Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Inhal Toxicol ; 36(6): 391-405, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952303

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate potential airborne asbestos exposures during brake maintenance and repair activities on a P&H overhead crane, and during subsequent handling of the mechanic's clothing. METHODS: Personal (n = 27) and area (n = 61) airborne fiber concentrations were measured during brake tests, removal, hand sanding, compressed air use, removal and reattachment of chrysotile-containing brake linings, and reinstallation of the brake linings. The mechanic's clothing was used to measure potential exposure during clothes handling. RESULTS: All brake linings contained between 19.9% to 52.4% chrysotile asbestos. No amphibole fibers were detected in any bulk or airborne samples. The average full-shift airborne chrysotile concentration was 0.035 f/cc (PCM-equivalent asbestos-specific fibers, or PCME). Average task-based personal air samples collected during brake maintenance, sanding, compressed air use, and brake lining removal tasks ranged from 0 to 0.48 f/cc (PCME). The calculated 30-minute time-weighted average (TWA) airborne chrysotile concentration associated with 5-15 minutes of clothes handling was 0-0.035 f/cc PCME. CONCLUSION: The results indicated that personal and area TWA fiber concentrations measured during all crane brake maintenance and clothes handling tasks were below the current OSHA 8-h TWA Permissible Exposure Limit for asbestos of 0.1 f/cc. Further, no airborne asbestos fibers were measured during routine brake maintenance tasks following the manufacturer's maintenance manual procedures. All short-term airborne chrysotile concentrations measured during non-routine tasks were below the current 30-minute OSHA excursion limit for asbestos of 1 f/cc. This study adds to the available data regarding chrysotile exposure potential during maintenance on overhead cranes.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire , Asbestos Serpentinas , Exposición Profesional , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Humanos , Asbestos Serpentinas/análisis , Mantenimiento , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Automóviles , Amianto/análisis
2.
Inhal Toxicol ; 36(1): 13-25, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38252504

RESUMEN

Sensory irritation is a health endpoint that serves as the critical effect basis for many occupational exposure limits (OELs). Schaper 1993 described a significant relationship with high correlation between the measured exposure concentration producing a 50% respiratory rate decrease (RD50) in a standard rodent assay and the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH®) Threshold Limit Values (TLVs®) as time-weighted averages (TWAs) for airborne chemical irritants. The results demonstrated the potential use of the RD50 values for deriving full-shift TWA OELs protective of irritant responses. However, there remains a need to develop a similar predictive model for deriving workplace short-term exposure limits (STELs) for sensory irritants. The aim of our study was to establish a model capable of correlating the relationship between RD50 values and published STELs to prospectively derive short-term exposure OELs for sensory irritants. A National Toxicology Program (NTP) database that included chemicals with both an RD50 and established STELs was used to fit several linear regression models. A strong correlation between RD50s and STELs was identified, with a predictive equation of ln (STEL) (ppm) = 0.86 * ln (RD50) (ppm) - 2.42 and an R2 value of 0.75. This model supports the use of RD50s to derive STELs for chemicals without existing exposure recommendations. Further, for data-poor sensory irritants, predicted RD50 values from in silico quantitative structure activity relationship (QSAR) models can be used to derive STELs. Hence, in silico methods and statistical modeling can present a path forward for establishing reliable OELs and improving worker safety and health.


Asunto(s)
Irritantes , Exposición Profesional , Valores Limites del Umbral , Irritantes/toxicidad , Frecuencia Respiratoria , Depresión , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos
3.
Toxicol Ind Health ; 36(9): 607-618, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33085585

RESUMEN

As businesses attempt to reopen to varying degrees amid the current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, industrial hygiene (IH) and occupational and environmental health and safety (OEHS) professionals have been challenged with assessing and managing the risks of COVID-19 in the workplace. In general, the available IH/OEHS tools were designed to control hazards originating in the workplace; however, attempts to tailor them specifically to the control of infectious disease outbreaks have been limited. This analysis evaluated the IH decision-making framework (Anticipate, Recognize, Evaluate, Control, and Confirm ("ARECC")) as it relates to biological hazards, in general, and to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), specifically. Available IH/OEHS risk assessment and risk management tools (e.g. control banding and the hierarchy of controls) are important components of the ARECC framework. These conceptual models, however, were primarily developed for controlling chemical hazards and must be adapted to the unique characteristics of highly infectious and virulent pathogens, such as SARS-CoV-2. This assessment provides an overview of the key considerations for developing occupational infection control plans, selecting the best available controls, and applying other emerging tools (e.g. quantitative microbial risk assessment), with the ultimate goal of facilitating risk management decisions during the current global pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Humanos , National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, U.S. , Salud Laboral , Pandemias , Medición de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Lugar de Trabajo
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36361303

RESUMEN

Hand sanitizer use in the United States (U.S.) increased after the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released temporary manufacturer guidance, changing impurity level limits for alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHSs). Since the guidance took effect, the FDA has recommended against using these hand sanitizers due to concerns over safety, efficacy, and/or risk of incidental ingestion. To address current gaps in exposure characterization, this study describes a survey of ABHSs marketed to children available in the U.S., as defined by several inclusion criteria. A subset of ABHSs (n = 31) were evaluated for ethanol and organic impurities using a modified FDA method. Products with detectable impurity levels were compared to the FDA's established interim limits. Seven children's products had impurity levels exceeding the FDA's recommended interim limits, including benzene (up to 9.14 ppm), acetaldehyde (up to 134.12 ppm), and acetal (up to 75.60 ppm). The total measured alcohol content ranged from 52% to 98% in all hand sanitizers tested, ranging from 39% below, and up to 31% above, the labeled concentration. Future studies should confirm impurity contamination sources. A risk assessment could determine whether dermal application or incidental ingestion of impurity-containing hand sanitizers pose any consumer risk.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Desinfectantes para las Manos , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Etanol
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA