RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD), but substantial heterogeneity in outcomes remains. We examined a potential mechanism of action of rTMS to normalize individual variability in resting-state functional connectivity (rs-fc) before and after a course of treatment. METHODS: Variability in rs-fc was examined in healthy controls (baseline) and individuals with MDD (baseline and after 4-6 weeks of rTMS). Seed-based connectivity was calculated to 4 regions associated with MDD: left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), right subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC), bilateral insula, and bilateral precuneus. Individual variability was quantified for each region by calculating the mean correlational distance of connectivity maps relative to the healthy controls; a higher variability score indicated a more atypical/idiosyncratic connectivity pattern. RESULTS: We included data from 66 healthy controls and 252 individuals with MDD in our analyses. Patients with MDD did not show significant differences in baseline variability of rs-fc compared with controls. Treatment with rTMS increased rs-fc variability from the right sgACC and precuneus, but the increased variability was not associated with clinical outcomes. Interestingly, higher baseline variability of the right sgACC was significantly associated with less clinical improvement (p = 0.037, uncorrected; did not survive false discovery rate correction).Limitations: The linear model was constructed separately for each region of interest. CONCLUSION: This was, to our knowledge, the first study to examine individual variability of rs-fc related to rTMS in individuals with MDD. In contrast to our hypotheses, we found that rTMS increased the individual variability of rs-fc. Our results suggest that individual variability of the right sgACC and bilateral precuneus connectivity may be a potential mechanism of rTMS.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/diagnóstico por imagen , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vías Nerviosas/fisiopatología , Vías Nerviosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Lóbulo Parietal/fisiopatología , Lóbulo Parietal/diagnóstico por imagen , Descanso , Giro del Cíngulo/fisiopatología , Giro del Cíngulo/diagnóstico por imagen , Conectoma , Resultado del Tratamiento , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), a novel form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), can be administered in 1/10th of the time of standard rTMS (~ 3 min vs. 37.5 min) yet achieves similar outcomes in depression. The brief nature of the iTBS protocol allows for the administration of multiple iTBS sessions per day, thus reducing the overall course length to days rather than weeks. This study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of active versus sham iTBS using an accelerated regimen in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). As a secondary objective, we aim to assess the safety, tolerability, and treatment response to open-label low-frequency right-sided (1 Hz) stimulation using an accelerated regimen in those who do not respond to the initial week of treatment. METHODS: Over three years, approximately 230 outpatients at the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and University of British Columbia Hospital, meeting diagnostic criteria for unipolar MDD, will be recruited and randomized to a triple blind sham-controlled trial. Patients will receive five consecutive days of active or sham iTBS, administered eight times daily at 1-hour intervals, with each session delivering 600 pulses of iTBS. Those who have not achieved response by the week four follow-up visit will be offered a second course of treatment, regardless of whether they initially received active or sham stimulation. DISCUSSION: Broader implementation of conventional iTBS is limited by the logistical demands of the current standard course consisting of 4-6 weeks of daily treatment. If our proposed accelerated iTBS protocol enables patients to achieve remission more rapidly, this would offer major benefits in terms of cost and capacity as well as the time required to achieve clinical response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04255784.
Asunto(s)
Conducta Adictiva , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychological and existential suffering affects many people with advanced illness, and current therapeutic options have limited effectiveness. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a safe and effective therapy for refractory depression, but no previous study has used rTMS to treat psychological or existential distress in the palliative setting. AIM: To determine whether a 5-day course of "accelerated" rTMS is feasible and can improve psychological and/or existential distress in a palliative care setting. DESIGN: Open-label, single arm, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy study of intermittent theta-burst stimulation to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, 600 pulses/session, 8 sessions/day (once per hour) for 5 days. The outcomes were the rates of recruitment, completion of intervention, and follow-up (Feasibility); and the proportion of participants achieving 50% improvement on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) or Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) 2 weeks post-treatment (Preliminary Efficacy). SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults admitted to our academic Palliative Care Unit with advanced illness, life expectancy >1 month and psychological distress. RESULTS: Due to COVID-19 pandemic-related interruptions, a total of nine participants were enrolled between August 2021 and April 2023. Two withdrew before starting rTMS, one stopped due to clinical deterioration unrelated to rTMS, and six completed the rTMS treatment. Five of six participants had a >50% improvement in HDRS, HADS-Anxiety, or both between baseline and the 2 week follow up; the sixth died prior to the 2-week follow-up. In this small sample, mean depression scores decreased from baseline to 2 weeks post-treatment (HDRS 18 vs 7, p = 0.03). Side effects of rTMS included transient mild scalp discomfort. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated rTMS improved symptoms of depression, anxiety, or both in this small feasibility and preliminary efficacy study. A larger, sham-controlled study is warranted to determine whether rTMS could be an effective, acceptable, and scalable treatment in the palliative setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04257227.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Adulto , Humanos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios de Factibilidad , PandemiasRESUMEN
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used for treatment of late-life depression. In the FOUR-D study, sequential bilateral theta-burst stimulation (TBS) had comparable remission rates to standard bilateral rTMS. Data were analysed from the FOUR-D trial to compare remission rates between two types of rTMS based on the number and class of prior medication trials. The remission rate was higher in participants with ≤1 previous trial (43.9%) than in participants with 2 previous trials (26.5%) or ≥3 previous trials (24.6%; χ² = 6.36, d.f. = 2, P = 0.04). Utilising rTMS earlier in late-life depression may lead to better outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Resultado del Tratamiento , AncianoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is commonly used in unipolar depression; yet, its evidence in bipolar disorder (BD) is limited. We sought to review the evidence on the use of rTMS across the different stages of BD. METHODS: MEDLINE database was systematically searched using the PubMed interface following the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (i) randomized clinical trials (RCTs), open-label studies, and case series; (ii) specific evaluation of the treatment outcomes using psychometric scales; (iii) clinical studies in adults; and (iv) articles in the English language. The systematic review has been registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020192788). RESULTS: Thirty-one papers were included in the review. Most studies included participants diagnosed with a bipolar depressive episode (N = 24), have yielded mixed findings, and have yet to reach a consensus on the most effective rTMS protocol. Few studies examined the effect of rTMS during manic (N = 5) or mixed episode (N = 1), or as maintenance treatment (N = 1). The limited data thus far suggest rTMS to be relatively safe and well tolerated. Small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study designs, patients and control groups recruited, rTMS parameters, and outcome measures are among the most significant limitations to these studies. CONCLUSION: The current data regarding the application of rTMS in BD patients remain limited. More adequately powered sham-controlled studies are required to verify its efficacy. Large-scale clinical trials are needed to also determine whether its effects extend to manic and mixed episodes, as well as its role in mood stabilization and amelioration of suicidal behavior.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar , Trastorno Depresivo , Adulto , Afecto , Trastorno Bipolar/etiología , Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Humanos , Manía , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of 10 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) on suicidality in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: We used data from a three-site randomized clinical trial comparing 10 Hz rTMS and iTBS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) in patients with TRD. We compared the effect of 10Hz rTMS and iTBS on suicidality as measured by the suicide item of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-item (HDRS-17). RESULTS: Suicidality remitted in 71 (43.7%) participants randomized to 10Hz stimulation and 91 (49.1%) participants randomized to iTBS, without a significant difference between the proportions in the two groups (Χ2 = 0.674, df = 1, p = 0.4117). There was a significant correlation between change in suicidality and change in depression severity for both modalities (10 Hz, Pearson's r = 0.564; iTBS, Pearson's r = 0.502), with a significantly larger decrease in depression severity for those in whom suicidality remitted compared to those in whom it did not (t = 10.912, df = 276.8, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both 10 Hz and iTBS rTMS were effective in reducing suicidality in TRD. Future trials of iTBS for depression should include discrete measures of suicidality.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Suicidio , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Humanos , Corteza Prefrontal , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Magnetic seizure therapy (MST) is a novel investigational brain stimulation modality for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). MST is a potential alternative seizure-based treatment to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), given that it may offer equivalent antidepressant efficacy, yet with a relative sparing of cognitive functioning. Heart rate variability (HRV) is a marker of central autonomic functioning. We aimed to explore the relationships among baseline HRV, age, clinical outcome, and executive function following MST, in patients with TRD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight TRD patients (55 females; 18-70 years) were enrolled and 48 patients completed a course of MST in an open-label study. Patients received MST treatments two to three times per week, using one of three stimulation frequencies (ie, 100 Hz, 50 Hz, or 25 Hz) at 100% stimulator output. Root mean square of the successive R-R differences (RMSSD), an index of HRV, was computed from a baseline electrocardiogram (ECG) recording. Clinical symptoms were assessed using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D24) and the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS16). Executive function was assessed using the Trail Making Test and the Mazes Test from the MATRICS battery. RESULTS: Baseline RMSSD was correlated with baseline HAM-D24 (r = -0.340, p = 0.001) and baseline Mazes Test (r = 0.417, p = 0.0007) but not with baseline Trail Making Test. Furthermore, baseline RMSSD was not correlated with changes on the HAM-D24, QIDS16, or total scores on the Trail Making Test. However, there was a significant correlation between baseline RMSSD and improvement on the Mazes Test following MST (r = 0.502, p = 0.0004). CONCLUSIONS: Since this is an open-label trial, the influence of the placebo effect cannot be excluded. However, our results suggest that baseline RMSSD may be a state-biomarker of depression and executive function impairment. Additionally, while baseline vagally mediated resting cardiac activity did not predict the outcome of depression, it may mediate executive function improvements following MST.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento , Función Ejecutiva , Femenino , Humanos , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/psicología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Convulsiones/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cognitive dysfunction (CD) is a commonly reported symptom of major depressive disorder (MDD). Patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) tend to experience greater rates of CD; however, treatment options are limited. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is effective in treating affective symptoms in patients with TRD, but its potential effect on CD in TRD has not been established. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to establish the potential cognitive benefits of rTMS in patients with TRD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study used data from a noninferiority clinical trial investigating two excitatory rTMS protocols to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in unipolar outpatients with TRD. Cognitive testing was performed at baseline and three months posttreatment in 47 patients and a demographically matched cohort of 22 healthy volunteers. Changes in cognitive performance from baseline to posttreatment were assessed using repeated-measures analysis of variance, using both normative and individualized cognitive scoring methods. RESULTS: Patients with baseline neurocognitive dysfunction showed significant changes in verbal memory at three months posttreatment when using individualized cognitive scoring. Furthermore, improvement in verbal memory within this subset was associated with improvements in affective symptoms. LIMITATIONS: This analysis was performed on a relatively small sample of patients with TRD who were not prescreened for CD and did not include a clinical comparator group. CONCLUSIONS: rTMS may be associated with improvements in verbal memory in patients with TRD who present with global CD and who are clinical responders to the treatment. These findings warrant replication in a larger sample as well as further investigations into the neural mechanisms of cognitive improvement after rTMS.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Humanos , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Late-life depression is often associated with non-response or relapse following conventional antidepressant treatment. The pathophysiology of late-life depression likely involves a complex interplay between aging and depression, and may include abnormalities in cortical inhibition and plasticity. However, the extent to which these cortical processes are modifiable by antidepressant pharmacotherapy is unknown. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with late-life depression received 12 weeks of treatment with open-label venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (≤ 300 mg/d). We combined transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex with electromyography recordings from the right hand to measure cortical inhibition using contralateral cortical silent period and paired-pulse short-interval intracortical inhibition paradigms; cortical facilitation using a paired-pulse intracortical facilitation paradigm; and short-term cortical plasticity using a paired associative stimulation paradigm. All measures were collected at baseline, 1 week into treatment (n = 23) and after approximately 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Venlafaxine did not significantly alter cortical inhibition, facilitation or plasticity after 1 or 12 weeks of treatment. Improvements in depressive symptoms during treatment were not associated with changes in cortical physiology. LIMITATIONS: The results presented here are specific to the motor cortex. Future work should investigate whether these findings extend to cortical areas more closely associated with depression, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that antidepressant treatment with venlafaxine does not exert meaningful changes in motor cortical inhibition or plasticity in late-life depression. The absence of changes in motor cortical physiology, alongside improvements in depressive symptoms, suggests that age-related changes may play a role in previously identified abnormalities in motor cortical processes in latelife depression, and that venlafaxine treatment does not target these abnormalities.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Potenciales Evocados Motores , Corteza Motora , Inhibición Neural , Plasticidad Neuronal , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/farmacología , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/farmacología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estimulación Eléctrica , Electromiografía , Potenciales Evocados Motores/efectos de los fármacos , Potenciales Evocados Motores/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Corteza Motora/efectos de los fármacos , Corteza Motora/fisiopatología , Inhibición Neural/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibición Neural/fisiología , Plasticidad Neuronal/efectos de los fármacos , Plasticidad Neuronal/fisiología , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Clorhidrato de Venlafaxina/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in the use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD), there is relatively little information about its effect on comorbid anxiety symptoms. METHODS: Data from a large randomized noninferiority trial comparing intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) and high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS delivered to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (HFL) were analyzed. The primary aim was assessing changes in anxiety/somatization items from the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-A), using baseline-adjusted change with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with the final scores as the outcome and baseline scores as the adjustment covariates. RESULTS: The analytical cohort comprised 388 participants (189 in HFL and 199 in iTBS groups). From baseline to the end of the rTMS course, the combined score from the anxiety items from the HAM-D dropped from 7.43 (SD = 2.15) to 4.24 (SD = 2.33) in the HFL group, and 7.33 (SD = 2.13) to 3.76 (SD = 2.23) in the iTBS group. The ANCOVA resulted in an effect from time (p < .0001), but not from group allocation (p = .793) or time × group interaction (p = .976). We observed mean changes in the BSI-A of -3.5 (SD = 5.4) and -3.2 (SD = 4.8), with significant effect of time (p < .0001) in the ANCOVA, but not group allocation (p = .793) or group × time interaction (.664). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that both 10 Hz and iTBS may yield potential reductions in anxiety symptoms when used for the treatment of MDD. Our findings warrant future research into the effects of left-sided rTMS on depressed patients struggling with concurrent anxiety symptoms.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Humanos , Corteza Prefrontal , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is growing interest in the potential of neuromodulation options in treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Magnetic seizure therapy (MST), is a new treatment intervention in which generalized seizures are induced with transcranial magnetic stimulation. We conducted a pilot study to assess the efficacy and cognitive effects of MST in patients with treatment-resistant OCD. METHODS: In an open-label pilot study, participants with treatment-resistant OCD and a baseline Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) scores of ≥16 were treated with up to 24 acute treatments. The primary clinical outcomes were clinical response (Y-BOCS score reduction ≥30%) and remission (final Y-BOCS score ≤8). A neurocognitive battery, the Quick Inventory for Depressive Symptoms-Self Report (QIDS-SR), the Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI), and the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire-Short Form (Q-LES-Q-SF) were also completed as secondary measures. RESULTS: Ten participants with OCD who had not responded to medications or psychotherapy enrolled in the study and seven completed an adequate trial (defined as ≥8 treatments). MST was associated with minimal cognitive effects except for some decrease in autobiographical memory and no serious adverse effects. Only one participant met the predefined criteria for response, and none for remission. The baseline and endpoint Y-BOCS scores were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: Overall, MST was not beneficial in a small group of patients with treatment-resistant OCD. At this time, other studies of MST for OCD are not warranted until different coil placements targeting other brain circuits can be proposed.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Trastorno Obsesivo Compulsivo/terapia , Proyectos Piloto , Convulsiones , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Background: Treatment-resistant bipolar depression can be treated effectively using electroconvulsive therapy, but its use is limited because of stigma and cognitive adverse effects. Magnetic seizure therapy is a new convulsive therapy with promising early evidence of antidepressant effects and minimal cognitive adverse effects. However, there are no clinical trials of the efficacy and safety of magnetic seizure therapy for treatment-resistant bipolar depression. Methods: Participants with treatment-resistant bipolar depression were treated with magnetic seizure therapy for up to 24 sessions or until remission. Magnetic seizure therapy was applied over the prefrontal cortex at high (100 Hz; n = 8), medium (50 or 60 Hz; n = 9) or low (25 Hz; n = 3) frequency, or over the vertex at high frequency (n = 6). The primary outcome measure was the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Participants completed a comprehensive battery of neurocognitive tests. Results: Twenty-six participants completed a minimally adequate trial of magnetic seizure therapy (i.e., ≥ 8 sessions), and 20 completed full treatment per protocol. Participants showed a significant reduction in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Adequate trial completers had a remission rate of 23.1% and a response rate of 38.5%. Per-protocol completers had a remission rate of 30% and a response rate of 50%. Almost all cognitive measures remained stable, except for significantly worsened recall consistency on the autobiographical memory inventory. Limitations: The open-label study design and modest sample size did not allow for comparisons between stimulation parameters. Conclusion: In treatment-resistant bipolar depression, magnetic seizure therapy produced significant improvements in depression symptoms with minimal effects on cognitive performance. These promising results warrant further investigation with larger randomized clinical trials comparing magnetic seizure therapy to electroconvulsive therapy. Clinical trial registration: NCT01596608; clinicaltrials.gov
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Bipolar/terapia , Terapia Convulsiva , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Magnetoterapia , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Terapia Convulsiva/efectos adversos , Terapia Convulsiva/instrumentación , Terapia Convulsiva/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Magnetoterapia/efectos adversos , Magnetoterapia/instrumentación , Magnetoterapia/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Corteza Prefrontal , CráneoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an essential psychiatric service with an important role in treating older adults with severe or treatment-resistant depression. During the COVID-19 pandemic, ECT services have be constrained by infection control measures. We report a case of a 66-year-old female patient with a severe major depressive episode who had previously responded to right unilateral ECT and was treated with two modified accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation (aiTBS) protocols. METHODS: The two aiTBS courses consisted of eight daily sessions over five consecutive days, followed by gradual tapering, using 1,800 pulses per session pre-COVID-19 (first course), and 600 pulses per session during the pandemic (second course). RESULTS: Moderate to severe baseline depressive symptoms reached remission levels after both courses. CONCLUSION: The 600-pulses aiTBS treatment protocol reported here warrants further study and evaluation, but may be a potential option in cases where older adults with severe depressive symptoms cannot access ECT during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/psicología , Terapia Electroconvulsiva , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Pandemias , Cuestionario de Salud del Paciente , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Treatment-resistant major depressive disorder is common; repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by use of high-frequency (10 Hz) left-side dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation is an evidence-based treatment for this disorder. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a newer form of rTMS that can be delivered in 3 min, versus 37·5 min for a standard 10 Hz treatment session. We aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of iTBS compared with standard 10 Hz rTMS in adults with treatment-resistant depression. METHODS: In this randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority clinical trial, we recruited patients who were referred to specialty neurostimulation centres based at three Canadian university hospitals (Centre for Addiction and Mental Health and Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, and University of British Columbia Hospital, Vancouver, BC). Participants were aged 18-65 years, were diagnosed with a current treatment-resistant major depressive episode or could not tolerate at least two antidepressants in the current episode, were receiving stable antidepressant medication doses for at least 4 weeks before baseline, and had an HRSD-17 score of at least 18. Participants were randomly allocated (1:1) to treatment groups (10 Hz rTMS or iTBS) by use of a random permuted block method, with stratification by site and number of adequate trials in which the antidepressants were unsuccessful. Treatment was delivered open-label but investigators and outcome assessors were masked to treatment groups. Participants were treated with 10 Hz rTMS or iTBS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, administered on 5 days a week for 4-6 weeks. The primary outcome measure was change in 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD-17) score, with a non-inferiority margin of 2·25 points. For the primary outcome measure, we did a per-protocol analysis of all participants who were randomly allocated to groups and who attained the primary completion point of 4 weeks. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01887782. FINDINGS: Between Sept 3, 2013, and Oct 3, 2016, we randomly allocated 205 participants to receive 10 Hz rTMS and 209 participants to receive iTBS. 192 (94%) participants in the 10 Hz rTMS group and 193 (92%) in the iTBS group were assessed for the primary outcome after 4-6 weeks of treatment. HRSD-17 scores improved from 23·5 (SD 4·4) to 13·4 (7·8) in the 10 Hz rTMS group and from 23·6 (4·3) to 13·4 (7·9) in the iTBS group (adjusted difference 0·103 [corrected], lower 95% CI -1·16; p=0·0011), which indicated non-inferiority of iTBS. Self-rated intensity of pain associated with treatment was greater in the iTBS group than in the 10 Hz rTMS group (mean score on verbal analogue scale 3·8 [SD 2·0] vs 3·4 [2·0] out of 10; p=0·011). Dropout rates did not differ between groups (10 Hz rTMS: 13 [6%] of 205 participants; iTBS: 16 [8%] of 209 participants); p=0·6004). The most common treatment-related adverse event was headache in both groups (10 Hz rTMS: 131 [64%] of 204; iTBS: 136 [65%] of 208). INTERPRETATION: In patients with treatment-resistant depression, iTBS was non-inferior to 10 Hz rTMS for the treatment of depression. Both treatments had low numbers of dropouts and similar side-effects, safety, and tolerability profiles. By use of iTBS, the number of patients treated per day with current rTMS devices can be increased several times without compromising clinical effectiveness. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Asunto(s)
Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/diagnóstico , Ritmo Teta/fisiología , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Adulto , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Canadá/epidemiología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/psicología , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Percepción del Dolor/clasificación , Percepción del Dolor/fisiología , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/efectos adversos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/tendencias , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Studies of clinical populations that combine MRI data generated at multiple sites are increasingly common. The Canadian Biomarker Integration Network in Depression (CAN-BIND; www.canbind.ca) is a national depression research program that includes multimodal neuroimaging collected at several sites across Canada. The purpose of the current paper is to provide detailed information on the imaging protocols used in a number of CAN-BIND studies. The CAN-BIND program implemented a series of platform-specific MRI protocols, including a suite of prescribed structural and functional MRI sequences supported by real-time monitoring for adherence and quality control. The imaging data are retained in an established informatics and databasing platform. Approximately 1300 participants are being recruited, including almost 1000 with depression. These include participants treated with antidepressant medications, transcranial magnetic stimulation, cognitive behavioural therapy and cognitive remediation therapy. Our ability to analyze the large number of imaging variables available may be limited by the sample size of the substudies. The CAN-BIND program includes a multimodal imaging database supported by extensive clinical, demographic, neuropsychological and biological data from people with major depression. It is a resource for Canadian investigators who are interested in understanding whether aspects of neuroimaging alone or in combination with other variables can predict the outcomes of various treatment modalities.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico por imagen , Neuroimagen , Canadá , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The management of late-life depression is challenged by high rates of treatment-resistance and adverse effects, along with medical comorbidities and polypharmacy. Together with the limited data on managing treatment-resistant depression in older adults, there is a need for investigating the efficacy of nonpharmacological treatment strategies. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is one modality that may better serve this patient population. METHODS: The present study examines data from two previous clinical trials (NCT00305045 and NCT01515215) to explore the efficacy of bilateral and unilateral high-frequency left-sided (HFL) rTMS in older adults suffering from treatment-resistant depression. A total of 43 adults aged 60 or older with a current major depressive episode were randomized to bilateral sequential, unilateral HFL, or sham. Bilateral sequential stimulation involved low-frequency (1 Hz) right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) stimulation followed immediately by high-frequency (10 Hz) left DLPFC. The unilateral condition was HFL stimulation alone, and the placebo condition was either HFL or sequential bilateral form of sham. The primary outcome was remission of depression. RESULTS: Participants receiving bilateral rTMS experienced greater remission rates (40%) compared with unilateral (0%) or sham (0%) groups. Response to rTMS in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores similarly favored the efficacy of bilateral rTMS. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that sequential bilateral treatment may be an optimal form of rTMS when used for treatment-resistant depression in older adults. Further large-scale comparative effectiveness trials of bilateral rTMS in this population are warranted.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo Resistente al Tratamiento/terapia , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Currently, the mainstay of treatment in patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD) requiring medical attention is second generation anti-depressants. However, about 40% of patients treated with second-generation anti-depressants do not respond to initial treatment and approximately 70% do not achieve remission during the first-step treatment. There are a few non-pharmacological options available, but none have shown consistently positive results. There is a need for an intervention that is relatively easy to administer, produces consistently positive results and is associated with minimal side effects. In the current study, we assessed the feasibility of using transcutaneous Functional Electrical Stimulation Therapy (FEST) of the facial muscles, as a tool for improving depressive symptoms in individuals with MDD. RESULTS: Ten (10) individuals with moderate to severe MDD received three FEST sessions/week for a minimum of 10 to a maximum of 40 sessions. All study participants completed the required 10 therapy sessions, and 5 of the 10 participants completed additional 30 (totalling 40) FEST sessions. There were no adverse events or concerns regarding compliance to therapy. We found statistically significant improvements on Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDS) and Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS) measures. However, no significant improvements were found on Positive and Negative Affect Scale and 10-point Visual Analogue Scale scales. Participants reported improvements in sleeping patterns, and this correlated with statistically significant improvements on sleep parameters of HDS and IDS measures. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that facial FEST is an acceptable, practical, and safe treatment in individuals with MDD. We provide preliminary evidence to show improvements in depressive symptoms following a minimum of 10 FEST sessions.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/fisiopatología , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica , Músculos Faciales/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has become increasingly popular during the last decades mainly driven by the antidepressant effects of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation with "butterfly" coils. Only recently, alternative targets such as the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) have been brought into focus and innovative coil designs such as the angled geometry of the double cone coil (DCC) have raised hope to reach even deeper located targets. OBJECTIVE: To provide a systematic and comprehensive review on the application of rTMS stimulation of the dmPFC using the DCC in neuropathological and healthy samples. METHODS: We systematically searched the MEDLINE® database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/). Due to the heterogeneous naming of DCC stimulation over the dmPFC a variety of search terms was applied resulting in a numeral quantity of 340 hits. RESULTS: DCC stimulation over the dmPFC has been proven to be safe and feasible in various neuropsychiatric disorders and in healthy subjects. Clinical results are encouraging, but have to be considered as preliminary as data from sham-controlled clinical trials and knowledge about the neurobiological underpinnings are still scarce. CONCLUSION: DCC stimulation over the dmPFC represents a promising approach in the fast evolving noninvasive brain stimulation techniques aiming at the functional modulation of brain areas vitally involved in affect, sensory autonomic, cognitive, and salience regulation. This may hold potential for both neuroscientific research and clinical applications in the treatment of psychiatric disorders.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Corteza Prefrontal , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/métodos , Trastorno Depresivo/psicología , Humanos , Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal/instrumentación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The influence of genetic variation on resting-state neural networks represents a burgeoning line of inquiry in psychiatric research. Monoamine oxidase A, an X-linked gene, is one example of a molecular target linked to brain activity in psychiatric illness. Monoamine oxidase A genetic variants, including the high and low variable nucleotide tandem repeat polymorphisms, have been shown to differentially affect brain functional connectivity in healthy humans. However, it is currently unknown whether these same polymorphisms influence resting-state brain activity in clinical conditions. Given its high burden on society and strong connection to violent behavior, antisocial personality disorder is a logical condition to study, since in vivo markers of monoamine oxidase A brain enzyme are reduced in key affect-modulating regions, and striatal levels of monoamine oxidase A show a relation with the functional connectivity of this same region. METHODS: We utilized monoamine oxidase A genotyping and seed-to-voxel-based functional connectivity to investigate the relationship between genotype and corticostriatal connectivity in 21 male participants with severe antisocial personality disorder and 19 male healthy controls. RESULTS: Dorsal striatal connectivity to the frontal pole and anterior cingulate gyrus differentiated antisocial personality disorder subjects and healthy controls by monoamine oxidase A genotype. Furthermore, the linear relationship of proactive aggression to superior ventral striatal-angular gyrus functional connectivity differed by monoamine oxidase A genotype in the antisocial personality disorder groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that monoamine oxidase A genotype may affect corticostriatal connectivity in antisocial personality disorder and that these functional connections may also underlie use of proactive aggression in a genotype-specific manner.
Asunto(s)
Agresión , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/genética , Corteza Cerebral/fisiopatología , Cuerpo Estriado/fisiopatología , Monoaminooxidasa/genética , Polimorfismo Genético , Adulto , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/fisiopatología , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Corteza Cerebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Cuerpo Estriado/diagnóstico por imagen , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Repeticiones de Minisatélite , Vías Nerviosas/diagnóstico por imagen , Vías Nerviosas/fisiopatología , Fenotipo , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Dysfunctional neuroplasticity may be one of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying major depression. We have previously established methods to assess neuroplasticity from the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) using a paired associative stimulation (PAS) paradigm, which pairs a preceding peripheral nerve stimulation with subsequent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) combined with electroencephalography (EEG). We aimed to investigate neuroplasticity through the PAS paradigm in the DLPFC in patients with depression compared to healthy subjects. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with depression and 28 healthy controls participated in this study. There were no significant age or sex differences between the two groups. All participants received PAS paradigm in the DLPFC. We analyzed PAS induced potentiation from the DLPFC in both groups calculating the power of TMS-evoked potentials (TEP). A two-way ANOVA with PAS effect as a within-subject factor and diagnostic group as a between-subject factor was performed to examine the group differences in the PAS paradigm. RESULTS: DLPFC-PAS induced a significant potentiation at the stimulation site in both patients and healthy subjects (mean ± SD: 1.24 ± 0.33 [µV] vs. 1.48 ± 0.28 [µV]). However, when we compared PAS potentiation between patients and healthy subjects, there were significant main effects of PAS (F1,53 = 68.63, p < 0.0001) and PAS-by-diagnostic group interaction (F1,53 = 25.05, p < 0.0001). Post hoc analysis demonstrated that patients had a significantly lower PAS potentiation compared to healthy subjects (t55 = 3.128, p = 0.003). CONCLUSTIONS: Our findings provide evidence for impaired neuroplasticity in DLPFC in patients with depression compared to healthy subjects. Such findings may ultimately help us understand the pathophysiology of MDD and mechanisms involved in its treatment.