RESUMEN
In vitro cancer cultures, including three-dimensional organoids, typically contain exclusively neoplastic epithelium but require artificial reconstitution to recapitulate the tumor microenvironment (TME). The co-culture of primary tumor epithelia with endogenous, syngeneic tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) as a cohesive unit has been particularly elusive. Here, an air-liquid interface (ALI) method propagated patient-derived organoids (PDOs) from >100 human biopsies or mouse tumors in syngeneic immunocompetent hosts as tumor epithelia with native embedded immune cells (T, B, NK, macrophages). Robust droplet-based, single-cell simultaneous determination of gene expression and immune repertoire indicated that PDO TILs accurately preserved the original tumor T cell receptor (TCR) spectrum. Crucially, human and murine PDOs successfully modeled immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) with anti-PD-1- and/or anti-PD-L1 expanding and activating tumor antigen-specific TILs and eliciting tumor cytotoxicity. Organoid-based propagation of primary tumor epithelium en bloc with endogenous immune stroma should enable immuno-oncology investigations within the TME and facilitate personalized immunotherapy testing.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Inmunológicos , Neoplasias Experimentales/inmunología , Organoides/inmunología , Receptores de Antígenos de Linfocitos T/inmunología , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Animales , Antígeno B7-H1/inmunología , Técnicas de Cocultivo , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoterapia , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Proteínas de Neoplasias/inmunología , Neoplasias Experimentales/patología , Neoplasias Experimentales/terapia , Organoides/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To elucidate whether chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), usually an inflammatory-mediated rather than infectious process, is a risk factor for extracranial and intracranial complications after elective endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent ETSS between January 2015 and July 2019 was performed, which included chart review and computed tomography assessment. CRS was defined by symptomatology and concurrent endoscopic or radiographic findings. RESULTS: Of 292 subjects, 11% (n = 33) met criteria for CRS. Median difference in Lund-Mackay scores between the CRS and non-CRS groups was 3.0 (95% CI 2.0-4.0). Complications included acute rhinosinusitis requiring antibiotics (23%, 68/292), epistaxis (10%, 28/292), meningitis (1%, 3/292), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (7%, 20/292), revision sinonasal procedures (10%, 28/292), and frequent in-office debridement (13%, 39/292). CRS was strongly associated with postoperative acute rhinosinusitis (aRR 1.85, 95% CI 1.18-2.90) and frequent debridement (aRR 1.96, 95% CI 1.00-3.83). Conversely, CRS was not associated with epistaxis (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 0.62-3.72), postoperative CSF leak (aRR 0.91, 95% CI 0.24-3.44), or additional sinonasal procedures (aRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.21-2.29). The rate of meningitis was not significantly higher in the CRS cohort (difference 2.2%, 95% CI -1.0% to 14.5%). CONCLUSIONS: CRS was a strong risk factor for acute rhinosinusitis and need for frequent in-office debridement after ETSS. It was not associated with other postoperative complications including epistaxis, CSF leak, or revision sinonasal procedures. CRS patients had a slightly higher rate of meningitis, which is likely not clinically meaningful.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/métodos , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Rinitis/etiología , Sinusitis/etiología , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Pérdida de Líquido Cefalorraquídeo/etiología , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Meningitis/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVEThe authors set out to conduct the first national-level study assessing the risks and outcomes for different lumbar fusion procedures in patients with opioid use disorders (OUDs) to help guide the future development of targeted enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for this unique population.METHODSData for patients with or without OUDs who underwent an anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), or lateral transverse lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) for lumbar disc degeneration (LDD) were collected from the 2013-2014 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database. Multivariable logistic regression was implemented to analyze how OUD status impacted in-hospital complications, length of hospital stay, discharge disposition, and total charges by procedure type.RESULTSA total of 139,995 patients with LDD were identified, with 1280 patients (0.91%) also having a concurrent OUD diagnosis. Overall complication rates were higher in OUD patients (48.44% vs 31.01%, p < 0.0001). OUD patients had higher odds of pulmonary (p = 0.0006), infectious (p < 0.0001), and hematological (p = 0.0009) complications. Multivariate regression modeling of outcomes by procedure type showed that after ALIF, OUD patients had higher odds of nonhome discharge (p = 0.0007), extended hospitalization (p = 0.0002), and greater total charges (p = 0.0054). This analysis also revealed that OUD patients faced higher odds of complication (p = 0.0149 and p = 0.0471), extended hospitalization (p = 0.0439 and p = 0.0001), and higher total charges (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001) after PLIF and LLIF procedures, respectively.CONCLUSIONSObtaining a better understanding of the risks and outcomes that OUD patients face perioperatively is a necessary step toward developing more effective ERAS protocols for this vulnerable population. This study, which sought to characterize the outcome profiles for lumbar fusion procedures in OUD patients on a national level, found that this population tended to experience increased odds of complications, extended hospitalization, nonhome discharge, and higher total costs. Results from this study warrant future prospective studies to better the understanding of these associations and to further the development of better ERAS programs that may improve patient care and reduce cost burden.
Asunto(s)
Recuperación Mejorada Después de la Cirugía , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/complicaciones , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Niño , Preescolar , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/complicaciones , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Herein we present the rare case of angiolymphoid hyperplasia with eosinophilia of the external ear treated by surgical resection and full-thickness skin graft. Current diagnosis and management options are reviewed.
Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Angiolinfoide con Eosinofilia/cirugía , Enfermedades del Oído/cirugía , Oído Externo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/métodos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Hiperplasia Angiolinfoide con Eosinofilia/patología , Enfermedades del Oído/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trasplante de Piel , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) requires effective chest compressions and ventilations to circulate and oxygenate blood. It has been established that a 2-handed mask seal is superior when providing bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilations. However a 1-handed technique remains the standard with which health care providers are trained to perform 2-rescuer CPR. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine if a modified 2-rescuer CPR technique that incorporates a 2-handed mask seal during ventilations can be accomplished without compromising chest compression quality during a simulated cardiac arrest. METHODS: Medical student volunteers were divided into an "intervention" arm, with 1 rescuer creating a 2-handed mask seal and the second rescuer performing chest compressions followed by that second rescuer squeezing the BVM bag to deliver ventilations during compression pauses, and a "control" arm, in which standard 2-rescuer CPR was performed. Both arms received a brief CPR refresher following a standard script. The 2 rescuer teams then performed 2 rounds of CPR on a manikin while being video recorded. Data were collected from real-time evaluation and post hoc video analysis. RESULTS: Forty-seven pairs of students enrolled in the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the intervention and control arms for median (interquartile range [IQR]) compression fraction (72% [69.5-75.7%] vs. 73.2% [69.1-76.1%]; p = 1.0), median time to complete 2 rounds of CPR (207.8 s [198.5-222.9 s] vs. 214.7 s [201.3-219.5 s]; p = 0.625), median hands-off time (49.8 s [46.2-63.0 s] vs. 55.4 s [50.4-65.2 s]; p = 0.278), or median time for 30 compressions (15.2 s [14.3-15.9 s] vs. 15.4 s [14.6-16.3 s]; p = 0.452). CONCLUSION: Two-rescuer CPR incorporating a 2-handed face mask seal can be performed effectively without impacting chest compression quality during simulated cardiac arrest.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Maniquíes , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudiantes de Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate trends in the annual number of PSOs performed, describe the patient populations associated with each cohort, and compare outcomes between specialties.Summary of Background Data:Pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO) are complex and advanced spine deformity surgical procedures performed by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons. Though both sets of surgeons can be equally qualified and credentialed to perform a PSO, it is possible that differences in training and exposure could translate into differences in patient management and outcomes. METHODS: Patients that underwent lumbar PSO from 2005 to 2014 in the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry were identified. Relevant demographic, preoperative comorbidity, and postoperative 30-day complications were queried and analyzed. The data was divided into 2 cohorts consisting of those patients who were treated by neurosurgeons versus orthopedic surgeons. Additional data from the Scoliosis Research Society Morbidity and Mortality database was queried and analyzed for comparison. RESULTS: Demographic and comorbidity factors were similar between the neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery cohorts, except there were higher rates of hypertension among orthopedic surgeon-performed PSOs (65.66% vs. 48.67%, P =0.004). Except for 2012, in every year queried, orthopedic surgeons reported more PSOs than neurosurgeons. In patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery, there was a higher rate of PSOs if the surgery was performed by an orthopedic surgeon (OR 1.7824, 95% CI: 1.4017-2.2665). The incidence of deep vein thrombosis after PSOs was higher for neurosurgery compared with orthopedic surgery (8.85% vs. 1.20%, P =0.004). However, besides deep vein thrombosis, there were no salient differences in surgical complication rates between neurosurgeon-performed PSOs and orthopedic surgeon-performed PSOs. CONCLUSIONS: The number of PSO procedures performed by neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons has increased annually. Differences in outcomes between neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons suggest an opportunity for wider assessment and alignment of adult spinal deformity surgery exposure and training across specialties.
Asunto(s)
Cirujanos Ortopédicos , Fusión Vertebral , Cirujanos , Trombosis de la Vena , Adulto , Humanos , Neurocirujanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Retrospectivos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Trombosis de la Vena/complicaciones , Fusión Vertebral/métodosRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is commonly used to treat an array of cervical spine pathology and is associated with good outcomes and low complication rates. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a common comorbidity for patients undergoing ACDF, but the literature is equivocal about the impact it has on outcomes. Because DM is a highly prevalent comorbidity, it is crucial to determine if it is an associated risk factor for outcomes after ACDF procedures. METHODS: Patients at a single institution from 2008 to 2016 undergoing ACDF were compared on the basis of having a prior diagnosis of DM versus no DM. The 2 cohorts were compared utilizing univariate tests and multivariate logistic and linear regressions. RESULTS: Data for 2470 patients was analyzed. Diabetic patients had significantly higher Elixhauser scores (P < .0001). Univariate testing showed diabetic patients were more likely to suffer from sepsis (0.82% vs 0.10%, P = .03) and bleeding complications (3.0% vs 1.5%, P = .04). In multivariate analyses, diabetic patients had higher rates of non-home discharge (odds ratio [OR] = 1.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.07-1.75, P = .013) and prolonged length of stay (OR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.25-3.05, P = .003), but similar complication (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 0.85-2.52, P = .17), reoperation (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.33-1.81, P = .55), and 90-day readmission (OR = 1.53, 95% CI = 0.97-2.43) rates compared to nondiabetic patients. Direct cost was also shown to be similar between the cohorts after adjusting for patient, surgical, and hospital-related factors (estimate = -$30.25, 95% CI = -$515.69 to $455.18, P = .90). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetic patients undergoing ACDF had similar complication, reoperation, and readmission rates, as well as similar cost of care compared to nondiabetic patients.
RESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The present study analyzes complication rates and episode-based costs for patients with and without diabetes mellitus (DM) following posterior lumbar fusion (PLF). METHODS: PLF cases at a single institution from 2008 to 2016 were queried (n = 3226), and demographic and perioperative data were analyzed. Patients with and without the diagnosis of DM were compared using chi-square, Student's t test, and multivariable regression modeling. RESULTS: Patients with diabetes were older (63.10 vs 56.48 years, P < .001) and possessed a greater number of preoperative comorbidities (47.84% of patients had Elixhauser Comorbidity Index >0 vs 42.24%, P < .001) than did patients without diabetes. When controlling for preexisting differences, diabetes remained a significant risk factor for prolonged length of stay (OR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.26-2.01, P < .001), intensive care unit stay (OR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.07-2.17, P = .021), nonhome discharge (OR = 1.86, 95% CI 1.46-2.37, P < .001), 30-day readmission (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.28-3.60, P = .004), 90-day readmission (OR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.05-2.59, P = .031), 30-day emergency room visit (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.27-3.63, P = .004), and 90-day emergency room visit (OR = 2.27, 95% CI 1.41-3.65, P < .001). Cost modeling controlling for overall comorbidity burden demonstrated that diabetes was associated with a $1709 increase in PLF costs (CI $344-$3074, P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings indicate a correlation between diabetes and a multitude of postoperative adverse outcomes and increased costs, thus illustrating the substantial medical and financial burdens of diabetes for PLF patients. Future studies should explore preventive measures that may mitigate these downstream effects.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Little data exists regarding the incidence of oropharyngeal and upper aerodigestive tract (UADT) second primary malignancies (SPM) among human papilloma virus (HPV)-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Here we evaluate SPM rates among patients with HPV-related OPSCC. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 412 patients with HPV-related OPSCC who underwent transoral resection +/- adjuvant therapy at a single center between 1996 and 2018. RESULTS: Twenty patients (4.9%) developed SPM of the UADT, nine (2.2%) occurring in the oropharynx. Median time to diagnosis was 59.5 months (0-173 months). Risk of SPM was lower for patients receiving adjuvant radiation (aHR: 0.25, 95%CI: 0.08-0.78). There was no difference in overall or disease-free survival between those with and without SPM. CONCLUSION: The rate of SPM among patients with HPV-positive OPSCC is lower than reported rates among HPV-negative OPSCC. To date, this is the largest study evaluating SPM in patients with surgically treated HPV-positive OPSCC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias/epidemiología , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/patología , Papillomaviridae , Estudios Retrospectivos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugíaRESUMEN
Ecological momentary assessment is a valuable research technique meant to capture real-time data and contextualize disease. While more common in neuropsychiatric research, this methodology is exceptionally fit for tinnitus. Tinnitus has been shown to be affected by many patient-level and environment-specific factors. From an individual's baseline anxiety to the level of ambient noise in their environment, the level of bother experienced by those with tinnitus can vary widely. Only assessing tinnitus within a clinical environment can distort the true impact of the disease. Ecological data can minimize bias while generating an individualistic picture of the burden being experienced by the patient. Individual data can also compliment new research methods rooted in precision medicine, providing clearer, better-suited treatments for each patient on the tinnitus spectrum.
Asunto(s)
Acúfeno , Evaluación Ecológica Momentánea , Humanos , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Importance: Hearing loss affects up to 88% of patients undergoing head and neck cancer treatment; however, there are few validated models to predict this outcome. A predictive posttreatment model for hearing loss will allow clinicians and patients to make well-informed decisions about treatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapies and radiotherapy. Objective: To validate a previously created predictive model for objective hearing outcomes and to assess barriers to using the prediction nomogram in general practice for patients newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study includes an evaluation of 105 patients (208 ears) and interviews with 6 clinicians. The patients were treated at a high-volume tertiary care hospital. Patient participants were newly diagnosed with head and neck cancer and treated at Siteman Cancer Center from July 1, 2018, to December 31, 2019, with radiotherapy both with and without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Additionally, the clinicians involved in the care of patients with head and neck cancer were interviewed to assess implementation strategies. Exposures: Radiotherapy with and without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hearing defined by the audiometric pure-tone average of 1, 2, and 4 kHz. Results: A total of 105 patients (208 ears; mean [SD] age, 61 [11] years; 82 men [78%]) were compared with the development cohort to assess the similarities and differences in case mix. All patients underwent radiation therapy, 50 (48%) received cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and 67 (64%) had a surgical resection. The mean (SD) cochlear dose of radiation was 13 (12) Gy, and the mean (SD) total cisplatin dose was 238 (83) mg/m2 for those undergoing cisplatin therapy. A calibration curve demonstrated that predicted and observed posttreatment pure-tone average were not significantly different. The model predicted a posttreatment pure-tone average greater than 35 dB (a common threshold for hearing aid consideration) with a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 67% with an area under the curve of 0.71, showing good discrimination. Clinician interviews suggest the nomogram requires careful integration into patient counseling to clarify risks and benefits for treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study confirm this model's ability to predict posttreatment hearing outcomes in a unique population of patients. This model has the potential to inform pretreatment counseling and posttreatment hearing evaluations for this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Pérdida Auditiva/etiología , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Toma de Decisiones , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nomogramas , Valor Predictivo de las PruebasRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To conduct the first comprehensive national-level study examining specific risks, outcomes, and costs surrounding surgical treatment of lumar spinal stenosis (LSS) in patients with and without neurogenic claudication (NC). METHODS: Data for patients with or without NC who underwent decompression with a lumbar interbody fusion approached anteriorly (ALIF), posteriorly (PLIF), or laterally (LLIF) for LSS was collected from the 2013-2014 National Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Disease codes. RESULTS: A total of 121 025 LSS cases without NC and 20 095 cases with NC were included in this study. The most significant complications associated with NC status by organ system included renal (P = .0030) and hematological complications (P = .0003). Multivariate regression controlling for key demographic and comorbidity variables showed that patients with NC did not have significantly higher odds of complication, non-home discharge, or extended hospitalization compared to patients without NC regardless of fusion type. Interestingly, NC patients had comparatively lower total charges for their hospitalization following PLIFs (P = .0001) and LLIFs (P < .0001), but not ALIFs (P = .6121). CONCLUSION: NC does not appear to significantly increase odds of adverse outcomes following fusion in LSS. Given the large prevalence of LSS and coincidental NC, these findings may carry important implications in managing this challenging patient population and justifies future prospective investigation of this topic.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies suggest a higher prevalence of cervical deformities in Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients who predispose to cervical myelopathy (CM). Despite the profound effect of CM on function and quality of life, no study has assessed the influence of PD on costs and outcomes of fusion procedures for CM. OBJECTIVE: To conduct the first national-level study that provides a snapshot of the current outcome and cost profiles for different fusion procedures for CM in PD and non-PD populations. METHODS: Patients with or without PD who underwent cervical decompression and fusion anteriorly (ACDF), posteriorly (PCDF), or both (Frontback), for CM were identified from the 2013 to 2014 National Inpatient Sample using International Classification of Disease codes. RESULTS: A total of 75 870 CM patients were identified, with 535 patients (0.71%) also having PD. Although no difference existed between in-hospital mortality rates, overall complication rates were higher in PD patients (38.32% vs 22.05%; P < .001). PD patients had higher odds of pulmonary (P = .002), circulatory (P = .020), and hematological complications (P = .035). Following ACDFs, PD patients had higher odds of complications (P = .035), extended hospitalization (P = .026), greater total charges (P = .003), and nonhome discharge (P = .006). Although PCDFs and Frontbacks produced higher overall complication rates for both populations than ACDFs, PD status did not affect complication odds for these procedures. CONCLUSION: PD may increase risk for certain adverse outcomes depending on procedure type. This study provides data with implications in healthcare delivery, policy, and research regarding a patient population that will grow as our population ages and justifies further investigation in future prospective studies.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/economía , Enfermedad de Parkinson/cirugía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/economía , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Preescolar , Honorarios y Precios/tendencias , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Alta del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective, observational study of clinical outcomes at a single institution. OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative complication and readmission rates of payer groups in a cohort of patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Studies examining associations between primary payer and outcomes in spine surgery have been equivocal. METHODS: Patients at Mount Sinai having undergone ACDF from 2008 to 2016 were queried and assigned to one of five insurance categories: uninsured, managed care, commercial indemnity insurance, Medicare, and Medicaid, with patients in the commercial indemnity group serving as the reference cohort. Multivariable logistic regression equations for various outcomes with the exposure of payer were created, controlling for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiology Physical Status Classification (ASA Class), the Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, and number of segments fused. A Bonferroni correction was utilized, such that alphaâ=â0.0125. RESULTS: Two thousand three hundred eighty seven patients underwent ACDF during the time period. Both Medicare (Pâ<â0.0001) and Medicaid (Pâ<â0.0001) patients had higher comorbidity burdens than commercial patients when examining ASA Class. Managed care (2.86 vs. 2.72, Pâ=â0.0009) and Medicare patients (2.99 vs. 2.72, Pâ<â0.0001) had more segments fused on average than commercial patients. Medicaid patients had higher rates of prolonged extubation (odds ratio [OR]: 4.99; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-22.0; Pâ=â0.007), and Medicare patients had higher rates of prolonged length of stay (LOS) (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 1.13-5.27%, Pâ=â0.004) than the commercial patients. Medicaid patients had higher rates of 30- (OR: 4.12; 95% CI: 1.43-11.93; Pâ=â0.0009) and 90-day (OR: 3.28; 95% CI: 1.34-8.03; Pâ=â0.0009) Emergency Department (ED) visits than the commercial patients, and managed care patients had higher rates of 30-day readmission (OR: 3.41; 95% CI: 1.00-11.57; Pâ=â0.0123). CONCLUSION: Medicare and Medicaid patients had higher rates of prolonged LOS and postoperative ED visits, respectively, compared with commercial patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Asunto(s)
Discectomía/efectos adversos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Cobertura del Seguro/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Discectomía/economía , Discectomía/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/economía , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/economía , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/tendencias , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/tendencias , Pacientes no Asegurados , Medicare/economía , Medicare/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the costs associated with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and to determine the extent to which ASA status is a predictor of increased cost and LOS following lumbar laminectomy and fusion (LLF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal fusion accounts for the highest hospital costs of any surgical procedure performed in the United States, and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) status is a known risk factor for cost and length of stay (LOS) in the orthopedic literature. There is a paucity of literature that directly addresses the influence of ASA status on cost and LOS following LLF. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of an institutional database of patients undergoing single-level LLF at an academic tertiary care facility from 2006 to 2016. Univariate comparisons were made using χ tests for categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables. Multivariate linear regression was utilized to estimate regression coefficients, and to determine whether ASA status is an independent risk factor for cost and LOS. RESULTS: A total of 1849 patients met inclusion criteria. For every one-point increase in ASA score, intensive care unit (ICU) LOS increased by 0.518 days (Pâ<â0.001), and hospital length of stay increased by 1.93 days (Pâ<â0.001). For every one-point increase in ASA score, direct cost increased by $7474.62 (Pâ<â0.001). CONCLUSION: ASA status is a predictor of hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and direct cost. Consideration of the ways in which ASA status contributes to increased cost and prolonged LOS can allow for more accurate reimbursement adjustment and more precise targeting of efficiency and cost effectiveness initiatives. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiólogos/economía , Laminectomía/economía , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Sociedades Médicas/economía , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/economía , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesiólogos/tendencias , Bases de Datos Factuales/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Laminectomía/tendencias , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas/tendencias , Enfermedades de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/tendencias , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This is the first large retrospective analysis of patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) with concern for clinical determinants leading to reoperation for adjacent segment disease (ASD). The objective of this study is to examine the specific perioperative and clinical determinants that affect need for adjacent segment reoperation in patients who underwent 1-level and 2-level ALIF procedures for degenerative disc disorders. METHODS: All cases at our institution between 2008 and 2016 involving an ALIF performed for degenerative disc disorders at 1 or 2 levels were examined. A total of 404 ALIF cases, of which 268 were single-level (66.33%) and 136 were 2-level procedures (33.67%), were included. Adjacent segment reoperation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included increased blood loss, extended surgery duration, greater nonhome discharge, extended hospitalization, and higher total direct costs. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression assessed how number of levels fused related to perioperative outcomes. RESULTS: The patient cohorts shared similar demographic characteristics and showed expected differences in certain intraoperative outcomes. After controlling for preoperative and intraoperative variables, multivariate regression showed that patients who underwent 2-level ALIFs experienced increased odds of adjacent segment reoperation (P = 0.0424) but no other adverse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support a biomechanical hypothesis of ASD onset after fusion, suggesting that the risk of ASD after ALIF lies primarily in the number of levels fused rather than any demographic or intraoperative variables.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Fusión Vertebral/estadística & datos numéricos , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Segunda Cirugía , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/economía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The present study examined the differences in outcomes of cervical spinal surgery for patients with and without a major psychiatric comorbidity using the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database. METHODS: Data were queried from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample database from 2013 to 2014 for hospitalizations with a major psychiatric comorbidity and a diagnosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by an appropriate surgical procedure. The included psychiatric comorbidities were schizophrenia, episodic mood disorders (bipolar I and II disorders), delusional disorders, and psychoses not otherwise specified. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine the differences in outcomes between patients with and without a major psychiatric comorbidity. RESULTS: A total of 18,335 hospitalizations met the inclusion criteria, of which 648 (3.5%) included a major psychiatric comorbidity. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that psychiatric comorbidity was an independent predictor of non-home discharge (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-2.30; P < 0.0001) and a longer hospital stay (+0.52 day; 95% CI, 0.43-0.61; P < 0.0001) but was not an independent predictor of overall complications (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.07; P = 0.13) or total hospital charges ($1992; 95% CI, -$917-$4902; P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with an increased risk of non-home discharge and a longer length of stay for patients undergoing surgical intervention for cervical myelopathy. However, we did not find an associated increased risk of in-hospital mortality, complications, or total hospital charges. Psychiatric comorbidity should not be weighed against patients who require surgical treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, and special attention should be given to postoperative care and discharge planning for this unique patient population.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Espondilosis/complicaciones , Anciano , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Precios de Hospital , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/economía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Espondilosis/economía , Espondilosis/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar fusions are performed to treat various spinal deformities, degenerative diseases, fractures, infections, and tumors. The possibility of episode-based bundled payments for spine surgery necessitates analysis of the factors predicting readmissions and postoperative complications. METHODS: Patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were queried via Current Procedural Terminology codes 22630, 22633, and 22612. Patients were grouped based on discharge destination, either to home/home health care or to a facility. Relevant demographics, comorbidities, perioperative statistics, and predischarge and postdischarge complications were compared. Multivariable logistic regression models for severe postdischarge complications and 30-day readmissions were created with the exposure of nonhome discharge. RESULTS: Patients discharged to nonhome destinations were significantly older (68.42 vs. 58.15 years; P < 0.0001), sicker (68.11% of patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification > 2 vs. 44.25%; P < 0.0001), more dependent (5.92% vs. 1.40%; P < 0.0001), and had significantly greater body mass indices (10.60% of patients had body mass index > 40 vs. 7.63%; P < 0.0001) than patients discharged home. Following discharge, patients in the nonhome discharge group experienced higher mortality (0.28% vs. 0.08%; P < 0.0001) and were more likely to experience a severe complication (5.96% vs. 2.85%; P < 0.0001), minor complication (4.59% vs. 1.74%; P < 0.0001), and readmission (8.92% vs. 4.78%; P < 0.0001). Nonhome discharge proved to be a risk factor for both readmission (odds ratio 1.43; 95% confidence interval 1.28-1.60; P < 0.0001) and severe postdischarge complication (odds ratio 1.73; 95% confidence interval 1.52-1.97; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Nonhome discharge patients experienced higher rates of complications and 30-day readmissions.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Lumbares/cirugía , Alta del Paciente , Readmisión del Paciente , Fusión Vertebral , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Centros de Rehabilitación , Factores de Riesgo , Instituciones de Cuidados Especializados de EnfermeríaRESUMEN
STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study was performed including all patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) by an orthopedic or neurological surgeon at a single institution between January 1, 2006 and November 30, 2016, and all patients who underwent PCDF by a spine surgeon in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database between 2007 and 2015. In-hospital complications were compared between surgical specialties. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine if in-hospital complication rates differ significantly between surgical services for PCDF patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Orthopedic and neurological surgeons commonly perform PCDF, and differences in surgical opinion and management have been cited between these two specialties in recent literature. This represents a variable that should be evaluated. METHODS: Cases were preliminarily identified by CPT code and confirmed using the ICD-9 code 81.03 or ICD-10 code M43.22. Cases were separated based on if the primary surgeon was an orthopedic surgeon or a neurological surgeon. The primary outcome variable was in-hospital complication rates; cohorts were compared using bivariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1221 patients at a single institution and 11,116 patients within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database underwent PCDF. Patients in the orthopedic surgery service had a higher proportion of bleeding requiring transfusion in both the institutional sample (14.5% vs. 9.08%, Pâ=â0.003) and national sample (11.16% vs. 6.18%, Pâ<â0.0001). In the national sample, orthopedic surgeons were 1.66 times as likely to encounter an in-hospital complication than neurological surgeons (95% CI: 1.44-1.91, Pâ<â0.0001). CONCLUSION: When examining a large institutional sample and an even larger national sample, this study found that orthopedic surgeons were more likely to encounter perioperative bleeding requiring transfusion than neurological surgeons. When in-hospital complications were considered as a whole, in the national sample, orthopedic surgeons are more likely to encounter in-hospital complications than neurological surgeons when performing PCDF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Descompresión Quirúrgica , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Fusión Vertebral , Descompresión Quirúrgica/efectos adversos , Descompresión Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Fusión Vertebral/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify predictors for postacute care facility discharge for patients undergoing posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) and to determine if discharge placement impacts postdischarge outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCDF from 2012 to 2015 were queried from the NSQIP database (n = 8743) and separated by discharge placement. Outcomes included nonhome discharge, unplanned 30-day readmission, and adverse events (AEs), both before and after discharge. Demographics and comorbidities were analyzed using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors for nonhome discharge, readmission, and severe AE after discharge. RESULTS: Patients with nonhome discharges were significantly older (67.4 vs. 58.6 years; P < 0.001), sicker (82% vs. 54% American Society of Anesthesiologists >2; P < 0.001), and more functionally dependent (16% vs. 3.4%; P < 0.001), with a greater comorbidity burden. Patients with PCDF had an increased likelihood of nonhome discharge if they had a dependent functional status (odds ratio [OR], 2.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.33-3.82; P < 0.001), diabetes (OR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55; P = 0.0007), and an American Society of Anesthesiologists >2 (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.5-2.05; P < 0.001), as well as if they were older (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.06; P < 0.001) and female (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.14-1.5; P = 0.0002). Patients with PCDF with nonhome discharges had an increased likelihood of having a severe postdischarge AE (OR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.26-2.33; P = 0.0006) and an unplanned readmission (OR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.15-1.82; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that patients with PCDF discharged to a postacute care facility have a higher likelihood of having a severe AE after discharge as well as a higher likelihood of being readmitted.