RESUMEN
Fully bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVSs) aim to overcome the limitations of metallic drug-eluting stents (DESs). However, polymer-based BVSs, such as Abbott's Absorb, the only US FDA-approved BVS, have had limited use due to increased strut thickness (157 µm for Absorb), exacerbated tissue inflammation, and increased risk of major cardiac events leading to inferior clinical performance when compared to metallic DESs. Herein we report the development of a drug-eluting BVS (DE-BVS) through the innovative use of a photopolymerizable, citrate-based biomaterial and a high-precision additive manufacturing process. BVS with a clinically relevant strut thickness of 62 µm can be produced in a high-throughput manner, i.e. one BVS per minute, and controlled release of the anti-restenosis drug everolimus can be achieved by engineering the structure of polymer coatings to fabricate drug-eluting BVS. We achieved the successful deployment of BVSs and DE-BVSs in swine coronary arteries using a custom-built balloon catheter and BVS delivery system and confirmed BVS safety and efficacy regarding maintenance of vessel patency for 28 days, observing an inflammation profile for BVS and DE-BVS that was comparable to the commercial XIENCE™ DES (Abbott Vascular).
RESUMEN
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the mechanism of long noncoding ribonucleic acid (lncRNA) SNHG16 on kidney clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) cells by targeting miR-506-3p/ETS proto-oncogene 1, transcription factor (ETS1)/RAS/Extracellular regulated protein kinases (ERK) molecular axis, thus to provide reference for clinical diagnosis and treatment of KIRC in the future. Methods: Thirty-six patients with KIRC were enrolled in this study, and their carcinoma tissues and adjacent tissues were obtained for the detection of SNHG16/miR-506-3p/ETS1/RAS/ERK expression. Then, over-expressed SNHG16 plasmid and silenced plasmid were transfected into KIRC cells to observe the changes of their biological behavior. Results: SNHG16 and ETS1 were highly expressed while miR-506- 3p was low expressed in KIRC tissues; the RAS/ERK signaling pathway was significantly activated in KIRC tissues (P < 0.05). After SNHG16 silence, KIRC cells showed decreased proliferation, invasion and migration capabilities and increased apoptosis rate; correspondingly, increase in SNHG16 expression achieved opposite results (P < 0.05). Finally, in the rescue experiment, the effects of elevated SNHG16 on KIRC cells were reversed by simultaneous increase in miR-506-3p, and the effects of miR-506-3p were reversed by ETS1. Activation of the RAS/ERK pathway had the same effect as increase in ETS1, which further worsened the malignancy of KIRC. After miR-506-3p increase and ETS1 silence, the RAS/ERK signaling pathway was inhibited (P < 0.05). At last, the rescue experiment (co-transfection) confirmed that the effect of SNHG16 on KIRC cells is achieved via the miR-506-3p/ETS1/RAS/ERK molecular axis. Conclusion: SNHG16 regulates the biological behavior of KIRC cells by targeting the miR-506-3p/ETS1/RAS/ERK molecular axis.
RESUMEN
Implantable polymeric biodegradable devices, such as biodegradable vascular scaffolds, cannot be fully visualized using standard X-ray-based techniques, compromising their performance due to malposition after deployment. To address this challenge, we describe a new radiopaque and photocurable liquid polymer-ceramic composite (mPDC-MoS2) consisting of methacrylated poly(1,12 dodecamethylene citrate) (mPDC) and molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) nanosheets. The composite was used as an ink with microcontinuous liquid interface production (µCLIP) to fabricate bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS). Prints exhibited excellent crimping and expansion mechanics without strut failures and, importantly, with X-ray visibility in air and muscle tissue. Notably, MoS2 nanosheets displayed physical degradation over time in phosphate-buffered saline solution, suggesting the potential for producing radiopaque, fully bioresorbable devices. mPDC-MoS2 is a promising bioresorbable X-ray-visible composite material suitable for 3D printing medical devices, such as vascular scaffolds, that require noninvasive X-ray-based monitoring techniques for implantation and evaluation. This innovative biomaterial composite system holds significant promise for the development of biocompatible, fluoroscopically visible medical implants, potentially enhancing patient outcomes and reducing medical complications.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Comparison of the clinical effectiveness and safety of three-dimensional transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (3D TLRP) versus 3D extraperitoneal LRP (3D ELRP) for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To retrospectively analyze the clinical and regular postoperative follow-up data of patients who underwent 3D LRP performed by the same attending surgeon at the Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College between 2017 and 2022. A total of 82 patients who met the criteria were included. They were divided into 3D TLRP (n = 39) and 3D ELRP groups (n = 43) according to the surgical approach. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were compared. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics between the two groups. There were also no statistically significant differences between the 3D TLRP and 3D ELRP groups in terms of intraoperative blood transfusion rate (12.82% vs. 2.33%), positive lymph node rate (11.11% vs. 2.38%), positive surgical margin rate (12.82% vs. 6.98%), pathological Gleason score, postoperative clinical stage, perioperative complication rate (10.26% vs. 4.65%), immediate urinary control rate (56.41% vs. 58.14%), 3-month postoperative urinary control rate (76.92% vs. 74.42%), 6-month postoperative urinary control rate (87.18% vs. 83.72%), 6-month postoperative biochemical recurrence rate (7.69% vs. 9.30%), or 6-month postoperative sexual function recovery rate (2.56% vs. 2.33%) (P > 0.05). Compared with the 3D ELRP group, the 3D TLRP group had a longer operative time (232.36 ± 48.52 min vs. 212.07 ± 41.76 min), more estimated blood loss (150.000 [100.0, 200.0] vs. 100.000 [100.0, 125.0]), longer recovery of gastrointestinal function (2.72 ± 0.89 vs. 2.26 ± 0.88), longer duration of drainage tube retention (5.69 ± 1.79 vs. 4.28 ± 2.68), and longer hospitalization time (12.54 ± 4.07 vs. 10.88 ± 2.97), with statistical significance (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: 3D TLRP and 3D ELRP have similar oncologic and functional outcomes. Clinically, physicians can choose a reasonable procedure according to the patient's specific situation and their own surgical experience.