Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 22(1): 279, 2022 09 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056321

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatric anesthesia care in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging is a challenge for clinicians. The recent debate about the role of anesthetic agent on neural development, encouraged an evaluation of their actual activity in this environment. In this active call survey, the authors sought to delineate the Italian situation regarding national centers, staff involved, monitoring tools available and sedation techniques. METHODS: A complete sample of all national centers performing almost a pediatric discharge in the 2014 was obtained from Health Ministry registers. All Institutions were contacted for a prospective phone investigation and a three-section survey was fill out with the Physician in charge. A descriptive and exploratory analyzes about the organization setting of the Centers were performed. RESULTS: Among 876 Institution screened, only 106 (37%) met minimal criteria for inclusion. Children are managed by anesthesiologists in the 95% of cases, while neonates in the 54%. A dedicated nurse is present in 74% of centers. While a pulse oximetry is present in 100% of centers, the rate of prevalence of other monitoring is lower. A specific MRI-compatible ventilator is available in the 95% of Centers, but many tools are not equally homogenously distributed. Pharmacological approach is preferred in pediatric age (98%), but its use for newborns is reduced to 43%. CONCLUSIONS: We found significant heterogeneity in the daily clinical practice of sedation in MRI. Our results could be a starting point to evaluate the further evolution of approach to children and neonates in magnetic resonance setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04775641.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Niño , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Estudios Prospectivos
3.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 20(3): 246-55, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20102527

RESUMEN

Remifentanil has gained the confidence of anesthesiologists and has given a real opportunity to change the way anesthesia is given. It can be considered the ideal opioid despite many obstacles to pediatric use: the condition of 'off-label', the lack of wide randomized clinical trials, and the fear of adverse events because of its high potency. Experiences in the field with this opioid over the years encouraged its use. Use has been associated with N(2)0 and volatile agents for general anesthesia and with propofol for total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). It seems very useful for sedation inside and outside the operating room and in intensive care for both short painful procedures and synchronization with mechanical ventilation. However, its unique pharmacokinetic characteristics causing rapid onset and offset of effect appear unchanged in small children and even in premature neonates and need to be really confirmed by further pharmacokinetic studies. Moreover, the real risks of tolerance and hyperalgesia should be evaluated in the pediatric population. In this review, we go through the newer aspects of this versatile drug that has been proposed as 'the pediatric anesthetist's opiate'.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/farmacocinética , Anestesia General/métodos , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Cuidado Intensivo Neonatal , Remifentanilo
5.
J Opioid Manag ; 13(2): 125-127, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28829527

RESUMEN

Sedation for endoscopic procedures may be challenging when facing patients with high risk. Traditional techniques, as propofol or meperidine/midazolam administration, cannot ensure an adequate level of safety and efficacy for these patients. Remifentanil infusion is a common alternative, but the incidence of apneic events does not allow achieving safely a good level of analgesia. To overcome with this issue, the authors borrowed suggestions from other medical fields. The clinical practice has recognized a wide utility of methylxanthines (caffeine, theophylline, etc). The positive effect of caffeine on the airways function is known and in the treatment of neonatal apnea, it works as direct stimulant of central respiratory center. Furthermore, preclinical studies suggest that methylxanthines could have a protective role on the opioids inhibition of the bulbar-pontine respiratory center. As described in this report, the authors observed that, also when apnea has been induced by remifentanil, caffeine is able to restore the respiratory rate. The authors present the management of a respiratory impaired patient scheduled for a therapeutic colonoscopy. Our sedation was focused on the match between remifentanil in target controlled infusion and intravenous caffeine, like an "expresso to wake-up" the respiratory drive.


Asunto(s)
Cafeína/farmacología , Colonoscopía/métodos , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/administración & dosificación , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Frecuencia Respiratoria/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Humanos , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/efectos adversos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Remifentanilo , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/inducido químicamente , Síndromes de la Apnea del Sueño/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Pediatr Neonatol ; 52(3): 176-9, 2011 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21703563

RESUMEN

Premature babies experience pain and require adequate analgesia for any painful procedure. Fentanyl and morphine resulted in safe and effective anesthesia in the past; however, their pharmacokinetics may be impaired in preterm babies with multiorgan failure. Remifentanil, despite the absence of available pharmacokinetic data in preterm infants and few reports in newborns, demonstrated its advantages in children undergoing either major surgery or minor painful procedures and has been shown to be useful even in neonates, because its elimination is independent of organ function. We report two cases of babies born at 26 weeks' and 27 weeks' gestation, weighing 580 g and 400 g, respectively, undergoing laparotomy for necrotizing enterocolitis. Both received midazolam bolus and remifentanil infusion at high doses. This technique seems to be an advantageous alternative even in extremely low-birth-weight prematures. Furthermore, it becomes a technique of choice in these babies because the available ventilators are often not equipped with halogenated vaporizers. Particularly in intensive care, where there are no scavenger systems, it could allow to operate without moving out the preterm babies and avoiding stress and hypothermia.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Intravenosos/farmacocinética , Enterocolitis Necrotizante/cirugía , Enfermedades del Prematuro/cirugía , Laparotomía , Piperidinas/farmacocinética , Anestésicos Intravenosos/administración & dosificación , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Recien Nacido con Peso al Nacer Extremadamente Bajo , Recién Nacido , Infusiones Intravenosas , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Remifentanilo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA