Neonatal BCG Vaccination for Prevention of Allergy in Infants: The MIS BAIR Randomised Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: The beneficial off-target effects of Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination potentially include protection against allergy. OBJECTIVE: In the MIS BAIR trial, we aimed to determine whether neonatal BCG vaccination reduces atopic sensitisation and clinical food allergy in infants. METHODS: In this randomised controlled trial, 1272 neonates were allocated to BCG-Denmark vaccine (0.05 mL intradermal dose) or no BCG at birth. Randomisation was stratified by recruitment site, mode of delivery and plurality of birth. The primary outcome was the incidence of atopic sensitisation determined by skin prick test at 1 year of age. Food allergy was determined by 3-monthly online questionnaires and oral food challenges. Data were analysed by intention-to-treat using binary regression. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (NCT01906853). RESULTS: Atopic sensitisation during the first year of life was 22.9% among infants in the BCG group and 18.9% in the control group (adjusted risk difference (aRD) 3.8% (95% CI -1.5 to 9.1) after multiple imputation). Clinical food allergy was similar between infants in the BCG and control groups (9.8% vs. 9.6%; aRD 0.2, 95% CI -3.4 to 3.8). An interaction was observed between the primary outcome and maternal history of BCG vaccination. No interaction was observed for the additional prespecified potential effect modifiers tested (sex, delivery mode, family history of any allergy, season of birth, hepatitis B vaccination at randomisation, BCG scar and age at BCG administration). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Neonatal BCG-Denmark vaccination does not protect against atopic sensitisation or clinical food allergy in the first year of life.

Early Hyperoxemia and 2-year Outcomes in Infants with Hypoxic-ischemic Encephalopathy: A Secondary Analysis of the Infant Cooling Evaluation Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the causal relationship between exposure to early hyperoxemia and death or major disability in infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE). STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed data from the Infant Cooling Evaluation (ICE) trial that enrolled newborns ≥35 weeks' gestation with moderate-severe HIE, randomly allocated to hypothermia or normothermia. The primary outcome was death or major sensorineural disability at 2 years. We included infants with arterial pO2 measured within 2 hours of birth. Using a directed acyclic graph, we established that markers of severity of perinatal hypoxia-ischemia and pCO2 were a minimally sufficient set of variables for adjustment in a regression model to estimate the causal relationship between arterial pO2 and death/disability. RESULTS: Among 221 infants, 116 (56%) had arterial pO2 and primary outcome data. The unadjusted analysis revealed a U-shaped relationship between arterial pO2 and death or major disability. Among hyperoxemic infants (pO2 100-500 mmHg) the proportion with death or major disability was 40/58 (0.69), while the proportion in normoxemic infants (pO2 40-99 mmHg) was 20/48 (0.42). In the adjusted model, hyperoxemia increased the risk of death or major disability (adjusted risk ratio 1.61, 95% CI 1.07-2.00, P = .03) in relation to normoxemia. CONCLUSION: Early hyperoxemia increased the risk of death or major disability among infants who had an early arterial pO2 in the ICE trial. Limitations include the possibility of residual confounding and other causal biases. Further work is warranted to confirm this relationship in the era of routine therapeutic hypothermia.

Correlation between centre size, metabolic variation and mean HbA1c in major paediatric diabetes centres.

AIM: To exploit a relatively homogeneous national health care context and a national diabetes database to address the questions: Is there an optimal clinic/centre size in determining outcomes?; and Can improvement in median centre outcomes be driven by reducing variability in outcome? METHODS: Using the Australasian Diabetes Database Network, data from seven tertiary hospital paediatric diabetes clinics for patients with type one diabetes from Australia were recorded from 6-month uploads: September 2017, March 2018, September 2018 and March 2019. Data from 25 244 patient visits included demographic variables, HbA1C, number of patient visits and insulin regimens. RESULTS: There was no association between centre size and median HbA1C. On the other hand, there was a significant association between or median absolute deviation of HbA1C outcomes and the median HbA1C result between centres. On average every two thirds of a median absolute deviation increase in clinic HbA1C was associated with a 1.0% (10.9 mmol/mol) increase in median clinic HbA1C. CONCLUSIONS: Our data have shown that it is likely difficult for centres to have a low median HbA1C if there is high variance of HbA1C's within centres or within centre treatment groups. This appears to be true regardless of centre size. These findings need to be carefully considered by teams who wish to lower their clinic median HbA1C.

Defining complicated urinary tract infection and route of antibiotics in children presenting to the emergency department: a cohort study using the Melbourne RUPERT clinical score.

OBJECTIVES: Most children with uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) can be managed with oral antibiotics. However, identifying those likely to fail oral and need intravenous antibiotics due to complicating features at presentation is challenging. We aimed to derive, validate and test a score to guide initial antibiotic route. DESIGN: This cohort study enrolled children both prospectively and retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received intravenous or oral antibiotics after 24 hours, including those who switched between routes. Children diagnosed with confirmed UTI were used to derive then validate the score, comparing complicating clinical features between the two groups. Combinations of significantly differentiating features generated receiver operating characteristic curves and the optimal cut-off for intravenous antibiotic use was selected. SETTING: The emergency department of a tertiary paediatric hospital. PARTICIPANTS: All children aged 3 months-17 years with suspected UTI were eligible, and were included if they fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for UTI. OUTCOME MEASURES: The effectiveness of the derived clinical score to differentiate patients at presentation who had complicated UTI requiring ongoing intravenous antibiotics. RESULTS: There were 1240 patients, of whom 167 children aged 12 months-11 years with confirmed UTI comprised the derivation cohort. The combination of features that performed optimally (area under curve 0.85, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.91) were: rigors, urological abnormality, fever (≥38°C), emesis, recurrent (≥3) UTI, tachycardia: the RUPERT score (1 point each, maximum 6). A score ≥3 accurately classified route of antibiotics after 24 hours for 80% patients (sensitivity 77%, specificity 81%). For the 168 patients in the validation cohort, the score accurately classified 76% (sensitivity 67%, specificity 78%). The score tested well in 'probable' UTI and adolescents, and less well in infants. CONCLUSION: The Melbourne RUPERT score provides the first standardised, easy-to-use score to aid clinicians in deciding route of antibiotics for more complicated UTI in children. It now needs prospective validation.

Allergy to beta-lactam antibiotics in children: predictors for a positive oral challenge test.

OBJECTIVE: Beta-lactam antibiotic allergies are reported in 5%-10% of children; however, up to 90% do not have any reaction at oral challenge test (OCT). This study aimed to determine the frequency and identify predictors of positive in-hospital graded beta-lactam OCTs in children with a beta-lactam antibiotic allergy label (AAL). DESIGN: This is a retrospective study conducted over 7 years, including children aged 0-19 years who underwent a beta-lactam OCT. The OCT comprised an in-hospital graded challenge followed by a 5-day outpatient antibiotic course. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of a positive in-hospital graded OCT. RESULTS: Overall, 1259 beta-lactam OCTs were included: median age at time of OCT was 6.3 years (range 8.8 months to 19.2 years). Of these, 18 (1.4%) in-hospital graded OCTs were positive and 10 (0.8%) were equivocal, with only 4 children (0.3%) having an immediate, severe reaction to their in-hospital graded OCT. Factors associated with a positive in-hospital graded OCT on univariate analysis were: history of other drug allergy (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 7.2; p 0.05), an index reaction which was severe (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 7.6; p 0.035), immediate and severe (OR 5.85, 95% CI 1.7 to 20.0; p 0.005) or that required epinephrine (OR 9.65, 95% CI 1.7 to 53.6; p 0.01). CONCLUSION: Of the children referred with a beta-lactam AAL, only 1.4% had a positive in-hospital graded OCT. Risk factors for a positive in-hospital graded OCT were history of other drug allergy, an index reaction which was severe, immediate and severe or required epinephrine.

Predicting extubation failure in preterm infants using lung ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the accuracy of pre-extubation lung ultrasound (LUS) to predict reintubation in preterm infants born <32 weeks' gestation. DESIGN: Prospective diagnostic accuracy study. SETTING: Two neonatal intensive care units. METHODS: Anterior and lateral LUS was performed pre-extubation. The primary outcome was the accuracy of LUS scores (range 0-24) to predict reintubation within 72 hours. Secondary outcomes were accuracy in predicting (1) reintubation within 7 days, (2) reintubation stratified by postnatal age and (3) accuracy of lateral imaging only (range 0-12). Pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed in extremely preterm infants born <28 weeks' gestation. Cut-off scores, sensitivities and specificities were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis and reported as area under the curves (AUCs). RESULTS: One hundred preterm infants with a mean (SD) gestational age of 27.4 (2.2) weeks and birth weight of 1059 (354) g were studied. Thirteen were subsequently reintubated. The AUC (95% CI) of the pre-extubation LUS score for predicting reintubation was 0.63 (0.45-0.80). Accuracy was greater in extremely preterm infants: AUC 0.70 (0.52-0.87) and excellent in infants who were <72 hours of age at the time of extubation: AUC 0.90 (0.77-1.00). Accuracy was poor in infants who were >7 days of age. Lateral imaging alone demonstrated similar accuracy to scanning anterior and lateral regions. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, LUS was not a strong predictor of reintubation in preterm infants. Accuracy is increased in extremely preterm infants. Future research should focus on infants at highest risk of extubation failure and consider simpler imaging protocols. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12621001356853.

Predictors of successful neonatal intubation in inexperienced operators: a secondary, non-randomised analysis of the SHINE trial.

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal endotracheal intubation is a lifesaving but technically difficult procedure, particularly for inexperienced operators. This secondary analysis in a subgroup of inexperienced operators of the Stabilization with nasal High flow during Intubation of NEonates randomised trial aimed to identify the factors associated with successful intubation on the first attempt without physiological stability of the infant. METHODS: In this secondary analysis, demographic factors were compared between infants intubated by inexperienced operators and those intubated by experienced operators. Following this, for inexperienced operators only, predictors of successful intubation without physiological instability were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 251 intubations in 202 infants were included in the primary intention-to-treat analysis of the main trial. Inexperienced operators were more likely to perform intubations in larger and more mature infants in the neonatal intensive care unit where premedications were used. When intubations were performed by inexperienced operators, the use of nasal high flow therapy (nHF) and a higher starting fraction of inspired oxygen were associated with a higher rate of safe, successful intubation on the first attempt. There was a weaker association between premedication use and first attempt success. CONCLUSIONS: In inexperienced operators, this secondary, non-randomised analysis suggests that the use of nHF and premedications, and matching the operator to the infant and setting, may be important to optimise neonatal intubation success. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12618001498280.

Higher versus lower nasal continuous positive airway pressure for extubation of extremely preterm infants in Australia (ÉCLAT): a multicentre, randomised, superiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Extremely preterm infants often require invasive mechanical ventilation, and clinicians aim to extubate these infants as soon as possible. However, extubation failure occurs in up to 60% of extremely preterm infants and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) is the most common post-extubation respiratory support, but there is no consensus on the optimal nCPAP level to safely avoid extubation failure in extremely preterm infants. We aimed to determine if higher nCPAP levels compared with standard nCPAP levels would decrease rates of extubation failure in extremely preterm infants within 7 days of their first extubation. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, open-label controlled trial done at three tertiary perinatal centres in Australia, we assigned extremely preterm infants to extubation to either higher nCPAP (10 cmH2O) or standard nCPAP (7 cmH2O). Infants were eligible if they were born at less than 28 weeks' gestation, were receiving mechanical ventilation via an endotracheal tube, and were being extubated for the first time to nCPAP. Eligible infants must have received previous treatment with exogenous surfactant and caffeine. Infants were ineligible if they were planned to be extubated to a mode of respiratory support other than nCPAP, if they had a known major congenital anomaly that might affect breathing, or if ongoing intensive care was not being provided. Parents or guardians provided prospective, written, informed consent. Infants were maintained within an assigned nCPAP range for a minimum of 24 h after extubation (higher nCPAP group 9-11 cmH2O and standard nCPAP group 6-8 cmH2O). Randomisation was stratified by both gestation (22-25 completed weeks or 26-27 completed weeks) and recruiting centre. The primary outcome was extubation failure within 7 days and analysis was by intention to treat. This trial was prospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12618001638224. FINDINGS: Between March 3, 2019, and July 31, 2022, 483 infants were born at less than 28 weeks and admitted to the recruiting centres. 92 infants were not eligible, 172 were not approached, 65 families declined to participate, and 15 consented but were not randomly assigned. 139 infants were enrolled and randomly assigned, 70 to the higher nCPAP group and 69 to the standard nCPAP group. One infant in the higher nCPAP group was excluded from the analysis because consent was withdrawn after randomisation. 104 (75%) of 138 mothers were White. The mean gestation was 25·7 weeks (SD 1·3) and the mean birthweight was 777 grams (201). 70 (51%) of 138 infants were female. Extubation failure occurred in 24 (35%) of 69 infants in the higher nCPAP group and in 39 (57%) of 69 infants in the standard nCPAP group (risk difference -21·7%, 95% CI -38·5% to -3·7%). There were no significant differences in rates of adverse events between groups during the primary outcome period. Three patients died (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group), pneumothorax occurred in one patient from each group, spontaneous intestinal perforation in three patients (two in the higher nCPAP group and one in the standard nCPAP group) and there were no events of pulmonary interstitial emphysema. INTERPRETATION: Extubation of extremely preterm infants to higher nCPAP significantly reduced extubation failure compared with extubation to standard nCPAP, without increasing rates of adverse effects. Future larger trials are essential to confirm these findings in terms of both efficacy and safety. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Research Excellence in Newborn Medicine, number 1153176.