorlin syndrome (Nâ =â 56, 82%) and with head and neck area as primary site (Nâ =â 51, 75%). After cCR, out of 68 patients, 90% (N = 61/68) discontinued vismodegib: 82% (Nâ =â 50/61) due to toxicity (R1), and 18% (Nâ =â 11/61) due to recurrence (R2). Conversely, 10% (Nâ =â 7/68) continued vismodegib until last follow-up. In the whole population (Nâ =â 68), cCR was achieved with a mDTCR of 180.50 days. DFS showed a significant correlation with DTS (Pâ <â .01, BF10â =â 39.2) and TTD (Pâ <â .01, BF10â =â 35566), while it was not correlated to DTCR (BF10â <â 0.1). The analysis of R1 subgroup (Nâ =â 50) confirmed these results. DFS correlated with DTS in all recurrent patients (Nâ =â 38, râ =â 0.44, Pâ <â .01) and in the recurrent patients who stopped vismodegib for toxicity (Nâ =â 26, râ =â 0.665, Pâ <â .01). DFS was longer when vismodegib was maintained for >2 months after cCR (mDFSâ >â 2 months, Nâ =â 54 vs.â ≤â 2 months, Nâ =â 14: 470 vs. 175 d, Pâ <â .01). CONCLUSIONS: Our retrospective results suggest that HHIs should be continued after cCR to improve DFS in BCC.
Asunto(s)
Anilidas , Carcinoma Basocelular , Proteínas Hedgehog , Piridinas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Carcinoma Basocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anilidas/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Piridinas/uso terapéutico , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Hedgehog/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Neoplasias Cutáneas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patologíaRESUMEN
Vulvar melanoma is considered rare, but it is the second most frequent vulvar neoplasm; 2% of melanomas in women arise in the vulvar area. It is important to highlight how the characteristics of vulvar melanoma differentiate it from classic cutaneous melanoma. Vulvar melanoma has different risk factors and clinical and dermoscopic characteristics; moreover, it has a higher recurrence rate and a greater likelihood of multifocality. Here, we present a case of a 44-year-old patient with two primary vulvar melanomas located on opposite sides of her vulva. The lesions were both flat, but they had distinct clinical and dermoscopic appearances. Melanoma of the genital tract is likely the result of a multifocal disorder of the melanocytes within the mucosa that inhabit the perineal squamous epithelium. The risk factors of vulvar melanoma differ from those of classical cutaneous melanomas. Vulvar melanoma occurs in an area shielded from ultraviolet radiation; the primary risk factors include chronic inflammatory disease, genetic susceptibility, irritant agents and viral infections. This case study reveals how a close examination of the genital area is important and how dermoscopy can aid in the differential diagnosis of vulvar lesions. Inspections of the genital area should be particularly thorough if a melanoma is detected there, given the higher risk of multifocality in that part of the body.
RESUMEN
Oral targeted therapy with hedgehog pathway inhibitors has revolutionized the standard of care for patients with advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC). These patients are frail and elderly, have various comorbidities, and receive pharmacological polytherapy. Moreover, adverse events may have a significant impact on therapeutic adherence, which must be managed by the clinician. We evaluated the impact of caregivers on the treatment of patients with advanced BCC in terms of continuation of therapy over time. All patients included in this observational prospective study had histologically confirmed metastatic or locally advanced BCC (LaBCC) and were treated with hedgehog pathway inhibitors from January 2016 to December 2021 at the Department of Dermatology at the University of Florence, Italy. The collected patient data included: age, sex, BCC site and area of spread; number of cycles, dose, duration and tolerability of therapy; marital status (single, divorced, married/living with a partner, widow/widower); and information such as living with someone, and the presence of any caregivers. Of the 34 patients included, 33 had LaBCC and one metastatic BCC. There were 11 females (32.4%) and 23 males (67.6%). Patients who were married or living with a caregiver -tolerated therapy better than single patients who lived alone. Indeed, patients with married/live-in caregivers and/or those with an adequate caregiver experienced greater therapeutic adherence and tolerance of adverse events. Given the greater therapeutic adherence of patients with live-in caregivers as partners, it is essential to consider patients' marital status. It is advisable to involve the caregiver early on, and there should be a training discussion on the various possible adverse events and the best way to mitigate them. Therapeutic success is linked not only to patients being informed but also to training of caregivers.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Carcinoma Basocelular , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Anciano , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Cuidadores , Proteínas Hedgehog/metabolismo , Piridinas/efectos adversos , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Anilidas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Periocular sebaceous carcinoma (PSC) is a rare, aggressive, and potentially metastatic adnexal malignancy. Due to the ability of PSC to resemble several benign and malignant conditions, diagnosis is often delayed or mistaken. In addition, even with a known diagnosis, choosing the right treatment is still an open debate. For this reason, we decided to review the most up-to-date literature on PSC and propose a dedicated procedural protocol to help clinicians when dealing with PSC. A PubMed search was carried out using the terms "Sebaceous Carcinoma", "Adnexal Periocular Cancer", "Sebaceous Carcinoma AND eyelid", "Periocular Sebaceous Carcinoma", and "Ocular Adnexa". Pertinent studies published in English from 1997 up to December 2022 were compared to the selection criteria and if suitable, included in this review. Through the initial search, 84 articles were selected. Of these, 36 were included in the final study. Several papers explored different diagnostic and therapeutic strategies regarding PSC diagnosis and management. In light of the current literature review and the multidisciplinary experience of three clinical centers, a dedicated procedural protocol is proposed. PSC diagnosis may be achieved through accurate clinical evaluation, but it requires histopathologic confirmation, which can be challenging. Dermoscopy, in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy, and optical coherence tomography may facilitate PSC clinical examination, while immunohistochemistry stains may support histological diagnosis. Appropriate disease staging is necessary before choosing the treatment, as local disease requires radically different treatment compared to advanced disease. In addition, recent innovations in nonsurgical treatments, including radio-chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, may be a viable option in the most challenging cases.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma Sebáceo , Neoplasias de los Párpados , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sebáceas , Humanos , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sebáceas/terapia , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sebáceas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Sebáceas/patología , Neoplasias de los Párpados/terapia , Neoplasias de los Párpados/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de los Párpados/patología , Adenocarcinoma Sebáceo/terapia , Adenocarcinoma Sebáceo/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma Sebáceo/patología , Dermoscopía , Diagnóstico DiferencialRESUMEN
Eyelid melanoma (EM) is a malignant neoplasm accounting for around 1% of eyelid malignancies. Because of its rarity, most of our knowledge of EM is currently based on studies of cutaneous melanomas located elsewhere. Accordingly, this study aimed to specifically evaluate EM characteristics, management strategies, and prognosis. A retrospective study was carried out on patients diagnosed with EM at Careggi University Hospital, Florence between May 2012 and May 2022. In addition, a systematic review of relevant literature was conducted, encompassing studies published from 2013 to 2023. Clinical, histopathological, therapeutical, and prognostic data were analyzed to assess the metastasis rate and the 5-year survival rate of patients with EM. Separate data were extracted for in situ and invasive disease. Our original study included 19 patients diagnosed with EM with a 5-year survival rate of 100% for in situ and 83.3% for invasive EM. The literature review identified five poorly detailed large database reviews and 14 original studies on EM with an overall 5-year survival rate of 79.7%. The present research indicates that EM is a challenging malignancy, but has a relatively better prognosis and easier management than other melanomas of the head and neck region. These are probably related to the anatomical location which leads to early diagnosis. Therefore, EM should be considered as a specific disease requiring dedicated treatment. Based on the personal authors' experience and comprehensive overview of the current knowledge, a dedicated protocol is proposed.
RESUMEN
Despite being early-stage tumors, thin cutaneous melanomas contribute significantly to mortality and have a rising incidence. A retrospective case-control study was performed to identify clinical-dermoscopic and histopathological variables linked to local and distant metastases in melanomas ≤0.8 mm. Data from 1 January 2000 to 22 June 2022 were analyzed from two Italian skin cancer referral centers. Sixteen patients with ≤0.8 mm melanomas developing metastases were studied compared to controls without metastases over 5 years. Statistical analysis involved Pearson's chi-squared test or Fisher's exact test. Of the 1396 cases, 1.1% progressed. The median diagnosis age was 49 (range 28-83), with 56.3% men and 43.7% women. The torso was the primary tumor site (43.7%). Clinically, lesions were pigmented (>10 mm diameter: 73.3%, ≥3 colors: 80%). Dermoscopically, the common features were white patches (73.3%), atypical vascular patterns (66.5%), blue-gray areas (60%) and absent pigment networks (60%). Histopathologically, all cases had adverse features like regression (87.4%), dermal mitoses (50%), a vertical growth phase (62.5%) and ulceration (12.5%). These findings were statistically significant compared to controls (p < 0.05). In ≤0.8 mm melanomas, specific clinical-dermoscopic traits might indicate higher metastatic potential when paired with adverse histopathological features.