Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Joint Bone Spine ; 73(2): 182-8, 2006 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16126426

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence and nature of karate injuries sustained in karate clubs and to identify risk factors for injuries. METHODS: One hundred eighty-six individuals from three karate clubs in Brest, France, were entered in a retrospective study extending from September 2002 to June 2003. Each athlete was asked to complete a questionnaire on karate injuries sustained during the previous year (type, location, mechanism, exercise during which the injury occurred, number of days off training and work, and medical care). Injury types were described by number of injuries and risk factors per number of injured athletes. RESULTS: Forty-eight (28.8%) of the 186 athletes sustained 83 injuries (63 while training and 20 while competing). The annual injury rate was 44.6 per 100 athletes. Incidence rates were similar in males and females and across the three clubs but increased with age, time spent training (3.6+/-1.7 vs. 2.9+/-1.5 h/week; P=0.001), rank (lower ranks vs. brown and black belts, P=0.015), and years of practice (7.3+/-5.5 years in athletes with injuries vs. 5.1+/-4.8 in those without injuries; P=0.03). Injuries consisted of 43 (53%) hematomas, 16 (19%) sprains, seven (7%) muscle lesions, six (7%) fractures, four (5%) malaise episodes, and seven (7%) miscellaneous lesions. Time off training occurred for 26 (31.3%) injuries and ranged from 8 to >30 days. The body region involved was the head in 22 (26.5%) injuries, the torso in eight injuries (9.6%), the upper limb in 24 (28.9%) injuries, and the lower limb in 29 (35%) injuries. CONCLUSION: Karate injuries are fairly common but usually minor. They are more likely to occur during competitions than while training. The head and limbs are the main regions involved. Longer training times per week and higher rank are associated with an increased risk of injury. Prevention seems crucial.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Artes Marciales/lesiones , Medicina Deportiva , Adolescente , Adulto , Traumatismos en Atletas/diagnóstico , Niño , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/epidemiología , Extremidades/lesiones , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Joint Bone Spine ; 83(2): 155-9, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26725745

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage in patients taking biological therapy for chronic inflammatory joint disease and to identify factors associated with the decision to administer these two vaccines. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional questionnaire study of a cohort of 584 patients taking biological therapy for chronic inflammatory joint disease (rheumatoid arthritis or spondyloarthritis). We studied the influenza and pneumococcal vaccine coverage rates, information about these vaccines given to patients by the primary-care physician and rheumatologist, and reasons for not administering the vaccines. RESULTS: Overall vaccine coverage rates were 44% for influenza and 62% for pneumococcus. Factors associated with being vaccinated were patient age, previous influenza vaccination, and patient information. Concern about adverse effects and absence of patient information by the primary-care physician and rheumatologist were associated with very low coverage rates. CONCLUSION: This study showed insufficient vaccine coverage rates, particularly against influenza, in a population at high risk because of exposure to biological therapy. Patient information by healthcare professionals about influenza and pneumococcal vaccination has a major impact and should be renewed as often as possible.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/complicaciones , Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Vacunas Neumococicas/administración & dosificación , Espondiloartritis/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/etiología , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones Neumocócicas/etiología , Infecciones Neumocócicas/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espondiloartritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
3.
Joint Bone Spine ; 75(3): 267-72, 2008 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18378179

RESUMEN

Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is the most common vasculitis, and epidemiological data indicate a further increase in incidence over the last two decades. The disease predominates in individuals from Scandinavia and other Northern European countries. The impact of GCA on mortality remains unclear, although an increased risk of cardiovascular events has been reported. Most of the complications are related to the use of glucocorticoids to treat the disease. Recently introduced tools for diagnosing GCA include high-resolution Doppler ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), whose performance remains to be determined. Glucocorticoids constitute the mainstay of the treatment of GCA. Other drugs have been evaluated, including dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, methylprednisolone pulse therapy, azathioprine, cyclosporine, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate; however, the studies were methodologically flawed and produced conflicting results. No drug has been found effective in reducing glucocorticoid requirements. The role for biotherapies remains unclear, as the promising results obtained in open-label studies were not borne out by controlled trials.


Asunto(s)
Arteritis de Células Gigantes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/diagnóstico , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/epidemiología , Arteritis de Células Gigantes/terapia , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Joint Bone Spine ; 74(1): 85-9, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17218141

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the respective contributions of various investigations used to identify the primary tumor in a cohort of patients referred for diagnostic evaluation of one or more bone metastases. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of patients admitted between October 1990 and January 2000 for evaluation of one or more bone metastases with no known primary. All patients underwent radionuclide bone scanning, a chest radiograph, and an abdominal ultrasound scan. Computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen, CT of the brain, and tumor marker assays were performed as clinically indicated. Using the final diagnosis as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic usefulness of each investigation. RESULTS: The 152 patients (104 men and 48 women) had a mean age of 63.5+/-12.5 years. The primary was located in the lung in 37 patients, prostate in 26, breast or female genital tract in 24, urinary system in 11, gastrointestinal tract in 11, head and neck in 6, and other organs in 4. In 33 patients, no primary was identified. The extraskeletal metastases were located chiefly in the liver (20.4%), lung (17.1%), pleura (13.2%), and brain (7.2%). Bone biopsies were performed in 107 patients: 84 had a single bone biopsy, 16 had two bone biopsies, and 7 had three bone biopsies. The first bone biopsy was taken in the rheumatology department with or without fluoroscopic guidance in 62 patients, in the radiology department under CT guidance in 6 patients, and in the surgery department in 32 patients; this information was unavailable for the 7 remaining patients. The first bone biopsy was taken from the iliac bone in 48 patients, spine in 32, sacrum in 10, rib in 3, and other sites in 7. The histological biopsy findings indicated adenocarcinoma in 58 cases, epidermoid carcinoma in 28 cases, undifferentiated carcinoma in 2 cases, and other histological patterns in 9 cases. In 80 patients, another metastatic site was easier to access than the bone metastasis. Tumor marker assays were of limited value for determining the site of the primary, with the exception of prostate-specific antigen. CONCLUSION: Bone biopsies performed by rheumatologists, generally under fluoroscopic guidance, usually indicate the site of the primary or at least the histological type. Tumor markers are often positive but are of limited usefulness for identifying the primary.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Neoplasias Primarias Desconocidas/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biomarcadores de Tumor , Biopsia , Neoplasias Óseas/patología , Huesos/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Estudios de Cohortes , Diagnóstico por Imagen , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Urogenitales/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Urogenitales/patología
5.
Joint Bone Spine ; 74(4): 385-8, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17613267

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Atypical mycobacteria are environmental organisms that cause opportunistic infections in humans. CASE REPORT: A 50-year-old electronics engineer sought advice about starting TNFalpha antagonist therapy for ankylosing spondylitis. Disease duration was 23 years and current treatment was methylprednisolone 4 mg/d. Atypical skin lesions and knee arthritis were noted. Fluid aspirated from the knee showed inflammatory properties and a few acid-fast bacteria, which a line probe assay identified as Mycobacterium chelonae. The same organism was found in a skin biopsy from a thigh lesion. Antimicrobial treatment was started immediately. Inadequate results 6 months later prompted synovectomy of the knee followed by interferon gamma, 50 microg/m(2) body surface area subcutaneously 3 times a week. After 16 months, there were no new skin or joint lesions, and the antimicrobials and interferon gamma were therefore discontinued. CONCLUSION: This highly unusual case suggests that interferon gamma may be effective in patients with M. chelonae infection that fails to respond adequately to antimicrobials.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Reactiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Interferón gamma/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Mycobacterium no Tuberculosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Mycobacterium chelonae/aislamiento & purificación , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reactiva/diagnóstico , Artritis Reactiva/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/efectos adversos , Metilprednisolona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos , Medición de Riesgo , Enfermedades Cutáneas Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/diagnóstico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA