Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo de estudio
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Viruses ; 11(2)2019 02 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30781518

RESUMEN

Following the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak from 2013 to 2016, viral RNA has been detected in survivors from semen and breast milk long after disease recovery. However, as there have been few cases of sexual transmission, it is unclear whether every RNA positive fluid sample contains infectious virus. Virus isolation, typically using cell culture or animal models, can serve as a tool to determine the infectivity of patient samples. However, the sensitivity of these methods has not been assessed for the Ebola virus isolate, Makona. Described here is an efficiency comparison of Ebola virus Makona isolation using Vero E6, Huh-7, monocyte-derived macrophage cells, and suckling laboratory mice. Isolation sensitivity was similar in all methods tested. Laboratory mice and Huh-7 cells were less affected by toxicity from breast milk than Vero E6 and MDM cells. However, the advantages associated with isolation in Huh-7 cells over laboratory mice, including cost effectiveness, sample volume preservation, and a reduction in animal use, make Huh-7 cells the preferred substrate tested for Ebola virus Makona isolation.


Asunto(s)
Ebolavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Virología/métodos , Animales , Animales Lactantes , Línea Celular , Línea Celular Tumoral , Chlorocebus aethiops , Fiebre Hemorrágica Ebola/virología , Humanos , Macrófagos/virología , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Leche Humana/virología , Semen/virología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Células Vero
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA