Right-sided Cockett's syndrome.

Background Cockett and Thomas described and named Cockett's syndrome in 1965, commonly referred to as iliac vein compression syndrome (IVCS). It is often found as underlying cause in iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT). They described the syndrome mostly seen on the left side and predominantly in women during the second to the fourth decade of life. In this article, we present a patient with a Cockett's syndrome on the right side. Case presentation Our patient is a 52-year old female with edema of the right leg since 4 months. She had no signs of a DVT and did not benefit from a 3-month compression therapy. She was diagnosed using a CT-scan. Endovascular treatment was performed with a venous stent in the right common iliac vein (CIV). No postoperative complications were seen. After a 6-month follow-up, patient was free of pain and had no residual edema of the right leg. Conclusions Our patient presented with a non-complicated right-sided Cockett's syndrome. She was successfully treated with balloon dilatation and additional stenting of the right common iliac vein. Because of the clinical improvement of the patient together with the excellent long-term results and good patency results of the stenting, guidelines nowadays advise more and more venous stenting to prevent DVT and to relieve symptoms in case of vein compression syndromes.

Immune checkpoint inhibition in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly advanced outcomes in both metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Despite these advancements, the 5-year survival rate remains suboptimal. Even in early-stage disease a significant portion of patients relapse and die from metastatic progression. The integration of immunotherapy in the management of early-stage NSCLC demonstrated promising results, supported by a plethora of positive clinical trials conducted in recent years. Nonetheless, numerous questions persist. In this manuscript we comprehensively review the currently available data on adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative treatment strategies. We also address the challenges inherent to these approaches from different stakeholders' perspective.

Neoadjuvant nivolumab with or without relatlimab in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.

Antibodies targeting the immune checkpoint molecules PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4, administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy, are the standard of care in most patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancers. When given before curative surgery, tumor responses and improved event-free survival are achieved. New antibody combinations may be more efficacious and tolerable. In an ongoing, open-label phase 2 study, 60 biomarker-unselected, treatment-naive patients with resectable non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive two preoperative doses of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) with or without relatlimab (anti-LAG-3) antibody therapy. The primary study endpoint was the feasibility of surgery within 43 days, which was met by all patients. Curative resection was achieved in 95% of patients. Secondary endpoints included pathological and radiographic response rates, pathologically complete resection rates, disease-free and overall survival rates, and safety. Major pathological (≤10% viable tumor cells) and objective radiographic responses were achieved in 27% and 10% (nivolumab) and in 30% and 27% (nivolumab and relatlimab) of patients, respectively. In 100% (nivolumab) and 90% (nivolumab and relatlimab) of patients, tumors and lymph nodes were pathologically completely resected. With 12 months median duration of follow-up, disease-free survival and overall survival rates at 12 months were 89% and 93% (nivolumab), and 93% and 100% (nivolumab and relatlimab). Both treatments were safe with grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events reported in 10% and 13% of patients per study arm. Exploratory analyses provided insights into biological processes triggered by preoperative immunotherapy. This study establishes the feasibility and safety of dual targeting of PD-1 and LAG-3 before lung cancer surgery.ClinicalTrials.gov Indentifier: NCT04205552 .

Liquid Biopsy in Early-Stage Lung Cancer: Current and Future Clinical Applications.

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with the majority of cases diagnosed in an advanced stage. Early-stage disease non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a better outcome, nevertheless the 5-year survival rates drop from 60% for stage IIA to 36% for stage IIIA disease. Early detection and optimized perioperative systemic treatment are frontrunner strategies to reduce this burden. The rapid advancements in molecular diagnostics as well as the growing availability of targeted therapies call for the most efficient detection of actionable biomarkers. Liquid biopsies have already proven their added value in the management of advanced NSCLC but can also optimize patient care in early-stage NSCLC. In addition to having known diagnostic benefits of speed, accessibility, and enhanced biomarker detection compared to tissue biopsy, liquid biopsy could be implemented for screening, diagnostic, and prognostic purposes. Furthermore, liquid biopsy can optimize therapeutic management by overcoming the issue of tumor heterogeneity, monitoring tumor burden, and detecting minimal residual disease (MRD), i.e., the presence of tumor-specific ctDNA, post-operatively. The latter is strongly prognostic and is likely to become a guidance in the postsurgical management. In this review, we present the current evidence on the clinical utility of liquid biopsy in early-stage lung cancer, discuss a selection of key trials, and suggest future applications.

Thymomectomy plus total thymectomy versus simple thymomectomy for early-stage thymoma without myasthenia gravis: a European Society of Thoracic Surgeons Thymic Working Group Study.

OBJECTIVES: Resection of thymic tumours including the removal of both the tumour and the thymus gland (thymothymectomy; TT) is the procedure of choice and is recommended in most relevant articles in the literature. Nevertheless, in recent years, some authors have suggested that resection of the tumour (simple thymomectomy; ST) may suffice from an oncological standpoint in patients with early-stage thymoma who do not have myasthenia gravis (MG) (non-MG). The goal of our study was to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of ST versus TT in non-MG early-stage thymomas using the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons thymic database. METHODS: A total of 498 non-MG patients with pathological stage I thymoma were included in the study. TT was performed in 466 (93.6%) of 498 patients who had surgery with curative intent; ST was done in 32 (6.4%). The completeness of resection, the rate of complications, the 30-day mortality, the overall recurrence and the freedom from recurrence were compared. We performed crude and propensity score-adjusted comparisons by surgical approach (ST vs TT). RESULTS: TT showed the same rate of postoperative complications, 30-day mortality and postoperative length of stay as ST. The 5-year overall survival rate was 89% in the TT group and 55% in the ST group. The 5-year freedom from recurrence was 96% in the TT group and 79% in the ST group. CONCLUSION: Patients with early-stage thymoma without MG who have a TT show significantly better freedom from recurrence than those who have an ST, without an increase in postoperative morbidity rate.