RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Italian Association of Preeclampsia (AIPE) and the Italian Society of Perinatal Medicine (SIMP) developed clinical questions on maternal hemodynamics state of the art. STUDY DESIGN: AIPE and SIMP experts were divided in small groups and were invited to propose an overview of the existing literature on specific topics related to the clinical questions proposed, developing, wherever possible, clinical and/or research recommendations based on available evidence, expert opinion, and clinical importance. Draft recommendations with a clinical rationale were submitted to 8th AIPE and SIMP Consensus Expert Panel for consideration and approval, with at least 75% agreement required for individual recommendations to be included in the final version. RESULTS: More and more evidence in literature underlines the relationship between maternal and fetal hemodynamics, as well as the relationship between maternal cardiovascular profile and fetal-maternal adverse outcomes such as fetal growth restriction and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Experts agreed on proposing a classification of pregnancy hypertension, complications, and cardiovascular states based on three different hemodynamic profiles depending on total peripheral vascular resistance values: hypodynamic (>1,300 dynes·s·cm-5), normo-dynamic, and hyperdynamic (<800 dynes·s·cm-5) circulation. This differentiation implies different therapeutical strategies, based drugs' characteristics, and maternal cardiovascular profile. Finally, the cardiovascular characteristics of the women may be useful for a rational approach to an appropriate follow-up, due to the increased cardiovascular risk later in life. CONCLUSION: Although the evidence might not be conclusive, given the lack of large randomized trials, maternal hemodynamics might have great importance in helping clinicians in understanding the pathophysiology and chose a rational treatment of patients with or at risk for pregnancy complications. KEY POINTS: · Altered maternal hemodynamics is associated to fetal growth restriction.. · Altered maternal hemodynamics is associated to complicated hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.. · Maternal hemodynamics might help choosing a rational treatment during hypertensive disorders..
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite major advances in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in the nonpregnant population, treatments for hypertension in pregnancy have remained largely unchanged over the years. There is recent evidence that a more adequate control of maternal blood pressure is achieved when the first given antihypertensive drug is able to correct the underlying hemodynamic disorder of the mother besides normalizing the blood pressure values. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the blood pressure control in women receiving an appropriate or inappropriate antihypertensive therapy following the baseline hemodynamic findings. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective multicenter study that included a population of women with de novo diagnosis of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. A noninvasive assessment of the following maternal parameters was performed on hospital admission via Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor before any antihypertensive therapy was given: cardiac output, heart rate, systemic vascular resistance, and stroke volume. The clinician who prescribed the antihypertensive therapy was blinded to the hemodynamic evaluation and used as first-line treatment a vasodilator (nifedipine or alpha methyldopa) or a beta-blocker (labetalol) based on his preferences or on the local protocols. The first-line pharmacologic treatment was retrospectively considered hemodynamically appropriate in either of the following circumstances: (1) women with a hypodynamic profile (defined as low cardiac output [≤5 L/min] and/or high systemic vascular resistance [≥1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral nifedipine or alpha methyldopa and (2) women with a hyperdynamic profile (defined as normal or high cardiac output [>5 L/min] and/or low systemic vascular resistances [<1300 dynes/second/cm2]) who were administered oral labetalol. The primary outcome of the study was to compare the occurrence of severe hypertension between women treated with a hemodynamically appropriate therapy and women treated with an inappropriate therapy. RESULTS: A total of 152 women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy were included in the final analysis. Most women displayed a hypodynamic profile (114 [75.0%]) and received a hemodynamically appropriate treatment (116 [76.3%]). The occurrence of severe hypertension before delivery was significantly lower in the group receiving an appropriate therapy than in the group receiving an inappropriately treated (6.0% vs 19.4%, respectively; P=.02). Moreover, the number of women who achieved target values of blood pressure within 48 to 72 hours from the treatment start was higher in the group who received an appropriate treatment than in the group who received an inappropriate treatment (70.7% vs 50.0%, respectively; P=.02). CONCLUSION: In pregnant individuals with de novo hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, a lower occurrence of severe hypertension was observed when the first-line antihypertensive agent was tailored to the correct maternal hemodynamic profile.